Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Switching from Trivalent to Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Argentina

The clinical and economic value of enhanced influenza vaccines for the elderly in Argentina

Background

Enhanced influenza vaccines are the best option for the elderly. In 2021, Argentina introduced the MF59-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV) for individuals aged 65 years. and above, in the national immunization program. High dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) is also currently registered. This study evaluates the clinical and economic outcomes of these noted enhanced influenza vaccines for the elderly in Argentina.

Methods

Using a static decision-tree model and adopting the payer's perspective during an average influenza season, the analysis incorporated influenza epidemiological data from pre-pandemic Argentinian seasons (2014-2019), strain distribution, vaccination uptake, influenza-related costs and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) gained. Results include two relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) scenarios from two published meta-analyses, due to reported rVE variability, although without statistical significance expected between enhanced vaccines. Vaccination acquisition costs were obtained from aIIV manufacturer, while HD-IIV costs were estimated using local (Argentinian private sector) and international public sector data (Europe). This assessment considered one GDP per-capita (US$13,696) as a cost-effectiveness threshold and included multiple sensitivity analysis.

Results

With an expected lower vaccine cost and non-significant higher rVE for aIIV vs HD-IIV (3.2 %), aIIV generated 41.4 QALYs gained and US$8.7 M savings to the Argentinean public health system. In this scenario aIIV resulted as a dominant strategy over HD-IIV. On a second scenario, where HD-IIV has a non-significant higher rVE compared to aIIV (15.9 % and 13.9 % for HD-IIV and aIIV, respectively, both vs standard-dose IIV), HD-IIV would only result cost-effective compared to aIIV if its public price is up to 25 % the incremental cost in relation to the standard-dose IIV acquisition price.

Conclusions

In Argentina, the use of enhanced influenza vaccines in the elderly can increase vaccine effectiveness, reduce mortality and disease-related costs. Based on comparable effectiveness, the economic advantage of aIIV over HD-IIV confirms the current vaccination strategy employing aIIV in Argentina.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cell Versus Egg-Based Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Children and Adults in Argentina

Background: Quadrivalent cell-based influenza vaccines (QIVc) avoid egg-adaptive mutations and can be more effective than traditional quadrivalent egg-based influenza vaccines (QIVe). This analysis compared the cost-effectiveness of QIVc and QIVe in Argentinian populations < 65 years old from the payer and societal perspectives. Methods: A static decision tree model compared the costs and health benefits of vaccination with QIVc vs. QIVe using a one-year time horizon. The relative vaccine effectiveness of QIVc vs. QIVe was assumed to be 8.1% for children and 11.4% for adults. An alternative high egg-adaptation scenario was also assessed. Model inputs were sourced from Argentina or the international literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Compared to QIVe, QIVc would prevent 17,857 general practitioner visits, 2418 complications, 816 hospitalizations, and 12 deaths per year. From the payers’ perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life years gained was USD12,214 in the base case and USD2311 in the high egg-adaptation scenario. QIVc was cost-saving from the societal perspective in both scenarios. Conclusions: QIVc in Argentina would be cost-effective relative to QIVe. The potential health benefits and savings would be even higher in high egg-adaptation seasons.