[Correlation of the peripheral serum complement protein levels and cognitive function in first-episode drug-naive patients with schizophrenia]

Prospects and Pitfalls of Plasma Complement C4 in Schizophrenia: Building a Better Biomarker

Complex brain disorders like schizophrenia may have multifactorial origins related to mis-timed heritable and environmental factors interacting during neurodevelopment. Infections, inflammation, and autoimmune diseases are over-represented in schizophrenia leading to immune system-centered hypotheses. Complement component C4 is genetically and neurobiologically associated with schizophrenia, and its dual activity peripherally and in the brain makes it an exceptional target for biomarker development. Studies to evaluate the biomarker potential of plasma or serum C4 in schizophrenia do so to understand how peripheral C4 might reflect central nervous system-derived neuroinflammation, synapse pruning, and other mechanisms. This effort, however, has produced mostly conflicting results, with peripheral C4 sometimes elevated, reduced, or unchanged between comparison groups. We undertook a pilot biomarker development study to systematically identify sociodemographic, genetic, and immune-related variables (autoimmune, infection-related, gastrointestinal, inflammatory), which may be associated with plasma C4 levels in schizophrenia (SCH; n = 335) and/or in nonpsychiatric comparison subjects (NCs; n = 233). As with previously inconclusive studies, we detected no differences in plasma C4 levels between SCH and NCs. In contrast, levels of general inflammation, C-reactive protein (CRP), were significantly elevated in SCH compared to NCs (ANOVA, F = 20.74, p < 0.0001), suggestive that plasma C4 and CRP may reflect different sources or causes of inflammation. In multivariate regressions of C4 gene copy number variants, plasma C4 levels were correlated only for C4A (not C4B, C4L, C4S) and only in NCs (R Coeff = 0.39, CI = 0.01-0.77, R2 = 0.18, p < 0.01; not SCH). Other variables associated with plasma C4 levels only in NCs included sex, double-stranded DNA IgG, tissue-transglutaminase (TTG) IgG, and cytomegalovirus IgG. Toxoplasma gondii IgG was the only variable significantly correlated with plasma C4 in SCH but not in NCs. Many variables were associated with plasma C4 in both groups (body mass index, race, CRP, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) NR2 subunit IgG, TTG IgA, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), and soluble CD14 (sCD14). While the direction of most C4 associations was positive, autoimmune markers tended to be inverse, and associated with reduced plasma C4 levels. When NMDAR-NR2 autoantibody-positive individuals were removed, plasma C4 was elevated in SCH versus NCs (ANOVA, F = 5.16, p < 0.02). Our study was exploratory and confirmation of the many variables associated with peripheral C4 requires replication. Our preliminary results point toward autoimmune factors and exposure to the pathogen, T. gondii, as possibly significant contributors to variability of total C4 protein levels in plasma of individuals with schizophrenia.

Alterations in innate immune defense distinguish first-episode schizophrenia patients from healthy controls

Innate immune components involved in host defense have been implicated in schizophrenia (SCZ). However, studies exploring their clinical utility in SCZ diagnosis are limited. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate whether circulating endotoxin, high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) and complement component 4 (C4) could act as peripheral biomarkers to distinguish first-episode schizophrenia (FES, n = 42) patients from healthy controls (HCs, n = 35) in associations with psychopathological symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions. Also, their changes after 8-week antipsychotic treatment were investigated. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS), and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) were administered. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of the three biological indicators. Compared to HCs, levels of endotoxin, HMGB1, and C4 were remarkably increased in FES patients after controlling for age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and education years, and the combination of the three biomarkers demonstrated desirable diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.933). Moreover, the endotoxin level was positively correlated with the severity of auditory hallucinations. After 8 weeks of treatment, HMGB1 was decreased significantly in patients but still higher than that in HCs, whereas endotoxin and C4 did not change statistically. The baseline levels of endotoxin, HMGB1, and C4, as well as their changes were not associated with changes in any PANSS subscale score and total score. Our preliminary results suggest that a composite peripheral biomarker of endotoxin, HMGB1, and C4 may have accessory diagnostic value to distinguish SCZ patients from HCs. Additionally, endotoxin might be implicated in the pathogenesis of auditory hallucinations.