Salvage irrigation-suction in gracilis muscle repair of complex rectovaginal and rectourethral fistulas

Gracilis Muscle Interposition for the Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

BACKGROUND

A rectovaginal fistula is a debilitating condition that often severely impacts quality of life. Despite many treatment options available, the best surgical treatment is far from being established, and many patients will undergo several procedures before fistula closure is achieved. Gracilis muscle interposition, which is the transposition of the gracilis muscle into the rectovaginal septum, is an option for complex and persistent fistulas, but literature on the subject is scarce, mainly consisting of small case series.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the success rate of gracilis muscle interposition for the surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies comprising at least 5 patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for rectovaginal fistula were included. No date or language restrictions was applied.

INTERVENTION

Gracilis muscle interposition.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome is the fistula closure rate (%). Other domains analyzed are stoma closure rate, postoperative complications, quality of life, fecal continence, and sexual function.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included for a total of 384 patients. The pooled fistula closure rate for gracilis muscle interposition was 64% (95% CI, 53%-74%; range, 33%-100%). Risk factors for failure were smoking, underlying Crohn's disease, and more than 2 previous repairs, whereas stoma formation was associated with improved outcomes. Postoperative complications ranged from 0% to 37%, mostly related to surgical site occurrences at the harvest site and perineal area. No deaths occurred. Gracilis muscle interposition improved quality of life and fecal continence, but impairment of sexual function was common.

LIMITATIONS

Most of the included studies were small case series.

CONCLUSIONS

Gracilis muscle interposition is a safe and moderately effective treatment that could be taken into consideration as second- or third-line therapy for recurrent rectovaginal fistula.

REGISTRATION NO

CRD42022319621.

Gracilis muscle transposition in complex anorectal fistulas of diverse types and etiologies: long-term results of 60 cases

PURPOSE

Complex fistulas often require several attempts at repair and continue to be a challenging task for the surgeon, but above all, a major burden for the affected patient. This study is aimed at evaluating the potential of gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) as a therapeutic option for complex fistulas of diverse etiologies.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted over a period of 16 years with a total of 60 patients (mean age 50 years). All were treated for complex fistula with GMT at St. Josef's Hospital in Regensburg, Germany. Follow-up data were collected and analyzed using a prospective database and telephone interview. Success was defined as the absence of fistula.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (44 women, 16 men; mean age 50 years, range 24-82 years) were reviewed from January 2005 to June 2021. Primary fistula closure after GMT was achieved in 20 patients (33%) and 19 required further interventions for final healing. Overall healing rate was 65%. Fistula type was heterogeneous, with a dominant subgroup of 35 rectovaginal fistulas. Etiologies of the fistulas were irradiation, abscesses, obstetric injury, and iatrogenic/unknown, and 98% of patients had had previous unsuccessful repair attempts (mean 3.6, range 1-15). In 60% of patients with a stoma (all patients had a stoma, 60/60), stoma closure could be performed after successful fistula closure. Mean follow-up after surgery was 35.9 months (range 1-187 months). No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications were observed in 25%: wound healing disorders (n = 6), gracilis necroses (n = 3), incisional hernia (n = 2), scar tissue pain (n = 2), suture granuloma (n = 1), and osteomyelitis (n = 1). In 3 patients, a second gracilis transposition was performed due to fistula recurrence (n = 2) or fecal incontinence (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Based on the authors' experience, GMT is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of complex fistulas when other therapeutic attempts have failed and should therefore be considered earlier in the treatment process. It should be seen as the main but not the only step, as additional procedures may be required for complete closure in some cases.

Gracilis Flap Repair for Reoperative Rectovaginal Fistula

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of recurrent rectovaginal fistulas is notoriously difficult. Placement of the gracilis muscle between the vagina and anus is an advanced technique used to close persistent fistulas. We have utilized this procedure for recalcitrant fistulas and hypothesized that a gracilis interposition would offer a good treatment option for patients with refractory rectovaginal fistulas, regardless of underlying etiology.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate healing rates of gracilis interposition in patients with refractory rectovaginal fistulas.

