A novel animal model for in vivo study of liver cancer metastasis

Hepatitis B virus X protein identifies the Smc5/6 complex as a host restriction factor

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection is a leading cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer. Hepatitis B virus encodes the regulatory HBx protein whose primary role is to promote transcription of the viral genome, which persists as an extrachromosomal DNA circle in infected cells. HBx accomplishes this task by an unusual mechanism, enhancing transcription only from extrachromosomal DNA templates. Here we show that HBx achieves this by hijacking the cellular DDB1-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase to target the 'structural maintenance of chromosomes' (Smc) complex Smc5/6 for degradation. Blocking this event inhibits the stimulatory effect of HBx both on extrachromosomal reporter genes and on hepatitis B virus transcription. Conversely, silencing the Smc5/6 complex enhances extrachromosomal reporter gene transcription in the absence of HBx, restores replication of an HBx-deficient hepatitis B virus, and rescues wild-type hepatitis B virus in a DDB1-knockdown background. The Smc5/6 complex associates with extrachromosomal reporters and the hepatitis B virus genome, suggesting a direct mechanism of transcriptional inhibition. These results uncover a novel role for the Smc5/6 complex as a restriction factor selectively blocking extrachromosomal DNA transcription. By destroying this complex, HBx relieves the inhibition to allow productive hepatitis B virus gene expression.

A "Patient-Like" Orthotopic Syngeneic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Metastasis

The majority of cancer-related deaths are caused by the metastasis of the cancer rather than the primary tumor itself. Yet, the underlying mechanisms of cancer metastasis are still unclear. Animal models are essential for elucidating the mechanisms and for evaluating novel strategies for the treatment of metastatic cancers. Here, an in-depth description of a "patient-like" orthotopic syngeneic mouse model for exploring the mechanisms of metastasis of solid organ tumors is provided. The survival surgical implantation of BNL 1ME A.7R.1 mouse hepatocellular carcinoma cells directly into the liver (the organ of origin) of the inbred wild-type immune competent laboratory mouse strain, BALB/c is described. The success and reproducibility of this methodology recommends it for widespread use in elucidating the biological mechanisms of solid organ cancer metastasis.

Preclinical imaging and translational animal models of cancer for accelerated clinical implementation of nanotechnologies and macromolecular agents

The majority of animal models of cancer have performed poorly in terms of predicting clinical performance of new therapeutics, which are most often first evaluated in patients with advanced, metastatic disease. The development and use of metastatic models of cancer may enhance clinical translatability of preclinical studies focused on the development of nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems and macromolecular therapeutics, potentially accelerating their clinical implementation. It is recognized that the development and use of such models are not without challenge. Preclinical imaging tools offer a solution by allowing temporal and spatial characterization of metastatic lesions. This paper provides a review of imaging methods applicable for evaluation of novel therapeutics in clinically relevant models of advanced cancer. An overview of currently utilized models of oncology in small animals is followed by image-based development and characterization of visceral metastatic cancer models. Examples of imaging tools employed for metastatic lesion detection, evaluation of anti-tumor and anti-metastatic potential and biodistribution of novel therapies, as well as the co-development and/or use of imageable surrogates of response, are also discussed. While the focus is on development of macromolecular and nanotechnology-based therapeutics, examples with small molecules are included in some cases to illustrate concepts and approaches that can be applied in the assessment of nanotechnologies or macromolecules.

A comparison between genetically humanized and chimeric liver humanized mouse models for studies in drug metabolism and toxicity

Mice that have been genetically humanized for proteins involved in drug metabolism and toxicity and mice engrafted with human hepatocytes are emerging and promising in vivo models for an improved prediction of the pharmacokinetic, drug-drug interaction and safety characteristics of compounds in humans. The specific advantages and disadvantages of these models should be carefully considered when using them for studies in drug discovery and development. Here, an overview on the corresponding genetically humanized and chimeric liver humanized mouse models described to date is provided and illustrated with examples of their utility in drug metabolism and toxicity studies. We compare the strength and weaknesses of the two different approaches, give guidance for the selection of the appropriate model for various applications and discuss future trends and perspectives.

Vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates establishment of a model of hepatic metastasis in Walker-256 tumor-bearing rats

BACKGROUND

Animal models of secondary liver cancer are limited by the time required for the development of hepatic metastases. The authors administered vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to stimulate tumor growth in a model of hepatic metastasis.

METHODS

A 0.5 to 1.0 mm³ Walker-256 carcinosarcoma tumor tissue was implanted into the livers of 45 Sprague-Dawley rats, randomly assigned to 3 equal groups to receive daily injections (0.1 mL), for 1 week, of either normal saline (control group), 20 mg/L VEGF (VEGF-20 group) or 40 mg/L VEGF (VEGF-40 group). Tumor growth was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging after 3, 7 and 14 days, and overall survival was recorded.

RESULTS

Three days after implantation, no tumors were detected by magnetic resonance imaging in the control group. In contrast, tumors were observed in 50% of rats in the VEGF-20 group and 66.7% of rats in the VEGF-40 group (P < 0.05). By day 7, tumors were detected in 92.8% of rats in the VEGF-20 group, 86.7% of rats in the VEGF-40 group, but only 21.4% of rats in the control group (P < 0.05). Tumor size increased progressively, reaching 1.81 ± 0.08, 2.51 ± 0.12 and 2.67 ± 0.10 cm³ in the control, VEGF-20 and VEGF-40 groups, respectively, 14 days after implantation of tumor tissue. Median survival times were significantly shorter in the VEGF-40 group (15 days) than in the control and VEGF-20 groups (27 and 25, respectively) (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily VEGF injection (20 mg/L, 1 week) accelerates tumorigenesis without compromising survival, potentially extending the period in which experiments can be conducted in this model.