1
|
The role of autophagy and apoptosis in early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage: an updated review. Mol Biol Rep 2022; 49:10775-10782. [PMID: 35819555 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07756-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a worldwide devastating type of stroke with high mortality and morbidity. Accumulating evidence show early brain injury (EBI) as the leading cause of mortality after SAH. The pathological processes involved in EBI include decreased cerebral blood flow, increased intracranial pressure, vasospasm, and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. In addition, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and autophagy have also been proposed to contribute to EBI. Among the various processes involved in EBI, neuronal apoptosis has been proven to be a key factor contributing to the poor prognosis of SAH patients. Meanwhile, as another important catabolic process maintaining the cellular and tissue homeostasis, autophagy has been shown to be neuroprotective after SAH. Studies have shown that enhancing autophagy reduced apoptosis, whereas inhibiting autophagy aggravate neuronal apoptosis after SAH. The physiological substrates and mechanisms of neuronal autophagy and apoptosis by which defects in neuronal function are largely unknown. In this review, we summarize and discuss the role of autophagy and apoptosis after SAH and contribute to further study for investigation of the means to control the balance between them.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ishwarya Lakshmi VG, Sreedhar M, JhansiLakshmi V, Gireesh C, Rathod S, Bohar R, Deshpande S, Laavanya R, Kiranmayee KNSU, Siddi S, Vanisri S. Development and Validation of Diagnostic KASP Markers for Brown Planthopper Resistance in Rice. Front Genet 2022; 13:914131. [PMID: 35899197 PMCID: PMC9309266 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.914131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important source of nutrition for the world’s burgeoning population that often faces yield loss due to infestation by the brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)). The development of rice cultivars with BPH resistance is one of the crucial precedences in rice breeding programs. Recent progress in high-throughput SNP-based genotyping technology has made it possible to develop markers linked to the BPH more quickly than ever before. With this view, a genome-wide association study was undertaken for deriving marker-trait associations with BPH damage scores and SNPs from genotyping-by-sequencing data of 391 multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) lines. A total of 23 significant SNPs involved in stress resistance pathways were selected from a general linear model along with 31 SNPs reported from a FarmCPU model in previous studies. Of these 54 SNPs, 20 were selected in such a way to cover 13 stress-related genes. Kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) assays were designed for the 20 selected SNPs and were subsequently used in validating the genotypes that were identified, six SNPs, viz, snpOS00912, snpOS00915, snpOS00922, snpOS00923, snpOS00927, and snpOS00929 as efficient in distinguishing the genotypes into BPH-resistant and susceptible clusters. Bph17 and Bph32 genes that are highly effective against the biotype 4 of the BPH have been validated by gene specific SNPs with favorable alleles in M201, M272, M344, RathuHeenati, and RathuHeenati accession. These identified genotypes could be useful as donors for transferring BPH resistance into popular varieties with marker-assisted selection using these diagnostic SNPs. The resistant lines and the significant SNPs unearthed from our study can be useful in developing BPH-resistant varieties after validating them in biparental populations with the potential usefulness of SNPs as causal markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. G. Ishwarya Lakshmi
- Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University (PJTSAU), Hyderabad, India
| | - M. Sreedhar
- Administrative Office, PJTSAU, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - C. Gireesh
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad, India
| | - Santosha Rathod
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad, India
| | - Rajaguru Bohar
- CGIAR Excellence in Breeding (EiB), CIMMYT-ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India
| | - Santosh Deshpande
- International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
| | - R. Laavanya
- International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
| | | | - Sreedhar Siddi
- Agricultural Research Station, PJTSAU, Peddapalli, India
| | - S. Vanisri
- Institute of Biotechnology, PJTSAU, Hyderabad, India
- *Correspondence: S. Vanisri,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Phenotyping for Rice Resistance and Tolerance to Planthoppers. INSECTS 2021; 12:insects12100847. [PMID: 34680617 PMCID: PMC8539731 DOI: 10.3390/insects12100847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary Rice in Asia is damaged by a range of sap-sucking planthoppers. For the last 50 years, the main focus for integrated management of these insects was to develop resistant rice varieties. A single, bulk phenotyping test, known as the standard seedling seedbox test (SSST) was used to inform the majority of genetics and breeding programs for planthopper-resistant rice. However, there has been much debate over the efficacy of this test. We compared results from the SSST against those from a range of other phenotyping tests to assess how antibiosis and tolerance (the ability of rice to compensate for damage) affect test results, and how phenotyping might be improved to capture information regarding plant traits that are otherwise overlooked by the SSST. Based on the efficacy and costs of different tests, we recommend that breeding programs adopt a modified seedling seedbox test (MSST) when phenotyping 100s of rice lines but that insect performance tests that assess relative changes in planthopper biomass could be adopted when phenotyping fewer lines (e.g., <100 lines). The days-to-wilt (DTW) test was found to be particularly effective in segregating resistant/tolerant lines from susceptible lines. Abstract The standard seedling seedbox test (SSST) is the most prevalent phenotyping test in research on the genetics and breeding of planthopper-resistant rice. Using 16 rice lines that included plants susceptible, resistant and tolerant to the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens), we compared the SSST to modified seedling seedbox tests (MSSTs) and the days-to-wilt (DTW) test. We also conducted a series of performance tests to assess nymph survival and development; adult longevity and egg-laying; egg survival; honeydew production; and plant weight loss. We also assessed the relative costs of the different phenotyping tests to better recommend test protocols that are suitable for high-throughput phenotyping. The SSST was found to be highly robust but fails to identify late-stage resistance; tolerance; or ovicidal responses. MSSTs improved phenotyping by identifying plants with low damage from planthoppers at later growth stages. Herbivore performance tests such as population or biomass build-up tests reduce space requirements and reduce setup and evaluation costs compared with bulk tests. They can also facilitate the assessment of plant tolerance; albeit with added costs. The DTW test most clearly segregates resistant and susceptible plants, thereby facilitating gene discovery and marker-assisted selection. We recommend that bulk testing be improved by switching from the SSST to a suitable MSST and that donor variety and pre-release lines be assessed for the nature of rice–planthopper interactions using biomass build-up tests—including the DTW test.
Collapse
|
4
|
Iriti M, Vitalini S. Plant Immunity and Crop Yield: A Sustainable Approach in Agri-Food Systems. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9020121. [PMID: 33546315 PMCID: PMC7913594 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Innate immunity represents a trait common to animals and plants. Indeed, similar to animals, plants also evolved a complex defense machinery to defend against pest and pathogen attacks. Due to the concerns posed by the intensive use of agrochemicals, the possibility to stimulate the plant immune system with environmentally friendly and low-risk chemical and biological inducers is intriguing. Therefore, some plant protection products are commercially available to trigger the plant’s immune system, with benefits in terms of consumer health and environmental protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Iriti
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy;
- National Interuniveristy Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), 50121 Firenze, Italy
- BAT Center—Interuniversity Center for Studies on Bioinspired Agro-Environmental Technology, University of Napoli “Federico II”, 80055 Napoli, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Sara Vitalini
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy;
- National Interuniveristy Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), 50121 Firenze, Italy
| |
Collapse
|