Gemcitabine/capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes

Heat shock protein 90 inhibitor 17-AAG down-regulates thymidine phosphorylase expression and potentiates the cytotoxic effect of tamoxifen and erlotinib in human lung squamous carcinoma cells

Elevated thymidine phosphorylase (TP) levels, a key enzyme in the pyrimidine nucleoside salvage pathway, in cancer cells, are related to a poor prognosis in a variety of cancers. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a ubiquitous molecular chaperone that is involved in the stabilization and maturation of many oncogenic proteins. The aim of this study is to elucidate whether Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG could enhance tamoxifen- and erlotinib-induced cytotoxicity in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells via modulating TP expression in two squamous NSCLC cell lines, H520 and H1703. We found that 17-AAG reduced TP expression via inactivating the MKK1/2-ERK1/2-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. TP knockdown with siRNA or ERK1/2 MAPK inactivation with the pharmacological inhibitor U0126 could enhance the cytotoxic and growth inhibitory effects of 17-AAG. In contrast, MKK1-CA or MKK2-CA (a constitutively active form of MKK1/2) vector-enforced expression could reduce the cytotoxic and cell growth inhibitory effects of 17-AAG. Furthermore, 17-AAG enhanced the cytotoxic and cell growth inhibitory effects of tamoxifen and erlotinib in NSCLC cells, which were associated with TP expression downregulation and MKK1/2-ERK1/2 signal inactivation. Taken together, Hsp90 inhibition downregulates TP, enhancing the tamoxifen- and erlotinib-induced cytotoxicity in H520 and H1703 cells.

A study of the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and lobaplatin in advanced HER-2 negative breast cancer patients

Background

This study sought to examine the efficacy and adverse reactions of capecitabine and lobaplatin in the treatment of metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative breast cancer (BC).

Methods

This retrospective study examined 45 patients diagnosed with advanced HER-2 negative BC. Patients were enrolled in this study from November 2015 to June 2019. The patients received capecitabine and lobaplatin combination therapy. The therapeutic efficacy and side effects were evaluated after at least 2 cycles of treatment.

Results

Therapeutic efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated in 38 patients, comprising 12 cases of partial response (PR), 19 cases of stable disease (SD), and 7 cases of progressive disease (PD). Among these, 3 patients required treatment delays or dose reductions for subsequent cycles, and 2 patients discontinued treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) was 31.58% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 81.58%. The ORR and DCR for hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative (HR+/HER-2−) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients were 31.82% and 31.25%, and 86.36% and 75%, respectively. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 8 months, 6 months, and 6 months in patients receiving the therapeutics as a first-line, second-line, or third-line and beyond treatment, respectively. The main side effects were myelosuppression, including granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Among patients with grade 1 side effects or above, 28 patients (73.68%) had myelosuppression, and 13 patients (34.21%) had gastrointestinal reactions. Further, we investigated the association between side effects and clinical outcomes, and found that PFS was increased in patients with myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions.

Conclusions

Capecitabine and lobaplatin combination therapy was effective and well tolerated among patients with advanced HER-2 negative BC.

Inhibition of thymidine phosphorylase expression by Hsp90 inhibitor potentiates the cytotoxic effect of salinomycin in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells

Salinomycin is a polyether ionophore antibiotic having anti-tumorigenic property in various types of cancer. Elevated thymidine phosphorylase (TP) levels, a key enzyme in the pyrimidine nucleoside salvage pathway, are associated with an aggressive disease phenotype and poor prognoses. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a ubiquitous molecular chaperone that is responsible for the stabilization and maturation of many oncogenic proteins. In this study, we report whether Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG could enhance salinomycin-induced cytotoxicity in NSCLC cells through modulating TP expression in two non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines, A549 and H1975. We found that salinomycin increased TP expression in a MKK3/6-p38 MAPK activation manner. Knockdown of TP using siRNA or inactivation of p38 MAPK by pharmacological inhibitor SB203580 enhanced the cytotoxic and growth inhibition effects of salinomycin. In contrast, enforced expression of MKK6E (a constitutively active form of MKK6) reduced the cytotoxicity and cell growth inhibition of salinomycin. Moreover, Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG enhanced cytotoxicity and cell growth inhibition of salinomycin in NSCLC cells, which were associated with down-regulation of TP expression and inactivation of p38 MAPK. Together, the Hsp90 inhibition induced TP down-regulation involved in enhancing the salinomycin-induced cytotoxicity in A549 and H1975 cells.

Capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) combination systemic chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

After taxane and anthracycline failure, no standard chemotherapy regimen is established in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) combination shows promising results in gastrointestinal cancer, but there are relatively scarce data in MBC. We reviewed the clinical outcome of XP regimen in anthracycline and taxane resistant, heavily pretreated MBC patients.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Between Jan. 2010 to Feb. 2016, 48 HER2 negative MBC patients who failed anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapy were enrolled. In 43.8% of patients, more than 4 regimens were administrated before XP. Thirty-four patients (70.8%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive MBC. Patients were treated with XP (capecitabine [2000mg/m2 per oral; day 1-14] plus cisplatin [60mg/m2 IV; day 1], every 3 weeks) regimen.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) in total population was 4.33 months (range 1.1~33.57 months). HR positive patients showed trends for superior PFS compared to triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), without statistical significance (6.53 vs. 3.83 months, P = 0.168). In HR positive group, patients receiving 3 or less lines of chemotherapy showed superior PFS compared to others (10.1 vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.039). In multivariate analysis, HR positive patients receiving 3 or less lines of regimens still showed superior PFS (HR = 2.624, 95% CI; 1.071~6.43, P = 0.032). Most common toxicity was grade 3-4 neutropenia, without treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

XP combination regimen showed clinical benefit with tolerable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients, including HR positive patients. After anthracycline and taxane failure, early administration of XP regimen in selected patients may have improve clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Gemcitabine and Capecitabine Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Pretreated with Anthracyclines and/or Taxanes

BACKGROUND

Owing to the need for effective and tolerable new regimens for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes, we aimed to assess the activity and safety of the gemcitabine plus capecitabine combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8, plus oral capecitabine at 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and predictive factors.

RESULTS

In the 64 patients, the ORR and DCR was 28.1 and 67.2%. Median OS and PFS were 23.6 and 13.4 months, respectively. Toxicities were mild and curable.

CONCLUSION

The combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine is an effective and tolerable treatment for MBC previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes.

Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting adverse event of capecitabine, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of capecitabine-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. Although pyridoxine has been used for the prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS, its efficacy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic pyridoxine reduces the incidence of capecitabine-associated HFS by performing a meta-analysis of the literature involving available studies. Systematic searches for trials were undertaken through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, updated to March, 2013, to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine against capecitabine-induced HFS. We performed a meta-analysis of five studies (n=793 patients) that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine in cancer patients treated with capecitabine. The odds ratio (OR) comparing prophylactic pyridoxine to placebo was 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.24] for HFS of all grades; OR=1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) for HFS ≥ grade 2 and OR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.60-1.85) for HFS ≥ grade 3. Based on our meta-analysis, prophylactic pyridoxine did not appear to reduce the incidence of HFS in patients receiving capecitabine.

Randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

An increasing proportion of patients are exposed to anthracyclines and/or taxanes in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Re-exposure in the metastatic stage is limited by drug resistance, thus evaluation of non-cross-resistant regimens is mandatory.

METHODS

Anthracycline-pretreated patients were randomly assigned to three gemcitabine-based regimens. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1.000 mg m(-2) plus vinorelbin 25 mg m(-2) on days 1+8 (GemVin), or plus cisplatin 30 mg m(-2) on days 1+8 (GemCis), or plus capecitabine 650 mg m(-2) b.i.d. orally days 1-14 (GemCap), q3w. The primary end point was response rate.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were recruited on the trial. The overall response rates were 39.0% (GemVin), 47.7% (GemCis) and 34.7% (GemCap). Median progression-free survival was estimated with 5.7, 6.9 and 8.3 months, respectively. Corresponding median survival times were 17.5 (GemVin), 13.0 (GemCis) and 19.4 months (GemCap). Neutropenia ≥grade 3 occurred in 16.7% (Gem/Vin), 4.4% (GemCis) and 0% (Gem/Cap), whereas non-haematological toxicities were rarely severe except grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 2.0% of the GemCap patients (per patient analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomised phase II trial has revealed comparable results for three gemcitabine-based regimens regarding treatment efficacy and toxicity. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to be a worthwhile treatment option for pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine and capecitabine in previously anthracycline-treated metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study (SOLTI 0301 trial)

BACKGROUND

On the basis of clinical activity of capecitabine and gemcitabine for metastatic breast cancer, we carried out a multicenter phase II clinical trial on the combination of these two agents in advanced anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients. Main objectives were to assess its efficacy and safety profile.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-six anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients were evaluated and were stratified according to previous treatment of advanced disease (group-1: not previously treated and group-2: previously treated). Study treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), i.v., as 30 min-infusion, days 1 and 8 every 21 days, plus oral capecitabine 830 mg/m(2) b.i.d., days 1-14 every 21 days.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 61% for group-1, 48.5% for group-2 and 55.2% for the whole population. Clinical benefit rate was 73% for group-1, 80% for patients in group-2 and 76% for all patients. Median time to progression was 13.0 months for group-1, 8.2 months for group-2 and 11.1 months for the whole population. Most frequent grade 3-4 observed toxic effects per patient were neutropenia (60%), asymptomatic liver toxicity (13.5%), asthenia (14%) and hand-foot syndrome (16%). Only one patient presented febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine is an active and safe regimen in anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients.

