Lymph node metastasis in gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma in male patients

Can we predict mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis in esophagogastric junction cancer? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to define clinical indicator that predicts mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis (MLNM) in patients with Esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) to select patient population requiring esophagectomy.

METHODS

A systematic and electronic search of several electronic databases was performed up to August 2020. Studies containing information on risk factors for MLNM in patients diagnosed with EJGC and who underwent curative surgery were included.

RESULTS

Two predictors, including undifferentiated type (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.07-3.10, p = 0.03) and esophageal invasion length (EIL) (OR = 10.95, 95% CI = 6.37-18.82, p < 0.00001) were identified as significant predictors for the risk of MLNM.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the associations of these clinicopathological features with MLNM can be useful in determining operative strategy for EGJC.

Is there association of gross tumor volume of adenocarcinoma of oesophagogastric junction measured on magnetic resonance imaging with N stage?

PURPOSE

To determine whether gross tumour volume (GTV) of adenocarcinoma of oesophagogastric junction (AOG) measured on fat-suppression T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) correlates with regional lymph node metastasis and N stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained. Forty-six patients with AOG underwent preoperative magnetic resonance scans including FS-T2WI and DWI with b-values of 500 and 800 s/mm2. GTV was measured on FS-T2WI and DWI. Statistical analyses were performed to determine association of GTV with N stage.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed GTV measured on FS-T2WI and DWI with b-values of 500 and 800 s/mm2 were correlated with lymph node metastasis (all Ps < 0.05). Spearman rank correlation tests demonstrated a trend toward an increase in GTV obtained on previous sequences with increasing N stage (r = 0.578 to 0.591, all Ps < 0.001). Mann-Whitney U tests showed GTV obtained on previous sequences could distinguish grouped N stages (all Ps < 0.05). Receiver operating curve analyses demonstrated that GTV obtained on FS-T2WI and DWI with b-value of 500 s/mm2 and DWI with b-value of 800 s/mm2 might differentiate stage N0 from stages N1-3 (cutoff, 19.70 cm3, 16.70 cm3 and 12.24 cm3, respectively), stages N0-1 from N2-3 (cutoff: 22.16 cm3, 17.54 cm3 and 14.17 cm3, respectively), stages N0-2 from N3 (cutoff: 25.57 cm3, 29.27 cm3 and 22.73 cm3, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There is a trend toward an increase in GTV obtained on FS-T2WI and DWI sequences with increasing N stage.

The Role of No. 10 Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Patients Without Metastasis to No. 4sa and No. 4sb Lymph Nodes

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus in the impact of No. 10 lymph node dissection (LND) for advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) and the status of negative No. 4sa and No. 4sb lymph nodes (No. 4s LNs) is reportedly associated with no metastasis to No. 10 LN. We aimed to evaluate the role of No. 10 LND in APGC patients with negative No. 4s LNs and the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative pathologic examination.

METHODS

We analyzed data on 727 patients with APGC who had undergone D2 lymphadenectomy with No. 10 LND (n = 380) or without No. 10 LND (n = 347) between January 2005 and December 2010. Additionally, from January to July 2014, we prospectively enrolled 48 patients with APGC and examined their No. 4s LNs intraoperatively.

RESULTS

The negative predictive efficacy of No. 4s LN status for no metastasis to No. 10 LN was 98.09 %. Operation time, blood loss, time to first solid diet, hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate differed significantly between patients with negative No. 4s LNs who underwent No. 10 LND (n = 260) and those who did not undergo No. 10 LND (n = 243). Differences between the two groups in 5-year overall and disease-free survival were not statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intraoperative pathological examination of LNs were 93.42, 96.56, and 95.86 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The No. 10 lymphadenectomy may not be recommended in patients with APGC who are found by intraoperative pathological examination to have negative No. 4s LNs.