New serological markers in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Enterogenous Microbiotic Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease and Intestinal Tuberculosis

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic intestinal disorder characterized by refractory gastrointestinal ulcerations. Intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) is one common intestinal disease in east Asia. The two diseases share similar clinical manifestations and endoscopic characteristics. Thus, it is difficult to establish a definite diagnosis of CD, CD concomitant with ITB (CD-ITB), and ITB in practice. Some enterogeneous microbiotic markers have been applied to differentiate CD and ITB, but it remains unknown how they work for the three groups of patients. The aim of our study was to explore the diagnostic values of these enterogeneous microbiotic markers (ASCA IgG, ASCA IgA, ACCA, Anti-I2 and AMCA) among CD, CD-ITB, and ITB patients. A total of 124 individuals were retrospectively enrolled in this study, namely, 103 CD patients, 10 CD-ITB patients, 9 ITB patients, and 68 healthy controls. The demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients were collected and analyzed. The values of these individual or combined enterogeneous microbiotic markers in diagnosis and classification were assessed in CD, CD-ITB, and ITB patients. ASCA IgG, ASCA IgA, and AMCA could accurately differentiate CD patients from healthy controls with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.688, 0.601, and 0.638, respectively. ASCA IgG was significantly higher in CD patients than in CD-ITB patients (P = 0.0003). The Anti-I2 antibody was appropriate for distinguishing CD-ITB from ITB patients (P = 0.039). In CD patients, ASCA IgG was higher in severe patients than in mild (P <0.0001) and inactive patients (P <0.0001), respectively. AMCA was significantly elevated in severe and moderate patients compared to inactive patients (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively). AMCA was associated with a higher risk of CD-related surgery with a significant P-value of 0.0038. In our cohort, ASCAs and AMCA could accurately distinguish CD from healthy controls with an acceptable AUC. A combination of elevated ASCA IgG and AMCA antibodies established a higher sensitivity in differentiating CD from healthy controls. Elevated ASCA IgG demonstrated a differential diagnostic value between CD and CD-ITB. Anti-I2 could also distinguish CD-ITB from ITB. The level of AMCA was associated with both disease severity and CD-related surgery. Likewise, the level of ASCA IgG was also related to disease severity.

CLASSICAL SEROLOGICAL MARKERS IN PEDIATRIC INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN BRAZIL

BACKGROUND

Perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (p-ANCA) and anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCAs) have long been used to differentiate between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), more recently having been used as prognostic indicators.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of serological markers in the identification of pediatric CD and UC in Sao Paulo, Brazil, as well as to correlate those markers with characteristics demographic and clinical of these two diseases.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional multi-center study involving pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We identified ASCAs serological markers and p-ANCA, correlating their presence with demographic and clinical data, not only in the patients with IBD but also in a group of age-matched gastrointestinal disease-free controls.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients, 74 with IBD (46% males), treated at four pediatric gastroenterology referral centers, the mean age of 13±7 years, 49 (66%) with CD, and 25 (34%) with UC. The control Group comprised 48 patients (54% males). The proportion of patients testing positive for p-ANCA was significantly higher in the UC group (69.9%) compared to the CD group (30.4%), as well as being significantly higher in the CD group versus the control Group (P<0.001 for both). The proportion of patients testing positive for ASCA IgA (76.2%) and ASCA IgG (94.4%) markers was also significantly higher in the CD group than in the control Group (P<0.001), and such positivity correlated significantly with the use of immunomodulatory medications such as azathioprine and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents (azathioprine 38.9%, anti-TNF 55.6%; P=0.002). In the CD group, the proportion of patients testing positive for the ASCA IgA was significantly higher among those who underwent surgery than among those who did not (26.86±17.99; P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

In pediatric patients with IBD in Sao Paulo, Brazil, serological tests proving to be highly specific, although not very sensitive, for the diagnosis of IBD. However, the serological markers showed a positive correlation with the severity of the disease.

Clinical value of antibodies in inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel disease IBD (Crohns disease CD, ulcerative colitis UC) immune-mediated diseases of the digestive tract of unknown etiology. The basis of the pathogenesis of IBD is a violation of the protective mechanisms of the intestinal barrier as a result of a complex interaction of environmental factors, a genetic predisposition and defects in the activation of the immune response in the lymphoid tissue of the intestinal mucosa. Three groups of antibodies are detected in the sera of IBD patients: autoantibodies, antimicrobial antibodies and antibodies to peptide antigens. In CD, the most useful diagnostic markers are ASCA; in UC patients pANCA. Antibodies are not among the diagnostic criteria for CD and UC, the diagnosis of which is traditionally made on the basis of a complex of clinical, radiological, endoscopic and histological signs, but can be used as useful additional non-invasive markers for early diagnosis, assessment of clinical phenotypes, prognosis and effectiveness of treatment of these diseases.

