Single-letter recognition accuracy benefits from advance cuing of location

The Influence of Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Attention on Decision Confidence

Spatial attention allows us to make more accurate decisions about events in our environment. Decision confidence is thought to be intimately linked to the decision making process as confidence ratings are tightly coupled to decision accuracy. While both spatial attention and decision confidence have been subjected to extensive research, surprisingly little is known about the interaction between these two processes. Since attention increases performance it might be expected that confidence would also increase. However, two studies investigating the effects of endogenous attention on decision confidence found contradictory results. Here we investigated the effects of two distinct forms of spatial attention on decision confidence; endogenous attention and exogenous attention. We used an orientation-matching task, comparing the two attention conditions (endogenous and exogenous) to a control condition without directed attention. Participants performed better under both attention conditions than in the control condition. Higher confidence ratings than the control condition were found under endogenous attention but not under exogenous attention. This finding suggests that while attention can increase confidence ratings, it must be voluntarily deployed for this increase to take place. We discuss possible implications of this relative overconfidence found only during endogenous attention with respect to the theoretical background of decision confidence.

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

This protocol describes how to conduct temporal-order experiments to measure visual processing speed and the attentional resource distribution. The proposed method is based on a new and synergistic combination of three components: the temporal-order judgments (TOJ) paradigm, Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention (TVA), and a hierarchical Bayesian estimation framework. The method provides readily interpretable parameters, which are supported by the theoretical and neurophysiological underpinnings of TVA. Using TOJs, TVA-based estimates can be obtained for a broad range of stimuli, whereas traditional paradigms used with TVA are mainly limited to letters and digits. Finally, the meaningful parameters of the proposed model allow for the establishment of a hierarchical Bayesian model. Such a statistical model allows assessing results in one coherent analysis both on the subject and the group level. To demonstrate the feasibility and versatility of this new approach, three experiments are reported with attention manipulations in synthetic pop-out displays, natural images, and a cued letter-report paradigm.

Improvement of visual acuity by spatial cueing: a comparative study in human and non-human primates

This study investigated the influence of spatial cueing (valid/invalid/no cue) on visual discrimination in human and non-human primates. We employed a spatial resolution task which required the accurate discrimination of the orientation of a Landolt "C" ring. The C appeared as single target in specific retinal locations while subjects maintained fixation of a central fixation point. The minimal discernable size of the "C" (=acuity threshold) was determined as a function of cue condition, retinal eccentricity (3 degrees -15 degrees ), and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) (200-1100 ms). For both species, we found consistent benefits from spatial cueing with differences in absolute thresholds ranging from 6% to 25%. These differences increased with retinal eccentricity and decreased with longer SOAs. Further experiments performed with humans only, showed that the effect of spatial cueing on visual discrimination is independent of spatial uncertainty, i.e. the number of possible target locations (2 versus 4), but fades with longer target presentation times. From our results we draw the following conclusions. (i) Since sensory noise and spatial uncertainty was small in our tasks, spatial shifts of attention involve signal enhancement in both, human and non-human primates. (ii) The similarity of the results obtained for humans and macaque monkeys indicates that the latter may serve as a suitable model system in studies trying to tackle the neural underpinnings of attentional control. (iii) In order to elicit robust effects on visual discrimination by spatial shifts of attention, a paradigm comprising short SOAs (approximately 200 ms) and target presentation times (approximately 150 ms), and retinal eccentricities larger than approximately 9 degrees seems most promising.

Spatial attention in early vision

The present study addressed whether the allocation of attention to a particular region in space can prevent processing of distractor information from non-attended regions. A cue indicated the area in visual space where the target singleton would be presented. Observers were required to detect this target singleton and ignore a distractor singleton presented within a non-attended region. The results indicate that the allocation of attention to a region in space cannot prevent the processing of unwanted information from elsewhere in the visual field. It is concluded that the function of the allocation of attention is not to enhance the processing capacity within the attended region but rather to attenuate interference from distractors in unattended regions.

The implementation of visual routines

Many visual tasks can be decomposed into a sequence of simpler subtasks. Ullman suggested that such subtasks are carried out by elemental operations that are implemented by specialized processes in the visual brain [Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition (18), 97-159]. According to this hypothesis, there are a limited number of elemental operations that, since they can be applied sequentially, may nevertheless give rise to a large number of visual routines. Examples of such elemental operations are visual search, texture segregation and contour grouping. Here we attempt to delineate how such elemental operations are implemented in the visual brain. When an image appears, feedforward processing rapidly leads to an activity pattern that is distributed across many visual areas. Thereafter, elemental operations come into play, and these are implemented by the modulation of firing rates. Firing rate modulations effectuate grouping of neural responses into coherent object representations. Moreover, they permit transfer of information from one operator to the next, which allows flexibility in the sequencing of operations. We discuss how the elemental operations provide a tool to relate cortical physiology to psychophysics, and suggest a reclassification of pre-attentive and attentive processes.

