Palliative chemotherapy for patients 70 years of age and older with metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-centre experience

TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with a hypertensive elderly patient: a case report

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignant tumor worldwide. Approximately 20%-25% of patients have metastases at the time of initial diagnosis, and nearly half eventually develop metastatic cancer. The standard first- and second-line treatments for unresectable metastatic CRC are full-dose two-/three-agent chemotherapy with or without a combination of molecularly targeted agents. However, many patients are ineligible for intensive therapy due to poor performance status or advanced age. TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) in combination with bevacizumab may provide a new treatment strategy for patients with advanced CRC who are ineligible for intensive therapy.

Case report description

We report a case of a 91-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction in the presence of multiple metastases. The patient had a history of hypertension, had suffered from deep vein thrombosis of the left lower extremity, and was allergic to several drugs. Genetic testing showed multiple mutations in Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS), Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PIK3CA), and Tumor Protein p53 (TP53); microsatellite stability; and a tumor mutational burden of 4.5 Mut/Mb. The patient was diagnosed with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction in May 2020, with a clinical stage of cTxNxM1. Without surgery, the patient received first-line treatment with capecitabine in combination with bevacizumab, which was changed to second-line treatment with TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab after disease progression, with a progression-free survival of 10 months, achieving a significant survival benefit. Later, due to the patient's poor physical condition, no further medication was administered, and the patient died on 1 September 2022.

Conclusion

TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab for the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic CRC who are ineligible for intensive therapy is a promising treatment option.

First-line trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival analysis in the TASCO1 study

Background

Therapeutic options are limited in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The use of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) in this setting was evaluated in the TASCO1 trial; here, we present the final overall survival (OS) results.

Methods

TASCO1 was an open-label, non-comparative phase II trial. Patients (n = 153) were randomised 1:1 to TT-B (trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12, and bevacizumab intravenously 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B; capecitabine, 1250 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1–14 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle). Final OS was analysed when all patients had either died or withdrawn from the study. Adjusted multivariate regression was used to investigate the effects of pre-specified variables on OS.

Results

At 1 September 2020, median OS was 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.0–23.7) with TT-B and 17.7 months (95% CI: 12.6–19.8) with C-B (adjusted HR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.55–1.10). No variables negatively affected OS with TT-B. Safety results were consistent with prior findings.

Conclusions

TT-B is a promising therapeutic regimen in mCRC patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Clinical trial information

NCT02743221 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study

BACKGROUND

We designed an open-label, noncomparative phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B) in untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 29 April 2016 to 29 March 2017, 153 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either TT-B (N = 77) or C-B (N = 76). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The primary PFS analysis was performed after 100 events (radiological progression or death) were observed. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL; QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires), and safety.

RESULTS

Median (range) duration of treatment was 7.8 (6.0-9.7) months and 6.2 (4.1-9.1) months in the TT-B and C-B groups, respectively. Median (range) PFS was 9.2 (7.6-11.6) and 7.8 (5.5-10.1) months, respectively. Median (range) OS was 18 (15.2 to NA) and 16.2 (12.5 to NA) months, respectively. QoL questionnaires showed no relevant changes over time for either treatment. Therapies were well tolerated. Patients receiving TT-B had more grade ≥3 neutropenia (47% versus 5% with C-B). Patients receiving C-B had more grade ≥3 hand-foot syndrome (12% versus 0% with TT-B) and grade ≥3 diarrhea (8% versus 1% with TT-B), consistent with the known safety profiles of these agents.

CONCLUSION

TT-B treatment showed promising clinical activity in untreated patients with unresectable mCRC ineligible for intensive therapy, with an acceptable safety profile and no clinically relevant changes in QoL.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

NCT02743221 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Age-dependent differences in first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the DISCO study

OBJECTIVES

First-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is effective and feasible in selected older patients. We investigated age-dependent differences in treatment and outcomes in patients with mCRC in clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 654 patients with mCRC referred to first-line chemotherapy in 2008-2014. Patients were divided into two age groups: 50-69 and ≥70 (older patients). Binary outcomes were analyzed by logistic regression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression, CRC-specific and other-cause mortality with Fine and Gray proportional hazard model for the sub-distribution of a competing risk.

RESULTS

After adjusting for performance status (PS) and comorbidity, older patients were more likely to receive monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 9.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.52-17.91), lower doses, and no additional targeted therapy (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.28-2.78) than younger patients. Yet, older patients experienced more toxicity and hospitalizations (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17). Among those treated, older patients had shorter PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.32, 95% CI 1.11-1.57), but after adjusting for PS and comorbidity, PFS was similar. No significant difference was found in CRC mortality (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.95-1.40) between age groups. Poor PS was associated with shorter OS and PFS and higher CRC mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In the DISCO study, older patients with mCRC received less aggressive first-line chemotherapy. Yet, they experienced more toxicity. Younger and older patients had similar CRC mortality. Shorter PFS and higher CRC mortality were observed in patients with poor PS.

