Magnetic Susceptibility Source Separation Solely from Gradient Echo Data: Histological Validation

Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group

This article provides recommendations for implementing QSM for clinical brain research. It is a consensus of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Electro-Magnetic Tissue Properties Study Group. While QSM technical development continues to advance rapidly, the current QSM methods have been demonstrated to be repeatable and reproducible for generating quantitative tissue magnetic susceptibility maps in the brain. However, the many QSM approaches available have generated a need in the neuroimaging community for guidelines on implementation. This article outlines considerations and implementation recommendations for QSM data acquisition, processing, analysis, and publication. We recommend that data be acquired using a monopolar 3D multi-echo gradient echo (GRE) sequence and that phase images be saved and exported in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format and unwrapped using an exact unwrapping approach. Multi-echo images should be combined before background field removal, and a brain mask created using a brain extraction tool with the incorporation of phase-quality-based masking. Background fields within the brain mask should be removed using a technique based on SHARP or PDF, and the optimization approach to dipole inversion should be employed with a sparsity-based regularization. Susceptibility values should be measured relative to a specified reference, including the common reference region of the whole brain as a region of interest in the analysis. The minimum acquisition and processing details required when reporting QSM results are also provided. These recommendations should facilitate clinical QSM research and promote harmonized data acquisition, analysis, and reporting.

So You Want to Image Myelin Using MRI: Magnetic Susceptibility Source Separation for Myelin Imaging

In MRI, researchers have long endeavored to effectively visualize myelin distribution in the brain, a pursuit with significant implications for both scientific research and clinical applications. Over time, various methods such as myelin water imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, and relaxometric imaging have been developed, each carrying distinct advantages and limitations. Recently, an innovative technique named as magnetic susceptibility source separation has emerged, introducing a novel surrogate biomarker for myelin in the form of a diamagnetic susceptibility map. This paper comprehensively reviews this cutting-edge method, providing the fundamental concepts of magnetic susceptibility, susceptibility imaging, and the validation of the diamagnetic susceptibility map as a myelin biomarker that indirectly measures myelin content. Additionally, the paper explores essential aspects of data acquisition and processing, offering practical insights for readers. A comparison with established myelin imaging methods is also presented, and both current and prospective clinical and scientific applications are discussed to provide a holistic understanding of the technique. This work aims to serve as a foundational resource for newcomers entering this dynamic and rapidly expanding field.

Distinguishing microgliosis and tau deposition in the mouse brain using paramagnetic and diamagnetic susceptibility source separation

Tauopathies, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), are neurodegenerative disorders characterized by hyperphosphorylated tau protein aggregates in the brain. In addition to protein aggregates, microglia-mediated inflammation and iron dyshomeostasis are other pathological features observed in AD and other tauopathies. It is known that these alterations at the subcellular level occur much before the onset of macroscopic tissue atrophy or cognitive deficits. The ability to detect these microstructural changes with MRI therefore has substantive importance for improved characterization of disease pathogenesis. In this study, we demonstrate that quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with paramagnetic and diamagnetic susceptibility source separation has the potential to distinguish neuropathological alterations in a transgenic mouse model of tauopathy. 3D multi-echo gradient echo data were acquired from fixed brains of PS19 (Tau) transgenic mice and age-matched wild-type (WT) mice (n = 5 each) at 11.7 T. The multi-echo data were fit to a 3-pool complex signal model to derive maps of paramagnetic component susceptibility (PCS) and diamagnetic component susceptibility (DCS). Group-averaged signal fraction and composite susceptibility maps showed significant region-specific differences between the WT and Tau mouse brains. Significant bilateral increases in PCS and |DCS| were observed in specific hippocampal and cortical sub-regions of the Tau mice relative to WT controls. Comparison with immunohistological staining for microglia (Iba1) and phosphorylated-tau (AT8) further indicated that the PCS and DCS differences corresponded to regional microgliosis and tau deposition in the PS19 mouse brains, respectively. The results demonstrate that quantitative susceptibility source separation may provide sensitive imaging markers to detect distinct pathological alterations in tauopathies.

