Gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma: A computed tomography report of six cases

Emphasis on the clinical relationship between alpha-fetoprotein and hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a highly malignant and rare extrahepatic tumor. The prognosis is controversial because of its rarity and the lack of multi-center cohort studies, especially on the influence of serum Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level on prognosis. We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HAS, particularly the effect of serum AFP on the prognosis of HAS.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of one HAS patient treated at our institution in 2019 and of 252 patients reported between 1984 and 2020 in research databases.

RESULTS

Among these patients, 60.1% were > 60 years, 51% had lesions in the gastric antrum, and 51.0% (73/143) had the ulcerative lesion type. The preoperative elevated levels of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were detected in most patients (76.7%). Lymph-node (84.6%) and preoperative liver metastasis (39.1%) were often found. The high-AFP group was characterized by a higher rate of stage IV (P = 0.000682) and liver metastasis (P = 0.000068). The 1-, 3-and 5-year progression-free survival(PFS) rates were 41%, 18%, and 0%, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 64%, 26%, and 21%, respectively. The survival analysis showed that OS was significantly shorter for HAS with high-AFP (> 300 ng/ml) than with low-AFP (≤ 300 ng/ml) (P = 0.023). The univariate analysis indicated that the OS of HAS was associated with tumor location, pTNM stage, lymph-node metastasis, surgical resection, and serum AFP > 300 ng/ml. However,the prognostic factors for PFS was only pTNM stage and surgical resection. The multivariate analysis confirmed that the independent prognostic factor affecting OS of HAS included pTNM stage and surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver metastasis was increasingly more likely with increasingly higher serum AFP, but the prognosis of HAS is not necessarily poor. Serum AFP level is an important prognostic indicator in HAS and should be monitored.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: CT findings

Objective

To analyze the CT findings of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and improve the diagnosis accuracy of this condition.

Methods

The CT images of 22 pathologically confirmed HAS patients were analyzed retrospectively. We investigated the location of lesions, morphology, enhancement features, area of invasion into surrounding organs, lymph node metastasis, and venous tumor thrombus.

Results

Among the 22 patients (17 men and 5 women, the mean age was 61.41 ± 9.83 years ranging from 36 to 80 years) with HAS; the morphology of tumors included mass (n = 5), focal ulcer (n = 7), and infiltrating ulcer (n = 10). Extraserous fat was invaded in 12 cases. Enhancement scans showed continuous enhancement in all cases. The CT values of unenhanced scan, the arterial phase, and the portal venous phase are 30.36 ± 6.46, 60.91 ± 17.80, and 75.64 ± 22.09 (Hounsfield Unit, HU), respectively. In six cases, the tumor infiltrated the surrounding organs: liver (n = 1), pancreas (n = 2), and both liver and pancreas (n = 3). In 16 out of 22 patients (72.3%), suspicious lymph node metastasis at CT imaging has then been confirmed by pathological specimens. Intrahepatic metastasis was found in 14 cases. Seven patients had venous tumor thrombus: three patients developed tumor thrombus in the main trunk and intrahepatic branches of the portal vein and two patients in the portal vein, splenic vein, and superior mesenteric vein simultaneously.

Conclusion

The CT scans of HAS often show a thickened gastric wall and infiltrating ulceration. Infiltration into extraserosal fat is often seen. Enhancement scans show a continuous and progressive enhancement of lesions. Lymph node metastasis, intrahepatic metastasis, and portal vein tumor thrombus are common in HAS patients.

CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiating gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma from gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

To develop a CT-based radiomics nomogram for the high-precision preoperative differentiation of gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (GHAC) patients from gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

108 patients with GHAC from 6 centers and 108 GAC patients matched by age, sex and T stage undergoing pathological examination were retrospectively reviewed. Patients from 5 centers were divided into two cohorts (training and internal validation) at a 7:3 ratio, the remaining patients were external test cohort. Venous-phase CT images were retrieved for tumor segmentation and feature extraction. A radiomics model was developed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. The nomogram was developed by clinical factors and the radiomics score.

