[Efficacy comparison of interventional treatment by anterograde or retrograde catheterization for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis]

Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment on Pregnancy-Related Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Objective: This study investigates the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatments on pregnancy-related iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 46 patients who had symptomatic pregnancy-related iliofemoral DVT and underwent endovascular treatment. The patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) were classified as the CDT group. In contrast, those treated with CDT combined with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) or angioplasty/stenting were classified as the pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) group. Results: Based on the immediate post-operative clot burden reduction rate analysis of 46 patients: 22 cases were completely dissolved (lysis grades III), 12 were partially dissolved (lysis grades II), and 12 failed (lysis grades I). There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of clot burden reduction between the CDT group (n = 19) and the PCDT group (n = 27) (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bleeding events between the two groups (p = 0.989). At 24 months, cumulative venous patency in the CDT group was 50.0%, compared to 78.2% in the PCDT group. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference in Villalta score (p = 0.001) and venous severity scoring (VCSS score) (p = 0.005) between the two groups. Conclusions: CDT treatment combined with PMT or angioplasty/stenting is comparatively safe and effective for pregnant-related DVT patients. PCDT outperforms CDT in terms of immediate efficacy and reduces the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome with better midterm outcomes.

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis With a Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Alteplase for Subacute Proximal Venous Thrombosis: Efficacy and Safety Compared to Urokinase

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety associated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using either recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or urokinase (UK) for subacute deep venous thrombosis (DVT). From January 2014 to December 2016, we conducted a retrospective analysis on a total of 49 patients who underwent consistent CDT with either rt-PA (rt-PA-CDT group) or UK (UK-CDT group) treatment. The thrombolytic rate of the rt-PA-CDT group was significantly higher than that of the UK-CDT group (87.5% vs 60%, respectively; χ2 = 4.751; P = .029). The rt-PA-CDT group exhibited an improved grade III thrombolytic rate (9 patients vs 3 patients; χ2 = 5.144; P = .023). The time for the rt-PA-CDT group to achieve a grade III thrombolytic rate was shorter than that of the UK-CDT group (5.01 ± 1.09 days vs 6.43 ± 1.69 days, respectively; t = -2.187; P = .044). No severe complications were seen in either group and mild complications rates were 16.7% and 20.0% (χ2 = .091; P = .763). The clinical efficacy rates at discharge were 91.7% and 76.0%, respectively (χ2 = 2.200; P = .138). In conclusion, CDT with a continuous infusion of low-dose rt-PA resulted in safe and effective thrombolysis in the great majority of patients with proximal DVT in the subacute phase. Furthermore, rt-PA was significantly better than UK in terms of the thrombolytic rate. In our study, rt-PA-CDT improved the thrombolytic rate of grade III thrombus and achieved a grade III thrombolytic rate in a shorter time than UK-CDT.

Consensus among Chinese experts on standard interventional therapy for deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity (second edition)

This is an update on the first edition of the expert consensus. This document discusses the indications and contraindications of interventional treatment methods for deep venous thrombosis such as anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent implantation. The operational procedures, considerations, preoperative management, and prevention of complications were also updated, supplemented, and revised. Emphasis is placed on the interventional treatment of acute and subacute deep venous thrombosis to effectively reduce the incidence of post-thrombosis syndrome.