Are we ready for conservative treatment in ovarian cancer?

Fertility sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer in Italy: perceptions, practice, and main issues

About 2.7% of patients epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) are younger than 40 and present with stage I disease. For this subset of women, the issue of fertility sparing surgery (FSS) has become critical. The aim of this survey was to investigate the management of EOC patients desiring to preserve fertility in Italy. A questionnaire consisting of 30 items was developed to evaluate: patient-selection criteria, rate of FSS, patient's counseling- and pregnancy-timing, fertility preservation, obstetrics, and oncologic outcomes. One expert clinician for each of 50 major gynecologic oncology centers was invited to participate. Data were entered into a database and statistically analyzed. 74% of questionnaires were complete. The proportion of EOC patients treated with FSS was <10%, 10%-20% and >20% in 70.3%, 24.3% and 5.4% of cases, respectively. Age, fertility preservation desire, histotype, and stage were considered relevant to select patients for a conservative treatment for 64.8%, 72.9%, and 78.3% of responders, respectively. Only 17 centers (45.9%) resulted to have an assisted reproductive technique service and Obstetrics Department. Our survey highlights discrepancies among oncologists in the management of patients with early EOC undergoing FSS. More efforts should be made to define and broadcast the best management before and after surgery.

Assisted reproductive techniques after fertility-sparing treatments in gynaecological cancers

BACKGROUND

The trend toward late childbearing has made fertility preservation a major issue for women who face gynecological cancer. New techniques in assisted reproductive medicine enable conception after primary treatment of these cancers. Here, we aimed to review the efficacy and safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) after fertility-preserving treatment of gynaecological cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review of both prospective and retrospective studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and SciSearch databases. In the retrieved studies, we evaluated live births, clinical pregnancies, overall survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

We identified many prospective and retrospective studies on this topic, but no relevant randomized clinical trials. Fertility-sparing treatments with safe oncological outcomes are feasible in endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer cases. After cancer treatment, ART seem safe and show variable obstetrical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

After fertility-preserving treatment for gynaecological cancers, ART can enable pregnancy to be achieved with apparent oncological safety. The success of such procedures should directly impact clinical practice and management of those patients who require fertility-sparing treatment.