Neuroimaging of Parkinson's disease by quantitative susceptibility mapping

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease, and apart from a few rare genetic causes, its pathogenesis remains largely unclear. Recent scientific interest has been captured by the involvement of iron biochemistry and the disruption of iron homeostasis, particularly within the brain regions specifically affected in PD. The advent of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) has enabled non-invasive quantification of brain iron in vivo by MRI, which has contributed to the understanding of iron-associated pathogenesis and has the potential for the development of iron-based biomarkers in PD. This review elucidates the biochemical underpinnings of brain iron accumulation, details advancements in iron-sensitive MRI technologies, and discusses the role of QSM as a biomarker of iron deposition in PD. Despite considerable progress, several challenges impede its clinical application after a decade of QSM studies. The initiation of multi-site research is warranted for developing robust, interpretable, and disease-specific biomarkers for monitoring PD disease progression.

MR Susceptibility Separation for Quantifying Lesion Paramagnetic and Diamagnetic Evolution in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion evolution may involve changes in diamagnetic myelin and paramagnetic iron. Conventional quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) can provide net susceptibility distribution, but not the discrete paramagnetic and diamagnetic components.

PURPOSE

To apply susceptibility separation (χ separation) to follow lesion evolution in MS with comparison to R2 */R2 ' /QSM.

STUDY TYPE

Longitudinal, prospective.

SUBJECTS

Twenty relapsing-remitting MS subjects (mean age: 42.5 ± 9.4 years, 13 females; mean years of symptoms: 4.3 ± 1.4 years).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Three-dimensional multiple echo gradient echo (QSM and R2 * mapping), two-dimensional dual echo fast spin echo (R2 mapping), T2 -weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery, and T1-weighted magnetization prepared gradient echo sequences at 3 T.

ASSESSMENT

Data were analyzed from two scans separated by a mean interval of 14.4 ± 2.0 months. White matter lesions on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery were defined by an automatic pipeline, then manually refined (by ZZ/AHW, 3/25 years' experience in MRI), and verified by a radiologist (MN, 25 years' experience in MS). Susceptibility separation yielded the paramagnetic and diamagnetic susceptibility content of each voxel. Lesions were classified into four groups based on the variation of QSM/R2 * or separated into positive/negative components from χ separation.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Two-sample paired t tests for assessment of longitudinal differences. Spearman correlation coefficients to assess associations between χ separation and R2 */R2 ' /QSM. Significant level: P < 0.005.

RESULTS

A total of 183 lesions were quantified. Categorizing lesions into groups based on χ separation demonstrated significant annual changes in QSM//R2 */R2 ' . When lesions were grouped based on changes in QSM and R2 *, both changing in unison yielded a significant dominant paramagnetic variation and both opposing yielded a dominant diamagnetic variation. Significant Spearman correlation coefficients were found between susceptibility-sensitive MRI indices and χ separation.

DATA CONCLUSION

Susceptibility separation changes in MS lesions may distinguish and quantify paramagnetic and diamagnetic evolution, potentially providing additional insight compared to R2 * and QSM alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with upper motor neuron predominance: diagnostic accuracy of qualitative and quantitative susceptibility metrics in the precentral gyrus

OBJECTIVE

The study aims at comparing the diagnostic accuracy of qualitative and quantitative assessment of the susceptibility in the precentral gyrus in detecting amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with predominance of upper motor neuron (UMN) impairment.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical and 3T MRI data of 47 ALS patients, of whom 12 with UMN predominance (UMN-ALS). We further enrolled 23 healthy controls (HC) and 15 ALS Mimics (ALS-Mim). The Motor Cortex Susceptibility (MCS) score was qualitatively assessed on the susceptibility-weighted images (SWI) and automatic metrics were extracted from the quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in the precentral gyrus. MCS scores and QSM-based metrics were tested for correlation, and ROC analyses.

RESULTS

The correlation of MCS score and susceptibility skewness was significant (Rho = 0.55, p < 0.001). The susceptibility SD showed an AUC of 0.809 with a specificity and positive predictive value of 100% in differentiating ALS and ALS Mim versus HC, significantly higher than MCS (Z = -3.384, p-value = 0.00071). The susceptibility skewness value of -0.017 showed specificity of 92.3% and predictive positive value of 91.7% in differentiating UMN-ALS versus ALS mimics, even if the performance was not significantly better than MCS (Z = 0.81, p = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

The MCS and susceptibility skewness of the precentral gyrus show high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating UMN-ALS from ALS-mimics subjects. The quantitative assessment might be preferred being an automatic measure unbiased by the reader.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The clinical diagnostic evaluation of ALS patients might benefit from the qualitative and/or quantitative assessment of the susceptibility in the precentral gyrus as imaging marker of upper motor neuron predominance.

