Urokinase perfusion prevents intrahepatic ischemic-type biliary lesion in donor livers

Favorable Outcomes After Liver Transplantation With Normothermic Regional Perfusion From Donors After Circulatory Death: A Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) has been associated with a high incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy and other perioperative complications. In an attempt to avoid these complications, we implemented an active protocol of cDCD liver transplant (LT) with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) preservation.

METHODS

This is a descriptive analysis of data collected from a prospective date base of cDCD LT preserved with NRP from January 2015 to June 2017 with a minimum follow up of 9 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven potential cDCD donors were connected to the NRP system. Of these, 46 livers were transplanted over a 30-month period (80% liver recovery rate). The median posttransplant peak in alanine transaminase was 1136 U/L (220-6683 U/L). Seven (15%) patients presented postreperfusion syndrome and 11 (23%) showed early allograft dysfunction. No cases of ischemic cholangiopathy were diagnosed, and no graft loss was observed over a medium follow-up period of 19 months. Of note, 13 donors were older than 65 years, achieving comparable perioperative and midterm results to younger donors.

CONCLUSIONS

As far as we know, this represents the largest published series of cDCD LT with NRP preservation. Our results demonstrate that cDCD liver grafts preserved with NRP appear far superior to those obtained by the conventional rapid recovery technique.

Heterogeneity of Bile Duct Management in the Development of Ischemic Cholangiopathy After Liver Transplantation: Results of a European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association Survey

BACKGROUND

Surgical factors and direct cytotoxicity of bile salts on cholangiocytes may play a role in the development of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) after liver transplantation (LTx). There is no validated consensus on how to protect the bile ducts during procurement, static preservation, and LTx. Meanwhile, IC remains the most troublesome complication after LTx.

AIM

To characterize bile duct management techniques during the LTx process among European transplant centers in cases of donation after brain death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD).

METHOD

An European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association-European Liver Transplant Registry web survey designed to conceal respondents' personal information was sent to surgeons procuring and/or transplanting livers in Europe.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent of responses came from large transplant centers (>50 procurements/y). In 8% of DBDs and 14% of DCDs the bile duct is not rinsed. In 46% of DBDs and 52% of DCDs surgeons prefer to remove the gallbladder after graft reperfusion. Protocols concerning preservation solutions (nature, pressure, volume) are extremely heterogeneous. In 54% of DBDs and 61% of DCDs an arterial back table pressure perfusion is performed. Steroids (20%-10%), heparin (72%-60%), prostacyclin (3%-7%), and fibrinolytics (4%-11%) are used as donor-protective interventions in DBD and DCD cases, respectively. In 2% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases a hepatic artery reperfusion is performed first. In 4% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases, fibrinolytics are administered through the hepatic artery during the bench and/or implantation.

CONCLUSION

This European web survey shows for the first time the heterogeneity in the management of bile ducts during procurement, preservation, and transplantation in Europe. In the context of sharing more marginal liver grafts, an expert meeting must be organized to formulate guidelines to be applied to protect liver grafts against IC.

Donation After Circulatory Death for Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis on the Location of Life Support Withdrawal Affecting Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation using donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors is associated with inferior outcomes compared to donation after brain death (DBD). Prolonged donor warm ischemic time has been identified as the key factor responsible for this difference. Various aspects of the donor life support withdrawal procedure, including location of withdrawal and administration of antemortem heparin, are thought to play important roles in mitigating the effects of warm ischemia. However, a systematic exploration of these factors is important for more confident integration of these practices into a standard DCD protocol.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries were systematically searched and 23 relevant studies identified for analysis. Donation after circulatory death recipients were stratified according to location of life support withdrawal (intensive care unit or operating theater) and use of antemortem heparin.

RESULTS

Donation after circulatory death recipients had comparable 1-year patient survival to DBD recipients if the location of withdrawal of life support was the operating theater, but not if the location was the intensive care unit. Likewise, the inferior 1-year graft survival and higher incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy of DCD compared with DBD recipients were improved by withdrawal in operating theater, although higher rates of ischemic cholangiopathy and worse graft survival were still observed in DCD recipients. Furthermore, administering heparin before withdrawal of life support reduced the incidence of primary nonfunction of the allograft.

CONCLUSIONS

Our evidence suggests that withdrawal in the operating theater and premortem heparin administration improve DCD liver transplant outcomes, thus allowing for the most effective usage of these valuable organs.