Labordiagnostik bei chronisch‑entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen

Die Labordiagnostik hat sowohl im empfohlenen initialen „work up“ bei Verdacht auf eine chronisch entzündliche Darmerkrankung (CED) wie auch für das Monitoring des Krankheitsverlaufs und des Therapieansprechens einen klar umrissenen Stellenwert: Mithilfe der „Basislaborparameter“ wie z. B. Blutkörperchensenkungsgeschwindigkeit (BSG) können krankheitsspezifische Aktivitätsindizes erstellt werden, und neue serologische Marker (u. a. ANCA [„antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies“], ASCA [„anti-saccharomyces cerevisiaeantibodies“]) dienen der ergänzenden Differenzierung der CED-Entitäten. Derzeit dürfte das Stuhl-Calprotectin – als am weitreichendsten untersuchter fäkaler Inflammationsmarker – v. a. aufgrund der hohen Sensitivität initial und zur Einschätzung der Krankheitsaktivität der relativ beste Surrogatmarker sein. Nach wie vor ist aber die endoskopisch-histopathologische Evaluierung nicht nur für die Diagnose unabdingbar, sondern auch bezüglich des erklärten Therapieziels des „mucosal healing“, also im Rahmen der präzisen Verlaufsdokumentation. Der Entwicklung weniger invasiver „Biomarker“, die möglichst gut mit dem Schleimhautbefund korrelieren, kommt besondere Bedeutung zu, um die derzeit oft noch notwendige invasive Reevaluierung verringern zu helfen. Wie die Wertigkeit sowohl in der Routine etablierter, aber auch neuer, teils experimentell angewandter serologischer, fäkaler und funktioneller Laborparameter bzw. -tests einzuschätzen ist, und welche diagnostischen Methoden in Erprobung sind, wird im vorliegenden Beitrag erläutert.

Autoantibodies as diagnostic markers and potential drivers of inflammation in ulcerative colitis

To date, no comprehensive analysis of autoantibodies in sera of patients with ulcerative colitis has been conducted. To analyze the spectrum of autoantibodies and to elucidate their role serum-IgG from UC patients (n = 49) and non-UC donors (n = 23) were screened by using a human protein microarray. Screening yielded a remarkable number of 697 differentially-reactive at the nominal 0·01 significance level (FDR<0·1) of the univariate test between the UC and the non-UC group. CD99 emerged as a biomarker to discriminate between both groups (p = 1e-04, AUC = 0·8). In addition, cytokines, chemokines and growth factors were analyzed by Olink's Proseek® Multiplex Inflammation-I 96×96 immuno-qPCR assay and 31 genes were significant at the nominal 0.05 level of the univariate test to discriminate between UC and non-UC donors. MCP-3, HGF and CXCL-9 were identified as the most significant markers to discriminate between UC patients with clinically active and inactive disease. Levels of CXCL10 (cor = 0.3; p = 0.02), CCL25 (cor = 0.25; p = 0.04) and CCL28 (cor = 0.3; p = 0.02) correlated positively with levels of anti CD99. To assess whether autoantibodies are detectable prior to diagnosis with UC, sera from nine donors at two different time points (T-early, median 21 months and T-late, median 6 months) were analyzed. 1201 features were identified with higher reactivity in samples at time points closer to clinical UC presentation. In vitro, additional challenge of peripheral mononuclear cells with CD99 did not activate CD4+ T cells but induced the secretion of IL-10 (-CD99: 20.21±20.25; +CD99: 130.20±89.55; mean ±sd; p = 0.015). To examine the effect of CD99 in vivo, inflammation and autoantibody levels were examined in NOD/ScidIL2Rγnull mice reconstituted with PBMC from UC donors (NSG-UC). Additional challenge with CD99 aggravated disease symptoms and pathological phenotype as indicated by the elevated clinical score (-CD99: 1·85 ± 1·94; +CD99: 4·25 ± 1·48) and histological score (-CD99: 2·16 ± 0·83; +CD99: 3·15 ± 1·16, p = 0·01). Furthermore, levels of anti-CD99 antibodies increased (Control: 398 ± 323; mean MFI ± sd; Ethanol + PBS: 358 ±316; Ethanol + CD99: 1363 ± 1336; Control versus Ethanol + CD99: p = 0.03). In a highly inflammatory environment, frequencies of pro-inflammatory M1 monocytes (CD14+ CD64+: unchallenged 8.09±4.72; challenged 14.2±8.62; p = 0.07; CD14+ CD1a+: unchallenged 16.29 ±6.97; challenged 43.81±14.4, p = 0.0003) increased and levels of autoantibodies in serum decreased in the NSG-UC mouse model. These results suggest that autoantibodies are potent biomarkers to discriminate between UC and non-UC and indicate risk to develop UC. In an inflammatory environment, auto-antibodies may promote the pathological phenotype by activating M1 monocytes in the NSG-UC animal model and also in patients with UC.