RESULTS

1409 features were extracted and a radiomics model consisting of 19 features was developed, which showed a favorable performance in discriminating GHAC from GAC (AUC_{training cohort} = 0.998, AUC_{internal validation set} = 0.942, AUC_{external test cohort} = 0.731). The radiomics nomogram, including the radiomics score, AFP, and CA72_4, achieved good calibration and discrimination (AUC_{training cohort} = 0.998, AUC_{internal validation set} = 0.954, AUC_{external test cohort} = 0.909).

CONCLUSIONS

The noninvasive CT-based nomogram, including radiomics score, AFP, and CA72_4, showed favorable predictive efficacy for differentiating GHAC from GAC and might be useful for clinical decision-making.

Computed Tomography Features and Clinical Prognostic Characteristics of Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach

PURPOSE

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a highly malignant and aggressive tumor. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical, computed tomography (CT), and prognostic features of HAS to increase the awareness of this entity and determine its distinguishing features from non-HAS tumors.

METHODS

The CT features and clinical data of 47 patients in our hospital with pathologically documented HAS were retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant differences between pure HAS (pHAS) and mixed HAS (mHAS) were determined. In addition, 141 patients with non-HAS tumors in the same T stage in the same period were selected as the control group. The data were compared between the two groups, and factors affecting the prognosis of HAS were analyzed. In addition, we included 9 patients with HAS and 27 patients with non-HAS tumors from another center for external validation.

RESULTS

The patients in the HAS group were predominantly men (n = 33), and the tumor location was mostly the cardia or fundus (n = 27). Between the HAS and non-HAS groups, there were observed differences in terms of: sex, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen (CA)-125, and CA-724 levels; longest tumor diameter; degree of differentiation; vascular invasion; N stage, M stage, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage; thickest tumor diameter; plain CT attenuation; arterial-phase CT attenuation; CT attenuation between the venous and arterial phases; enhancement modes; and degrees of enhancement (all P < 0.05). In the data from another center for external validation, there were observed differences in terms of: age, degree of differentiation, vascular invasion, thickest tumor diameter, the ratio of arterial CT attenuation to CT attenuation of the abdominal aorta at the same level (RA), CT attenuation difference between the venous phase and arterial phase (HUv-a) (all P < 0.05). The results of the multivariate analysis revealed that the independent factors for differentiation were serum AFP level (P = 0.001), M stage (P = 0.038), and tumor enhancement on CT (P = 0.014). Among patients in the HAS group, 72.34% had pHAS and 27.66% had mHAS. The thickest tumor diameter and the longest short diameter of the metastatic lymph nodes of the mHAS group were on average 6.39 cm and 1.45 cm, respectively, which were larger than those in the pHAS group. The median progression-free survival time was 18.25 months in the HAS group, which was shorter than that in the non-HAS group (72.96 months; P = 0.001). The median overall survival time in the HAS group was 24.80 months, which was shorter than that in the non-HAS group (67.96 months; P = 0.001). The factors affecting the prognosis of HAS were M stage (P = 0.001), overall TNM stage (P = 0.048), presence of vascular cancer emboli (P = 0.040), and pHAS type (P = 0.046). Multifactorial analysis revealed that M stage (P = 0.027) and pHAS type (P = 0.009) were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of HAS.

CONCLUSION

Although HAS is a rare clinical entity, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of gastric tumors. Patients with HAS often have advanced-stage disease at presentation and a worse prognosis than patients with non-HAS tumors. CT findings, combined with laboratory results, can support the diagnosis of HAS. However, the final diagnosis needs to be confirmed with a histopathologic examination. If the postoperative pathologic findings reveal the mHAS type, a rapid clinical intervention and a detailed follow-up with CT are essential.