The effect of noise in a single-item localization and identification task

Shiu and Pashler ((1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception of Performance, 20, 1037-1054) argue that in single-item identification and localization tasks irrelevant, small, elements can induce costs. For explaining the results, they advance a Noise Reduction explanation as an alternative for the traditional Signal Enhancement explanation. The results of a single-item identification and localization task are reported that investigated the effect of irrelevant, small, elements. The experiment supported the view that the noise elements induce costs. The total pattern of results obtained is compatible with the Signal Enhancement explanation and with an elaborated version of the Noise Reduction explanation. It is argued that an explanation with location selection only, that is, an explanation without a second step with Signal Enhancement or Noise Reduction, can also account for the results.

Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: a dimensional overlap account

According to the automatic response activation hypothesis of the dimensional overlap (DO) model (Kornblum, Stevens, Whipple, & Requin, 1999), stimulus-response compatibility effects are expected to occur in go-no-go tasks. This prediction is confirmed in two experiments in which subjects moved a hand to one side of the field on presentation of a go stimulus. Although the direction of movement was known in advance and the spatial attribute of the go stimuli was irrelevant to the go-no-go decision, the subjects' response time was shorter when the spatial attribute to the go stimulus corresponded to that of the response than when it did not. These effects are shown to depend on the similarity of the go and the no-go stimuli, as well as on whether the spatial attribute of the go stimuli was its actual location or its meaning. We discuss these results in terms of the temporal dynamics of automatic and controlled response processes, as hypothesized in the DO model.

Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention

Visual selective attention improves our perception and performance by modifying sensory inputs at an early stage of processing. Spatial attention produces the most consistent early modulations of visual processing, which can be observed when attention is voluntarily allocated to locations. These effects of spatial attention are similar when attention is cued in a trial-by-trial, or sustained, fashion and are manifest as changes in the amplitudes, but not the latencies, of evoked neural activity recorded from the intact human scalp. This modulation of sensory processing first occurs within the extrastriate visual cortex and not within the striate or earlier subcortical processing stages. These relatively early spatial filters alter the inputs to higher stages of visual analysis that are responsible for feature extraction and ultimately object perception and recognition, and thus provide physiological evidence for early precategorical selection during visual attention. Moreover, the physiological evidence extends early selection theories by providing neurophysiologically precise information about the stages of visual processing affected by attention.

Selective attentional delays and attentional capture among simultaneous visual onset elements

Visual discrimination and detection responses to a single stimulus presented simultaneously with noise stimuli are slower and less accurate than are responses to a single stimulus presented alone. This occurs even though the location of the relevant stimulus (target) is known or visually indicated with stimuli onset. Results showed that noise elements delay focal attending and processing of a target. Furthermore, precuing the target location reduces, and can eliminate, target processing delays. Processing delays were not due to response competition or to random attentional capture by noise. It is suggested that simultaneous stimuli are perceived initially as a single object, and delays in processing a single stimulus are due to difficulties in perceptually segregating this stimulus from noise. Precuing is assumed to facilitate this segregation process.

Visual selective attention: a theoretical analysis

The present paper outlines a framework which allows a consistent interpretation of data regarding visual selection in visual search tasks. It organizes and reviews visual search tasks in which the target is defined by primitive features, by conjunctions of features and when the target is categorically different from non-targets. The special role of spatial attention is reviewed and different theoretical accounts are discussed. Because visual selection depends principally on the outcome of the early parallel preattentive stage of processing, the main focus will be on this stage. It is concluded that visual selection is to a large extent determined by the physical characteristics of the stimuli present in the visual field. The early preattentive parallel process computes how different each object is from each of the other objects within a particular stimulus dimension. Attention is automatically drawn to the location having the highest activation, implying that the object at that location is automatically selected irrespective of the intentions of the subject. The model also assumes some top-down control. It is well known that attention can be voluntarily directed to nonfixated locations in visual space, varying from a uniform distribution over the visual field to a highly focused concentration. The model assumes that the endogenous direction of attention to an area in the visual field is the only top-down manner of affecting visual selection. Within the area of directed attention, no top-down control is possible: selection is completely determined by the physical properties of the stimuli.

On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries

In the typical visual laterality experiment, words and letters are more rapidly and accurately identified in the right visual field than in the left. However, while such studies usually control fixation, the deployment of visual attention is rarely restricted. The present studies investigated the influence of visual attention on the visual field asymmetries normally observed in single-letter identification and lexical decision tasks. Attention was controlled using a peripheral cue that provided advance knowledge of the location of the forthcoming stimulus. The time period between the onset of the cue and the onset of the stimulus (Stimulus Onset Asynchrony--SOA) was varied, such that the time available for attention to focus upon the location was controlled. At short SOAs a right visual field advantage for identifying single letters and for making lexical decisions was apparent. However, at longer SOAs letters and words presented in the two visual fields were identified equally well. It is concluded that visual field advantages arise from an interaction of attentional and structural factors and that the attentional component in visual field asymmetries must be controlled in order to approximate more closely a true assessment of the relative functional capabilities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres.

Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?

Visual search and texture segregation studies have led to the inference that stimuli differing in the orientation of their component line segments can be distinguished without focal attention, whereas stimuli that differ only in the arrangement of line segments cannot. In most of this research, the locus of attention has not been explicitly manipulated. In the first experiment presented here, attention was directed to a relevant peripheral target by a cue presented near the target location or at the fovea. Effects of attention on orientation discrimination were assessed in a two-alternative forced-choice task with targets that were either: (1) lines that slanted obliquely to the right or left, or were horizontal or vertical, or (2) Y-like targets that had a short arm leading obliquely right or left of a vertical line. In some groups, a four-alternative forced-choice test with lines at 0 degree, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees orientations was used. Discrimination of these targets (i.e. targets that differ in the orientation of component line segments) was only minimally facilitated as the time between the onset of the valid cue and the onset of the target (cue-target stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA) was increased from 0 or 17 msec to 267 msec. In contrast, discrimination of targets that did not differ in the orientation of component line segments but differed in line arrangement (T-like characters), was greatly facilitated by longer cue-target SOAs. In Experiment 2, a cue misdirected attention on 20% of the trials. A decrement occurred on incorrectly cued trials in comparison to correctly cued trials for both types of stimuli used (lines and Ts). The results from these experiments suggest that discrimination of line orientation benefits less from focal attention than does discrimination of line arrangement, but that both discriminations suffer when attention must be disengaged from an irrelevant spatial location.

Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding

The purpose in this study was to distinguish among possible mechanisms by which focused attention facilitates visual perceptual processing in a cued discrimination task. In two experiments, subjects verified the presence of an X in masked, briefly presented, four-letter arrays. On most trials, subjects were precued to the location of the stimulus array (valid-cue condition); however, sometimes a nonstimulus location was cued (invalid-cue condition). The exposure duration of the stimulus array was varied. In Experiment 1, there was a large effect of cue condition on hit probability, but no effect of cue condition on false alarm probability. In Experiment 2, there was a large effect of cue condition on d'. In both experiments, the stimulus duration needed to reach any given performance level was greater by a constant factor for stimuli in the invalid-cue than it was in the valid-cue condition. This suggests that visual information is acquired (or utilized) more rapidly from attended than from unattended locations.

Large and rapid improvement in form discrimination accuracy following a location precue

Processing of a visual stimulus can be improved by precuing its location. Most previous precue studies have used reaction time as the dependent measure and have found large effects; but when form discrimination accuracy has been used, precue effects have been relatively small. The present experiments yielded large, short-latency precue effects on form discrimination accuracy. A small square precue was briefly presented near one of four possible target locations. Then one of four possible targets (T-like figures) was presented in each location, followed by a mask. Observers attempted to identify the target that had been presented in the cued location. In experiment 1, target duration, cue-to-target distance, and cue-target onset asynchrony (SOA) were varied. Target discriminability (d') increased markedly with increasing precue-target SOA, even at very short SOAs. Thus, there was no evidence for a delay in the onset of precue effects (caused, for example, by the need to shift attention across the visual field). Performance was best for precues that were closest to the target, thus ruling out a forward masking explanation of the effect. Finally SOA and target duration interacted strongly - longer precue SOAs resulted in larger effects of target duration. In experiment 2, this interaction was replicated using an additional target duration and longer SOAs. One interpretation of this result is that focal attention increases the rate at which information can be extracted from a visual location.

Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities

Considerable disagreement exists in the visual attention literature about how attention is allocated over the visual field. One frequently expressed metaphor is that attention moves like a spotlight, and in some variants it is assumed that attention takes longer to shift to targets further from fixation. In order to test this metaphor, five experiments were conducted in which target location was precued and form discrimination accuracy was assessed. By varying the interval between the precue and the target (stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA), a time course of attention effects was obtained for targets at 2 degrees, 6 degrees, and 10 degrees eccentricity. In the first three experiments, precueing effects were found, but there were no differences in performance as a function of eccentricity for very short SOAs, with either a peripheral cue or a foveal arrow cue. For long SOAs, however, performance was better for targets that were closer to fixation. In Experiments 4 (peripheral cue) and 5 (foveal cue), the targets were scaled to make them equally discriminable at all eccentricities. Again precueing effects were found, but there were no differences in accuracy as a function of eccentricity for most SOAs. These results suggest that attention shifting is not analogous to a constant-velocity moving spotlight.