The Management of Retained Rectal Foreign Body

A Perilous Plunge: A Unique Case of Rectal Foreign Body

Rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are foreign bodies in the rectum that pose a challenge to the surgeons in the emergency department. We report a case of an RFB; the patient was a 30-year-old man who put a glass bottle into his rectum on his own. The 10-cm bottle was successfully retrieved through the transanal approach without complication. The patient had no sign of injury or bleeding after the procedure. The patient was stable and was discharged with counseling to avoid such conduct. An effective approach for extraction is to have a structured protocol encompassing prompt diagnosis, extraction techniques, and post-removal assessment. In addition, there is a psychological aspect to RFBs that requires counseling and patient education.

Rectal foreign body of a cosmetic bottle treated successfully by transanal retrieval: A case report

RATIONALE

Retained rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are unusual clinical presentations whose management is challenging for emergency physicians owing to variations in the object types, anorectal anatomy, sacral curvature, insertion times, and local contamination. Here, we present the diagnosis and treatment in 1 case of retained rectal foreign body.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 62-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a cosmetic bottle inserted into the rectum while bathing. He had difficulty defecating and denied any underlying psychiatric illness. Before coming to the hospital, the patient attempted to remove the cosmetic bottle with a screwdriver but failed, causing the cosmetic bottle to penetrate further into the intestinal lumen. The patient felt that the anal bulging was gradually worsening.

DIAGNOSES

Investigations, a digital rectal examination, and coronal abdominal computed tomography revealed a foreign body stuck in the rectum.

INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES

After lateral internal sphincterotomy, the cosmetic bottle's plastic cap was pinched using a towel clamp and rotated slowly. The patient had an uneventful recovery period; the difficult defecation and anal bulging were relieved.

LESSONS

This case proves that lateral internal sphincterotomy can be performed to remove retained rectal foreign bodies if sufficient sphincter relaxation and anal dilatation cannot be achieved with proper anesthesia.

Minimally invasive techniques as adjuncts in low- versus high-lying retained rectal foreign bodies of autoerotic nature in young men: a tailored management algorithm with two contrasting case reports from India

Retained rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) of an autoerotic nature represent an emerging and rare surgical emergency, posing a sensitive challenge for surgeons. RFBs exhibit a wide range of presentations and require varied management approaches, with the choice of treatment modality differing from case to case. Recently, minimally invasive techniques have been employed for the retrieval of RFBs. In 2021, the World Society of Emergency Surgery and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma released guidelines on anorectal emergencies, highlighting the usefulness of these techniques as adjunctive tools for both diagnosis and ruling out associated complications. In this report, we describe two noteworthy cases of men who presented to the trauma emergency department with foreign bodies lodged in their rectums. We also highlight the potential role of minimally invasive techniques within a "step-up" approach for the management of retained RFBs.

Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic method for foreign body removal from descending colon: A case report

BACKGROUND

The majority of published reports on foreign bodies (FBs) involve the rectum and applied a transanal retrieval. Usually, patients with FB above the rectum are subjected to laparotomy for removal. Here, we illustrate the case of a man with an FB that had migrated into the descending colon, and its successful removal via a laparoscopic approach.

CASE SUMMARY

A 43-year-old man, who had the habit of FB insertion into his anus to aid defecation, presented upon experience of such an FB slipping through and migrating upward to the distal colon. Plain abdominal radiograph revealed a bottle-shaped FB, positioned in the left iliac fossa region. The FB was successfully removed via a laparoscopic-assisted procedure in which we combined diagnostic laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques during surgery. The patient was monitored for 2 d postoperatively and subsequently discharged home.

CONCLUSION

A minimally invasive approach should be adopted to aid extraction of colorectal FB as it is effective and safe.

Proposal of an algorithm for the management of rectally inserted foreign bodies: a surgical single-center experience with review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Retained rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are uncommon clinical findings. Although the management of RFBs is rarely reported in the literature, clinicians regularly face this issue. To date, there is no standardized management of RFBs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate our own data and subsequently develop a treatment algorithm.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who presented between January 2006 and December 2019 with rectally inserted RFBs at the emergency department of the Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany, were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathologic features, management, complications, and outcomes were assessed. Based on this experience, a treatment algorithm was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 69 presentations with rectally inserted RFBs were documented in 57 patients. In 23/69 cases (33.3%), the RFB was removed transanally by the emergency physician either digitally (n = 14) or with the help of a rigid rectoscope (n = 8) or a colonoscope (n = 1). In 46/69 cases (66.7%), the RFB was removed in the operation theater under general anesthesia with muscle relaxation. Among these, 11/46 patients (23.9%) underwent abdominal surgery, either for manual extraction of the RFB (n = 9) or to exclude a bowel perforation (n = 2). Surgical complications occurred in 3/11 patients. One patient with rectal perforation developed pelvic sepsis and underwent abdominoperineal extirpation in the further clinical course.

CONCLUSION

The management of RFBs can be challenging and includes a wide range of options from removal without further intervention to abdominoperineal extirpation in cases of pelvic sepsis. Whenever possible, RFBs should obligatorily be managed in specialized colorectal centers following a clear treatment algorithm.

Deodorant aerosol spray can in the rectum: a potential fire hazard during surgery

Rectal foreign bodies are not uncommon and often pose a serious challenge to surgeons. In majority, the objects are inserted by self in children, psychiatric patients and for sexual gratification in adults. Various rectal foreign bodies have been reported. Deodorant aerosol spray can in the rectum has not been reported previously. Danger of aerosol dispenser can is the risk of fire and explosion. Especially during any surgical procedures to remove the foreign body using cautery or any energy devices. We report of a rare foreign body of deodorant aerosol spray can in the rectum in a young male patient, which was removed under general anaesthesia.