The Role of the Tumor Microenvironment in Developing Successful Therapeutic and Secondary Prophylactic Breast Cancer Vaccines

Novel strategies in breast cancer management: From treatment to long-term remission

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although improvements in early detection and therapy have been made, metastatic breast cancer (mBC) continues to be an incurable disease. Although existing treatments can prolong survival and enhance quality of life, they do not provide a definitive cure. Targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes, particularly for subtypes such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+) BC. Key innovations include antibodydrug conjugates (ADCs) and next-generation endocrine therapies. ADCs combine monoclonal antibodies with cytotoxic agents, allowing targeted delivery to tumor cells while minimizing systemic toxicity. Immunotherapy is emerging as a promising approach for aggressive subtypes, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Strategies under investigation include chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies, and natural killer (NK) cell treatments, all aimed at enhancing the ability of the immune system to target and eliminate resistant tumor cells. Tissue engineering, particularly hydrogel-based delivery systems, offers the potential for localized treatment. These systems enable the controlled release of therapeutic agents or immune cells directly to the tumor site, supporting tissue regeneration and enhancing immune surveillance to reduce recurrence. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including treatment resistance, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and high costs. Overcoming these barriers requires further innovation in drug delivery systems and a deeper understanding of tumor biology.

Emerging Frontiers in Colorectal Cancer Therapy: From Targeted Molecules to Immunomodulatory Breakthroughs and Cell-Based Approaches

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, necessitating urgent advancements in therapeutic approaches. The emergence of groundbreaking therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapies, oncolytic viruses, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, marks a transformative era in oncology. These innovative modalities, tailored to individual genetic and molecular profiles, hold the promise of significantly enhancing patient outcomes. This comprehensive review explores the latest clinical trials and advancements, encompassing targeted molecular therapies, immunomodulatory agents, and cell-based therapies. By evaluating the strengths, limitations, and potential synergies of these approaches, this research aims to reshape the treatment landscape and improve clinical outcomes for CRC patients, offering new found hope for those who have exhausted conventional options. The culmination of this work is anticipated to pave the way for transformative clinical trials, ushering in a new era of personalized and effective CRC therapy.

Pre-vaccination transcriptomic profiles of immune responders to the MUC1 peptide vaccine for colon cancer prevention

Introduction

Self-antigens abnormally expressed on tumors, such as MUC1, have been targeted by therapeutic cancer vaccines. We recently assessed in two clinical trials in a preventative setting whether immunity induced with a MUC1 peptide vaccine could reduce high colon cancer risk in individuals with a history of premalignant colon adenomas. In both trials, there were immune responders and non-responders to the vaccine.

Methods

Here we used PBMC pre-vaccination and 2 weeks after the first vaccine of responders and non-responders selected from both trials to identify early biomarkers of immune response involved in long-term memory generation and prevention of adenoma recurrence. We performed flow cytometry, phosflow, and differential gene expression analyses on PBMCs collected from MUC1 vaccine responders and non-responders pre-vaccination and two weeks after the first of three vaccine doses.

Results

MUC1 vaccine responders had higher frequencies of CD4 cells pre-vaccination, increased expression of CD40L on CD8 and CD4 T-cells, and a greater increase in ICOS expression on CD8 T-cells. Differential gene expression analysis revealed that iCOSL, PI3K AKT MTOR, and B-cell signaling pathways are activated early in response to the MUC1 vaccine. We identified six specific transcripts involved in elevated antigen presentation, B-cell activation, and NF-κB1 activation that were directly linked to finding antibody response at week 12. Finally, a model using these transcripts was able to predict non-responders with accuracy.

Discussion

These findings suggest that individuals who can be predicted to respond to the MUC1 vaccine, and potentially other vaccines, have greater readiness in all immune compartments to present and respond to antigens. Predictive biomarkers of MUC1 vaccine response may lead to more effective vaccines tailored to individuals with high risk for cancer but with varying immune fitness.

