Incidental encoding of enclosure geometry does not require visual input: evidence from blindfolded adults

Blindfolded adults' use of geometric cues in haptic-based relocation

Non-visual information is important for navigation in limited visibility conditions. We designed a haptic-based relocation task to examine blindfolded adults' use of geometric cues. Forty-eight participants learned to locate a corner in a parallelogram frame. They were then tested in different transformed frames: (a) a reverse-parallelogram, in which locations predicted by original length information and angle information conflicted, (b) a rectangle, which retained only length information, and (c) a rhombus, which retained only angle information. Results show that access to the environment's geometry through haptic modality is sufficient for relocation. However, adults' performances in the current task were different from that in visual tasks in previous findings. First, compared to previous findings in visual-based tasks, length information lost its priority. Approximately half of the participants relied on angle information in the conflict test and the other half relied on length. Second, though participants encoded both length and angle information in the learning phase, only one cue was relied on after the conflict test. Finally, though participants encoded the target location successfully, they failed to represent the global shape of the environment. We attribute adults' different performances in haptic-based and visual-based tasks to the high cognitive demands in encoding and using haptic spatial cues, especially length information.

For humans navigating without vision, navigation depends upon the layout of mechanically contacted ground surfaces

Navigation can be haptically guided. In specific, tissue deformations arising from both limb motions during locomotion (i.e., gait patterns) and mechanical interactions between the limbs and the environment can convey information, detected by the haptic perceptual system, about how the body is moving relative to the environment. Here, we test hypotheses concerning the properties of mechanically contacted environments relevant to navigation of this kind. We studied blindfolded participants implicitly learning to perceive their location within environments that were physically encountered via walking on, stepping on, and probing ground surfaces with a cane. Environments were straight-line paths with elevated sections where the path either narrowed or remained the same width. We formed hypotheses concerning how these two environments would affect spatial updating and reorientation processes. In the constant pathwidth environment, homing task accuracy was higher and a manipulation of the elevated surface, to be either unchanged or (unbeknown to participants) shortened, biased the performance. This was consistent with our hypothesis of a metric recalibration scaled to elevated surface extent. In the narrowing pathwidth environment, elevated surface shortening did not bias performance. This supported our hypothesis of positional recalibration resulting from contact with the leading edge of the elevated surface. We discuss why certain environmental properties, such as path-narrowing, have significance for how one becomes implicitly oriented the surrounding environment.

Spatial reorientation with a geometric array of auditory cues

A visuocentric bias has dominated the literature on spatial navigation and reorientation. Studies on visually accessed environments indicate that, during reorientation, human and non-human animals encode the geometric shape of the environment, even if this information is unnecessary and insufficient for the task. In an attempt to extend our limited knowledge on the similarities and differences between visual and non-visual navigation, here we examined whether the same phenomenon would be observed during auditory-guided reorientation. Provided with a rectangular array of four distinct auditory landmarks, blindfolded, sighted participants had to learn the location of a target object situated on a panel of an octagonal arena. Subsequent test trials were administered to understand how the task was acquired. Crucially, in a condition in which the auditory cues were indistinguishable (same sound sample), participants could still identify the correct target location, suggesting that the rectangular array of auditory landmarks was encoded as a geometric configuration. This is the first evidence of incidental encoding of geometric information with auditory cues and, consistent with the theory of functional equivalence, it supports the generalisation of mechanisms of spatial learning across encoding modalities.

Spatial reorientation with non-visual cues: Failure to spontaneously use auditory information

Among the environmental stimuli that can guide navigation in space, most attention has been dedicated to visual information. The process of determining where you are and which direction you are facing (called reorientation) has been extensively examined by providing the navigator with two sources of information—typically the shape of the environment and its features—with an interest in the extent to which they are used. Similar questions with non-visual cues are lacking. Here, blindfolded sighted participants had to learn the location of a target in a real-world, circular search space. In Experiment 1, two ecologically relevant non-visual cues were provided: the slope of the floor and an array of two identical auditory landmarks. Slope successfully guided behaviour, suggesting that proprioceptive/kinesthetic access is sufficient to navigate on a slanted environment. However, despite the fact that participants could localise the auditory sources, this information was not encoded. In Experiment 2, the auditory cue was made more useful for the task because it had greater predictive value and there were no competing spatial cues. Nonetheless, again, the auditory landmark was not encoded. Finally, in Experiment 3, after being prompted, participants were able to reorient by using the auditory landmark. Overall, participants failed to spontaneously rely on the auditory cue, regardless of how informative it was.