Practical Recommendations for Long-term Management of Modifiable Risks in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Guidance Report and Clinical Checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) Group

Short-term patient and graft outcomes continue to improve after kidney and liver transplantation, with 1-year survival rates over 80%; however, improving longer-term outcomes remains a challenge. Improving the function of grafts and health of recipients would not only enhance quality and length of life, but would also reduce the need for retransplantation, and thus increase the number of organs available for transplant. The clinical transplant community needs to identify and manage those patient modifiable factors, to decrease the risk of graft failure, and improve longer-term outcomes.COMMIT was formed in 2015 and is composed of 20 leading kidney and liver transplant specialists from 9 countries across Europe. The group's remit is to provide expert guidance for the long-term management of kidney and liver transplant patients, with the aim of improving outcomes by minimizing modifiable risks associated with poor graft and patient survival posttransplant.The objective of this supplement is to provide specific, practical recommendations, through the discussion of current evidence and best practice, for the management of modifiable risks in those kidney and liver transplant patients who have survived the first postoperative year. In addition, the provision of a checklist increases the clinical utility and accessibility of these recommendations, by offering a systematic and efficient way to implement screening and monitoring of modifiable risks in the clinical setting.

Liver grafts procured from donors after circulatory death have no increased risk of microthrombi formation

Microthrombi formation provoked by warm ischemia and vascular stasis is thought to increase the risk of nonanastomotic strictures (NAS) in liver grafts obtained by donation after circulatory death (DCD). Therefore, potentially harmful intraoperative thrombolytic therapy has been suggested as a preventive strategy against NAS. Here, we investigated whether there is histological evidence of microthrombi formation during graft preservation or directly after reperfusion in DCD livers and the development of NAS. Liver biopsies collected at different time points during graft preservation and after reperfusion were triple-stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H & E), von Willebrand factor VIII (VWF), and Fibrin Lendrum (FL) to evaluate the presence of microthrombi. In a first series of 282 sections obtained from multiple liver segments of discarded DCD grafts, microthrombi were only present in 1%-3% of the VWF stainings, without evidence of thrombus formation in paired H & E and FL stainings. Additionally, analysis of 132 sections obtained from matched, transplanted donation after brain death and DCD grafts showed no difference in microthrombi formation (11.3% versus 3.3% respectively; P = 0.082), and no relation to the development of NAS (P = 0.73). Furthermore, no microthrombi were present in perioperative biopsies in recipients who developed early hepatic artery thrombosis. Finally, the presence of microthrombi did not differ before or after additional flushing of the graft with preservation solution. In conclusion, the results of our study derogate from the hypothesis that DCD livers have an increased tendency to form microthrombi. It weakens the explanation that microthrombi formation is a main causal factor in the development of NAS in DCD and that recipients could benefit from intraoperative thrombolytic therapy to prevent NAS following liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 22 1676-1687 2016 AASLD.

Flushing the liver with urokinase before transplantation does not prevent nonanastomotic biliary strictures

The aim of the present study was to assess whether flushing the donor liver with urokinase immediately before implantation reduces the incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NASs) after liver transplantation, without causing increased blood loss, analyzed as a historical cohort study. Between January 2005 and October 2012, all liver (re-)transplantations were included. Of the 185 liver transplant recipients included, 63 donor livers between January 2010 and October 2012 received urokinase (study group), whereas the donor liver of 122 consecutive recipients, who served as a historical control group, between January 2005 and January 2010 did not receive urokinase. Basic donor (Eurotransplant donor risk index) and recipient (age, body mass index, laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score) characteristics did not significantly differ in both groups. Thirty-three recipients developed NASs: 22 in the control group (18%) and 11 (17.5%) in the study group (P = 0.68). Analyzed separately for donation after circulatory death (P = 0.42) or donation after brain death (P = 0.89), there was no difference between the groups in incidence of NAS. Of all the recipients developing NAS, 7 (21%) needed retransplantation and all others were treated conservatively. Autologous blood transfusion requirements did not differ significantly between both groups (P = 0.91), whereas interestingly, more heterologous blood transfusions were needed in the control group (P < 0.001). This study has its limitations by its retrospective character. A multi-institutional prospective study could clarify this issue. In conclusion, arterial flushing of the liver with urokinase immediately before implantation did not lead to a lower incidence of NAS in this study, nor did it lead to increased blood loss.

High peak alanine aminotransferase determines extra risk for nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation with donation after circulatory death

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with donation after circulatory death (DCD) often leads to a higher first week peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and a higher rate of biliary nonanastomotic strictures (NAS) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). This retrospective study was to evaluate whether an association exists between peak ALT and the development of NAS in OLT with livers from DBD (n = 399) or DCD (n = 97) from two transplantation centers. Optimal cutoff value of peak ALT for risk of development of NAS post-DCD-OLT was 1300 IU/l. The 4-year cumulative incidence of NAS after DCD-OLT was 49.5% in patients with a high ALT peak post-OLT, compared with 11.3% in patients with a low ALT peak. (P < 0.001). No relation between peak ALT and NAS was observed after DBD-OLT. Multivariate analysis revealed peak ALT ≥1300 IU/l [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 3.71, confidence interval (CI) (1.26-10.91)] and donor age [aHR = 1.04, CI 1.00-1.07] to be independently associated with development of NAS post-DCD-OLT. A peak ALT of <1300 IU/l carries a risk for NAS similar to DBD-OLT. Thus, in DCD-OLT, but not in DBD-OLT, peak ALT discriminates patients at high or low risk for NAS.

