1
|
Sinha SD, Perapogu S, Chary S S, Ramesh S, Bakshi J, Singh A, Ahmed AK, Mohan Reddy B, Panapakam M, Talluri L, Vattipalli R. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination of Bilastine-Montelukast in adult patients with allergic rhinitis: a phase III, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, active controlled clinical study. J Asthma 2023; 60:2014-2020. [PMID: 37140964 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2209175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are potent inflammatory mediators in allergic rhinitis (AR). Studies involving other combinations of antihistaminics (Levocetirizine) and highly selective leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTA) (Montelukast) combination have shown additive benefits and are widely prescribed for AR. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bilastine 20 mg and Montelukast 10 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy in patients with AR. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, comparative, parallel, phase III study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of Bilastine 20 mg and Montelukast 10 mg FDC at 16 tertiary care otolaryngology centres in India. Adult patients with AR for one year with IgE antibody positive and 12-h NSS score >36 in 3 days were randomized to receive either Bilastine 20 mg and Montelukast 10 mg or Montelukast 10 mg & Levocetirizine 5 mg tablets for 4 weeks. The change in total symptom score (nasal symptom scores (NSS) & non-nasal symptom scores (NNSS)) from baseline to week 4 was assessed as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included changes in TSS, NSS, NNSS, individual symptom scores (ISS), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life (RQLQ), discomfort due to rhinitis (VAS), and clinical global impression (CGI) scores. RESULTS The change in mean TSS from baseline to week 4 in Test group (16.6 units) was comparable to reference group (17 units) (p= 0.8876). The difference in change in mean NSS, NNSS and ISS from baseline to day 7, 14, 28 were comparable. RQLQ improved from baseline to Day 28. Significant improvements were observed in discomfort due to AR measured by VAS and CGI scores from baseline to day 14 and 28. The safety and tolerability of patients were comparable between the groups. All adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in severity. No patient discontinued due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS The FDC of Bilastine 20 mg and Montelukast 10 mg was efficacious and well tolerated in Indian patients with AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shubhadeep D Sinha
- Department of Clinical Development & Medical Affairs, Hetero, Hyderabad, Telengana, India
| | - Sridevi Perapogu
- Department of ENT, Government Medical College & Hospital, SPSR, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Sreenivasa Chary S
- Department of Clinical Development & Medical Affairs, Hetero, Hyderabad, Telengana, India
| | - S Ramesh
- Department of ENT, Govt Medical College & Govt General Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Jaimanti Bakshi
- Department of ENT, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ajit Singh
- Division of Allergy & Pulmonary Medicine, Dhanvantri OPD Block, SMS Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | | | - B Mohan Reddy
- Department of Clinical Development & Medical Affairs, Hetero, Hyderabad, Telengana, India
| | - Muralidhar Panapakam
- Department of Clinical Development & Medical Affairs, Hetero, Hyderabad, Telengana, India
| | - Leela Talluri
- Department of Clinical Development & Medical Affairs, Hetero, Hyderabad, Telengana, India
| | - Ramya Vattipalli
- Department of Clinical Development & Medical Affairs, Hetero, Hyderabad, Telengana, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ridolo E, Incorvaia C, Pucciarini F, Makri E, Paoletti G, Canonica GW. Current treatment strategies for seasonal allergic rhinitis: where are we heading? Clin Mol Allergy 2022; 20:9. [PMID: 35948975 PMCID: PMC9367100 DOI: 10.1186/s12948-022-00176-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allergic rhinitis (AR) is very commonly caused by pollens. The symptoms of AR consist of sneezing, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and airflow obstruction. The diagnosis has long been based on clinical history, skin prick tests and in vitro measurement of specific IgE, but the innovative approach of precision medicine has made diagnostic tools of much greater accuracy available. AREAS COVERED This review covers the advances in the treatment of seasonal AR concerning the drugs to be used according to the grade of disease and the characteristics of the patients, and the role of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), which is the only treatment capable of acting, in addition to the symptoms, on the cause of AR and therefore to modify its natural history. EXPERT OPINION Drug treatment of AR include a large number of agents, the choice of which depends on the severity of the disease. AIT has high evidence of efficacy demonstrated by meta-analyses, and further improvement is currently apparent, as for diagnosis, applying the means of precision medicine. However, when AIT is performed in current practice, without the strict rules of controlled trials, long-term low adherence is a major problem to be solved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erminia Ridolo
- Dept. Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