The bright side of chemistry: Exploring synthetic peptide-based anticancer vaccines

The present review focuses on synthetic peptide-based vaccine strategies in the context of anticancer intervention, paying attention to critical aspects such as peptide epitope selection, adjuvant integration, and nuanced classification of synthetic peptide cancer vaccines. Within this discussion, we delve into the diverse array of synthetic peptide-based anticancer vaccines, each derived from tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), including melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (Melan-A or MART-1), mucin 1 (MUC1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), tumor protein 53 (p53), human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), survivin, folate receptor (FR), cancer-testis antigen 1 (NY-ESO-1), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). We also describe the synthetic peptide-based vaccines developed for cancers triggered by oncovirus, such as human papillomavirus (HPV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Additionally, the potential synergy of peptide-based vaccines with common therapeutics in cancer was considered. The last part of our discussion deals with the realm of the peptide-based vaccines delivery, highlighting its role in translating the most promising candidates into effective clinical strategies. Although this discussion does not cover all the ongoing peptide vaccine investigations, it aims at offering valuable insights into the chemical modifications and the structural complexities of anticancer peptide-based vaccines.

Targeting cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) in breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) has a high mortality rate and is one of the most common malignancies in the world. Initially, BC was considered non-immunogenic, but a paradigm shift occurred with the discovery of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the BC tumor microenvironment. CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) immunotherapy has emerged as a treatment option for BC, but it has limitations, including suboptimal antitumor effects and toxicity. Research has demonstrated that anti-CTLA-4 combination therapies, such as Treg depletion, cancer vaccines, and modulation of the gut microbiome, are significantly more effective than CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody (mAB) monotherapy. Second-generation CTLA-4 antibodies are currently being developed to mitigate immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and augment antitumor efficacy. This review examines anti-CTLA-4 mAB in BC, both as monotherapy and in combination with other treatments, and sheds light on ongoing clinical trials, novel CTLA-4 therapeutic strategies, and potential utility of biomarkers in BC.

Pre-vaccination transcriptomic profiles of immune responders to the MUC1 peptide vaccine for colon cancer prevention

Self-antigens abnormally expressed on tumors, such as MUC1, have been targeted by therapeutic cancer vaccines. We recently assessed in two clinical trials in a preventative setting whether immunity induced with a MUC1 peptide vaccine could reduce high colon cancer risk in individuals with a history of premalignant colon adenomas. In both trials, there were immune responders and non-responders to the vaccine. Here we used PBMC pre-vaccination and 2 weeks after the first vaccine of responders and non-responders selected from both trials to identify early biomarkers of immune response involved in long-term memory generation and prevention of adenoma recurrence. We performed flow cytometry, phosflow, and differential gene expression analyses on PBMCs collected from MUC1 vaccine responders and non-responders pre-vaccination and two weeks after the first of three vaccine doses. MUC1 vaccine responders had higher frequencies of CD4 cells pre-vaccination, increased expression of CD40L on CD8 and CD4 T-cells, and a greater increase in ICOS expression on CD8 T-cells. Differential gene expression analysis revealed that iCOSL, PI3K AKT MTOR, and B-cell signaling pathways are activated early in response to the MUC1 vaccine. We identified six specific transcripts involved in elevated antigen presentation, B-cell activation, and NF-kB1 activation that were directly linked to finding antibody response at week 12. Finally, a model using these transcripts was able to predict non-responders with accuracy. These findings suggest that individuals who can be predicted to respond to the MUC1 vaccine, and potentially other vaccines, have greater readiness in all immune compartments to present and respond to antigens. Predictive biomarkers of MUC1 vaccine response may lead to more effective vaccines tailored to individuals with high risk for cancer but with varying immune fitness.

mRNA vaccination in breast cancer: current progress and future direction

Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination has proven to be highly successful in combating Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has recently sparked tremendous interest. This technology has been a popular topic of research over the past decade and is viewed as a promising treatment strategy for cancer immunotherapy. However, despite being the most prevalent malignant disease for women worldwide, breast cancer patients have limited access to immunotherapy benefits. mRNA vaccination has the potential to convert cold breast cancer into hot and expand the responders. Effective mRNA vaccine design for in vivo function requires consideration of vaccine targets, mRNA structures, transport vectors, and injection routes. This review provides an overview of pre-clinical and clinical data on various mRNA vaccination platforms used for breast cancer treatment and discusses potential approaches to combine appropriate vaccination platforms or other immunotherapies to improve mRNA vaccine therapy efficacy for breast cancer.

