An Immunobridging Study to Evaluate the Neutralizing Antibody Titer in Adults Immunized with Two Doses of Either ChAdOx1-nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) or MVC-COV1901

Higher correlation between neutralizing antibodies and surrogate neutralizing or binding antibodies in COVID-19 patients than vaccine recipients

This study determined the seropositive rates and levels of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in 50 patients and 108 vaccinees using microneutralization test (MNT), surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). MNT, as the reference method, employed living clade S and Delta viruses to measure neutralizing (NT) antibodies, while sVNT employed wild type strain and Delta receptor-binding domains (RBD) as the test antigens to measure sVNT antibodies. CMIA and ECLIA employed only one version of RBD to measure the binding antibodies. Our study performed S gene sequencing of the test virus to exclude undesired mutants that might lead to changes in antibody levels in MNT assay. We showed that spike protein amino acid sequences of our Delta virus contained 13 amino acid changes, with 3 related to the reduced neutralization. The MNT assay showed a significant reduction in seropositive rates and antibody levels in the patients' sera when the Delta variant replaced clade S as the test virus. In contrast, the seropositive rates determined by sVNT assay using wild type strain RBD and Delta RBD were non-significantly different, suggesting that sVNT assay could not identify the difference between the antigenicity of wild type RBD and Delta RBD. Furthermore, the correlation between the levels of NT and sVNT antibodies was moderate with the patients' sera but modest with the post-vaccination sera. The seropositive rates in the patients, as determined by CMIA or ECLIA, were not different from the MNT assay using clade S, but not Delta, as the test virus. In all analyses, the correlations between the antibody levels measured by MNT and the other 3 assays were modest to moderate, with the r-values of 0.3500-0.7882.

Comparable safety and non-inferior immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine candidate PTX-COVID19-B and BNT162b2 in a phase 2 randomized, observer-blinded study

In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 into a seasonal pathogen along with the emergence of new variants, underscores the need for dynamic and adaptable responses, emphasizing the importance of sustained vaccination strategies. This observer-blind, double-dummy, randomized immunobridging phase 2 study (NCT05175742) aimed to compare the immunogenicity induced by two doses of 40 μg PTX-COVID19-B vaccine candidate administered 28 days apart, with the response induced by two doses of 30 µg Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2), administered 21 days apart, in Nucleocapsid-protein seronegative adults 18-64 years of age. Both vaccines were administrated via intramuscular injection in the deltoid muscle. Two weeks after the second dose, the neutralizing antibody (NAb) geometric mean titer ratio and seroconversion rate met the non-inferiority criteria, successfully achieving the primary immunogenicity endpoints of the study. PTX-COVID19-B demonstrated similar safety and tolerability profile to BNT162b2 vaccine. The lowest NAb response was observed in subjects with low-to-undetectable NAb at baseline or no reported breakthrough infection. Conversely, participants who experienced breakthrough infections during the study exhibited higher NAb titers. This study also shows induction of cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses by PTX-COVID19-B. In conclusion, the vaccine candidate PTX-COVID19-B demonstrated favourable safety profile along with immunogenicity similar to the active comparator BNT162b2 vaccine.

To be remembered: B cell memory response against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals

COVID-19 disease has plagued the world economy and affected the overall well-being and life of most of the people. Natural infection as well as vaccination leads to the development of an immune response against the pathogen. This involves the production of antibodies, which can neutralize the virus during future challenges. In addition, the development of cellular immune memory with memory B and T cells provides long-lasting protection. The longevity of the immune response has been a subject of intensive research in this field. The extent of immunity conferred by different forms of vaccination or natural infections remained debatable for long. Hence, understanding the effectiveness of these responses among different groups of people can assist government organizations in making informed policy decisions. In this article, based on the publicly available data, we have reviewed the memory response generated by some of the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, particularly B cell memory in different groups of individuals.

Outcomes and Effects of Vaccination on Sars-Cov-2 Omicron Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk of COVID-19. Vaccination is significantly effective at preventing infection and reducing infection severity. Omicron infections are less severe than infections by previous strains, but breakthrough disease is more common. Thus, we conducted this study to observe the vaccine efficacy in our KTRs.

METHODS

During the surge in the Omicron variant, beginning in May 2022, we retrieved data from 365 KTRs who had received at least one dose of various COVID vaccines until June 30, 2022. Outcomes of the KTRs (n = 168) after at least the 2nd vaccination were assessed until September 30, 2022, before the border was opened for tourism.

RESULTS

The antibody response in KTRs after the 1st and 2nd doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines demonstrated a significant increase from the 1st dose (median: 0.4; IQR: 0.4-8.4 U/mL, P < .001) to the 2nd dose (median: 57.5; IQR: 0.4-799.2 U/mL), and the response rate rose from 32% to 65% (P < .001). SARS-CoV-2 infection was identified in 14/365 (3.8%) patients after at least the 1st dose and 7/187 (3.7%) patients at least 7 days beyond the 2nd dose. Most KTRs had a mild course, but 3 (17%) were hospitalized due to pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate a lower response rate and anti-S titers after 2nd dose vaccination in KTRs than in the general population, but a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination was observed during the Omicron outbreak. Owing to the breakthrough infections found in ordinarily vaccinated KTRs, we must emphasize the importance of vaccination and boosters to prevent severe illness, hospitalizations, and death among those developing infections.