| | | | | | | | - Giovanni Paoletti
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Singh Randhawa A, Mohd Noor N, Md Daud MK, Abdullah B. Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 12:731201. [PMID: 35082662 PMCID: PMC8784885 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.731201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Bilastine is a non-sedating second generation H1 oral antihistamine (OAH) for treating allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. The effect of bilastine has not previously been evaluated in a meta-analysis. The aim of this review was to determine the efficacy and safety of bilastine in treating AR. An electronic literature search was performed using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Science Direct and Google Scholar up to March 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing bilastine with placebo and standard pharmacotherapy were included. The included studies must have diagnosis of AR established by clinicians and the outcomes must have a minimum of 2 weeks of follow-up period. The primary outcomes assessed were total symptom score (TSS), nasal symptom score (NSS) and non-nasal symptom score (NNSS). The secondary outcomes were discomfort due to rhinitis, quality of life (QOL) and adverse events. The risk of bias and quality of evidence for all studies were appraised. The meta-analysis was done using Review Manager 5.3 software based on the random-effects model. The search identified 135 records after removal of duplicates. Following screening and review of the records, fifteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Five trials involving 3,329 patients met the inclusion criteria. Bilastine was superior to placebo in improving TSS, NSS, NNSS, rhinitis discomfort score and QOL but has comparable efficacy with other OAHs in TSS, NSS, NNS, rhinitis discomfort score and QOL. There was no difference in adverse effects when bilastine was compared against placebo and other OAHs except for somnolence. Bilastine has fewer incidence of somnolence compared to cetirizine. The overall quality of evidence ranged from moderate to high quality. Bilastine is effective and safe in treating the overall symptoms of AR with comparable efficacy and safety with other OAHs except somnolence. Whilst bilastine has similar efficacy to cetirizine, somnolence is notably less in bilastine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aranjit Singh Randhawa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - Norhayati Mohd Noor
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Khairi Md Daud
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - Baharudin Abdullah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leceta A, García A, Sologuren A, Campo C. Bilastine 10 and 20 mg in paediatric and adult patients: an updated practical approach to treatment decisions. Drugs Context 2021; 10:dic-2021-5-1. [PMID: 34457015 PMCID: PMC8366504 DOI: 10.7573/dic.2021-5-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Bilastine, a non-sedating H1-antihistamine, is indicated to treat the symptoms of allergic disorders (e.g. rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria) in adults and adolescents and, more recently, in children. Following its marketing approval, many questions regarding the ideal use of bilastine in various clinical practice situations have been received by the Medical Information Department (MID) of Faes Farma Spain. This article is an update of a previous review, with a focus on recent clinical information on the use of bilastine in paediatric and other populations. Methods Results of recent clinical studies in paediatric and other populations as well as questions received and responses provided by the Faes Farma MID. Results The information regarding the use of bilastine in paediatric patients is the most relevant aspect of this updated review. The stepwise approval of the paediatric formulations in various countries started with the European Medicines Agency approval in 2017 in accordance with a 2009 Paediatric Investigation Plan, followed by approval in other countries. The queries that are most commonly received by the Faes Farma MID include the potential for drug interactions involving bilastine and other frequently used drugs, and the use of bilastine in special populations or to treat specific symptoms related to allergic conditions. As the concomitant use of many medications is not permitted during clinical trials, the advice provided regarding the concomitant use of other medications with bilastine considers the pharmacological properties of both the drug in question and bilastine, as well as expert opinion. Likewise, advice regarding the use of bilastine in special populations (e.g. patients with renal impairment, obesity, lactose intolerance, and elderly or pregnant individuals) or to treat specific symptoms (e.g. treatment-resistant urticaria, pruritus or BASCULE syndrome) considers the best evidence from a variety of sources, including clinical studies, real-world experience, guideline recommendations and expert opinion. Conclusion This updated review provides current data regarding the best use of bilastine in specific situations and patients and identifies areas in which further knowledge is required. Although decisions regarding the use of bilastine may be aided by expert opinion that relies on knowledge of the underlying science, additional research and evidence are required to answer certain queries regarding the use of bilastine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalia Leceta