Relationship between the histological appearance of the portal vein and development of ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation

Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBLs) are a major cause of morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Their assumed underlying pathophysiological mechanism is ischemia/reperfusion injury of the biliary tree, in which the portal circulation has been proposed recently to have a role. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early histological changes, particularly in the portal vein, predispose patients to ITBLs. A case-control study of 22 LT recipients was performed through a retrospective assessment of more than 30 histological parameters in 44 intraoperative liver biopsy samples taken after cold ischemia (time 0) and portal reperfusion (time 1). Eleven grafts developed ITBLs requiring retransplantation (the ITBL group), and 11 matched controls had normally functioning grafts 11 years after LT on average (the non-ITBL group). Additionally, 11 liver biopsy samples from hemihepatectomies performed for metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) were assessed similarly. Analyses showed no significant histological differences at time 0 between the ITBL and non-ITBL groups. However, the time 1 biopsy samples from the ITBL group showed smaller portal vein branches (PVBs) significantly more often than the samples from the non-ITBL group, which also showed persisting paraportal collateral vessels. Larger PVBs and paraportal collateral vessels were also found in the CRC group. A morphometric analysis confirmed these findings and showed that PVB measurements were significantly lower for the ITBL group at time 1 versus the ITBL group at time 0 and the non-ITBL and CRC groups (they were largest in the CRC group). Thus, the PVB dimensions decreased in the ITBL group in comparison with the time 0 biopsy samples, and they were significantly smaller at time 1 in comparison with the dimensions for the non-ITBL and CRC groups. In conclusion, a smaller PVB lumen size in postreperfusion biopsy samples from liver grafts, suggesting a relatively decreased portal blood flow, is associated with a higher incidence of ITBLs. These findings support recent clinical studies suggesting a possible pathophysiological role of portal blood flow in the oxygenation of the biliary tree after LT.

Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Ischemic-Type Biliary Lesions following Liver Transplantation

Ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury after liver transplantation (LT) induces intra- and/or extrahepatic nonanastomotic ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBLs). Subsequent bile duct stricture is a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality in patients who underwent LT. Although the pathogenesis of ITBLs is multifactorial, there are three main interconnected mechanisms responsible for their formation: cold and warm I-R injury, injury induced by cytotoxic bile salts, and immunological-mediated injury. Cold and warm ischemic insult can induce direct injury to the cholangiocytes and/or damage to the arterioles of the peribiliary vascular plexus, which in turn leads to apoptosis and necrosis of the cholangiocytes. Liver grafts from suboptimal or extended-criteria donors are more susceptible to cold and warm I-R injury and develop more easily ITBLs than normal livers. This paper, focusing on liver I-R injury, reviews the risk factors and mechanisms leading to ITBLs following LT.

Use of a liver from donor after cardiac death: is it appropriate for the sick or the stable?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver transplantation following donation after cardiac death (DCD) continues to be a subject for heated debate. Opinion is divided in the literature as to who benefits the most from receiving a liver from a DCD donor. This review will focus on some important questions regarding the outcome of transplantation and the selection and matching of donor and recipient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Liver transplantation with an organ from a donor after cardiac death is becoming an accepted way to treat patients on the waiting list with end-stage liver disease. However, there are still some major issues to address such as ischemic-type biliary lesions, retransplantation rates, criteria for donor and patient selection and whether conversion of donation after brain death to DCD exists. Accepting a DCD liver has the potential for reduced recipient quality of life after transplant. Death on the waiting list must be balanced against the inherent risks of a DCD liver.

SUMMARY

Success of liver transplantation is mostly measured as graft and patient survival. DCD liver transplantation is a potential tool to decrease mortality on the waiting list. Careful selection and matching of donor organ and recipient can lead to good outcomes. However, ischemic-type biliary lesions after DCD liver transplantation remain an important obstacle to overcome and have a serious impact on quality of life after transplantation.

The importance of portal venous blood flow in ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation

Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) are the most frequent cause of nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. This complication develops in up to 25% of patients, with a 50% retransplantation rate in affected patients. Traditionally, ischemia-reperfusion injury to the biliary system is considered to be the major risk factor for ITBL. Several other risk factors for ITBL have been identified, including the use of liver grafts donated after cardiac death, prolonged cold and warm ischemic times and use of University of Wisconsin preservation solution. In recent years however, impaired microcirculation of the peribiliary plexus (PBP) has been implicated as a possible risk factor. It is widely accepted that the PBP is exclusively provided by blood from the hepatic artery, and therefore, the role of the portal venous blood supply has not been considered as a possible cause for the development of ITBL. In this short report, we present three patients with segmental portal vein thrombosis and subsequent development of ITBL in the affected segments in the presence of normal arterial blood flow. This suggests that portal blood flow may have an important contribution to the biliary microcirculation and that a compromised portal venous blood supply can predispose to the development of ITBL.