Mixed pancreatic hepatoid carcinoma: A surgical case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Hepatoid carcinoma (HC) is a rare type of malignant tumor that shared similar features of morphology and immunohistochemistry with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Pancreatic HC exists as either pure or mixed type. Mixed pancreatic HC is extremely rare, with only a few cases reported in the literature to date. Because of the rarity of mixed pancreatic HC, its clinical features including incidence, characteristics, and prognosis remain unclear. We herein report a case of a 49-year-old man who was diagnosed with mixed pancreatic HC with neuroendocrine differentiation and was treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. We also review the existing case reports in literature.

PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old man was admitted to our hospital after a chronic abdominal pain in the upper right quadrant. Abdominal ultrasound revealed only one low-density retroperitoneal mass measured at 20 × 48mm in size in the pancreatic-duodenal junction, whereas contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed three lymphatic neoplasms measured at 28 × 22 × 30 mm, 27 × 33 × 38 mm and 22 × 35 × 48 mm in size in the retroperitoneal pancreatic-duodenal junction. Ultrasound-guided tumor biopsy was performed. Pathological reading of tumor biopsy suspected of Paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma. Laparotomic retroperitoneal tumoral resection and lymphadenectomy was then performed. Histological reading was lymphatic metastasis of primary pancreatic hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, which were immunohistochemically positive for CKAE1/AE3, Hepatocyte paraffin 1, Chromogranin. After three weeks of the first surgery, the patient was assigned with Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) before adjuvant chemotherapy, revealing a low-density high-metabolism mass, 26 × 28 mm in size within the parenchyma of pancreatic head. Laparotomic pancreaticoduodenectomy and standard lymphadenectomy was performed to resect one mass, which revealed the same immunohistology features with the first mass. The patient was followed up with FOLFIRINOX protocol, and after 12 cycles, there was no evidence of postoperative recurrence.

DISCUSSION

There are few reported cases describing pancreatic hepatoid carcinoma, especially mixed form with other histological associated component. Neuroendocrine differentiation is the majority associated component with 62.5% of all cases of mixed - type form.

CONCLUSION

Primary pancreatic hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation was rare, biopsy and immunohistochemistry appeared with high diagnostic value in this case. The prognosis of pancreatic HC depends on the extent and tumor eradication, and in this case we recorded no postoperative complications and no recurrence in the 6-month follow-up period.

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Current Perspectives and New Developments

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare malignant tumor, accounting for only 0.17-15% of gastric cancers. Patients are often diagnosed at an advanced disease stage, and their symptoms are similar to conventional gastric cancer (CGC) without specific clinical manifestation. Morphologically, HAC has identical morphology and immunophenotype compared to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This is considered to be an underestimation in diagnosis due to its rare incidence, and no consensus is reached regarding therapy. HAS generally presents with more aggressive behavior and worse prognosis than CGC. The present review summarizes the current literature and relevant knowledge to elaborate on the epidemic, potential mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prognosis to help clinicians accurately diagnose and treat this malignant tumor.

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Pancreatitis

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) is an uncommon and aggressive type of adenocarcinoma, typically affecting the middle-aged and elderly. The morphological features of the HAC resemble hepatocellular carcinoma. Presenting symptoms may include upper abdominal pain, hematemesis, back pain, and palpable abdominal mass. HAC has no proven therapy, and the prognosis is extremely poor. Early surgical removal with chemotherapy remains the standard of care. We describe one of the youngest patients in the literature with HAC who presented with acute pancreatitis. The diagnostic workup was confused by diffuse lymphadenopathy and elevated β-human chorionic gonadotropin making lymphoma and germ cell tumor likely possibilities until immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis.

The Potential Role of Radiotherapy in the Management of Hepatoid Carcinomas of the Stomach: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (AC) of the stomach (HAS) represents a rare variant of conventional gastric AC characterised by poor prognosis. They are usually managed with surgery (localised disease) and chemotherapy.