An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of the chronic inflammatory bowel diseases relies upon initial recognition of an inflammatory condition, followed by definitive endoscopic, histological and radiological investigations. Various biomarkers are available to assist with initial elucidation of an inflammatory process: these also have important roles after diagnosis in monitoring and ongoing assessment of progress. Areas covered: Various inflammatory markers, serological tests and genetic analyses may be helpful in predicting the course of disease in the coming months. This review provides an update on the current understanding and knowledge about these markers. It also highlights key gaps and identifies aspects that require further study. Expert commentary: Our current approach to the application of non-invasive biomarkers is rudimentary. Further work is required to elucidate the roles of the various markers.

Serological markers in diagnosis of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and as predictors for early tumor necrosis factor blocker therapy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of serological markers in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), their utility in differentiating Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and symptomatic non-IBD patients and whether serological markers are associated with early TNF blocker treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-six children and adolescents <18 years, 58 with IBD and 38 symptomatic non-IBD controls were included. At diagnosis and after 1-2 years, serological antibodies (anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA), perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA), flagellin expressed by Clostridial phylum (anti-CBir1), outer membrane porin of Escherichia coli (anti-OmpC), Pseudomonas fluorescens-associated sequence (anti-I2), CRP, ESR and fecal calprotectin were analyzed. The choice of treatment was made at the discretion of the treating pediatrician.

RESULTS

Of the IBD patients, 20 (36%) and 26 (47%) were positive for ASCA and pANCA compared to 3(8%), p < .01 and 10 (27%), p = .04 of the controls. Thirteen (72%) of UC patients were pANCA positive, versus 13 (35%) of CD patients (p < .01). None of the UC patients was ASCA positive versus 20 (54%) of CD patients (p < .0001). Compared to conventionally treated patients, the 18 (49%) TNF blocker treated CD patients had higher presence of ASCA (p < .01), lower presence of pANCA (p = .02) and higher levels of fecal calprotectin, CRP and ESR at diagnosis. In multivariate analyses ASCA and pANCA status, but not CRP, ESR or calprotectin, were independently associated with early TNF blocker treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

ASCA and pANCA status were associated with having IBD and with early TNF blocker treatment in CD.

Laparoscopic-assisted subtotal colectomy combined with modified Duhamel procedure for mixed constipation

Background and Objectives:

To evaluate the effects of subtotal colectomy combined with the modified Duhamel procedure on mixed constipation.

Methods:

A total of 16 female patients with mixed constipation were enrolled and underwent subtotal colectomy combined with the modified Duhamel procedure under laparoscopy from April 2010 to April 2012. Before surgery, physical examinations such as the gastrointestinal transit test, barium enema, and defecography were performed for all the patients. After surgical treatment, 2-year follow-up was performed using questionnaires to assess the effect of treatment.

Results:

All 16 cases were treated successfully, with a mean operation time of 230 minutes (range, 180–290 minutes). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were found, and no deaths occurred. Constipation and relevant symptoms were relieved, and all patients were satisfied with their quality of life. The gastrointestinal quality-of-life score was significantly increased 6 months postoperatively (mean, 102) compared with preoperatively (mean, 75).

Conclusion:

Subtotal colectomy combined with the modified Duhamel procedure under laparoscopy is effective and safe for the treatment of mixed constipation.