A Brighton Collaboration standardized template with key considerations for a benefit/risk assessment for the Medigen COVID-19 protein vaccine

The Brighton Collaboration Benefit-Risk Assessment of VAccines by TechnolOgy (BRAVATO) Working Group has prepared standardized templates to describe the key considerations for the benefit-risk assessment of several vaccine platform technologies, including protein subunit vaccines. This article uses the BRAVATO template to review the features of the MVC-COV1901 vaccine, a recombinant protein subunit vaccine based on the stabilized pre-fusion SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S-2P, adjuvanted with CpG 1018 and aluminum hydroxide, manufactured by Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corporation in Taiwan. MVC-COV1901 vaccine is indicated for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 12 years of age and older. The template offers details on basic vaccine information, target pathogen and population, characteristics of antigen and adjuvant, preclinical data, human safety and efficacy data, and overall benefit-risk assessment. The clinical development program began in September 2020 and based on demonstration of favorable safety and immunogenicity profiles in 11 clinical trials in over 5,000 participants, it has been approved for emergency use based on immunobridging results for adults in Taiwan, Estwatini, Somaliland, and Paraguay. The main clinical trials include placebo-controlled phase 2 studies in healthy adults (CT-COV-21), adolescents (CT-COV-22), and elderly population (CT-COV-23) as well as 3 immunobridging phase 3 trials (CT-COV-31, CT-COV-32, and CT-COV-34) in which MVC-COV1901 was compared to AZD1222. There are also clinical trials studying MVC-COV1901 as homologous and heterologous boosters (CT-COV-24 and CT-COV-25). The totality of evidence based on ∼3 million vaccinees to date includes a mostly clean safety profile, with adverse events mostly being mild and self-limiting in both clinical development and post-marketing experience, proven immunogenic response, and real-world effectiveness data. The immunogenic profile demonstrates that MVC-COV1901 induces high levels of neutralizing and binding antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. There is a dose-dependent response and a significant correlation between binding and neutralizing antibody activity. Antigen-specific T-cell responses, particularly a Th1-biased immune response characterized by high levels of interferon gamma and IL-2 cytokines, have also been observed. Coupled with this, MVC-COV1901 has favorable thermostability and better safety profiles when compared to other authorized vaccines from different platforms, which make it potentially a good candidate for vaccine supply chains in global markets.

An evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of MVC-COV1901: Results of an interim analysis of a phase III, parallel group, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled immunobridging study in Paraguay

BACKGROUND

Data from previous studies of the MVC-COV1901 vaccine, a subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 based on the stable prefusion spike protein (S-2P) adjuvanted with CpG 1018 adjuvant and aluminum hydroxide, suggest that the vaccine is generally safe and elicits a good immune response in healthy adults and adolescents. By comparing with AZD1222, this study adds to the findings from previous trials and further evaluates the breadth of protection offered by MVC-COV1901.

METHODS

In this phase 3, parallel group, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial conducted in 2 sites in Paraguay, we assigned adults aged 18-91 years in a 1:1 ratio to receive intramuscular doses of MVC-COV1901 or AZD1222 administered as scheduled in the clinical trial. Serum samples were collected on the day of vaccination and 14 days after the second dose. Primary and secondary safety and immunogenicity endpoints were assessed. In addition, other outcomes investigated were cross-reactive immunity against the Omicron strain and the induction of IgG subclasses.

RESULTS

A total of 1,030 participants underwent randomization. Safety data was derived from this set while primary immunogenicity data involved a per-protocol immunogenicity (PPI) subset including 225 participants. Among the participants, 58% are seropositive at baseline. When compared against AZD1222, MVC-COV1901 exhibited superiority in terms of neutralizing antibody titers and non-inferiority in terms of seroconversion rates. Reactogenicity was generally mild and no serious adverse event was attributable to MVC-COV1901. Both vaccines have a Th1-biased response predominated by the production of IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses. Omicron-neutralizing titers were 44.5 times lower compared to wildtype-neutralizing titers among seronegative individuals at baseline. This fold-reduction was 3.0 times among the seropositive.

CONCLUSION

Safety and immunogenicity data of MVC-COV1901 from the study in Paraguay confirm previous results. The previous infection coupled with vaccination of this vaccine may offer protection against the Omicron strain though its durability is still unknown.

