Multicomponent Training and Optimal Dosing Strategies for Adults with Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Moderate intensity continuous training, combined moderate-intensity continuous training vs combined high-intensity interval training in adults with hypertension: Randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite all efforts to treat hypertension, it is still responsible for 10.8 million deaths annually. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of continuous moderate-intensity training, strength training combined with continuous moderate-intensity training and strength training combined with high-intensity interval training in adults with high blood pressure.

METHODS

A 12-week randomized control trial was performed. A total of 100 volunteers, 51 women and 49 men with hypertension participated. The sample was randomly assigned into three intervention groups and one control group.

RESULTS

All intervention groups significantly improved their hemodynamic parameters, body composition, lipid profile, glucose, and physical fitness as compared to the control group. Both combined training groups showed greater improvements than the moderate-intensity continuous training group. However, the strength group combined with the moderate-intensity continuous group showed the greatest benefits in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure, of -13.4 mmHg, -6.8 mmHg and -8.9 mmHg respectively, abdominal circumference, upper and lower limb strength and VO₂peak, versus the continuous moderate-intensity group; it also achieved greater reductions in systolic and mean blood pressure, up to -6.8 mmHg and 4.3 mmHg respectively, than the strength group combined with the high intensity interval group.

CONCLUSION

Performing a strength training program combined with continuous moderate intensity training, 2 days per week for 12 weeks, produces significant improvements in cardiometabolic biomarkers, body composition, and physical condition of adults with hypertension, with these adaptations being superior to those produced by continuous moderate-intensity training and strength training combined with high-intensity intervallic training.

Statistical heterogeneity in meta-analysis of hypertension and exercise training: A meta-review

We aim to evaluate the prevalence of reporting and the extent of statistical heterogeneity of systematic reviews with meta-analyses (SRMAs) of exercise training for hypertension and to provide practical recommendations for dealing with statistical heterogeneity. We systematically searched on four databases (from 2002 to September of 2023) for SRMAs comparing exercise interventions vs. a non-exercise control on blood pressure (BP) control in adults with hypertension. Fifty-nine SRMAs, with a median of 14 studies, were analysed. Cochran's Q (41%), I2 (24%), forest plots (44%), and particularly τ2 (54%) and prediction intervals (96.6%) frequently were not reported for the hypertension subgroup. The recalculated prediction intervals were discrepant (i.e., crossed the null effect) of significant 95% confidence intervals of most meta-analyses (systolic BP: 65%; diastolic BP: 92%). This suggests substantial heterogeneity across studies, which was often not acknowledged by authors' conclusions (78%). Consequently, downgrading the certainty of the available evidence may be justified alone due to heterogeneity across studies. Finally, we illustrate areas for improving I2 interpretation and provide practical recommendations on how to address statistical heterogeneity across all stages of a SRMA.