Is there a changing trend in surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children?

Hospital and procedure incidence of pediatric retained surgical items

BACKGROUND

Prevention of retained surgical items (RSIs) is the main objective of the World Health Organization "Guidelines for Safe Surgery" (WHO/GSS) 2008 to improve patient safety.

METHODS

We analyzed Kids' Inpatient Database 1997-2009 for RSI in patients aged <18 y. Incidence of RSI was calculated by per 100,000 admissions and per 100,000 procedures. The incidence was analyzed based on hospital bedsize, teaching status, region, and ownership and rural versus metropolitan location based on per 100,000 admissions.

RESULTS

Overall, 713 cases were identified with a mean (standard deviation) age of 8.31 y (6.62), length of stay of 13 d (20), and total charges of $91,321 (155,054). RSI occurred at a rate of 2.22 per 100,000 admissions and 1.93 per 100,000 procedures; both rates decreased post-WHO/GSS implementation versus pre-WHO/GSS, P < 0.005. On average, public or children's hospitals reported the highest RSI rates (8.89 and 6.07/100,000 admissions, respectively). Small and medium bedsize hospitals had lower rates of RSI post-WHO/GSS, P < 0.05. Nonteaching, non-children's, or public hospitals reported lower rates post-WHO/GSS, P < 0.003. Private (nonprofit) hospitals reported higher rates post-WHO/GSS, P < 0.001. Facilities in the southern United States or in metropolitan areas reported lower rates post-WHO/GSS, P < 0.02. A subanalysis of 107 cases requiring surgical removal demonstrated that fundoplications had the highest rate of RSI, followed by gastric procedures, laparotomy, bile duct procedures, lysis of adhesions, and abdominal wall repair.

CONCLUSIONS

RSI rates have decreased overall after the introduction of the WHO/GSS. The largest reductions have occurred in public or nonteaching hospitals. Only private (nonprofit) hospitals reported increases in RSI since 2008. Higher rates of RSI are associated with fundoplications and other gastric procedures.

Gastroesophageal reflux in critically ill children: a review

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is very common in children due to immaturity of the antireflux barrier. In critically ill patients there is also a high incidence due to a partial or complete loss of pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter though other factors, such as the use of nasogastric tubes, treatment with adrenergic agonists, bronchodilators, or opiates and mechanical ventilation, can further increase the risk of GER. Vomiting and regurgitation are the most common manifestations in infants and are considered pathological when they have repercussions on the nutritional status. In critically ill children, damage to the esophageal mucosa predisposes to digestive tract hemorrhage and nosocomial pneumonia secondary to repeated microaspiration. GER is mainly alkaline in children, as is also the case in critically ill pediatric patients. pH-metry combined with multichannel intraluminal impedance is therefore the technique of choice for diagnosis. The proton pump inhibitors are the drugs of choice for the treatment of GER because they have a greater effect, longer duration of action, and a good safety profile.

Thirty-day outcome in children randomized to open and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is considered by some to be superior to open Nissen fundoplication (ONF). To test this hypothesis, we compared early results after LNF and ONF in a randomized trial.

METHODS

All children accepted for antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease were offered enrollment. Ethical approval and parental consent were obtained. Anesthesia, surgical methods, and postoperative treatment were standardized. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay (LOS), and complications occurring the first 30 postoperative days were registered.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight children were randomized to LNF (n = 44) or ONF (n = 44). The groups were comparable with regard to age, weight, and comorbidity. Duration of surgery was 150 ± 34 minutes for LNF and 89 ± 25 minutes for ONF (P < .001). Median LOS was 7.0 days (range, 3-57 days) and 7.5 days (range, 2-20 days) after LNF and ONF, respectively (P = .74). Postoperative complications occurred in 48 patients, 24 in both groups. Twenty-four patients (LNF: n = 12, ONF: n = 11) were readmitted to hospital because of complications occurring after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to show that LNF is superior to ONF when surgery duration, LOS, and complications occurring during the first postoperative month were compared. Apart from surgery duration, the results were surprisingly similar.

Population-based comparison of open vs laparoscopic esophagogastric fundoplication in children: application of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality pediatric quality indicators

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Increasing national focus on patient safety has promoted development of the pediatric quality indicators (PDIs), which screen for preventable events during provision of health care for children. Our objective is to apply these safety metrics to compare 2 surgical procedures in children, specifically laparoscopic and open esophagogastric fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis using 20 years of data from national representative state inpatient databases through the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was conducted. Patients younger than 18 years with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes for open or laparoscopic esophagogastric fundoplication were included. Pediatric quality indicators were linked to each patient's profile. Demographics, comorbidities, outcomes, and 8 selected PDIs between open and laparoscopic fundoplications were compared using Pearson χ(2) tests and t tests.

RESULTS

Of 33,533 patients identified, 28,141 underwent open and 5392 underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. Comorbidities occurred more frequently in open surgery. In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges were less in laparoscopic surgery. Of the 8 PDIs evaluated, decubitus ulcer (P = .04) and postoperative sepsis (P = .003) had decreased rates with laparoscopic surgery compared with open.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux in children can be performed safely compared with the open approach with equivalent or improved rates of PDIs.

Treating acid reflux disease in patients with Down syndrome: pharmacological and physiological approaches

Down syndrome (DS) is often accompanied by gastrointestinal disease, occurring mainly in early infancy and frequently requiring therapy. Among motility disorders, the most frequent is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which may often be misdiagnosed because of its atypical manifestations. Early diagnosis of esophageal functional disorders is essential to prevent respiratory problems, growth retardation in children, weight loss in adults, and to establish the correct type of surgery if needed. Furthermore, the involvement of the enteric nervous system in the pathophysiology of GERD in DS is not yet completely understood but seems supported by much evidence. In fact DS is often associated with motor disorders and this evidence must be considered in the choice of therapy: in particular all options available to improve motility seem to be effective in these patients. The effectiveness of therapy is strictly related to the rate of mental impairment, so that modulating therapy is essential, especially in view of the severity of the neurological status.