KEY POINTS

• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis diagnostic work-up lacks biomarkers able to identify upper motor neuron involvement. • Susceptibility-weighted imaging/quantitative susceptibility mapping-based measures showed good diagnostic accuracy in discriminating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with predominant upper motor neuron impairment from patients with suspected motor neuron disorder. • Susceptibility-weighted imaging/quantitative susceptibility mapping-based assessment of the magnetic susceptibility provides a diagnostic marker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with upper motor neuron predominance.

Recommended Implementation of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in The Brain: A Consensus of the ISMRM Electro-Magnetic Tissue Properties Study Group

This article provides recommendations for implementing quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) for clinical brain research. It is a consensus of the ISMRM Electro-Magnetic Tissue Properties Study Group. While QSM technical development continues to advance rapidly, the current QSM methods have been demonstrated to be repeatable and reproducible for generating quantitative tissue magnetic susceptibility maps in the brain. However, the many QSM approaches available give rise to the need in the neuroimaging community for guidelines on implementation. This article describes relevant considerations and provides specific implementation recommendations for all steps in QSM data acquisition, processing, analysis, and presentation in scientific publications. We recommend that data be acquired using a monopolar 3D multi-echo GRE sequence, that phase images be saved and exported in DICOM format and unwrapped using an exact unwrapping approach. Multi-echo images should be combined before background removal, and a brain mask created using a brain extraction tool with the incorporation of phase-quality-based masking. Background fields should be removed within the brain mask using a technique based on SHARP or PDF, and the optimization approach to dipole inversion should be employed with a sparsity-based regularization. Susceptibility values should be measured relative to a specified reference, including the common reference region of whole brain as a region of interest in the analysis, and QSM results should be reported with - as a minimum - the acquisition and processing specifications listed in the last section of the article. These recommendations should facilitate clinical QSM research and lead to increased harmonization in data acquisition, analysis, and reporting.

What is the potential of paramagnetic rim lesions as diagnostic indicators in multiple sclerosis?

INTRODUCTION

In multiple sclerosis (MS), paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) on MRI identify a subset of chronic active lesions (CALs), which have been linked through clinical and pathological studies to more severe disease course and greater disability accumulation. Beside their prognostic relevance, increasing evidence supports the use of PRL as a diagnostic biomarker.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the most recent updates regarding the MRI pathophysiology of PRL, their prevalence in MS (by clinical phenotypes) vs mimicking conditions, and their potential role as diagnostic MS biomarkers. We searched PubMed with terms including 'multiple sclerosis' AND 'paramagnetic rim lesions' OR 'iron rim lesions' OR 'rim lesions' for manuscripts published between January 2008 and July 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Current research suggests that PRL can improve the diagnostic specificity and the overall accuracy of MS diagnosis when used together with the dissemination in space MRI criteria and the central vein sign. Nevertheless, future prospective multicenter studies should further define the real-world prevalence and specificity of PRL. International guidelines are needed to establish methodological criteria for PRL identification before its implementation into clinical practice.

From pathology to MRI and back: Clinically relevant biomarkers of multiple sclerosis lesions

Focal lesions in both white and gray matter are characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Histopathological studies have helped define the main underlying pathological processes involved in lesion formation and evolution, serving as a gold standard for many years. However, histopathology suffers from an intrinsic bias resulting from over-reliance on tissue samples from late stages of the disease or atypical cases and is inadequate for routine patient assessment. Pathological-radiological correlative studies have established advanced MRI's sensitivity to several relevant MS-pathological substrates and its practicality for assessing dynamic changes and following lesions over time. This review focuses on novel imaging techniques that serve as biomarkers of critical pathological substrates of MS lesions: the central vein, chronic inflammation, remyelination and repair, and cortical lesions. For each pathological process, we address the correlative value of MRI to MS pathology, its contribution in elucidating MS pathology in vivo, and the clinical utility of the imaging biomarker.