Resected specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up after STARR procedures

Treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome due to rectocele and rectal intussusception with a high volume stapler (TST STARR-plus)

BACKGROUND

In recent years, stapled transanal resection (STARR) has been adopted worldwide with convincing short-term results. However, due to the high recurrence rate and some major complications after STARR, there is still controversy about when the procedure is indicated. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and feasibility of STARR performed with a new dedicated device for tailored transanal stapled surgery.

METHODS

All the consecutive patients affected by obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) due to rectocele or/and rectal intussusception, who underwent STARR with the TST STARR-Plus stapler, were included in a prospective study. Pain, Cleveland Clinic Score for Constipation (CCCS) and incontinence, patient satisfaction, number of hemostatic stitches, operative time, hospital stay and perioperative complications were recorded. Postoperative complications and recurrence were also reported.

RESULTS

Forty-five consecutive patients (median age 50; range 24-79) were included in the study. Median resected volume was 15 cm³ (range 12-19 cm³) with a median height of surgical specimen of 5.6 cm (range 4.5-10 cm). The mean CCCS decreased from 17.26 (± 3.77) to 5.42 (± 2.78) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction grade was excellent in 14 patients (31.1%), good in 25 (55.5%), sufficient in three (6.7%) and poor in three patients (6.7%). No major complications occurred. Five patients (11%) reported urgency after 30 days and two patients (4%) after 12 months. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence score did not significantly change. At a median follow-up of 23 months (range 12-30 months), only three patients (6.7%) reported recurrent symptoms of obstructed defecation comparable to those reported at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

TST STARR-Plus seems to be safe and effective for the treatment of ODS due to rectocele and rectal intussusception, and technical improvement could reduce the risk of some complications. However, careful patient selection is still the best means of preventing complications.

Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations: Results III: Rectal wall excisional procedures (Rectal Excision)

AIM

To assess the outcomes of rectal excisional procedures in adults with chronic constipation.

METHOD

Standardised methods and reporting of benefits and harms were used for all CapaCiTY reviews that closely adhered to PRISMA 2016 guidance. Main conclusions were presented as summary evidence statements with a summative Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2009) level.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were identified, providing data on outcomes in 8340 patients. Average length of procedures was 44 min and length of stay (LOS) was 3 days. There was inadequate evidence to determine variations in procedural duration or LOS by type of procedure. Overall morbidity rate was 16.9% (0-61%), with lower rates observed after Contour Transtar procedure (8.9%). No mortality was reported after any procedures in a total of 5896 patients. Although inconsistently reported, good or satisfactory outcome occurred in 73-80% of patients; a reduction of 53-91% in Longo scoring system for obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) occurred in about 68-76% of patients. The most common long-term adverse outcome is faecal urgency, typically occurring in up to 10% of patients. Recurrent prolapse occurred in 4.3% of patients. Patients with at least 3 ODS symptoms together with a rectocoele with or without an intussusception, who have failed conservative management, may benefit from a rectal excisional procedure.

CONCLUSION

Rectal excisional procedures are safe with little major morbidity. It is not possible to advise which excisional technique is superior from the point of view of efficacy, peri-operative variables, or harms. Future study is required.

Value and limits of stapled transanal rectal repair for obstructed defecation syndrome: 10 years-experience with 450 cases

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

In the late's 90' a new surgical treatment, the stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) was born to treat obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). In this study we retrospectively analyze a series of 450 cases that underwent STARR in 10 years.

METHODS

Between January 2001 to December 2011, 450 patients, diagnosed with ODS syndrome caused by rectocele or intussusception, underwent to STARR procedure. The presence of rectocele and/or intussusception was verified by dynamic defecography. The preoperative evaluation was completed with anorectal manometry and colonoscopy. Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 1 years, 3 years and 5 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 30,2 min. In 408 cases (90.7%) hospital discharge occurred 24 hours after surgery. Among postoperative complications urinary retention was observed in 35 patients (7.8%). Five (1.1%) patients presented an early rectal bleeding and 8 (1.8%) patients presented a late bleeding. In 5 (1.1%) patients a stable pelvic hematoma was found. Six (1.3%) patients presented pelvic sepsis due to subperitoneal perforation. An asymptomatic partial dehiscence of stapler row occurred in 19 patients (4.2%).125 patients (27.8%) reported defecation urgency that completely vanished at 3 months follow-up in 83 patients (66,4%) and in further 42 patients (33,6%) at 6-months. The average preoperative ODS score was 14.1; 3.1 at one year; 4.3 at 3 years and 6.4 after five years.

CONCLUSIONS

In expert hands, with right indications, STARR procedure is safe with good results in terms of improvement of the ODS score.

Short-term results after STARR versus internal Delorme for obstructed defecation: a non-randomized prospective study

Obstructed defecation syndrome due to internal intussusception and rectocele is a common disease, and various transanal surgical techniques have been proposed. Aim of the present study was to compare the internal Delorme (ID) and the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) results in the treatment of patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. From September 2011 to May 2012, 23 patients were operated with STARR procedure and 12 patients with Delorme's procedure for obstructed defecation syndrome. All patients underwent preoperative assessment: clinical evaluation (Altomare ODS score, Wexner constipation scoring system), proctoscopy, defecography, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography. Surgery was proposed with: failure of medical therapy, incomplete defecation, and unsuccessful attempts with long periods spent in bathroom, defecation with digital assistance, use of enemas and defecography findings of rectoanal intussusception and rectocele. The average operative time was 28 min (range 15-65) for the STARR group and 56 min (range 28-96) for the ID group with a mean hospital stay of 2 days for both the procedures. The Wexner score significantly fell postoperatively from 17 to 4, 7 in STARR group and from 15.3 to 3.3 in the ID group. The Altomare score postoperatively fell from 18.2 to 5.5 for STARR group and from 16.5 to 5.3 for ID group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two procedures considering the outcomes parameters and the complications. Both ID and STARR procedure seem to be effective in the treatment of ODS.

Correlation between outcome and instrumental findings after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Several studies show that stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) significantly improves constipation in most patients, while others remain symptomatic for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of the study was to analyze clinical, manometric, and endoanal ultrasonography results in order to find any possible correlation between clinical and instrumental data, particularly in dissatisfied patients, both for those who remain symptomatic for ODS and for patients with new-onset fecal disorders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients underwent a preoperative and postoperative assessment based on clinical evaluation, proctoscopy, defecography, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasonography. Furthermore, we asked patients about a subjective satisfaction grading of outcome.

RESULTS

From January 2007 to December 2009, 103 patients were treated in our department with STARR for ODS. Postoperative endoanal ultrasound did not demonstrate any variations compared with the preoperative one. Postoperative scores showed statistically significant improvement, with respect to the preoperative value, with good and sufficient scores in 79.6% of patients, and an overall rate of satisfaction of 87.1%. Fecal disorders, including also the slightest alteration of continence, occurred in 24% of patients, in particular soiling 1.8%, urgency 7.4%, occasional gas leakage 5.5%, and liquid/solid leakage 9.3%. Anorectal manometry revealed a statistically significant reduction only in sensitivity threshold and maximum tolerated volume compared to patients with no disorders of continence.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate good satisfaction grading and a statistically significant improvement in scores of constipation. There is no close correlation between satisfaction grading and scores. Besides, the assessment of patient's satisfaction often does not match the objective functional outcome.