Characterization of Hepatitis B Virus Integrations Identified in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Genomes

Comparison of Pegylated Interferon Alfa Therapy in Combination with Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Purpose

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) and pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN-α) regimen compared to a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and PegIFN-α therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Patients and Methods

Patients who were treated with PegIFN-α in combination with TAF or TDF were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcome measured was the HBsAg loss rate. The rates of virological response, serological response for HBeAg, and normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were also calculated. The cumulative incidences of response rates were compared between the two groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

A total of 114 patients were retrospectively enrolled in the study, with 33 receiving TAF plus PegIFN-α treatment and 81 receiving TDF plus PegIFN-α treatment. The HBsAg loss rate for the TAF plus PegIFN-α group was 15.2% at 24 weeks and 21.2% at 48 weeks, while the TDF plus PegIFN-α group had rates of 7.4% at 24 weeks and 12.3% at 48 weeks (P=0.204 at 24 weeks, P=0.228 at 48 weeks). In subgroup analysis of HBeAg positive patients, the TAF group had a higher HBsAg loss rate of 25% at week 48, compared to 3.8% in the TDF group (P=0.033). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the TAF plus PegIFN-α group achieved virological response more quickly than the TDF plus PegIFN-α group (p=0.013). There was no statistical difference in HBeAg serological rate or ALT normalization rate.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the HBsAg loss between the two groups. However, subgroup analysis revealed that TAF plus PegIFN-α treatment had a higher HBsAg loss rate than TDF plus PegIFN-α treatment in HBeAg-positive patients. Additionally, TAF plus PegIFN-α treatment demonstrated better virological suppression for CHB patients. Therefore, TAF plus PegIFN-α treatment regimen is recommended for CHB patients who aim to achieve functional cure.

Hepatitis Virus and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a global health challenge, causing 600,000 deaths each year. Infectious factors, including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV), have long been considered the major risk factors for the development and progression of HCC. These pathogens induce hepatocyte transformation through a variety of mechanisms, including insertional mutations caused by viral gene integration, epigenetic changes, and the induction of long-term immune dysfunction. The discovery of these mechanisms, while advancing our understanding of the disease, also provides targets for new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. In addition, the discovery and research of chronic HEV infection over the past decade indicate that this common hepatitis virus also seems to have the potential to induce HCC. In this review, we provide an overview of recent studies on the link between hepatitis virus and HCC, as well as new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to HCC based on these findings. Finally, we also discuss the potential relationship between HEV and HCC. In conclusion, these associations will further optimize the diagnosis and treatment of infection-associated HCC and call for better management policies.

Pathogenesis and Current Treatment Strategies of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent liver cancer with high lethality and low five-year survival rates leading to a substantial worldwide burden for healthcare systems. HCC initiation and progression are favored by different etiological risk factors including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, non-/and alcoholic fatty liver disease (N/AFLD), and tobacco smoking. In molecular pathogenesis, endogenous alteration in genetics (TP53, TERT, CTNNB1, etc.), epigenetics (DNA-methylation, miRNA, lncRNA, etc.), and dysregulation of key signaling pathways (Wnt/β-catenin, JAK/STAT, etc.) strongly contribute to the development of HCC. The multitude and complexity of different pathomechanisms also reflect the difficulties in tailored medical therapy of HCC. Treatment options for HCC are strictly dependent on tumor staging and liver function, which are structured by the updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification system. Surgical resection, local ablative techniques, and liver transplantation are valid and curative therapeutic options for early tumor stages. For multifocal and metastatic diseases, systemic therapy is recommended. While Sorafenib had been the standalone HCC first-line therapy for decades, recent developments had led to the approval of new treatment options as first-line as well as second-line treatment. Anti-PD-L1 directed combination therapies either with anti-VEGF directed agents or with anti-CTLA-4 active substances have been implemented as the new treatment standard in the first-line setting. However, data from clinical trials indicate different responses on specific therapeutic regimens depending on the underlying pathogenesis of hepatocellular cancer. Therefore, histopathological examinations have been re-emphasized by current international clinical guidelines in addition to the standardized radiological diagnosis using contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging. In this review, we emphasize the current knowledge on molecular pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. On this occasion, the treatment sequences for early and advanced tumor stages according to the recently updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification system and the current algorithm of systemic therapy (first-, second-, and third-line treatment) are summarized. Furthermore, we discuss novel precautional and pre-therapeutic approaches including therapeutic vaccination, adoptive cell transfer, locoregional therapy enhancement, and non-coding RNA-based therapy as promising treatment options. These novel treatments may prolong overall survival rates in regard with quality of life and liver function as mainstay of HCC therapy.

Liver biopsy of chronic hepatitis B patients indicates HBV integration profile may complicate the endpoint and effect of entecavir treatment

AIMS

Viral integration profiles attract increased interest in the study of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but their features in the early stage of infection and changes due to antiviral treatments remain largely unknown.

METHODS

Liver biopsies and paired blood samples were obtained from HBeAg-positive patients before and after 48 weeks of entecavir treatment, and a probe-based capture strategy was applied for analyzing the HBV integrations in these samples. Serum HBV markers, including viral DNA, pgRNA, and HBsAg, were longitudinally assessed.

RESULTS

Entecavir treatment successfully reduced the levels of ALT, AST, and HBV serological markers (HBeAg, HBV pgRNA, and HBV DNA) in all patients (<40 years old). As expected, HBV integrations contributed to HBsAg production, with the total number of integrations positively correlated with serum HBsAg level (r = 0.47, P = 0.04). Along with repressed HBV replication, the number of viral integrations in liver biopsies decreased by about 1.94-fold after ETV treatment, with viral breakpoints significantly enriched within nt 1600-1900 of the HBV genome. No recurrent events were observed both at baseline and after treatment for the same individual, and only one same integration was found in two patients. Unlike in tumors, integrations in CHB biopsies seemed to have no chromosomal preference. Moreover, CHB integrations demonstrated lower enrichment scores for open active states than tumors, such as DNase, TssA, and ZNF/Rpts, and the scores reduced after ETV treatment. The antiviral therapy led to the disappearance of the enrichment tendency of integrations in both open chromatin and heterochromatin regions.

CONCLUSION

Reduced HBV replications by the nucleoside analogue may lead to decreased viral integrations in the liver, and those contributing to the HBsAg production may consistently occur. The pattern of HBV integration after ETV treatment is more random and irregular, which may contribute to a reduced risk of liver cancer due to antiviral treatment.

Molecular Mechanisms and Animal Models of HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: With Emphasis on Metastatic Tumor Antigen 1

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an important cause of cancer death worldwide, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major etiology, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. Lack of sensitive biomarkers for early diagnosis of HCC and lack of effective therapeutics for patients with advanced HCC are the main reasons for high HCC mortality; these clinical needs are linked to the molecular heterogeneity of hepatocarcinogenesis. Animal models are the basis of preclinical and translational research in HBV-related HCC (HBV-HCC). Recent advances in methodology have allowed the development of several animal models to address various aspects of chronic liver disease, including HCC, which HBV causes in humans. Currently, multiple HBV-HCC animal models, including conventional, hydrodynamics-transfection-based, viral vector-mediated transgenic, and xenograft mice models, as well as the hepadnavirus-infected tree shrew and woodchuck models, are available. This review provides an overview of molecular mechanisms and animal models of HBV-HCC. Additionally, the metastatic tumor antigen 1 (MTA1), a cancer-promoting molecule, was introduced as an example to address the importance of a suitable animal model for studying HBV-related hepatocarcinogenesis.