Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: focus on bronchial neuroendocrine tumors

Well-differentiated bronchial neuroendocrine tumors (B-NETs) are rare. They represent 1-5 % of all lung cancers. The incidence of these neoplasms has risen over the past 30 years and, especially for advanced or metastatic disease, management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is the most important first-line therapy, in particular in well-differentiated NETs with high somatostatin type receptor (SSTR) expression. In these tumors, the role of mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) inhibitors and the potential utility of other target therapies remain unclear while chemotherapy represents the gold standard treatment only for aggressive forms with low SSTR expression. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging treatment modality for advanced NETs. There are many cumulative evidences about the effectiveness and tolerability of this therapeutic approach, especially in gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NETs. For B-NETs, scientific research is moving more slowly. Here, we performed a review in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT with a focus on patients with inoperable or metastatic well-differentiated B-NETs.

Can peptide receptor radionuclide therapy be safely applied in florid bone metastases? A pilot analysis of late stage osseous involvement

AIM

Highly advanced metastatic bone disease with extensive osseous infiltration of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) may preclude patients from treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in concern about haematotoxicity. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of PRRT with 177Lu-octreotate in a patient cohort with this condition.

PATIENTS, METHODS

41 PRRT courses were performed in 11 patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) and florid bone metastases (severely advanced widespread metastatic bone disease). A mean activity of 6.95 GBq 177Lu-octreotate was administered per treatment cycle, aimed at four courses with standard intervals of 3 months. Haematological parameters were determined prior to each treatment course, in 2-4 weeks intervals between the courses, 8-12 weeks after the last course of PRRT and in 3 monthly intervals thereafter. Toxicity was recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Restaging was performed 3 months after termination of PRRT with CT/MRI and functional imaging (modified MDA criteria).

RESULTS

Significant (grade III-IV), reversible haematotoxicity occurred in 4 (35%) patients and after 10 (24%) administrations. It either resolved spontaneously (1 patient) or was controlled by supportive measures (3 patients), such as blood transfusions (3 patients) or deferral of the subsequent therapy cycle (1 patient). Patients returned to baseline blood values within up to 23 months after termination of PRRT. The observed treatment response of bone metastases consisted of a partial response in 2, a minor response in 1, stable disease in 7, and progressive disease in 1 patient. Of the 4 patients with metastatic bone pain, 1 experienced complete and 3 partial resolution of symptoms within 3-10 weeks after commencement of PRRT.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary data indicate that PRRT with 177Lu-octreotate can be safely applied even in florid bone metastases with extensive, severely advanced osseous replacement. The higher myelosuppression rate was not associated with serious complications and should not preclude patients from being treated and potentially experiencing remarkable treatment efficacy despite the very advanced stage.