[Financing strategies and cost estimates of influenza vaccination for the elderly in China: explore a multi-party co-payment mechanism]

Analysis on the intention and influencing factors of free influenza vaccination among the elderly people aged 70 and above in Hangzhou in 2022

Background

Although influenza vaccination is recommended for people aged 70 and above in Hangzhou, and the vaccine is provided free of charge, the elderly influenza vaccination rate is still low. The purpose of this study was to understand the barriers and motivations of older people in deciding to receive free influenza vaccine through questionnaires.

Methods

The method of stratified random sampling was adopted to take samples. A questionnaire survey was conducted among the elderly aged 70 years and above by face-to-face interview or telephone interview.

Results

A total of 11,663 elderly people aged 70-100 years were successfully and effectively interviewed. 85.98% of the respondent were willing to get the influenza shot, 8.91% were unwilling to get the influenza shot, and 5.11% were on vaccine hesitancy. The people of age of 70-79 years old (hesitancy: OR 70~79 = 0.668, 95%CI: 0.571 0.782, Unwilling: OR 70 - 79 = 0.755, 95%CI: 0.622 0.916), primary school degree or below (hesitancy: OR Secondary school degree or above = 1.467, 95%CI: 1.249 1.724, Unwilling: OR Secondary school degree or above = 1.255, 95%CI: 1.028 1.535), remote areas (hesitancy: OR near central urban area = 2.111, 95%CI: 1.604 2.778, OR central urban area = 2.957, 95%CI: 2.255 3.877, Unwilling: OR near central urban area = 1.687, 95%CI: 1.230 2.313. OR centralurbanarea = 2.218, 95%CI: 1.626 3.027), and convenient for movement (hesitancy: OR yes = 0.494, 95%CI: 0.420 0.580, Unwilling: OR yes = 0.585, 95%CI: 0.480 0.713), understanding of the free vaccine policy (hesitancy: OR understand = 0.204, 95%CI: 0.171 0.245, Unwilling: OR understand = 0.164, 95%CI: 0.128 0.210), influenza knowledge level≥ 13 points (hesitancy: OR ≥13points = 0.628, 95%CI: 0.533 0.739, Unwilling: OR ≥13points = 0.538, 95%CI: 0.437 0.662), influenza vaccine knowledge level≥ 12 points (hesitancy: OR ≥12points = 0.422, 95%CI: 0.350 0.508, Unwilling: OR ≥12points = 0.370, 95%CI: 0.290 0.472), and social trust level ≥ 12 points (hesitancy: OR ≥12points = 0.134, 95%CI: 0.112 0.160, Unwilling: OR ≥12points = 0.220, 95%CI: 0.180 0.269) are more willing to receive free influenza vaccine.

Conclusion

The proportion of elderly people aged 70 and above who are willing to receive free influenza vaccine is high in Hangzhou. But the level of knowledge about influenza, vaccine and trust in society is low. The government should continue to improve the elderly's awareness and trust in society through medical staff, family members, television and radio media, and guide the elderly to actively vaccinate against influenza. Effective publicity should be carried out through the above channels to guide the elderly to actively vaccinate against influenza.

A guideline for economic evaluations of vaccines and immunization programs in China

This study aimed to develop a consensus framework for economic evaluations of vaccines as a national guideline in China. Some unique and important aspects were particularly emphasized. Nineteen Chinese experts in the field of health economics and immunization decision-making were nominated to select and discuss relevant aspects of vaccine economic evaluations in China. A workshop attended by external experts was held to summarize unique and important aspects and formulate consensus recommendations. There were ten unique and/or important aspects identified for economic evaluations of vaccines in China, including study perspectives, comparator strategies, analysis types, model choices, costing approaches, utility measures, discounting, uncertainty, equity, and evaluation purposes. Background information and expert recommendations were provided for each aspect. Economic evaluations of vaccines should play an important role in China's immunization policy-making. This guideline can help improve the quality of economic evaluations as a good practice consensus.