DESIGN

Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all adult female patients with a diagnosis of rectovaginal fistula between January 2009 and August 2020 was performed; those who underwent gracilis interposition for definitive fistula closure were included for analysis.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a colorectal surgery department at a tertiary center in the United States.

PATIENTS

All patients were adult females with a diagnosis of a rectovaginal fistula who underwent gracilis interposition for definitive closure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient demographics, etiology of rectovaginal fistula, previous surgical intervention, presence of intestinal diversion, operative details, 30-day morbidity, recurrence of fistula, and time to recurrence. Fistula closure was defined as lack of clinical symptoms following stoma closure, negative fistula detection on gastrograffin enema' and absence of an internal opening at examination under anesthesia.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included who had a median age of 43 years (range, 19-64 years) and median body mass index of 31 kg/m 2 (range, 22-51). Median time between prior attempted surgical repair and gracilis surgery was 7 months (range, 3-17). The number of previously attempted repairs were 1-2 (n = 8), 3-4 (n = 9), and > 4 (n = 5). The most recent attempted surgical repair was rectal advancement flap (n = 7), transperineal +/- Martius flap (n = 4), episioproctotomy (n = 3), transvaginal repair (n = 2), and other (n = 6). All patients had fecal diversion at the time of gracilis surgery. Thirty-day postoperative surgical site infection at the graft/donor site was 32% (n = 7). At a median follow-up of 22 months (range 2-62), fistula closure was 59% (n = 13). Gracilis interposition was successful in all inflammatory bowel disease patients.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Gracilis interposition is an effective operative technique for reoperative rectovaginal fistula closure. Patients should be counseled regarding the possibility of graft/donor site infection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B763 .

REPARACIN CON COLGAJO DE GRACILIS PARA LA FSTULA RECTOVAGINAL REOPERATORIA

ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico de las fístulas rectovaginales recurrentes es muy difícil. La colocación del músculo gracilis entre la vagina y el ano es una técnica avanzada que se utiliza para cerrar las fístulas persistentes. Hemos utilizado este procedimiento para las fístulas recalcitrantes y planteamos la hipótesis de que una interposición del gracilis ofrecería una buena opción de tratamiento para pacientes con fístulas rectovaginales refractarias, independientemente de la etiología subyacente.OBJETIVO:Investigar las tasas de curación de la interposición del gracilis en pacientes con fístulas rectovaginales refractarias.DISEÑO:Tras la aprobación de la junta de revisión institucional, se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de todas las pacientes adultas con un diagnóstico de fístula rectovaginal entre enero de 2009 y agosto de 2020; los que se sometieron a interposición de gracilis para el cierre definitivo de la fístula se incluyeron para el análisis.AJUSTE:Departamento de cirugía colorrectal de un centro terciario en Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Todas las pacientes adultas con diagnóstico de fístula rectovaginal que se sometieron a interposición de gracilis para cierre definitivo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:datos demográficos del paciente, etiología de la fístula rectovaginal, intervención quirúrgica previa, presencia de derivación intestinal, detalles quirúrgicos, morbilidad a los 30 días, recurrencia de la fístula y tiempo hasta la recurrencia. El cierre de la fístula se definió como la ausencia de síntomas clínicos después del cierre del estoma, la detección negativa de la fístula en el enema de gastrograffin y la ausencia de una abertura interna en el examen bajo anestesia.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 22 pacientes que tenían una mediana de edad de 43 años (rango 19-64 años) y una mediana de índice de masa corporal de 31 kg / m2 (rango 22-51). La mediana de tiempo entre el intento previo de reparación quirúrgica y la cirugía del gracilis fue de 7 meses (rango 3-17). El número de reparaciones previamente intentadas fue: 1-2 (n = 8), 3-4 (n = 9), y >4 (n = 5). El intento de reparación quirúrgica más reciente fue el colgajo de avance rectal (n = 7), el colgajo transperineal +/- Martius (n = 4), la episioproctotomía (n = 3), la reparación transvaginal (n = 2) y otros (n = 6). Todos los pacientes tenían derivación fecal en el momento de la cirugía gracilis. La infección del sitio quirúrgico posoperatorio a los 30 días en el sitio del injerto / donante fue del 32% (n = 7). Con una mediana de seguimiento de 22 meses (rango 2-62), el cierre de la fístula fue del 59% (n = 13). La interposición de Gracilis fue exitosa en todos los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo de los datos.CONCLUSIONES:La interposición de Gracilis es una técnica quirúrgica eficaz para el cierre reoperatorio de la fístula rectovaginal. Se debe asesorar a los pacientes sobre la posibilidad de infección del sitio del injerto / donante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B763 . (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Gracilis muscle interposition for complex perineal fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

