Beware of Early Relapse in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy

Efficacies of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision or other types of surgery: an updated meta-analysis

Background

An updated meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) or other types of surgery (non-TME-only).

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases were searched. Data on overall survival (OS) were extracted.

Results

Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS associated with preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), preoperative radiotherapy alone, and postoperative radiotherapy in patients treated with TME were 1.02 [95% CI: 0.92-1.14, P = 0.65], 1.04 [95% CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.47], 0.87 [95% CI: 0.61-1.25, P = 0.46], and 1.18 [95% CI: 0.91-1.52, P = 0.20], respectively. HRs for OS associated with preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative LCCRT, preoperative radiotherapy alone, preoperative long-course RT (LCRT), and preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery were 0.85 [95% CI: 0.79-0.90, P < 0.00001], 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94, P = 0.009], 0.86 [95% CI: 0.80-0.92, P < 0.0001], 0.83 [95% CI: 0.73-0.95, P = 0.005], and 0.84 [95% CI: 0.77-0.91, P= <0.0001], respectively. The HR for postoperative radiotherapy in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery was 1.08 [95% CI: 0.84-1.39, P = 0.57].

Conclusion

Preoperative radiotherapy, regardless of the regimen, improves the OS in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery, but not in those treated with TME. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve OS.

Advances in knowledge

This meta-analysis will serve as a reference for decision-making in multidisciplinary approaches for rectal cancer patients.

The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

This study aims to oncologic outcomes of the watch-and-wait (WW) strategy compared with radical resection (RR).

Methods

Patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and achieved ≤ycT2 between 2008 and 2016 were included. The mean follow-up time was 61 months (range, 0-168 months). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. A total of 446 patients were included, and WW was adopted for 34 patients.

Results

WW patients were older (P = 0.022) and less advanced initial cT stage (P = 0.004). Ten patients in the WW group (29.4%) experienced local regrowth. Later, distant metastases occurred in 7 of these patients. The 5-year RFS (74.1% vs. 79.5%), DMFS (74.1% vs. 81.6%), and OS (90.4% vs. 87.7%) for the WW and RR groups were not statistically different. However, LRFS in the WW group was significantly lower (65.1% vs. 97.0%, P < 0.001). The initial cT stage was associated with RFS (P = 0.019) and LRFS (P = 0.037). WW was an independent risk factor for LRFS (P < 0.001) and DMFS (P = 0.024). After 1:4 propensity score matching between the WW and RR groups, there was no difference in RFS and OS. However, the 5-year LRFS (67.5% vs. 96.5%) and DMFS (73.2% vs. 86.4%) demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the groups.

Conclusion

By appointing the WW strategy, oncologic safety was not ensured. The WW strategy must be implemented with caution in patients with ≤ycT2 stage, particularly those with advanced initial cT stage.

Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates

Tumors with good response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy have a favorable prognosis, and these findings raise interest in rectum-sparing strategies. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcome between local excision and radical resection in ypT0-1 patients and to analyze prognostic factors. Patients with primary rectal cancer diagnosed with ypT0-1 after PCRT followed by either radical resection (RR) or local excision (LE) between 2005 and 2014 were included in this study (LE = 78, RR = 442). Clinicopathologic features, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and OS were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in the RFS and OS between the LE and RR groups. Clinical T stage (cT3-4) before PCRT was related to RFS and in the LE group (p = 0.022). Lymph node metastasis (HR: 4.884, 95% confidence interval: 2.451-9.732, p < 0.001) in the final pathology was the only factor associated with RFS, showing a statistically significant difference in the RR group. Lymph node metastasis and age were associated with OS in the RR group. This study confirms the oncologic feasibility of LE in ypT0-1 rectal cancer after PCRT. Additionally, careful patient selection with higher accuracy modalities should be updated to improve treatment outcomes of LE.

Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study

This study aimed to assess whether surveillance intensity is associated with recurrence and survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Overall, 3794 patients with pathologic stage I-III CRC who underwent radical surgery between January 2012 and December 2014 were examined. Surveillance comprised abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) every 6 months and chest CT annually for 5 years. Patients who underwent more than and less than an average of three imaging examinations annually were assigned to the high-intensity (HI) and low-intensity (LI) groups, respectively. Demographics were similar in both groups. T and N stages were higher and perineural and lymphovascular invasion were more frequent in the HI group (p < 0.001 each). The mean overall survival (OS) was similar for both groups; however, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was longer (p < 0.001) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) was shorter (p = 0.024) in the LI group. In the multivariate analysis, surveillance intensity was associated with RFS (p < 0.001) in contrast to PRS (p = 0.731). In patients with high recurrence risk predicted using the nomogram, OS was longer in the HI group (p < 0.001). A higher imaging frequency in patients at high risk of recurrence could be expected to lead to a slight increase in PRS but does not improve OS. Therefore, rather than increasing the number of CT scans in high-risk patients, other imaging modalities or innovative approaches, such as liquid biopsy, are required.