A new method for segmentation of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume using the peritumoural halo layer and a 10-step colour scale. A study in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography using 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-18-fluoro-D-glucose peri-tumoral halo uptake layer method outperforms magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound methods in tumor size measurement of breast cancer

As a non-invasive method, positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) using 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-18-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) is applied as a useful modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. By evaluating glucose metabolism, this method can also be used in staging, restaging and post-therapeutic response evaluation. To evaluate the reliability of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-based peri-tumoral halo uptake layer (PHL) method for assessing tumor size, a total of 79 female patients with breast cancer who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, breast ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations were included in the present study. Upon examination by two independent nuclear medicine radiologists, tumor sizes were estimated by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT using margins defined as the inner line of the PHL. Pathological tumor sizes were evaluated on the direction of largest diameter indicated by previous imaging examination, which were also utilized as final standards. Statistical analysis of the results suggested that ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had a more linear correlation with pathology compared with breast ultrasound (r²=0.89 vs. 0.73) and MRI (r²=0.89 vs. 0.69) in terms of tumor size estimation, including a significantly lower bias in size difference relative to pathology. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT also exhibited improved performance compared with breast ultrasound and MRI in T stage assessment. These results indicated that the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-based PHL method was superior to breast ultrasound and MRI, and that it provides sufficient reliability and high accuracy for measuring tumor size in patients with breast cancer.

Accurate FDG PET tumor segmentation using the peritumoral halo layer method: a study in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

In a previous study, FDG PET tumor segmentation (SegPHL) using the peritumoral halo layer (PHL) was more reliable than fixed threshold methods in patients with thyroid cancer. We performed this study to validate the reliability and accuracy of the PHL method in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs), which can be larger and more heterogeneous than thyroid cancers.

Methods

A total of 121 ESCC patients (FDG avid = 85 (70.2%); FDG non-avid = 36 (29.8%)) were enrolled in this study. In FDG avid ESCCs, metabolic tumor length (ML) using SegPHL (ML_PHL), fixed SUV 2.5 threshold (ML_2.5), and fixed 40% of maximum SUV (SUVmax) (ML_40%) were measured. Regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate associations between ML, endoscopic tumor length (EL), and pathologic tumor length (PL). A comparison test was performed to evaluate the absolute difference between ML and PL. Correlation with tumor threshold determined by the PHL method (PHL tumor threshold) and SUVmax was evaluated.

Results

ML_PHL, ML_2.5, and ML_40% correlated well with EL (R² = 0.6464, 0.5789, 0.3321, respectively; p < 0.001) and PL (R² = 0.8778, 0.8365, 0.6266, respectively; p < 0.001). However, ML_2.5 and ML_40% showed significant proportional error with regard to PL; there was no significant error between ML_PHL and PL. ML_PHL showed the smallest standard deviation on Bland-Altman analyses. The absolute differences between ML and PL were significantly smaller for ML_PHL and ML_40% than for ML_2.5 (p < 0.0001). The PHL tumor threshold showed an inverse correlation with SUVmax (σ = − 0.923, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

SegPHL was more accurate than fixed threshold methods in ESCC. The PHL tumor threshold was adjusted according to SUVmax of ESCC.