Gemcitabine and capecitabine in combination for advanced anthracycline and taxane pre-treated breast cancer patients: A phase II study

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore the clinical value of gemcitabine combined with capecitabine (GC) in heavily pre-treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients had failed anthracyclines and taxanes. In 14 patients (41%), more than two metastatic sites were diagnosed with bone (68%) and liver (62%) being the most prominent. Gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2), d1+8) and capecitabine (800 mg/m(2) twice daily, d1-14) were administered according to a 3-week schedule. The majority of patients received GC as 3rd or 4th line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Laboratory tests were done on day 1+8 in cycles. Subjective toxicity was recorded according to the NCI-CTC v. 2.0 criteria. Tumour evaluations were done every 12th week according to the RECIST criteria. The primary objective was to investigate time to progression. Secondary objectives were response rate with special focus on the proportion of patients achieving PR or SD of at least three months, toxicity and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were enrolled. All subjects are eligible for toxicity, response and time to event analyses. Treatment was given until progressive disease, severe toxicity or until the patient wanted to withdraw. The Kaplan-Meier median time to progression was estimated to 4.3 months and the overall survival time to 13.7 months. Partial response was noted in 12 of 29 evaluable patients (41%). The best outcome amongst remaining patients was stable disease in nine (31%) or tumour progression in eight (28%). A delay of disease progression of more than three months was noted in 53% of the study population. The main side effect was granulocytopenia with 44% and 15% of patients suffering from grade 3 or grade 4 events respectively however, no neutropenic infections were observed. Pre-dominant grade 3 subjective toxicities were: fatigue (21% of patients) and hand-foot syndrome (15% of patients).

DISCUSSIONS

We investigated the value of the GC combination as a treatment for late stage breast cancer patients. Tumour progression was delayed and the treatment was well tolerated. We believe that the GC therapy can achieve meaningful palliation.

Pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy of capecitabine: focus on breast and colorectal cancer

Capecitabine (N -pentyloxycarbonyl-5-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine), an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, has provided compelling efficacy data for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and stage III or IV colorectal cancer, both as monotherapy and in combination regimens. The preferential conversion of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil in neoplastic tissues renders this fluoropyrimidine particularly appealing for clinical use. The enzyme thymidine phosphorylase, which mediates the final step of the capecitabine activation pathway, is expressed in higher concentration in neoplastic than in healthy tissues. This makes capecitabine more tumor specific than other chemotherapeutic agents. Accordingly, capecitabine is generally well tolerated. In particular, the incidence of myelosuppression and alopecia is low, and the most common side effects, hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea, are usually manageable. Given its good toxicity profile, capecitabine was assessed in combination with several chemotherapeutic or biologic agents. In addition, the observation that thymidine phosphorylase is upregulated after treatment with other anticancer drugs, namely taxanes, provided a rationale for the prominent antitumor activity recently observed for the combination of capecitabine with these agents. This review provides an evidence-based update of clinical trials investigating the role of capecitabine in the treatment of breast and colorectal cancer, with special emphasis on pharmacological and safety issues that form the basis of currently used schedules.

Gemcitabine and Capecitabine (GemCap) Regimen for Solid Tumors

The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires that pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparing, dispensing, and administering antineoplastic therapy and to the agents, commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

Capecitabine: an overview of the side effects and their management

Xeloda (capecitabine), a thymidine phosphorylase activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is currently the only universally approved orally administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug. It belongs to a newer generation of orally administered fluoropyrimidines. It has been developed because of the clinical need for efficient, tolerable and convenient agents, which do not require continuous infusion. Capecitabine is not a cytotoxic drug in itself, but via a three-step enzymatic cascade, it is converted to 5-FU mainly within human cancer cells. While the drug compares favorably with 5-FU in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer and pretreated breast cancer, it also has an improved toxicity profile, mainly of gastrointestinal and dermatologic effects with a significantly lower incidence of grade 3/4 myelotoxicity compared with infusional 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Capecitabine's selective activation within the tumor allows for less systemic toxicity events. A gradient of fluoropyrimidine toxicity is observed: high in the US and low in East Asia. In addition, there is a discrepancy in tolerance of dose among patients treated in the US vs. Europe. Although patients can take the drug orally in the convenience of their own home, the key to successful management of capecitabine is the clinician's awareness of its severe, but low in incidence, adverse effects, and the patients' education, emphasizing compliance with the treatment plan, prevention and timely recognition of its toxicities.

