Prognostic performance of an index based on lactic dehydrogenase and transaminases for patients with liver steatosis and COVID-19

Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Is a Novel Predictor for the Severity in the Patients With MAFLD: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hefei, China

Background & Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the association between the level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and the severity of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) and the potential diagnostic value of LDH for identifying at-risk metabolic associated steatohepatitis (MASH).

Methods

This cross-sectional, real-world retrospective study enrolled a total of 1118 obese patients in the department of bariatric surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Of these, 855 were enrolled in the study cohort. MAFLD was defined as the presence or absence of fatty liver disease as suggested by histologic biopsy of liver or postoperative pathology slides, or even hematology, and meets one of the following three conditions: overweight or obesity, T2DM, and metabolic dysfunction (MetS). Serum LDH activity levels were measured in 885 patients, and logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between LDH and metabolic syndrome and the severity of MAFLD.

Results

In the study cohort of 855 obese patients, 604 (70.6%) had MetS. Patients with MetS (214.1[209.0-219.2]) had significantly higher serum LDH levels than those without MetS (188.7[181.6-195.9]). Particularly, serum LDH level was significantly higher in subjects with hypertension, central obesity, diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia, elevated levels of triglycerides, or reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein than in those without. Moreover, LDH concentrations were grouped according to the total number of MetS components present in each patient, with Serum LDH levels gradually increase with the total number of MetS components. The MASH subjects had significantly higher LDH levels than the other three less severe non-MASH cohorts, including normal liver, simple fatty steatosis, and B.MASH. Logistic regression showed that LDH was significantly and positively correlated with MAFLD, B.MASH, MASH, at-risk MASH, fibrosis grade ≥1, fibrosis grade ≥2 and fibrosis grade ≥3.

Conclusion

Increased LDH levels were significantly and independently associated with the presence and severity of metabolic syndrome and MAFLD, indicating that LDH could be used as a novel biomarker and clinical predictor of severity of metabolic syndrome and MAFLD.

Association between lactate dehydrogenase and the risk of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes

Objective

This study aims to investigate the association between lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and the risk of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods

The study enrolled patients with diagnosis of T2D between 2009 and 2018 from the National Nutrition and Health Examination Survey (NHANES) database. Demographic information, laboratory test, and diagnostic data were collected. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) plots were used to assess the dose-effect relationship between LDH levels and the risk of DKD in patients with T2D. Based on LDH levels, individuals were divided into higher and lower groups using dichotomy, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between different LDH levels and the risk of DKD in T2D patients. Stratified analysis was performed to assess the consistency of the result.

Results

A total of 4888 patients were included in the study, with 2976 (60.9%) patients without DKD and 1912 (39.1%) patients with DKD. RCS plots showed that the risk of DKD increased with increasing LDH levels. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that T2D patients with higher LDH levels had a 45% increased risk of DKD compared to those with lower LDH levels (OR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.11-1.89). Furthermore, each standard deviation increase in LDH level was associated with a 24% increase in DKD incidence among T2D patients (OR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.07-1.44). Stratified analysis consistently supported these findings.

Conclusions

LDH can serve as a valuable biomarker for screening DKD in patients with T2D.

COVID-19 and Fatty Liver Disorders

In late 2019, the world was shaken by the COVID-19 pandemic. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection became one of the main causes of illness and hospitalization worldwide, especially in subjects with metabolic comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, or liver disease. This scenario crosses with the metabolic liver disorders' "pandemic", caused by the exponential spreading of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, which is now the most prevalent cause of chronic liver disease (CLD). The aim of this review is to analyze the key factors of the relationship between COVID-19 and the spectrum of fatty liver disorders (FLD), in terms of molecular mechanisms and clinical presentation which can predict a more severe course of the infection. In addition, this review will face the change in management of FLD during pandemics, with a central role of telemedicine, and the role of other interventions in preventing and treating severe infection in these subjects.

Potential risk of liver injury in epileptic patients during COVID-19 pandemic

Most of the antiseizure medications (ASMs) are metabolized in liver and many of them particularly first-generation ASMs have the potential to increase liver enzymes or induce liver injury. Hence, treatment of new onset seizures or epilepsy by ASMs during the course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which could potentially be complicated by hepatic dysfunction, is a challenging clinical issue. Intravenous form of levetiracetam which has no significant hepatic metabolism or drug-drug interaction is often a favorable option to control seizures in acute phase of COVID-19. Administration of enzyme inducer ASMs and valproate with the well-known hepatotoxicity and common drug interactions is not generally recommended. In patients with epilepsy who are under control with potentially hepatotoxic ASMs, close observation and cautious dose reduction or drug switch should be considered if any evidence of hepatic impairment exists. However, risks of possible breakthrough seizures should be weighed against benefits of lowering the hazard of liver injury. In patients with epilepsy who receive polytherapy with ASMs, transient dose modification with the tendency to increase the dose of ASMs with more favorable safety profile and less drug interaction and decrease the dose of drugs with main hepatic metabolism, high protein binding, potential to cause liver injury and known drug-drug reaction should be considered. Finally, decision making should be individualized based on patients' conditions and course of illness.