Effect of adding nitroglycerin to early diuretic therapy on the morbidity and mortality of patients with chronic kidney disease presenting with acute decompensated heart failure

Revisiting nitrates use in pre-shock state of contemporary cardiogenic shock classification

Patients at each shock stage may behave and present differently with a spectrum of shock severity and adverse outcomes. Shock severity, shock aetiology, and several factors should be integrated in management decision-making. Although the contemporary shock stages classification provided a standardized shock severity assessment, individual agents or management strategy has not yet been studied in the context of each shock stage. The pre-shock state may comprise a wide range of presentations. Nitrate therapy has potential benefit in myocardial infarction and acute heart failure. Herein, this review aims to discuss the potential use of nitrate therapy in the context of the pre-shock state or stage B of the contemporary shock classification given its various presentations.

Safety of prehospital intravenous bolus dose nitroglycerin in patients with acute pulmonary edema: A 4-year review

Background

Intravenous nitrates are a primary therapy for hypertensive congestive heart failure (CHF) with acute pulmonary edema (APE) in the hospital setting. Historically, sublingual nitrates are the mainstay of emergency medical services (EMS) pharmacologic therapy for these patients. We aimed to evaluate the safety of prehospital bolus dose intravenous nitroglycerin in patients with APE.

Methods

This is a retrospective evaluation of EMS data between March 15, 2018, and March 15, 2022, where CHF with APE was suspected and bolus-dose intravenous nitroglycerin was administered. Protocol inclusion criteria were hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] >160 mmHg) and acute respiratory distress, with a presumption of decompensated CHF with APE. These patients received 1 mg intravenous nitroglycerin, with the option to repeat once for ongoing distress if the SBP remained >160 mmHg. The primary outcomes were adverse events, defined as hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg), syncope, vomiting, or dysrhythmia.

Results

The final analysis included 235 patients. In patients receiving intravenous bolus nitroglycerin, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) initial and final EMS SBP values decreased from 198 mmHg (180-218) to 168 (148-187), respectively. The median (IQR) pulse decreased from 108 (92-125) to 103 (86-119), and the median oxygen saturation increased from 89% (82-95) to 98% (96-99). Three episodes (1.3%) of asymptomatic hypotension occurred, and none required intervention.

Conclusion

This study supports a favorable safety profile for prehospital bolus-dose intravenous nitroglycerin for decompensated CHF with APE. Blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation improvements are also demonstrated. Further, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Targeting Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate to Treat Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week

The significant morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) justify the search for novel therapeutic agents. Reduced cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels contribute to HF progression. Among molecules modulating the nitric oxide (NO)-GMP-phosphodiesterase (PDE) pathway, the evaluation of nitrates, synthetic natriuretic peptides (NP), and NP analogs has yielded mixed results. Conversely, sacubitril/valsartan, combining NP degradation inhibition through neprilysin and angiotensin receptor blockade, has led to groundbreaking findings in HFrEF. Other strategies to increase tissue cyclic guanosine monophosphate have been attempted, such as PDE-3 or PDE-5 inhibition (with negative or neutral results), NO-independent soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activation, or enhancement of sGC sensitivity to endogenous NO. Following the positive results of the phase 3 VICTORIA (A Study of Vericiguat in Participants With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial on the sGC stimulator vericiguat in HFrEF, the main open questions are the efficacy of the sacubitril/valsartan-vericiguat combination in HFrEF and of vericiguat in HFpEF.

Vasodilators in acute heart failure - evidence based on new studies

Acute heart failure (AHF) contributes largely to the worldwide burden of heart failure (HF) and is associated with high mortality, poor prognosis and high rehospitalization rate. The pharmacologic therapy of AHF includes diuretics and vasodilators, which are a keystone when fluid overload and congestion are present. However, vasodilators are mainly focused on controlling symptoms, and drugs that also improve long-term mortality and morbidity seem to be in high demand. In this review, we summarize the existing evidence on mortality benefits of IV vasodilators in AHF. There is lack of evidence on the mortality benefits of IV vasodilators in AHF, as well as well-designed and large-scale trials for some of them. The existing trials on nitrates have conflicting results and are insufficient to establish definitive conclusions. Other vasodilators, such as enalaprilat, clevidipine, carperitide, and ularitide, have been evaluated only in a few trials assessing mortality. Levosimendan, nesititide and carperitide are approved by some regulatory agencies; however, data regarding mortality are also conflicting and large-scale post-marketing studies would be important. Serelaxin is a recent therapy with a novel mechanism of action and seemed to be promising; although serelaxin was safe and well tolerated in earlier trials, the results of a larger phase III trial failed to meet the primary endpoints of reduction in cardiovascular death at day 180 and reduction of worsening heart failure at day 5. The absence of definitive mortality benefits and high-quality and large-scale data not allow firm conclusions to be drawn about the role of IV vasodilators in AHF. Well-designed studies are needed to clarify the role of these drugs in the long-term outcome of AHF, as well as new therapies entering the clinical investigation.