Improved Survival of a HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient Following a Personalized Peptide Immunization

Cancer neoantigens that arise from somatic mutations have emerged as important targets for personalized immunization. Here, we report an improved overall survival of a HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patient using a bioinformatic-based personalized peptide immunization called BITAP (BioInformatic Tumor Address Peptides). The epitopes were predicted using our in-house bioinformatic pipeline, and the immunogenicity was tested by IFN-γ ELISPOT and intracellular cytokine staining assays. In total, a significant peptide-specific T-cell response was detected against 18 out of the 76 (≈24%) tested peptides. The patient's follow-up by measuring serologic markers showed a significant reduction in the tumor marker levels following BITAP immunization. Along with standard treatment, the patient treated with the BITAP showed stable disease with a remarkably improved overall survival, and no serious treatment-related adverse effects. In conclusion, our findings suggest that BITAP immunization is feasible, and safe, and may induce tumor regressions in patients with HER2-positive subsets of breast cancer.

Establishing the applicability of cancer vaccines in combination with chemotherapeutic entities: current aspect and achievable prospects

Cancer immunotherapy is one of the recently developed cancer treatment modalities. When compared with conventional anticancer drug regimens, immunotherapy has shown significantly better outcomes in terms of quality of life and overall survival. It incorporates a wide range of immunomodulatory modalities that channel the effects of the immune system either by broadly modulating the host immune system or by accurately targeting distinct tumor antigens. One such treatment modality that has gained interest is cancer vaccine therapy which acts by developing antibodies against tumor cells. Cancer vaccines target individual peptides or groups of antigens that are released by tumor cells and presented by the APCs. This also initiates an effective process to activate the host immune responses. Studies on various types of cancer vaccines are conducted, out of which only few are approved by FDA for clinical uses. Despite of documented safety and efficacy of conventional chemotherapy and cancer vaccines, individually they did not produce substantial results in eradication of the cancer as a monotherapy. Hence, the combination approach holds the extensive potential to provide significant improvement in disease outcomes. Certain chemotherapy has immunomodulatory effects and is proven to synergize with cancer vaccines thereby enhancing their anti-tumor activities. Chemotherapeutic agents are known to have immunostimulatory mechanisms apart from its cytotoxic effect and intensify the anti-tumor activities of vaccines by various mechanisms. This review highlights various cancer vaccines, their mechanism, and how their activity gets affected by chemotherapeutic agents. It also aims at summarizing the evidence-based outcome of the combination approach of a cancer vaccine with chemotherapy and a brief on future aspects.

Recent Progress on Therapeutic Vaccines for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide. Advanced breast cancer is still an incurable disease mainly because of its heterogeneity and limited immunogenicity. The great success of cancer immunotherapy is paving the way for a new era in cancer treatment, and therapeutic cancer vaccination is an area of interest. Vaccine targets include tumor-associated antigens and tumor-specific antigens. Immune responses differ in different vaccine delivery platforms. Next-generation sequencing technologies and computational analysis have recently made personalized vaccination possible. However, only a few cases benefiting from neoantigen-based treatment have been reported in breast cancer, and more attention has been given to overexpressed antigen-based treatment, especially human epidermal growth factor 2-derived peptide vaccines. Here, we discuss recent advancements in therapeutic vaccines for breast cancer and highlight near-term opportunities for moving forward.

Vaccination against Her-2/neu, with focus on peptide-based vaccines

Immunotherapy has been a milestone in combatting cancer, by complementing or even replacing classic treatments like surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and anti-hormonal therapy. In 15%-30% of breast cancers, overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2/neu) is associated with more aggressive tumor development. Passive immunization/immunotherapy with the recombinantly produced Her-2/neu-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) pertuzumab and trastuzumab has been shown to effectively treat breast cancer and lead to a significantly better prognosis. However, allergic and hypersensitivity reactions, cardiotoxicity, development of resistance, lack of immunological memory which results in continuous application over a long period, and cost-intensiveness are among the drawbacks associated with this treatment. Furthermore, intrinsic or acquired resistance is associated with the application of therapeutic mAbs, leading to the disease recurrence. Conversely, these drawbacks could be potentially overcome by vaccination, i.e. an active immunization/immunotherapy approach by activating the patient’s own immune system to target cancer, along with inducing immunological memory. This review aims to summarize the main approaches investigated and undertaken for the production of Her-2/neu vaccine candidates, with the main focus on peptide-based vaccines and their evaluation in clinical settings.