Real-World Adverse Effects of Capecitabine Toxicity in an Elderly Population

BACKGROUND

Few studies have assessed the safety and effectiveness of the numerous available chemotherapeutic therapies for geriatric oncology patients. Most safety studies are conducted in large trials, and there is some uncertainty surrounding whether the results would be the same in typical daily use.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aims to assess the adverse effects of real-world capecitabine use in elderly patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients treated with capecitabine in an oncology department of a University Clinic in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. We scored adverse effects such as hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea, and dosage adjustments and the reasons for them. In total, 132 patients were included, 69 of whom were aged 70 years or below (mean age: 57 years), while 63 were aged older than 70 years (mean age: 74 years).

RESULTS

Patients aged over 70 years experienced more serious adverse effects than younger patients. Grade 2 or 3 hand-foot syndrome toxicity was experienced by 20.2% of patients aged younger than 70 years and by 34.9% of patients older than 70 years (p = 0.059). Grade 2, 3, or 4 diarrhea was experienced by 17.4% of the patients aged younger than 70 years but by 31.7% of the patients aged older than 70 years (p = 0.044). Dosage was adjusted for 27/69 patients in the younger group and 52/63 patients in the older group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The difference in observed adverse effects cannot be the sole explanation for the high incidence of observed dose adjustments. A prospective follow-up study of elderly patients using capecitabine outside clinical trials is needed to evaluate the optimum balance between adverse effects and efficacy.

The effect of geriatric intervention in frail elderly patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomized trial (GERICO)

Background

Better surgical techniques, chemotherapy and biological therapy have improved survival in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), most markedly in younger patients. About half of patients over 70 years receive dose reductions or early treatment discontinuation of the planned adjuvant or first-line treatment due to side effects. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary evaluation of an elderly individual’s health status. This assessment in older patients with cancer can predict survival, chemotherapy toxicity and morbidity.

Methods

This randomized phase II trial (GERICO) is designed to investigate whether comprehensive geriatric assessment and intervention before and during treatment with chemotherapy in frail elderly patients with stages II–IV CRC will increase the number of patients completing chemotherapy. All patients ≥70 years in whom chemotherapy for CRC is planned to start at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital are screened for frailty using the G8 questionnaire at the first visit to the outpatient clinic. The G8 questionnaire is a multi-domain screening tool to identify frail or vulnerable patients at risk of increased toxicity and morbidity. Frail patients are offered inclusion and are then randomized to two groups (the intervention group and the control group). Patients in the intervention group receive a full geriatric assessment of comorbidity, medication, psycho-cognitive function, physical, functional and nutrition status, and interventions are undertaken on identified health issues. Simultaneously, they are treated for their cancer according to international guidelines. Patients in the control group receive the same chemotherapy regimens and standard of care. Primary outcome is number of patients completing scheduled chemotherapy at starting dose. Secondary outcomes are dose reductions, treatment delays, toxicity, time to recurrence, survival, cancer-related mortality and quality of life.

Discussion

This ongoing trial is one of the first to evaluate the effect of geriatric intervention in frail elderly patients with CRC. The trial will provide new and valuable knowledge about whether it is beneficial for the elderly patient undergoing chemotherapy to be treated simultaneously by a geriatrician.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02748811. The trial was registered retrospectively; registration date 04/28/2016.

The impact of age on first-line systemic therapy in patients with metachronous metastases from colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The paucity of evidence for the optimal use of systemic therapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) poses significant challenges to cancer specialists. The present population-based study provides insight into the impact of age on palliative systemic therapy in patients with metachronous metastases from CRC, in order to optimize the decision-making process.

METHODS

Data on the development and treatment of metachronous metastases were collected for patients with primary resected CRC diagnosed between 2003 and 2008 in the Eindhoven area of the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients undergoing surgery for metastases were excluded, resulting in a study population treated with palliative intent, with or without systemic therapy (n=746).

RESULTS

385 patients received palliative systemic therapy (52%). Patients aged ≥75years were less likely to receive systemic therapy (31% ≥75years vs 73% <60years) and more likely to receive single-agent chemotherapy than combination-chemotherapy. Elderly patients (≥75years) treated with capecitabine-oxaliplatin (CAPOX) received fewer cycles (51% ≤3 oxaliplatin cycles, 43% ≤3 capecitabine cycles) and lower cumulative dosages compared to patients aged <75years, although initial dosages were similar. If capecitabine monotherapy (CapMono) was administered, starting dosages were 2414mg/m²/d<75years and 1992mg/m²/d≥75years (p<0.05), but no differences in number of received cycles or cumulative dosages were observed.

CONCLUSION

Age beginning at 75years significantly influenced palliative systemic therapy. Even in selected elderly patients, first-line treatment with CAPOX was associated with less cycles and lower cumulative dosages compared to younger patients. With single-agent fluoropyrimidine therapy, however, no such results were observed.