AIM

Complex perineal fistulas (CPFs) are among the most challenging problems in colorectal practice. Various procedures have been used to treat CPFs, with none being a panacea. Our study aimed to assess the overall success and complication rates after gracilis muscle interposition in patients with CPF.

METHOD

PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched until January 2022 according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies including children <18 years or <10 patients were excluded, as well as reviews, duplicate or animal studies, studies with poor documentation (no report of success rate) and non-English text. An open-source, cross-platform software for advanced meta-analysis openMeta [Analyst]™ version 12.11.14 and Cochrane Review Manager 5.4® were used to conduct the meta-analysis of data.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies published between 2002 and 2021 were identified. The studies included 658 patients (409 women). Most patients had rectovaginal (50.7%) or rectourethral fistulas (33.7%). The most common causes of CPF were pelvic surgery (29.4%) and inflammatory bowel disease (25.2%). A history of radiotherapy was reported in approximately 18% of the patients. 498 (75.7%) patients with CPF achieved complete healing after gracilis muscle interposition. The weighted mean rate of success of the gracilis interposition procedure was 79.4% (95% CI 73.8%-85%, I²  = 75.3%), the weighted mean short-term complication rate was 25.7% (95% CI 18.1-33.2, I²  = 84.1%) and the weighted mean rate for 30-day reoperation was 3.6% (95% CI 1.6-5.6, I²  = 42%). The weighted mean rate of fistula recurrence was 16.7% (95% CI 11%-22.3%, I²  = 61%).

CONCLUSION

The gracilis muscle interposition technique is a viable treatment option for CPF. Surgeons should be familiar with indications and techniques to offer it as an option for patients. Given the relatively infrequent use of the operation, referral rather than performance of graciloplasty is an acceptable option.

Clinical outcome and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for fistula closure over a 10-year period

PURPOSE

Gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) is an established surgical technique in the treatment of anorectal fistulas and fistulas to the vagina and the urinary system when previous closure options have failed. There is little evidence on the success rate of this procedure in the long term.

METHODS

This is a follow-up study on all patients undergoing GMT over a 10-year period at a tertiary referral center for complex fistulas. Postoperative function and quality of life were evaluated by standardized questionnaires (Wexner score, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score (FIQL), SF-12 and a brief questionnaire designed for this study). Sexual function was evaluated by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the International Index of Erectile Function.

RESULTS

Forty-seven gracilis muscle transpositions (GMT) in 46 patients were performed. Most treated patients had (neo-)-rectovaginal fistulas (n = 29). An overall fistula closure was achieved in 34 of 46 patients (74%): in 25 cases primarily by GMT (53%) and in nine patients with persistent or recurrent fistula by additional surgical procedures. A clinically apparent relapse occurred on average 276 days (median: 180 days) after GMT (mean follow-up 73.4 months).

CONCLUSION

GMT in our hands has a primary closure rate of 53%, and after further procedures, this rises to 74%. Fecal continence is impaired in patients having undergone GMT. The overall quality of life in patients after GMT is only slightly impaired, and sexual function is severely impaired in female patients.

