Clinical characteristics of ischemic colitis according to location

Ischemic Colitis in a Young Female Following Herbal Supplement Ingestion

Ischemic colitis is typically considered a disease of the elderly, given their atherosclerotic risk factors and other comorbidities. Ischemic colitis in the younger population is considered very uncommon. We present an interesting case of a young female presenting with abdominal pain and hematochezia found to have ischemic colitis on pathological biopsy results after a colonoscopy. She was an otherwise healthy female with no medical problems prior to her hospitalization but endorsed recent use of a bitter herbal tea to relieve her symptoms. Here, we review potential causes of ischemic colitis, including herbal remedies, which have been linked to causing hypercoagulable and hypotensive states.

Ischemic colitis. Does right colon location mean worst prognosis?

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with ischemic colitis have a favourable evolution; nevertheless, the location in the right colon has been associated with a worse prognosis. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical presentation and results of right colon ischemic colitis (CICD) with ischemic colitis of other colonic segments (non-CIDC).

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of patients admitted to our hospital with ischemic colitis between 1993 and 2014, identified through a computerized search of ICD9 codes. They were divided into 2 groups: CICD and non-CICD. Comorbidities, clinical presentation, need for surgery, and mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression adjusting for age and sex. Statistical significance was established at a value of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients were identified, 61 (30%) with CICD; 61% of CICD patients required surgery compared to 22% of non-CICD patients (P < 0.001). Differences in post-surgical mortality (32% vs 55%) and overall mortality (20% vs 15%) were not statistically significant. CICD patients had more commonly unfavourable outcomes than non-CICD patients (61% vs 25%, P < 0.001). The odds ratio (OR) for surgery was 5.28 and 4.47 for unfavourable outcomes for patients with CICD.

CONCLUSIONS

CICD patients have a worse prognosis than non-CICD patients, 5 times more likely to need surgery and 4 times more likely to have unfavourable outcomes.

Ischemic colitis. Does right colon location mean worst prognosis?

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with ischemic colitis have a favourable evolution; nevertheless, the location in the right colon has been associated with a worse prognosis. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical presentation and results of right colon ischemic colitis (CICD) with ischemic colitis of other colonic segments (non-CIDC).

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of patients admitted to our hospital with ischemic colitis between 1993 and 2014, identified through a computerized search of ICD9 codes. They were divided into 2 groups: CICD and non-CICD. Comorbidities, clinical presentation, need for surgery, and mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression adjusting for age and sex. Statistical significance was established at a value of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients were identified, 61 (30%) with CICD; 61% of CICD patients required surgery compared to 22% of non-CICD patients (P < 0.001). Differences in post-surgical mortality (32% vs 55%) and overall mortality (20% vs 15%) were not statistically significant. CICD patients had more commonly unfavourable outcomes than non-CICD patients (61% vs 25%, P < 0.001). The odds ratio (OR) for surgery was 5.28 and 4.47 for unfavourable outcomes for patients with CICD.

CONCLUSIONS

CICD patients have a worse prognosis than non-CICD patients, 5 times more likely to need surgery and 4 times more likely to have unfavourable outcomes.

Real-world multicentre experience of the pathological features of colonic ischaemia and their relationship to symptom duration, disease distribution and clinical outcome

AIM

To determine the pathological features of colonic ischaemia (CI) and their relationship to symptom duration, disease distribution and clinical outcome in a real-world, clinical setting.

METHOD

A retrospective, multicentre chart review was performed in patients diagnosed with CI at Montefiore Medical Center (January 2005 to July 2015), and Yale-New Haven Hospital (January 2005 to June 2010). Patients were included if clinical presentation, colonoscopic findings and colonic pathology were all consistent with CI.

RESULTS

Six hundred and sixteen patients with pathologically proven CI were included. Common pathological findings included inflammation (51.1%), ulceration (38.2%), fibrosis (26.0%) and necrosis (20.4%). Infarction and ghost cells were seen in 1.6% and 0.2% of cases, respectively. There was a significant relationship between symptom duration and hyalinization of the lamina propria (P = 0.05) and cryptitis/crypt abscesses (P = 0.01). Patients with isolated right CI (IRCI) were more likely than patients with isolated left CI (ILCI) to exhibit necrosis (P < 0.01), cryptitis/crypt abscess (P < 0.01) and inflammation (P = 0.03). Patients with poor outcomes were more likely to exhibit necrosis (P < 0.01) and capillary fibrin thrombi (P < 0.01) and less likely to exhibit fibrosis (P < 0.01) and epithelial changes (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

CI is accompanied by a broad spectrum of pathological findings. The traditional pathognomonic findings of CI are rare and cannot be relied upon to exclude the diagnosis. Patients with IRCI and/or poor outcomes were more likely to have pathological findings of necrosis than patients who had ILCI and/or nonpoor outcomes.