- Medical Affairs Department, Faes Farma SA, Bizkaia, Spain
| | | | | | - Cristina Campo
- Head of Clinical Research Medical Affairs Department, Faes Farma SA, Bizkaia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tiotiu A, Novakova P, Baiardini I, Bikov A, Chong-Neto H, de-Sousa JC, Emelyanov A, Heffler E, Fogelbach GG, Kowal K, Labor M, Mihaicuta S, Nedeva D, Novakova S, Steiropoulos P, Ansotegui IJ, Bernstein JA, Boulet LP, Canonica GW, Dubuske L, Nunes C, Ivancevich JC, Santus P, Rosario N, Perazzo T, Braido F. Manifesto on united airways diseases (UAD): an Interasma (global asthma association - GAA) document. J Asthma 2021; 59:639-654. [PMID: 33492196 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1879130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The large amount of evidence and the renewed interest in upper and lower airways involvement in infectious and inflammatory diseases has led Interasma (Global Asthma Association) to take a position on United Airways Diseases (UAD). METHODS Starting from an extensive literature review, Interasma executive committee discussed and approved this Manifesto developed by Interasma scientific network (INES) members. RESULTS The manifesto describes the evidence gathered to date and defines, states, advocates, and proposes issues on UAD (rhinitis, rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis), and concomitant/comorbid lower airways disorders (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, obstructive sleep apnoea) with the aim of challenging assumptions, fostering commitment, and bringing about change. UAD refers to clinical pictures characterized by the coexistence of upper and lower airways involvement, driven by a common pathophysiological mechanism, leading to a greater burden on patient's health status and requiring an integrated diagnostic and therapeutic plan. The high prevalence of UAD must be taken into account. Upper and lower airways diseases influence disease control and patient's quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Patients with UAD need to have a timely and adequate diagnosis, treatment, and, when recommended, referral for management in a specialized center. Diagnostic testing including skin prick or serum specific IgE, lung function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), polysomnography, allergen-specific immunotherapies, biological therapies and home based continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) whenever these are recommended, should be part of the management plan for UAD. Education of medical students, physicians, health professionals, patients and caregivers on the UAD is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Tiotiu
- Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.,EA 3450 DevAH - Development, Adaptation and Disadvantage, Cardiorespiratory Regulations and Motor Control, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Plamena Novakova
- Clinic of Clinical Allergy, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ilaria Baiardini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andras Bikov
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Herberto Chong-Neto
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Jaime Correia- de-Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Alexander Emelyanov
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, North-Western Medical University named after I.I.Mechnikov, St-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Personalized Medicine, Asthma & Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Guillermo Guidos Fogelbach
- Clinic of Clinical Allergy, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.,Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Medicina y Homeopatía, Laboratorio de Bioquímica Estructural, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Krzysztof Kowal
- Department of Allergology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | | | - Stefan Mihaicuta
- Pulmonology Department, Cardio Prevent Foundation, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Dr Victor Babes", Timisoara, Romania
| | - Denislava Nedeva
- Clinic of Clinical Allergy, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Sylvia Novakova
- Allergy Unit of Internal Consulting Department, University Hospital "St. George", Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Paschalis Steiropoulos
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | | | - Jonathan A Bernstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Immunology, Allergy Section University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Personalized Medicine, Asthma & Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Lawrence Dubuske
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Carlos Nunes
- Centro de ImmunoAlergologia de Algarve, Porto, Portugal
| | - Juan Carlos Ivancevich
- Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, del Salvador University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pierachille Santus
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Division of Respiratory Diseases "L. Sacco" Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Tommaso Perazzo
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Fulvio Braido
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.,Respiratory Unit for Continuity of Care IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|