Association of LCT-13910 C/T Polymorphism and Colorectal Cancer

Genetically Determined Circulating Lactase/Phlorizin Hydrolase Concentrations and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

Previous research has found that milk is associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is unclear whether the milk digestion by the enzyme lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LPH) plays a role in CRC susceptibility. Our study aims to investigate the direct causal relationship of CRC risk with LPH levels by applying a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) strategy. Genetic instruments for LPH were derived from the Fenland Study, and CRC-associated summary statistics for these instruments were extracted from the FinnGen Study, PLCO Atlas Project, and Pan-UK Biobank. Primary MR analyses focused on a cis-variant (rs4988235) for LPH levels, with results integrated via meta-analysis. MR analyses using all variants were also undertaken. This analytical approach was further extended to assess CRC subtypes (colon and rectal). Meta-analysis across the three datasets illustrated an inverse association between genetically predicted LPH levels and CRC risk (OR: 0.92 [95% CI, 0.89-0.95]). Subtype analyses revealed associations of elevated LPH levels with reduced risks for both colon (OR: 0.92 [95% CI, 0.89-0.96]) and rectal cancer (OR: 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87, 0.98]). Consistency was observed across varied analytical methods and datasets. Further exploration is warranted to unveil the underlying mechanisms and validate LPH's potential role in CRC prevention.

The Association of Lactose Intolerance With Colon and Gastric Cancers: Friend or Foe?

Background: Lactose intolerance (LI) appears usually in later ages when the lactase enzyme becomes deficient or absent in the small intestine. Conflicting results have been reported in the literature about the association of lactose intolerance with various gastrointestinal malignancies. Hence, our aim was to study the association between LI, colon cancer (CCa), and gastric cancer (GC) using a large database. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2004 and 2014. We identified adult patients (18-90 years) who were diagnosed with LI (study group) using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. The control group comprised patients who did not have a diagnosis of LI. We identified the diagnosis of CCa and GC in both study and control groups using the ICD-9 codes. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between LI, CCa, and GC. Results: The total population comprised 71,360,501 patients, of which 57,909 (0.08%) were diagnosed with LI. LI patients were older (62 vs 51 years) with more females (61.5% vs 60.1%) and less African American patients (11.8% vs 14.3%) (p <0.0001 for all). In addition, LI patients had more smoking (12.4% vs 12%) and obesity (15% vs 8.9%). On the other hand, patients in the LI group had less alcohol use (3.8% vs 4.2%) (p <0.0001). After adjusting for the age, gender, race, smoking, alcohol, obesity, and inflammatory bowel disease, the LI group had a slightly lower rate of CCa (OR 0 .974, 95%CI 0.906-1.048, p = 0.486) and a lower rate of GC (OR: 0.993, 95%CI 0.924-1.068, p =0.853); however, the results were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Patients with lactose intolerance may have a lower risk of colon and gastric cancer. However, these findings were not statistically significant. Further studies are needed to understand this association.

Genetically proxied milk consumption and risk of colorectal, bladder, breast, and prostate cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have shown that milk consumption is inversely associated with colorectal, bladder, and breast cancer risk, but positively associated with prostate cancer. However, whether the associations reflect causality remains debatable. We investigated the potential causal associations of milk consumption with the risk of colorectal, bladder, breast, and prostate cancer using a genetic variant near the LCT gene as proxy for milk consumption.

METHODS

We obtained genetic association estimates for cancer from the UK Biobank (n = 367,643 women and men), FinnGen consortium (n = 135,638 women and men), Breast Cancer Association Consortium (n = 228,951 women), and Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome consortium (n = 140,254 men). Milk consumption was proxied by a genetic variant (rs4988235 or rs182549) upstream of the gene encoding lactase, which catalyzes the breakdown of lactose.

RESULTS

Genetically proxied milk consumption was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer. The odds ratio (OR) for each additional milk intake increasing allele was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.99; P = 0.009). There was no overall association of genetically predicted milk consumption with bladder (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.94-1.05; P = 0.836), breast (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.02; P = 0.113), and prostate cancer (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.99-1.02; P = 0.389), but a positive association with prostate cancer was observed in the FinnGen consortium (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01-1.13; P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings strengthen the evidence for a protective role of milk consumption on colorectal cancer risk. There was no or limited evidence that milk consumption affects the risk of bladder, breast, and prostate cancer.

Routine disaccharidase testing: are we there yet?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Disaccharidase testing, as applied to the evaluation of gastrointestinal disturbances is available but it is not routinely considered in the diagnostic work-up. The purpose of this review was to determine if disaccharidase testing is clinically useful and to consider how the results could alter patient management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Indicate that carbohydrate maldigestion could contribute functional bowel disorders and negatively impact the fecal microbiome. Diagnostic techniques include enzyme activity assays performed on random endoscopically obtained small intestinal biopsies, immunohistochemistry, stable isotope tracer and nonenriched substrate load breath testing, and genetic testing for mutations. More than 40 sucrase--isomaltase gene variants coding for defective or reduced enzymatic activity have been reported and deficiency conditions are more common than previously thought.

SUMMARY

The rationale for disaccharidase activity testing relates to a need to fully assess unexplained recurrent abdominal discomfort and associated symptoms. All disaccharidases share the same basic mechanism of mucosal expression and deficiency has far reaching consequences. Testing for disaccharidase expression appears to have an important role in symptom evaluation, but there are accuracy and logistical issues that should be considered. It is likely that specific recommendations for patient management, dietary modification, and enzyme supplementation would come from better testing methods.