[Pulmonary rehabilitation in the management of patients with lung cancer]

Physical Activity Behavior After a Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Differs Between Countries: An Observational Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Physical activity (PA) is important in lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate PA levels and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with lung cancer in China and compare this to a similar cohort in Australia.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study. 71 patients from China (group CH) and 90 patients from Australia (group AU) with newly diagnosed lung cancer. Questionnaires assessed self-reported PA levels and HRQoL at baseline (diagnosis) and 8 weeks.

RESULTS

At baseline, group CH were engaged in less overall PA than group AU (Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly [PASE] total score: median [IQR] group CH, 56 [32-59]; group AU, 66 [38-116]; P < .005), and less occupational and household activity ( P < .005). However, at baseline, group CH reported significantly more walking time than group AU (median [IQR]: group CH, 210 [150-315] min/wk; group AU, 55[0-210] min/wk; P < .0005). Global HRQoL scores were similar between groups (P = .038). Over 8 weeks, group CH increased their overall PA levels ( P < .005) and walking time ( P = .008), and HRQoL remained unchanged. The comparison group AU experienced a reduction in PA levels ( P = .02) and HRQoL ( P < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

A diagnosis, patients in China were less physically active than those in Australia. Following diagnosis, patients in China increased their PA levels, whereas those in Australia reduced their PA levels. Research is required to explore potential reasons behind differences, and this may inform research/clinical services to facilitate patients with lung cancer to be more active.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing screening and pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation reduce postoperative complications and improve fast-track recovery after lung cancer surgery: A study for 342 cases

Background

An evaluation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) screening and pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation in reducing postoperative complications and improving fast-track recovery in high-risk patients who undergo resection for lung cancer.

Methods

Of 342 potential lung cancer cases, 142 high-risk patients were finally divided into two groups: group R (n = 71) underwent an intensive pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP), followed by lobectomy; group S (n = 71) underwent only lobectomy with conventional management. Postoperative complications, average days in hospital, postoperative days in hospital, and cost were analyzed.

Results

The 142 high-risk patients were screened by smoking history and CPET. Sixty-eight patients had bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and 47 patients had peak expiratory flow <250 L/minute by CPET. The rate of postoperative total complications in group R (16.90%) was significantly lower than in group S (83.31%) (P = 0.00), as was the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications PPC: group R (12.81%) versus S (13.55%) (P = 0.009); the PPC in the left lung (17.9%) was higher than in the right lung (2.3%) (P = 0.00). The average days in hospital in group S was significantly higher than in group R (P = 0.03). There was no difference between groups in average hospital cost (P = 0.304).

Conclusion

Pre-operative screening using CPET is conducive to identifying high-risk patients for lung resection. Pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation is helpful to reduce postoperative complications and improve fast-track recovery.

Effects of systematic rehabilitation programs on quality of life in patients undergoing lung resection

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of systematic rehabilitation programs on the quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing lung resection of malignant lung lesions. In this prospective population-based cohort study, QOL in patients prior to, as well as 3 and 6 months after surgery, was investigated. Using a single-group design, 48 patients (7 females and 41 males) with suspected operable lung cancer were included in this study. The demographic characteristics and the clinical history of the patients were recorded. QOL [assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30)] was evaluated at baseline (immediately before), and 3 and 6 months after surgical resection. The systematic rehabilitation program, including breathing control, breathing exercises, relaxation training, upper and lower extremity exercises, mobilization and additional incorporating physiotherapy programs, was designed to meet each patient's individual needs. The χ² and Fisher's tests showed no statistically significant difference in the two groups in terms of age, gender, behavior, clinical stage, adjuvant therapy and Karnofsky scores. QOL analysis of baseline was homogeneous between the experimental and control groups. Three months after the rehabilitation process, the experimental group demonstrated an increase in the general QOL functional scales and a decrease of symptom scales compared to the control group. These changes were statistically significant in the functional scales of global health (P<0.01), physical function (P<0.01), role function (P<0.01), emotional function (P<0.05), symptom scales of fatigue (P<0.01) and appetite loss (P=0.001). Six months after the intervention, the outcome was the same as 3 months after the intervention in functional scale domains. However, in the symptom scales, the symptoms in the experimental group were improved compared to the control group. The domains had been significant in the scales of fatigue (P<0.001), dyspnea (P<0.001), pain (P<0.001), insomnia (P<0.001), appetite loss (P<0.001) and constipation (P<0.001). Therefore, the two groups demonstrated a statistically significant difference in 10 domains. In addition, the experimental group demonstrated a significant recovery. In conclusion, systematic rehabilitation programs may be beneficial for lung cancer patients by reducing respiratory symptoms, pain, and improving health-related QOL. Consequently, the findings of this study suggest that systematic rehabilitation programs, prepared by taking into consideration the individual requirements of lung cancer patients, should be incorporated into lung cancer treatment.