The extent of aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer impacts on survival

Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors

BACKGROUND

Several pathological parameters, including tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion and lymph node status, have been proposed as prognostic predictors in cervical cancer. However, given the high mortality and recurrence rate of cervical cancer, novel parameters that are able to provide additional prognostic information are needed in order to allow a better prognostic stratification of cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

A search was conducted on PubMed to identify relevant literature data regarding prognostic factors in cervical cancer. The key words "cervical cancer", "prognostic factors", "pathology", and "outcome" were used.

RESULTS

The novel pathological grading system based on tumor budding and cell nest size appeared the most relevant prognostic factor in primary neoplasms. Moreover, other potentially useful prognostic factors were tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion, perineural invasion, tumor-free distance and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Prognostic factors related to advanced-stage cervical cancer, including lymph-nodes status, endometrial and cervical involvement as well as distant metastases, were also taken into consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, tumor budding and cell nest size grading system, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion, perineural invasion, tumor-free distance and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes appeared the most relevant factors included in the pathology report.

Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Oncology—Significance of Vessels Variations

Lymphadenectomy has been an essential part of the surgical treatment in surgical oncology, as the lymphatic channels and nodes are the main dissemination pathway for most of the gynecological cancers. Pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy are frequent surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology. Paraaortic lymph node dissection facilitates staging, prognosis, surgical and postoperative management of patients. It is one of the most challenging retroperitoneal surgeries. A comprehensive knowledge of the paraaortic region is mandatory. Intraoperative bleeding is the most common complication during lymphadenectomy due to direct vascular injury, poor tissue handling, exuberant retraction and possible anatomical variations of the vessels in the paraaortic region. Approximately, one-third of women will have at least one anatomic variation in the paraaortic region. It must be stressed that anomalous vessels may be encountered in every woman who will undergo surgery. Consequently, detailed knowledge of anatomical vessels variations is required in order to prevent iatrogenic vessel injury. The importance of these variations is well described in urology, vascular and general surgery. Conversely, in oncogynecological surgery, there are few articles, which described some of the vessels variations in the paraaortic region. The present article aims to propose a surgical classification and to describe the majority of vessels variation, which could be encountered during paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology. Moreover, surgical considerations in order to prevent anomalous vessels injury are well described.

Postreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen as a survival prognostic factor in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. A Spanish multicenter study. The SEGO Spain-GOG group

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical value of postreatment plasmatic levels of the squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) as a survival independent prognostic factor in patients with LACC.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter study including LACC patients (FIGO 2009 stages IB2, IIA2-IVA) managed at the Gynecology Oncological Units corresponding to eight reference hospitals in Spain between 2000 and 2016. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off values of postreatment SCC-Ag levels in prediction of survival. Survival curves were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test. Cox models were used to analyze different factors in terms of their prognosis predictive value.

RESULTS

The study included 447 patients with a median follow-up time of 53 months (IQR 26-101) and median pre- and postreatment SCC-Ag levels of 3.4 ng/ml (IQR 1.2-11) and 0.8 ng/ml (IQR 0.5-1.2), respectively. The cut-off level of pretreatment SCC-Ag was 11.75 ng/ml (sensibility 37.5%; specificity 80.5%) and that of postreatment SCC-Ag was 1.24 ng/ml (sensibility 34.6%; specificity 83.1%). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, factors that were independent predictors of OS were: FIGO stage (HR 2.12; 95%CI 1.18-3.8; p = 0.011), paraaortic lymph node involvement (HR 3.56; 95%CI 2.04-6.2; p < 0.0001), postreatment SCC-Ag level ≥ 1.2 ng/ml (HR 1.95; 95%CI 1.11-3.44; p = 0.02) and incomplete response to treatment (HR 4.5; 95%CI 2.5-8.11; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Postreatment plasmatic SCC-Ag level ≥ 1.2 ng/ml was an independent risk factor for the survival of patients with LACC. Further factors influencing survival included: paraaortic lymph node involvement, advanced disease and poor response to concomitant chemoradiotherapy.

Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymph nodal staging for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common neoplasm in women. In locally advanced cervical cancers, the international guidelines recommend nodal aortic assessment. Two techniques have been described to perform laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy: transperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (TLL) and extraperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (ELL). This meta-analysis aims to compare the surgical outcomes of TLL and ELL for staging purposes. The systematic review was carried out in agreement with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement (PRISMA). Two hundred and twenty studies were analyzed, and 19 studies were included in the review (7 for TLL and 12 for ELL group). 1112 patients were included in the analysis: 390 patients were included in group 1 and 722 patients in group 2.38 patients (9.7%) in the TLL group and 69 (9.5%) patients in the ELL group developed major complications. The analysis of all complications (intraoperative and postoperative) rate through pooled analysis did not show a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.979), although a significantly higher intraoperative complication rate (p = 0.018) occurred in the TLL group compared to ELL. No significant differences were found between groups for BMI (p = 0.659), estimated blood loss (p = 0.889), length of stay (p = 0.932), intraoperative time (p = 0.932), conversion to laparotomy rate (p = 0.404), number of lymph node excised (p = 0.461) and postoperative complication (p = 0.291). TLL approach shows a higher rate of intraoperative complications, while no significant difference was found between the two techniques when postoperative complications were analyzed.