•

Her-2/neu is overexpressed in 10%-30% of breast and gastric cancer patients and this correlates with poor clinical outcomes.

•

Passive application of trastuzumab and pertuzumab has outstandingly improved the Her-2/neu-related clinical outcomes.

•

Treatment with mAbs is associated with frequent administration, cost-intensiveness, and resistance.

•

Vaccination against Her-2/neu with e.g. mimotope- or peptide-based vaccines can alternatively overcome the mAbs’ drawbacks.

•

Such alternatives may pave the way to therapeutics which could be used as monotherapy or in combination therapies with mAbs.

Prognostic Efficacy of Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Women With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Background

Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has been suggested as an emerging prognostic predictor in women with breast cancer. However, previous studies evaluating the association between TSR and survival in women with breast cancer showed inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the possible prognostic role of TSR in breast cancer.

Methods

Relevant cohort studies were obtained via search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A random-effects model, which incorporated the potential heterogeneity, was used to pool the results.

Results

Twelve cohort studies with 6175 patients were included. Nine of the 12 studies used 50% as the cutoff to divide the patients into those with stroma-rich (low TSR) and stroma-poor (high TSR) tumors. Pooled results showed that compared women with stroma-poor tumor, those with stroma-rich tumor were associated with worse survival outcomes (disease-free survival [DFS]: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32 to 1.85, P < 0.001; overall survival [OS]: HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.46 to 1.91, P < 0.001; and cancer-specific survival [CSS]: HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.20, P < 0.001). Analysis limited to women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed consistent results (DFS: HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.59 to 2.71, P < 0.001; OS: HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.73, P < 0.001; and CSS: HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.52 to 3.78, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Current evidence from retrospective studies supports that tumor TSR is a prognostic predictor or poor survival in women with breast cancer.

High expression of DLL3 is associated with a poor prognosis and immune infiltration in invasive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown the prognostic value of delta like canonical Notch ligand 3 (DLL3) in patients with different types of tumors, but the role and predictive value of DLL3 in invasive breast cancer (IBC) have not been reported. In this study, we explored the prognostic ability and potential ways of DLL3 in IBC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 130 IBC patients from a single institution from 2004 to 2019 for bioinformatics and statistical analysis. The Cancer Genome Atlas breast invasive carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) cohort was used for verification.

RESULTS

High expression of DLL3 was associated with overall survival (OS) in IBC patients (P = 0.023). Multivariate analysis further showed that DLL3 expression was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.15; P = 0.017). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) with the area under the curve (0.786) demonstrated that DLL3 expression can predict the survival outcome of IBC patients. Furthermore, the expression of DLL3 was related to a variety of tumor infiltrating immune cells (TIICs), particularly T cells regulatory (Tregs). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results indicated that DLL3 was closely related to p53 signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

High expression of DLL3 was associated with poor prognosis and immune cell infiltration in IBC patients. Moreover, P53 signaling pathway may be the key pathway.

Selecting Target Antigens for Cancer Vaccine Development

One of the principal goals of cancer immunotherapy is the development of efficient therapeutic cancer vaccines that are able to elicit an effector as well as memory T cell response specific to tumor antigens. In recent years, the attention has been focused on the personalization of cancer vaccines. However, the efficacy of therapeutic cancer vaccines is still disappointing despite the large number of vaccine strategies targeting different tumors that have been evaluated in recent years. While the preclinical data have frequently shown encouraging results, clinical trials have not provided satisfactory data to date. The main reason for such failures is the complexity of identifying specific target tumor antigens that should be unique or overexpressed only by the tumor cells compared to normal cells. Most of the tumor antigens included in cancer vaccines are non-mutated overexpressed self-antigens, eliciting mainly T cells with low-affinity T cell receptors (TCR) unable to mediate an effective anti-tumor response. In this review, the target tumor antigens employed in recent years in the development of therapeutic cancer vaccine strategies are described, along with potential new classes of tumor antigens such as the human endogenous retroviral elements (HERVs), unconventional antigens, and/or heteroclitic peptides.