CASE REPORT

We present the first case report of a patient with HAS who presented with weight loss, poor appetite, general clinical deterioration (performance status [PS] = 3), and active gastrointestinal bleeding who was treated with fractionated palliative radiotherapy (RT) using 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The use of RT was associated with excellent symptomatic and radiological response and facilitated surgery secondary to significant improvement in general fitness and PS.

CONCLUSION

RT may have a role in the multimodality management of hepatoid AC of the stomach.

Gastric Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma: Differentiation From Gastric Adenocarcinoma With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Findings

PURPOSE

This study aimed to describe the computed tomographic (CT) findings of gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (GHA) and determine features distinguishing it from gastric adenocarcinoma (GA).

METHODS

Computed tomographic images of pathologically verified GHA (n = 11) and GA (n = 38) were retrospectively reviewed. α-Fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and CT findings were assessed in our study. Computed tomographic findings included the location, distribution, growth pattern, ulceration, thickness of gastric wall, enhancement pattern, and the ratio of lesion attenuation to aorta CT attenuation. Short diameter of the metastatic lymph nodes, mean short diameter of metastatic lymph nodes, and the ratio of the number of enlarged lymph node on CT to the number of metastatic lymph nodes pathologically were measured and calculated. Data were compared using the χ and Student t tests; significant CT criteria were identified using receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

α-Fetoprotein, CEA, and CT findings, including the longest short diameter, the mean short diameter, the ratio of the number of enlarged lymph node on CT to the number of metastatic lymph nodes pathologically, the lesion in arterial phase minus portal venous phase, and the lesion/aorta ratio, were statistically significant predictors for the differentiation of GHA from GA (P < 0.05). When only the aforementioned CT findings were used as criteria, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing GHA were 82.86% and 90.91%, respectively. When AFP, CEA, and CT findings were used as criteria, sensitivity of 97.14% and specificity of 90.91% were achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated serum AFP level and CT findings could distinguish GHA and GA with a high degree of accuracy.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is an extremely rare and unique gastric malignancy. The present study aimed to examine the relevance of the clinicopathological characteristics of HAS with patient prognosis. We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 34 HAS patients treated at our institution between January 2010 and December 2016, as well as 294 cases reported prior to 2017 in research databases. Among these patients, 45.6% (115/252) had lesions in the gastric antrum and 77.0% (235/305) were male. Elevated levels of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were detected in most patients (75/93, 80.6%). Vascular invasion (199/286, 69.6%), lymph node metastasis (222/283, 78.4%), and preoperative distant metastasis (121/328, 36.9%) were commonly observed. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 20.7% and 29.2%, respectively. DFS and DSS of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were significantly higher than those of patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy [DFS: P<0.001, hazard ratio (HR)=-1.831, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.060-0.429; DSS: P<0.001, HR=-2.185, 95% CI: 0.032-0.401]. In conclusion, HAS exhibits distinct clinicopathological characteristics and a strikingly worse prognosis when compared with common gastric cancer. Complete surgery, early pTNM stage, and adjuvant therapy may predict a more favorable prognosis. Neoadjuvant therapy is strongly recommended for patients with lymph node metastasis or/and preoperative distant metastasis.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach--proper identification and treatment remain a challenge

OBJECTIVE

The term hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) of the stomach was introduced three decades ago with the observation of high serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels in some gastric adenocarcinoma patients. This very rare gastric cancer patient subgroup is likely frequently misdiagnosed.

MATERIAL

Two patients who were recently diagnosed with HAC of the stomach at our institution are presented. We also performed a structured literature search and reviewed pertinent articles to provide knowledge to improve the proper identification, diagnosis and management of patients with gastric HAC.

RESULTS

HAC is a rare subgroup of gastric carcinoma with poor prognosis. Clinical management of this population may be challenging. The scientific literature is largely based on very small patient series or case reports, and the evidence for proper decision making and management is considered weak.

CONCLUSION

All physicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastric cancer should pay attention to this rare subgroup to improve identification.