Colonic ischemia: usual and unusual presentations and their management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of colonic ischemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Formerly regarded as a rare cause of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage, colonic ischemia is now recognized to be the most common manifestation of intestinal vascular compromise. In contrast to ischemic events in the small intestine wherein thrombotic and embolic events predominate, colonic ischemia typically results from a global reduction in blood flow to the colon and no occlusive lesion(s) are evident. Several risk factors for colonic ischemia have been identified and, together with an appropriate clinical presentation and patient demographics, create a context in which the clinician should have a high level of suspicion for its presence. Imaging with computerized tomography, in particular, may be highly supportive of the diagnosis, which where appropriate can be confirmed by colonoscopy and colonic biopsy. For most patients, management is supportive and noninterventional, and the prognosis for recurrence and survival are excellent.

SUMMARY

Colonic ischemia is a common cause of lower abdominal pain and hemorrhage among the elderly typically occurring in the aftermath of an event which led to hypoperfusion of the colon. For most affected individuals the ischemia is reversible and clinical course benign.

The predictors of the severity of ischaemic colitis: a systematic review of 2823 patients from 22 studies

AIM

The study reviews the literature related to ischaemic colitis (IC) as the evidence base to identify factors predicting severity.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on the predictors of the severity of IC. Severe IC or adverse outcome of IC was defined as a patient requiring surgery or who died. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to 15 January 2015. Manual searches of reference lists from potentially relevant papers and meetings were also performed.

RESULTS

In all, 22 studies involving 2823 patients were identified; 19 were case series, two were case-control studies and one was a cohort study. The overall adverse outcome rate was 22.0% (620/2823). The prognostic predictors for surgery or mortality which were most frequently reported included right sided IC, peritonitis, shock or arterial hypotension (< 90 mmHg), male gender, tachycardia and lack of rectal bleeding. Thirteen studies relating to the right colon from which data could be extracted were further analysed. The right colon was involved in 277 cases, with an incidence of adverse outcomes of 48.4% (134/277), while in the non-right colonic involvement group the incidence was significantly lower at 12.1% (142/1175) (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of adverse outcome in patients with IC remains high. Male gender, tachycardia, lack of rectal bleeding, peritonitis, shock or arterial hypotension (< 90 mmHg) and right sided IC are predictors of poor prognosis. Right-sided IC, shock or arterial hypotension (< 90 mmHg) and signs of peritonitis may be the most significant predictors of severity.

Right-Side Colon Ischemia: Clinical Features, Large Visceral Artery Occlusion, and Long-Term Follow-Up

CONTEXT

Large visceral artery occlusion (LVAO) could underlie right-side colon ischemia (RSCI) but is little known.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patients with RSCI through long-term follow-up, including features and management of LVAO.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mesenteric ischemia and mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study in an integrated health care system.

RESULTS

Of 49 patients (30 women [61.2%]; mean [standard deviation] age, 69.4 [11.9] years), 19 (38.8%) underwent surgery—that is, 5 (83.3%) of 6 who developed RSCI in hospital following surgical procedures and 14 (32.6%) of 43 who had RSCI before hospitalization (p value = 0.03); overall, 5 (10.2%) died. Among 44 survivors with a median (range) follow-up of 5.19 (0.03-14.26) years, 5 (11.4%), including 3 (20.0%) of 15 operated cases, had symptomatic LVAO and underwent angioplasty and stent placement: 2 for abdominal angina that preceded RSCI, 1 for acute mesenteric ischemia 1 week after resection of RSCI, 1 for RSCI 6 weeks after resection of left-side ischemia, and 1 for abdominal angina that began 3 years after spontaneous recovery from RSCI. None had further mesenteric ischemia until death from nonintestinal disease or the end of follow-up (1.6 to 10.2 years later). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for all 44 survivors at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 88.6%, 72.3%, 57.6%, and 25.9%, respectively. Thirty-one patients (70.4%) died during follow-up, 19 (61.3%) of a known cause; the 39 patients not treated for LVAO lacked mesenteric ischemia.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RSCI may have symptomatic LVAO; therefore, we advise they undergo careful query for symptoms of abdominal angina and routine visceral artery imaging.

Ischemic colitis: spectrum of CT findings, sites of involvement and severity

To summarize the frequency of findings on IV contrast, enhanced computer tomography (CT) in 335 patients with pathologically proven ischemic colitis (IC) determine the most frequent locations and patterns of involvement and establish the correlation of these findings with the severity of IC. 231 patients were excluded for not having a concomitant CT or for having underlying comorbidities. 104 cases were analyzed. Scans were evaluated for abnormal wall enhancement (AE), bowel wall thickening (BWT), bowel dilatation (DIL), mesenteric fat stranding (FS), venous engorgement (VE), pericolonic free fluid (FF), and pneumatosis (PN) and portomesenteric venous gas. Segmental versus pancolonic involvement was noted. Severity was determined by histopathology criteria. Data obtained are as follows: female to male incidence, 69 % (70) vs. 31 % (34); average age, 64.5; and positive CT, 102/104 (98.1 %). The most frequent findings include FS (88 %), BWT (88 %), and AE (82 %) regardless of severity of involvement. Statistically significant increased risk ratio and likelihood of severe ischemia for PN, DIL, and FF individually. BWT, DIL, FS, FF, VE, and PN together have a probability for severe IC of 91.8 %. A correlation between fewer findings and milder IC was found (R (2) = 0.6771). The most frequently involved segments: descending (64 %) and sigmoid colon (54 %). Splenic flexure (SF) was infrequently involved (n = 8, 7.84 %). Females had two times higher incidence of IC. The most frequent CT findings in IC are FS, BWT, and AE regardless of the severity. PN is suggestive of severe IC. Segmental involvement is the predominant pattern. The distal colon is more frequently involved. SF contrary to the conventional literature is not disproportionately involved in IC.