Nitrates as a Treatment of Acute Heart Failure

The purpose of this article is to review the clinical efficacy and safety of nitrates in acute heart failure (AHF) by examining various trials on nitrates in AHF. Management of AHF can be challenging due to the lack of objective clinical evidence guiding optimal management. There have been many articles suggesting that, despite a benefit, nitrates are underused in clinical practice. Nitrates, when appropriately dosed, have a favourable effect on symptoms, blood pressure, intubation rates, mortality and other parameters.

Drug Therapy for Acute Heart Failure

Acute heart failure is globally one of most frequent reasons for hospitalization and still represents a challenge for the choice of the best treatment to improve patient outcome. According to current international guidelines, as soon as patients with acute heart failure arrive at the emergency department, the common therapeutic approach aims to improve their signs and symptoms, correct volume overload, and ameliorate cardiac hemodynamics by increasing vital organ perfusion. Recommended treatment for the early management of acute heart failure is characterized by the use of intravenous diuretics, oxygen, and vasodilators. Although these measures ameliorate the patient's symptoms, they do not favorably impact on short- and long-term mortality. Consequently, there is a pressing need for novel agents in acute heart failure treatment with the result that research in this field is increasing worldwide.

Lack of evidence for intravenous vasodilators in ED patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review

There are nearly 700,000 annual US emergency department (ED) visits for acute heart failure (AHF). Although blood pressure is elevated on most of these visits, acute therapy remains focused on preload and not afterload reduction. Data from recent prospective studies suggest that patients with AHF with concomitant acute hypertension benefit from intravenous (IV) vasodilators. To better understand the use of vasodilators for such patients, we conducted a systematic review of (1) currently available intravenous vasodilators for ED patients with AHF, or (2) intravenous vasodilators that are not yet available, but have completed phase III clinical trials in AHF, and may be available for ED use in the future. We used multiterm search queries to retrieve research involving nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, enalaprilat, hydralazine, relaxin, and nesiritide. A total of 2001 unique citations were identified from 3 databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Of these, 1966 were excluded on the basis of established review criteria, leaving 35 published articles for inclusion. Our primary finding was that intravenous nitrovasodilators, when used in the treatment of AHF in ED and ED-like settings, do improve short-term symptoms and appear safe to administer. There are no data suggesting that they impact mortality. Other commonly used vasodilators such as hydralazine and enalaprilat have very little published data about their safety and efficacy. Of note, few studies enrolled patients early in their course of treatment. Thus, to assess the specific impact of vasodilator therapy on both short- and long-term outcomes, future research efforts should focus on patient recruitment in the ED setting.

Is addition of vasodilators to loop diuretics of value in the care of hospitalized acute heart failure patients? Real-world evidence from a retrospective analysis of a large United States hospital database

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend the use of intravenous (IV) vasodilators in addition to IV loop diuretics for the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF) patients without hypotension. The evidence basis for these recommendations is limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hospital billing records for 82,808 AHF patients in the United States were analyzed. Patients receiving IV loop diuretics alone were paired with patients receiving IV loop diuretics + IV nitrates or IV nesiritide with the use of propensity score matching, excluding those with hypotension and/or evidence of cardiogenic shock, myocardial infarction, or acute coronary syndrome. Compared with paired patients receiving IV loop diuretics alone, in-hospital mortality was similar among IV loop diuretics + IV nitrates patients (n = 4,401; 1.9% vs 2.0%; P = .88) and marginally higher for IV loop diuretics + IV nesiritide patients (n = 2,254; 2.2% vs 3.1%; P = .05). Compared with paired IV loop diuretics patients, IV loop diuretics + IV nitrates or IV nesiritide had longer lengths of stay (+1.6 and +2.1 days; P < .01) and 57% higher costs (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among hospitalized AHF patients, the addition of IV vasodilators to IV loop diuretics did not lower inpatient mortality or rehospitalization rates compared with loop diuretics alone, and was associated with longer lengths of stay and higher hospitalization costs. Although the lack of complete clinical, socioeconomic, and post-discharge data may have confounded these results, this analysis questions whether currently available IV vasodilators can improve outcomes in hospitalized AHF patients.

Vasodilators in Acute Heart Failure: Review of the Latest Studies

Vasodilators play an important role in the management of acute heart failure, particularly when increased afterload is the precipitating cause of decompensation. The time-honored approach to afterload reduction has been largely focused on use of intravenous nitrovasodilators and, when properly dosed, this class of agents does provide substantial symptom relief for patients with acute hypertensive heart failure. Despite this, nitrovasodilators have never been shown to diminish mortality or provide any post-discharge outcome benefit leading to an on-going search for viable and more effective alternatives. While no new vasodilators have been approved for use in acute heart failure since nesiritide more than a decade ago, a number of novel agents have been developed, with some showing significant promise in recent clinical trials. In this review, we summarize the latest study data as it relates to vasodilator therapy and provide a glimpse into the not too distant future state of acute heart failure care.