Clinical Utility of Biomarkers in IBD

There is no gold standard for the diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Biomarkers are useful tools for the management of patients suffering from IBD. However, they should be used only when their additional information is useful for clinical decision-making. In principal, four situations during the management of an individual IBD patient can be discriminated from a clinical standpoint in which biomarkers provide useful information. First, biomarkers may be helpful when the diagnosis of IBD is established and aid in the discrimination between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) is necessary. Second, biomarkers may be helpful in the prognostic evaluation of IBD severity or disease behavior and for early decisions on the best treatment. The third situation in which biomarkers are useful is the evaluation of disease activity during the disease course, for monitoring and for guidance of ongoing treatment. Finally, the fourth typical situation when biomarkers are of value is after surgery to predict or diagnose a relapse of the disease. From a clinical point of view, it may be more useful to discuss specific biomarkers and their individual value and impact in these four prototypic situations than to sum up advantages and disadvantages for each biomarker isolated from the clinical situation. Therefore, this overview is structured in chapters reflecting those four typical situations during the disease course of IBD patents to critically evaluate the potential and value of each of the biomarkers in the specific situation.

Role of serum S100A12 in diagnosis and evaluation of ulcerative colitis

AIM: To determine serum levels of S100A12 in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to explore its potential role in the diagnosis of UC and evaluation of disease development.

METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 66 patients with active UC (A-UC), 24 patients with UC in remission (R-UC) and 20 healthy controls. S100A12 levels were determined by ELISA. The role of S100A12 in the diagnosis and evaluation of disease development was then investigated.

RESULTS: The levels of serum S100A12 were significantly higher in patients with A-UC (725.6 pg/mL ± 239.6 pg/mL) compared with R-UC patients (311.2 pg/mL ± 87.5 pg/mL) and healthy controls (218.6 pg/mL ± 76.8 pg/mL) (P < 0.001). S100A12 was found to be markedly increased in severe UC patients compared with mild and moderate UC patients (P < 0.05). S100A12 was positively correlated with serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in UC patients. Moreover, S100A12 was found to be markedly decreased in UC patients after receiving effective treatment compared with that before treatment (P< 0.05).

CONCLUSION: S100A12 is markedly increased in the sera of UC patients. It can be used to diagnose the disease and predict the disease progression, suggesting that S100A12 is a useful marker for the prediction of UC.

The association of autoimmune diseases with pediatric ulcerative colitis does not influence its disease course

OBJECTIVE

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition. Previous reports suggested that UC may have a worse prognosis when associated with auto-immune diseases. We compared characteristics at diagnosis and natural history of the disease between classical ulcerative colitis (CUC) and UC associated with auto-immune diseases (CAI) in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study, 67 children followed for UC at Nancy University Hospital between 1993 and 2012 were included: 45 patients in the CUC group and 22 in the CAI group.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Median age at diagnosis was 11.6 years in the CAI group and 9.8 years in the CUC group. Time between symptoms onset and diagnosis was broadly similar in the two groups (<3 months) and there were no significant differences regarding biological and histological findings. At 5 years, the need for corticosteroids and azathioprine did not differ between the CAI and the CUC groups. There was also no significant difference between the two groups regarding infliximab use at 1 and 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pediatric study, CAI had similar characteristics at baseline as CUC. The course of CAI does not seem to be influenced by the presence of concomitant auto-immune diseases.

Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathogenesis and Therapy: Is It All About Diet?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and unclassified IBD, continues to cause significant morbidity. While its incidence is increasing, no clear etiology and no cure have yet been discovered. Recent findings suggest that IBD may have a multifactorial etiology, where complex interactions between genetics, epigenetics, environmental factors (including diet but also infections, antibiotics, and sanitation), and host immune system lead to abnormal immune responses and chronic inflammation. Over the past years, the role of altered gut microbiota (in both composition and function) in IBD pathogenesis has emerged as an outstanding area of interest. According to new findings, gut dysbiosis may appear as a key element in initiation of inflammation in IBD and its complications. Moreover, complex metagenomic studies provide possibilities to distinguish between IBD types and appreciate severity and prognosis of the disease, as well as response to therapy. This review provides an updated knowledge of recent findings linking altered bacterial composition and functions, viruses, and fungi to IBD pathogenesis. It also highlights the complex genetic, epigenetic, immune, and microbial interactions in relation to environmental factors (including diet). We overview the actual options to manipulate the altered microbiota, such as modified diet, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, and fecal transplantation. Future possible therapies are also included. Targeting altered microbiota could be the next therapeutic personalized approach, but more research and well-designed comparative prospective studies are required to formulate adequate directions for prevention and therapy.