CT findings in acute, subacute, and chronic ischemic colitis: suggestions for diagnosis

Purpose. This paper aims at evaluating CT findings of occlusive and nonocclusive ischemic colitis (IC), in correlation with the etiology and the different phases of the disease. Materials and Methods. CT examination and clinical history of 32 patients with proven IC were retrospectively reviewed. The CT findings were analyzed according to the different phases of the disease (acute, subacute, and chronic). Results. Among the 32 CT examinations performed in the acute phase, 62.5% did not present signs of occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), whereas IMA occlusion was detected in 37.5% of CT examinations. In the acute phase, the presence of pericolic fluid was found in 100% of patients undergoing progressive resorption from acute to subacute phase if an effective reperfusion occurred; the bowel wall thickening was observed in 28.1% patients in acute phase and in 86.4% patients evaluated in subacute phase. The unthickened colonic wall was found in all conditions where ischemia was not followed by effective reperfusion (71.9% of cases), and it was never found in chronic phase, when the colon appeared irregularly thickened. Conclusion. CT allows determining the morphofunctional alterations associated with the IC discriminating the occlusive forms from the nonocclusive forms. CT, furthermore, allows estimating the timing of ischemic damage.

Severe hyperkalemia following colon diversion surgery in a patient undergoing chronic hemodialysis: a case report

Introduction

Potassium (K⁺) homeostasis in healthy subjects is maintained mainly by urinary excretion of K⁺. In patients with end-stage renal disease, the intestinal tract might assume an accessory K⁺ excretory role in the face of declining renal excretory function. Here, we report the case of a patient with end-stage renal disease who developed severe hyperkalemia following colon diversion surgery.

Case presentation

A 56-year-old Caucasian woman undergoing hemodialysis experienced ischemic colitis, leading to ileocecal resection and a temporary ileostomy. She made a good recovery and her dietary intake improved. However, her pre-dialysis serum K⁺ level three weeks later was 7.2mmol/L, which was much higher than her previous level (range 4.9 to 6.1mmol/L). Despite dietary restriction of K⁺ and use of oral cation-exchange resin and low K⁺ dialysate, her serum K⁺ level remained high (6.1 to 8.3mmol/L). Six months later, her bowel continuity was restored and her serum K⁺ decreased to the previous level. Her fecal K⁺ concentration before and after stoma reversal showed a marked difference: 23mmol/L before and 60mmol/L after.

Conclusions

We assume that the severe hyperkalemia seen in our patient was caused by reduced colonic K⁺ secretion due to the colon diversion. Our patient’s case demonstrates the importance of colonic K⁺ secretion for the maintenance of K⁺ homeostasis in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Intestinal Ischemia: US-CT findings correlations

Background

Intestinal ischemia is an abdominal emergency that accounts for approximately 2% of gastrointestinal illnesses. It represents a complex of diseases caused by impaired blood perfusion to the small and/or large bowel including acute arterial mesenteric ischemia (AAMI), acute venous mesenteric ischemia (AVMI), non occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI), ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R), ischemic colitis (IC). In this study different study methods (US, CT) will be correlated in the detection of mesenteric ischemia imaging findings due to various etiologies.

Methods

Basing on experience of our institutions, over 200 cases of mesenteric ischemia/infarction investigated with both US and CT were evaluated considering, in particular, the following findings: presence/absence of arterial/venous obstruction, bowel wall thickness and enhancement, presence/absence of spastic reflex ileus, hypotonic reflex ileus or paralitic ileus, mural and/or portal/mesenteric pneumatosis, abdominal free fluid, parenchymal ischemia/infarction (liver, kidney, spleen).

Results

To make an early diagnosis useful to ensure a correct therapeutic approach, it is very important to differentiate between occlusive (arterial,venous) and nonocclusive causes (NOMI). The typical findings of each forms of mesenteric ischemia are explained in the text.

Conclusion

At present, the reference diagnostic modality for intestinal ischaemia is contrast-enhanced CT. However, there are some disadvantages associated with these techniques, such as radiation exposure, potential nephrotoxicity and the risk of an allergic reaction to the contrast agents. Thus, not all patients with suspected bowel ischaemia can be subjected to these examinations. Despite its limitations, US could constitutes a good imaging method as first examination in acute settings of suspected mesenteric ischemia.