Gemcitabine plus capecitabine combination in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) exposed to anthracyclines and taxanes is challenging. Effective and well-tolerated regimens are required. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine combination was assessed in MBC patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 31 patients treated between November 2004 and September 2005 were retrospectively evaluated in 4 institutions. The median age was 48 years (range 29-77). The patients were given gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 1,500 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 160 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with a median of 5 cycles per patient (range 2-12). Three patients achieved a partial response (10%) and 8 patients (26%) stable disease. The median time to disease progression was 6 months (95% CI 5-7), with a median survival of 18 months (95% CI 15-21) at a median follow-up of 16 months (range 2-28). One-year and 2-year survival rates were 67 and 28%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (n = 11, 35%), nausea and vomiting (n = 4, 13%), hand-foot syndrome (n = 2, 6%), anemia (n = 2, 6%), thrombocytopenia (n = 2, 6%) and asthenia (n = 1, 3%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of gemcitabine plus capecitabine was a tolerable regimen with a mild but comparable survival efficacy to similar regimens in patients with MBC after anthracyclines and taxanes.

Capecitabine/Cyclophosphamide/Methotrexate for patients with metastatic breast cancer: a dose-finding, feasibility, and efficacy study

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is a fluoropyrimidine carbamate that acts as a prodrug, mimics continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and has encouraging antitumor activity in women with metastatic breast cancer. We performed a feasibility study in which the 5-FU of the cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-FU regimen was substituted with capecitabine in a novel regimen applicable to women with breast cancer. Three doses of capecitabine were explored (1650 mg/m2, 1850 mg/m2, and 2000 mg/m2 per day from day 1 to day 14) in combination with intravenous bolus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and methotrexate (40 mg/m2), given on day 1 and day 8 every 4 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 2002 to August 2004, 39 women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled and were evaluable for toxicity and response.

RESULTS

Hematologic toxicity was mild for the majority of patients: grade 4 neutropenia and anemia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 1 patient. Nonhematologic toxicity of grade > or = 3 occurred only at the highest dose level. Overall response rate was 44% (complete response rate, 13%; partial response rate, 31%). Clinical benefit including long-lasting (> or = 6 months) stable disease overall accounted for 82%. Responses were observed at each dose level. The median duration of response was 14 months (95% confidence interval, 10-28 months). At a median observation of 24 months (range, 8-36 months), time to progression was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 9-24 months).

CONCLUSION

The data of our study show that cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/capecitabine is feasible and active. The capecitabine dose of 1850 mg/m(2) orally on days 1-14 every 28 days was selected as the recommended dose in view of the higher likelihood of "on time" chronic therapy compared with the 2000-mg/m(2) dose.

Gemcitabine single or combination chemotherapy in post anthracycline and taxane salvage treatment of metastatic breast cancer: retrospective analysis of 124 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, particularly in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated 2(nd)-line or greater metastatic breast cancer, and to compare gemcitabine monotherapy (G) with two gemcitabine-based doublets, gemcitabine/vinorelbine (GV) and gemcitabine/capecitabine (GX).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 124 consecutive patients who progressed after anthracycline- and taxane-containing chemotherapy, 58 received G alone, 38 received GV, and 28 received GX; their outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median number of prior metastatic chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range 0 approximately 4). Visceral metastases were observed in 65 patients (51.4%). The overall response rate was 19.3% (21 partial responses). After a median follow-up period of 21.4 months, the overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.5 approximately 9.6 months) and the median time to progression was 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.0 approximately 4.2 months). Compared with monotherapy (G), combination therapy with vinorelbine or capecitabine (GV/GX) was associated with a significantly higher response rate (8.2% vs. 28.3%, p=0.008) and a significantly longer median time to progression (2.8 vs. 3.5 months; p=0.028), but overall survival did not differ between the groups (7.4 vs. 8.2 months, respectively; p=0.54). Most of the adverse treatment-related events were mild to moderate in intensity. The most common adverse event was hematologic toxicity. Multivariate analysis showed that poor performance status and a short disease-free interval were independent prognostic factors for impaired overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine with vinorelbine or capecitabine was an active and well-tolerated treatment option for taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated 2(nd)-line or greater metastatic breast cancer patients, and gemcitabine-based doublets were more beneficial than gemcitabine monotherapy in alleviating symptoms for these patients.