Functional outcome and quality of life evaluation of graciloplasty for the treatment of complex recto-vaginal and recto-urethral fistulas

Recto-vaginal (RVF) and recto-urethral (RUF) fistulas are infrequent but disabling conditions that severely affect patients' quality of life. Considering the high recurrence rate after conservative approaches, the best surgical treatment is still challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of graciloplasty to treat patients with complex RVF or RUF, and to investigate its effect on the quality of life. Fourteen patients with RVF and RUF who underwent graciloplasty between 2003 and 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The main outcome was the healing rate of fistulas. Postoperative patients satisfaction was evaluated administering the Clinical Patient Grading Assessment Scale (CPGAS), SF-36 questionnaires and Changes in Sexual Functioning (CSF) questionnaires. The Wexner score was calculated in case of preoperative faecal incontinence. RVF and RUF were iatrogenic in 11 patients and due to Crohn's disease in 3 cases. After 1 year of follow-up (IQR 10-14 months), the success rate of the procedure was 78%. Out of three patients with RVF due to Crohn's disease, two healed after the procedure. Six months after surgery, all eight SF-36 domains significantly improved except for "body pain"; CSF score significantly increased from 35.5 (IQR 31-38.7) to 44 (IQR 37.7-48.5); CPGAS score improved from a median value of 0 (IQR 0-0) to 4 (IQR 3.2-4). The Wexner score was calculated only in 5 patients with preoperative faecal incontinence and it significantly decreased from a median value of 12 (IQR 11-14) to 5 (IQR 4-5). Graciloplasty could be considered as a first option treatment for complex or recurrent RVF and RUF. It shows a good healing rate even in case of unfavourable factors like Crohn's disease.

Operative results, sexual function and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition in complex rectovaginal fistulas

AIM

Successful treatment of complex rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) continues to be a surgical challenge. Interposition of well-perfused tissue, such as gracilis muscle, is one treatment option. The aim of this study was to investigate the operative results, sexual function and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) in the authors' own group of patients.

METHOD

The study included 19 women with RVF (mean age 48 years). The postoperative outcome was evaluated by a questionnaire and clinical examination.

RESULTS

The postoperative follow-up period was 7 months to 3.5 years (mean 23 months). GMT led to primary healing of RVF in 10 (53%) patients. Recurrences were observed in nine (47%) patients with RVF, in four (44%) of whom healing was achieved as a result of further interventions. Following GMT, two complications (abscess formation) requiring revision occurred. Although 42% of the patients reported certain limitations following muscle removal, GMT is a procedure that has a positive influence on the healing rate (74%), quality of life, continence and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

GMT is a procedure that allows healing in the majority of patients with RVFs, and it should be considered especially in patients with recurrent fistulas, in whom a correlation between decreasing healing rates and the number of previous operations has been demonstrated.

Gracilis muscle interposition for rectovaginal and anovaginal fistula repair: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Repair of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is associated with high recurrence. For this reason gracilis muscle interposition is increasingly being used.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of this procedure for RVF repair.

METHOD/SEARCH STRATEGY

A search of PubMed and Medline databases was performed in November 2013 using the text terms and MESH headings 'rectovaginal fistula/fistulation', and 'gracilis muscle', spanning 1980-2013. The search strategy was restricted to articles written in English with available abstracts. Sample size, aetiology of RVF, previous repair attempts, follow-up period, healing rates and complications were recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies involving 106 patients were analysed. The cause of RVF included inflammatory bowel disease (n = 37 [34.9%]: Crohn's disease [34], ulcerative colitis [3]), pelvic surgery (37 [34.9%]), obstetric injury (9 [8.5%]), malignancy (7 [6.6%]), trauma (5 [4.7%]), miscellaneous (idiopathic, endometriosis, radiation: 11 [10.4%]). Patients had undergone a median number of two previous unsuccessful repairs. At a median follow-up of 21 months, healing had occurred in 33-100% (median 100%) with the largest studies reporting rates between 60% and 90%. Thirteen studies did not report any complications, with the remainder reporting only minor morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Gracilis interposition appears to have a reasonable success rate for RVF repair with acceptable morbidity. It may be considered as one of the first-line treatment options for recurrent RVF.