[Short-term outcome of sacral neuromodulation on refractory interstitial cystitis/pelvic pain syndrome]

Bladder pain syndrome and sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Bladder pain syndrome (BPS)/interstitial cystitis can adversely affect physical, mental, and sexual health. The aim of the systematic review is to compare sexual function between patients with BPS and healthy controls and to examine whether or not treatment of BPS improves sexual function.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on Embase, Medline, and other databases. Studies comparing sexual function in BPS patients with healthy controls and before/after treatment were included. Where appropriate, data were pooled in a meta-analysis, using a random effects model and the standardised mean difference (SMD) was used for comparison.

RESULTS

Out of 384 studies initially identified, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 11 for the meta-analysis. Six studies compared sexual function in BPS cases with healthy controls. All studies found that the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was worse in BPS cases than in controls. Pooled data from 5 studies showed that the SMD was -1.02 (CI -1.64, -0.4) in total FSFI scores between the cases and controls, p=0.001. Further analysis showed better sexual function in all FSFI subdomains in healthy controls. Five studies compared sexual function in BPS patients before treatment with after treatment. Pooled data from 3 studies showed an overall improvement in total FSFI score after intravesical treatment: SMD=0.69 (CI 0.23, 1.14), p=0.003. Further analysis showed improvement in all subdomains.

CONCLUSION

Our review suggests that sexual function might be worse in BPS patients than in the general population, but it seems to improve with intravesical BPS treatment.

Sacral neuromodulation treating chronic pelvic pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is gaining popularity as a treatment option for chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Our hypothesis is that SNM is effective in improving CPP.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted through September 2018. Peer-reviewed studies using pre- and postpain intensity scores were selected. The primary outcome was pain improvement on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) (adjusted or de novo) in patients with CPP. Secondary outcomes included comparing SNM approaches and etiologies and evaluating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

RESULTS

Fourteen of 2175 studies, evaluating 210 patients, were eligible for further analysis. The overall VAS pain score improvement was significant [weighted mean difference (WMD) -4.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -5.22, to-3.64, p < 0.0001)]. Regarding SNM approach, both standard and caudal approaches had significant reduction in pain scores: WMD -4.32, CI 95% = -5.32, to -3.31 (p < 0.001) for the standard approach, compared with WMD -4.63, 95% CI = -6.57 to -2.69 (P < 0.001), for the caudal approach (p = 0.75). While significant improvement in pain was observed both in patients with and without interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), the observed improvement was lower in patients with (WMD -4.13, CI 95% -5.36 to -2.90 versus without (WMD -5.72, CI 95% = -6.18, to-5.27) IC/BPS (p = 0.02). SNM was effective in treating voiding symptoms (frequency, urgency, nocturia) associated with IC/BPS (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SNM is an effective therapy for CPP in both IC/BSP and non-IC/BSP patients, with better results in non-IC/BSP patients. Outcomes of the antegrade caudal approach were comparable with the standard retrograde approach.