1
|
Xian Y, Su Y, Liang J, Long F, Feng X, Xiao Y, Lian H, Xu J, Zhao J, Liu Q, Song F. Oroxylin A reduces osteoclast formation and bone resorption via suppressing RANKL-induced ROS and NFATc1 activation. Biochem Pharmacol 2021; 193:114761. [PMID: 34492273 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Excessive bone erosion by osteoclasts is associated with osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and periprosthetic osteolysis. Targeting osteoclasts may serve as an effective treatment for osteolytic diseases. Although drugs are currently available for the treatment of these diseases, exploring potential anti-osteoclast natural compounds with safe and effective treatment remains needed. Oroxylin A (OA), a natural flavonoid isolated from the root of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, has numerous beneficial pharmacological characteristics, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity. However, its effects and mechanisms on osteoclast formation and bone resorption have not yet been clarified. Our research showed that OA attenuated the formation and function of osteoclast induced by RANKL in a time- and concentration-dependent manner without any cytotoxicity. Mechanistically, OA suppressed intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels through the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response. Moreover, OA inhibited the activity of NFATc1, the master transcriptional regulator of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. OA exhibited protective effects in mouse models of post-ovariectomy (OVX)- and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced bone loss, in accordance with its in vitro anti-osteoclastogenic effect. Collectively, our findings highlight the potential of OA as a pharmacological agent for the prevention of osteoclast-mediated osteolytic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yansi Xian
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China; Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomedicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yuangang Su
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jiamin Liang
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Feng Long
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China; Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomedicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xiaoliang Feng
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China; Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomedicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yu Xiao
- Medical College of Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Haoyu Lian
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jiake Xu
- School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Jinmin Zhao
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China; Orthopaedic Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Qian Liu
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
| | - Fangming Song
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China; Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomedicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Low doses of uranium and osteoclastic bone resorption: key reciprocal effects evidenced using new in vitro biomimetic models of bone matrix. Arch Toxicol 2021; 95:1023-1037. [PMID: 33426622 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02966-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Uranium is widely spread in the environment due to its natural and anthropogenic occurrences, hence the importance of understanding its impact on human health. The skeleton is the main site of long-term accumulation of this actinide. However, interactions of this metal with biological processes involving the mineralized extracellular matrix and bone cells are still poorly understood. To get a better insight into these interactions, we developed new biomimetic bone matrices containing low doses of natural uranium (up to 0.85 µg of uranium per cm2). These models were characterized by spectroscopic and microscopic approaches before being used as a support for the culture and differentiation of pre-osteoclastic cells. In doing so, we demonstrate that uranium can exert opposite effects on osteoclast resorption depending on its concentration in the bone microenvironment. Our results also provide evidence for the first time that resorption contributes to the remobilization of bone matrix-bound uranium. In agreement with this, we identified, by HRTEM, uranium phosphate internalized in vesicles of resorbing osteoclasts. Thanks to the biomimetic matrices we developed, this study highlights the complex mutual effects between osteoclasts and uranium. This demonstrates the relevance of these 3D models to further study the cellular mechanisms at play in response to uranium storage in bone tissue, and thus better understand the impact of environmental exposure to uranium on human bone health.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hurault L, Creff G, Hagège A, Santucci-Darmanin S, Pagnotta S, Farlay D, Den Auwer C, Pierrefite-Carle V, Carle GF. Uranium Effect on Osteocytic Cells In Vitro. Toxicol Sci 2020; 170:199-209. [PMID: 31120128 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Once absorbed in the body, natural uranium [U(VI)], a radionucleotide naturally present in the environment, is targeted to the skeleton which is the long-term storage organ. We and others have reported the U(VI) negative effects on osteoblasts (OB) and osteoclasts (OC), the main two cell types involved in bone remodeling. In the present work, we addressed the U(VI) effect on osteocytes (OST), the longest living bone cell type and the more numerous (> 90%). These cells, which are embedded in bone matrix and thus are the more prone to U(VI) long-term exposure, are now considered as the chief orchestrators of the bone remodeling process. Our results show that the cytotoxicity index of OST is close to 730 µM, which is about twice the one reported for OB and OC. However, despite this resistance potential, we observed that chronic U(VI) exposure as low as 5 µM led to a drastic decrease of the OST mineralization function. Gene expression analysis showed that this impairment could potentially be linked to an altered differentiation process of these cells. We also observed that U(VI) was able to trigger autophagy, a highly conserved survival mechanism. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure analysis at the U LIII edge of OST cells exposed to U(VI) unambiguously shows the formation of an uranyl phosphate phase in which the uranyl local structure is similar to the one present in Autunite. Thus, our results demonstrate for the first time that OST mineralization function can be affected by U(VI) exposure as low as 5 µM, suggesting that prolonged exposure could alter the central role of these cells in the bone environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucile Hurault
- UMR E-4320 TIRO-MATOs CEA/DRF/BIAM, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Université Côte d'Azur 06107 Nice
| | - Gaelle Creff
- UMR7272 Institut de Chimie de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Nice
| | - Agnès Hagège
- Institut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR 5280, Université de Lyon, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon
| | - Sabine Santucci-Darmanin
- UMR E-4320 TIRO-MATOs CEA/DRF/BIAM, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Université Côte d'Azur 06107 Nice
| | - Sophie Pagnotta
- Centre Commun de Microscopie Appliquée, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice
| | | | | | - Valérie Pierrefite-Carle
- UMR E-4320 TIRO-MATOs CEA/DRF/BIAM, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Université Côte d'Azur 06107 Nice
| | - Georges F Carle
- UMR E-4320 TIRO-MATOs CEA/DRF/BIAM, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Université Côte d'Azur 06107 Nice
| |
Collapse
|