Clinical surveillance compared with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging surveillance for brain metastasis: a feasibility survey

Effects of different brain surveillance strategies on outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma under targeted therapy

OBJECTIVES

Brain metastasis (BM) is common in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer. However, the brain surveillance strategy during treatment in advanced lung cancer patients varies, and the impact on clinical outcome is unclear. Here we aimed to evaluate the effect of different brain surveillance strategies on the clinical characteristics and treatment outcome in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated with first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study conducted in a medical center in an area with high prevalence of EGFR mutation. Patients with initially diagnosed stage IV EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma were included. Patients undergoing regular brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 3-6 months were categorized in the regular follow-up (RFU) group, and the rest were categorized in the liberal follow-up (LFU) group. Clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients were included, and 43.5% initially had brain metastases. Patients in the LFU group were significantly older than those in the RFU group (median age: 67 vs 62, p < 0.001). The overall survival and time-to-treatment failure of patients with initial EGFR-TKIs treatment showed no statistical difference between the two groups. However, the intracranial progression free survival was significantly shorter in the RFU group than in the LFU group (p = 0.009). The risk of mortality was similar in the LFU and RFU groups. There was no difference in the intracranial progression patterns and cause of death between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients who used EGFR-TKIs as the frontline therapy, regular or liberal brain MRI follow-up showed no significant impact on the outcome, irrespective of initial brain metastasis.

Impact of regular magnetic resonance imaging follow-up after stereotactic radiotherapy to the surgical cavity in patients with one to three brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Administering stereotactic radiotherapy to the surgical cavity and thus omitting postoperative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is a favored strategy in limited metastatic brain disease. Little is known about the impact of regular magnetic resonance imaging follow-up (MRI FU) in such patient cohorts. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of regular MRI FU and to report the oncological outcomes of patients with one to three brain metastases (BMs) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) to the surgical cavity.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who received SRS or HFSRT to the surgical cavity after resection of one to two BMs. Additional, non-resected BMs were managed with SRS alone. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were examined with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. Regular MRI FU was defined as performing a brain MRI 3 months after radiotherapy (RT) and/or performing ≥1 brain MRI per 180 days. Primary endpoint was local control (LC). Secondary endpoints were distant brain control (DBC), overall survival (OS) and the correlation between regular MRI FU and overall survival (OS), symptom-free survival (SFS), deferment of WBRT and WBRT-free survival (WFS).

RESULTS

Overall, 75 patients were enrolled. One, 2 and 3 BMs were seen in 63 (84%), 11 (15%) and 1 (1%) patients, respectively. Forty (53%) patients underwent MRI FU 3 months after RT and 38 (51%) patients received ≥1 brain MRI per 180 days. Median OS was 19.4 months (95% CI: 13.2-25.6 months). Actuarial LC, DBC and OS at 1 year were 72% (95% CI: 60-83%), 60% (95% CI: 48-72%) and 66% (95% CI: 53-76%), respectively. A planning target volume > 15 cm³ (p = 0.01), Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score (p = 0.001) and residual tumor after surgery (p = 0.008) were prognostic for decreased OS in multivariate analysis. No significant correlation between MRI FU at 3 months and OS (p = 0.462), SFS (p = 0.536), WFS (p = 0.407) or deferment of WBRT (p = 0.955) was seen. Likewise, performing ≥1 MRI per 180 days had no significant impact on OS (p = 0.954), SFS (p = 0.196), WFS (p = 0.308) or deferment of WBRT (p = 0.268).

CONCLUSION

Our results regarding oncological outcomes consist with the current data from the literature. Surprisingly, regular MRI FU did not result in increased OS, SFS, WFS or deferment of WBRT in our cohort consisting mainly of patients with a single and resected BM. Therefore, the impact of regular MRI FU needs prospective evaluation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Project ID: 2017-00033, retrospectively registered.