Boosting with Multiple Doses of mRNA Vaccine after Priming with Two Doses of Protein Subunit Vaccine MVC-COV1901 Elicited Robust Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses against Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Confronted with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, such as Delta and Omicron, with high infectivity and immune evasion capacity, vaccination remains the most effective tool to prevent infection and severe illness. However, heterologous vaccination of mRNA vaccines primed with protein subunit vaccines had not been evaluated before the current study. Since subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 (MVC) has been granted emergency use authorization in Taiwan, in this study, we explored the humoral and cellular immune responses to additional third (2× MVC/Mod) and fourth (2× MVC/2× Mod) doses of mRNA-1273 (Mod) after priming with two doses of subunit vaccine MVC against the emerging variants. We found a 12.3- to 16.1-fold increase in antibodies targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the Delta variant with 2× MVC/Mod compared to two doses of MVC (2× MVC) or AZD1222 (2× AZ) regimens and a 26- to 32.2-fold improvement in neutralizing potency against the Omicron variant (BA.1). Besides, the numbers of gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-secreting T cells induced by 2× MVC/Mod were also elevated 3.5-fold and 3.7- to 4.3-fold for the wild type and Delta variant. However, boosting with a fourth dose of Mod (2× MVC/2× Mod) after the 2× MVC/Mod regimen failed to significantly improve the immune responses. Moreover, all vaccination schedules showed reduced neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant. Collectively, our results suggested that the third or fourth dose booster vaccination with mRNA vaccine after priming with two doses of protein subunit vaccine could elicit stronger humoral and cellular immune responses. These findings could provide a future global heterologous boosting strategy against COVID-19. IMPORTANCE Vaccination is the most important strategy to combat the COVID-19 outbreak; however, it remains to be determined whether heterologous prime-boost regimens could induce equal or even stronger immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. Here, we showed that boosting the additional doses of mRNA-1273 (Mod) priming with two doses of MVC-COV1901 (MVC) (2× MVC/Mod) improved humoral and cellular immunity compared to two doses of AZD1222 (2× AZ) or MVC (2× MVC) against SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, the Omicron variant showed strong immune evasion ability for all vaccination schedules. Our findings provided evidence supporting that heterologous vaccination by boosting with mRNA vaccine after priming with two doses of protein subunit vaccine could strongly promote humoral and cellular immune responses against the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

A randomized controlled trial of heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and recombinant subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 against COVID-19

Heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine strategy may facilitate mass COVID-19 immunization. We reported early immunogenicity and safety outcomes of heterologous immunization with a viral vector vaccine (ChAdOx1) and a spike-2P subunit vaccine (MVC-COV1901) in a participant-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority trial (NCT05054621). A total of 100 healthy adults aged 20–70 years having the first dose of ChAdOx1 were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive a booster dose either with ChAdOx1 (n = 50) or MVC-COV1901 (n = 50) at an interval of 4–6 or 8–10 weeks. At day 28 post-boosting, the neutralizing antibody geometric mean titer against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 in MVC-COV1901 recipients (236 IU/mL) was superior to that in ChAdOx1 recipients (115 IU/mL), with a GMT ratio of 2.1 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9). Superiority in the neutralizing antibody titer against Delta variant was also found for heterologous MVC-COV1901 immunization with a GMT ratio of 2.6 (95% CI, 1.8 to 3.8). Both spike-specific antibody-secreting B and T cell responses were substantially enhanced by the heterologous schedule. Heterologous boosting was particularly prominent at a short prime-boost interval. No serious adverse events occurred across all groups. The findings support the use of heterologous prime-boost with ChAdOx1 and protein-based subunit vaccines.

Public safety concern of the ChAdOx1 vaccine has led to an alternative immunisation strategy against SARS-CoV-2, with this heterologous schedule widely adopted and officially recommended in many countries. Here, the authors report the immunogenicity and safety outcomes of heterologous prime-boost immunisation with ChAdOx1 and a spike-2P subunit vaccine in a single-blinded, randomised trial.

Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 COVID-19 booster vaccinations after two doses of BNT162b2 among healthcare workers in Japan: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 booster doses after the primary two-dose BNT162b2 series in Japan and is the first report from Western Pacific region.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Healthcare workers receiving the two-dose BNT162b2 series and eligible for booster vaccination were enrolled. Self-reported adverse reactions were recorded for 8 days. Antibody titer was measured at baseline and on day 28.

RESULTS

A total of 2,931 and 890 subjects received BNT162b2 (homologous) and mRNA-1273 (heterologous) booster vaccinations, respectively. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG titer increased by 50.9- and 64.3-fold in the homologous and heterologous groups, respectively. Immunogenicity was greater with increasing age, regardless of sex. Adverse reactions were mild to moderate and decreased with age. The most common adverse reactions were injection-site pain (92.2%), fatigue (71.8%), headache (58.3%), and fever ≥37.5°C (46.5%). Two cases of non-severe myocarditis occurred in the heterologous group and resolved without clinical sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Homologous booster schedules had fewer reported adverse reactions; heterologous boosters elicited greater immunogenicity. Among different age groups, subjects aged 60 or over had the lowest immunogenicity before the booster, and both homologous and heterologous boosters restored vaccine immunogenicity level comparable to those of younger age groups.