[Short-term efficacy of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia: a single-institution experience]

Only FLT3-ITD co-mutation did not have a deleterious effect on acute myeloid leukemia patients with NPM1 mutation, but concomitant with DNMT3A co-mutation or a < 3log reduction of MRD2 predicted poor survival

Co-occurring mutations are frequently observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1 mutation, and NPM1 measurable residual disease (MRD) is an effective prognostic biomarker. This retrospective study investigated the impact of gene co-mutations and NPM1 MRD on outcomes in these patients. Among 234 patients, 11.5% carried the rare type NPM1 mutation (NPM1RT). The median age was 49 years (IQR 36-58), with a median follow-up of 30.4 months (IQR 12.1-55.7). Nine genes were mutated in > 10%, with DNMT3A (53.8%) and FLT3-ITD (44.4%) being most prevalent. Univariable analysis in 137 patients showed FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A co-mutations, and MRD2 < 3 log reduction predicted poorer survival. FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A co-mutations correlated with the lowest event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) (3-year EFS 30.0%; 3-year OS 34.4%; both p < 0.001). FLT3-ITD alone did not worsen survival compared to patients without FLT3-ITD. Multivariable analysis identified DNMT3A co-mutation [EFS, HR = 1.9, p = 0.021; OS, HR = 2.2, p = 0.023] and MRD2 ≥ 3 log reduction (EFS, HR = 0.2; OS, HR = 0.1, both p < 0.001) as independent survival predictors. Patients with FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A co-mutations or a MRD2 < 3 log reduction were identified as high risk, but allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) improved survival significantly compared to chemotherapy only (3-year EFS, 57.9% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.012; 3-year OS, 72.9% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.001). In AML patients with NPM1 mutation, the detrimental impact of FLT3-ITD mutation was exacerbated by DNMT3A co-mutation. Poor-risk younger patients identified by FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A co-mutations or MRD2 < 3 log reduction benefit from allo-HSCT.

Homoharringtonine may help improve the outcomes of venetoclax and azacitidine in AML1-ETO positive acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

T(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/AML1-ETO positive acute myeloid leukemia (AE-AML) is sensitive to conventional chemotherapy with a favorable prognosis. However, recent small case reports suggest the limited effectiveness of venetoclax (VEN) and hypomethylating agents (HMA) in treating AE-AML. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of VEN plus AZA (VA) in AE-AML and explore whether adding homoharringtonine (HHT) to VA (VAH) could improve the response.

METHODS

Patients who received VEN plus AZA and HHT (VAH) or VEN plus AZA (VA) regimens were included in this retrospective study. The endpoints of this study were to evaluate the rate of composite complete remission (CRc), measurable residual disease (MRD), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and relapse between VAH and VA groups.

RESULTS

A total of 32 AE-AML patients who underwent VA or VAH treatments (newly diagnosed with VA, ND-VA, n = 8; relapsed/refractory with VA, R/R-VA, n = 10; relapsed/refractory with VAH, R/R-VAH, n = 14) were included. The CR (complete remission) /CRi (CR with incomplete count recovery) rate of ND-VA, R/R-VA and R/R-VAH were 25%, 10%, and 64.3%, respectively. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negative was observed in 66.7% of R/R-VAH and none of VA-R/R patients. Co-occurring methylation mutations are associated with poor outcomes with VA but exhibit a more favorable response with VAH treatment. Additionally, patients with c-kit mutation presented inferior outcomes with both VEN-based regimens. All regimens were tolerated well by all patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirmed the poor response of VA in AE-AML, whether used as frontline or salvage therapy. Adding HHT to VA may improve outcomes and enhance the efficacy of VEN in this population.