Capecitabine/Vinorelbine: An Effective and Well-Tolerated Regimen for Women with Pretreated Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer

Co-targeting triple-negative breast cancer cells and endothelial cells by metronomic chemotherapy inhibits cell regrowth and migration via downregulation of the FAK/VEGFR2/VEGF axis and autophagy/apoptosis activation

High-dose standard-of-care chemotherapy is the only option for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, which eventually die due to metastatic tumors. Recently, metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) showed advantages in treating TNBCs leading us to investigate the anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic potential of metronomic 5-Fluorouracil plus Vinorelbine (5-FU+VNR) on endothelial cells (ECs) and TNBCs in comparison to standard treatment (STD). We found that 10-fold lower doses of 5-FU+VNR given mCHT vs. STD inhibits cell proliferation and survival of ECs and TNBC cells. Both schedules strongly affect ECs migration and invasion, but in TNBC cells mCHT is significantly more effective than STD in impairing cell migration and invasion. The two treatments disrupt FAK/VEGFR/VEGF signaling in both ECs and TNBC cells. mCHT, and to a much lesser extent STD treatment, induces apoptosis in ECs, whereas it switches the route of cell death from apoptosis (as induced by STD) to autophagy in TNBC cells. mCHT-treated TNBCs-derived conditioned medium also strongly affects ECs' migration, modulates different angiogenesis-associated proteins, and hampers angiogenesis in matrix sponge in vivo. In conclusion, mCHT administration of 5-FU+VNR is more effective than STD schedule in controlling cell proliferation/survival and migration/invasion of both ECs and TNBC cells and has a strong anti-angiogenic effect. Our data suggest that the stabilization of tumor growth observed in TNBC patients treated with mCHT therapy schedule is likely due not only to direct cytotoxic effects but also to anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic effects.

Fever and breast cancer: A critical review of the literature and possible underlying mechanisms

Fever is a common feature in various pathological conditions that manifests a series of molecular events in the internal milieu. Much less attention has been paid to the clinical importance and the management of fever in breast cancer patients. However, several studies have reported an association between postoperative fever and poor treatment outcomes in breast cancer patients. The fever is a side effect of chemotherapy and a manifestation of cancer recurrence. The postmenopausal breast cancer patients experience another body temperature disturbance that is known as a hot flashes. Here, we reviewed the literature regarding postoperative fever and the possible underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms. Then the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was discussed as a therapeutic option to control postoperative fever. Finally, we reviewed the chemotherapy-induced neutropenic fever and cancer vaccination-induced fever.

Vinorelbine plus Capecitabine (Vinocap): a retrospective analysis in heavily pretreated HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Metastatic breast cancer is regarded as an incurable entity. In heavily pretreated patients with increasingly limited options for palliative management, ensuring proper quality of life continues is to be an elusive issue. With this in mind, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Vinorelbine/Capecitabine doublet (VINOCAP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The investigators retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 67 women with HER2 negative MBC treated at a large breast cancer practice and a local cancer center with Vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 combined with Capecitabine 1 g PO BID for 14 consecutive days of 21 day cycles. Patients had been treated with an average of 4 prior lines of chemotherapy. Patient characteristics and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients received VINOCAP, and an additional 2 underwent repeat exposure yielding a cohort of 69. Clinical benefit rate, defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease ≥ 6 months (SD), was 55.07%. Complete response was seen in 4.34%, PR in 18.8% and SD ≥ 6 months in 31.9%. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months and overall survival 35.47 months after VINOCAP exposure. The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia in 10% of cases. Dose had to be reduced in 18% of cases due to toxicity of any type. The regimen was well tolerated, and serious side effects were uncommon.

CONCLUSION

Vinorelbine/Capecitabine appears to be an active and well-tolerated regimen in women with MBC. In particular, encouraging was the efficacy of VINOCAP as fourth or greater line of chemotherapy.

Evaluation of the clinical benefits of adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer: A retrospective study

Capecitabine is orally administered and may be safely and conveniently used in patients with cancer. The antitumor activity of capecitabine in breast cancer was mostly demonstrated in the salvage therapy setting, whereas the effect of adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy in breast cancer remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer. A total of 251 patients were enrolled and survival was compared between elderly breast cancer patients who received adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy and those who received no chemotherapy. Cancer-specific and disease-free survival curves were compared using log-rank tests and survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox's proportional hazard regression model. There was no significant difference between the clinicopathological characteristics, including age, tumor size, lymph node status, histological grade and hormone status, between patients in the two groups. The breast cancer-specific survival rate was 89.3% in the capecitabine monotherapy group vs. 81.3% in the no chemotherapy group; the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.128). The disease-free survival rate was 81.7% in the capecitabine monotherapy group vs. 65.3% in the no chemotherapy group. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a longer disease-free survival in the capecitabine monotherapy group (P=0.015). On Cox regression analysis, capecitabine monotherapy was found to be associated with the disease-free survival rate (P=0.014, hazard ratio=0.500) but not with the cancer-specific survival rate (P=0.181). The adverse events of capecitabine monotherapy were recorded and there was no chemotherapy interruption due to severe adverse reactions. Therefore, adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer is a safe and effective option, as well as a viable alternative for elderly breast cancer patients who refuse standard adjuvant therapy.

Capecitabine combined with docetaxel versus vinorelbine followed by capecitabine maintenance medication for first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: Phase 3 randomized trial

BACKGROUND

In this prospective study, progression-free survival (PFS) and the safety profiles of docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) and vinorelbine/capecitabine (NX) followed by capecitabine maintenance therapy were compared in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to a TX group (n = 104) and an NX group (n = 102), both of which included capecitabine maintenance medication. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The trial met its primary endpoint and was closed to accrual subsequent to interim analysis. Forty-eight patients in the TX group (46.2%) and 42 patients in the NX group (41.2%) received maintenance medication. The median PFS (8.4 vs 7.1 months; P = .0026; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.3; hazard ratio, 1.65), the response duration (7.8 vs 6.6 months; P = .0451), and the median overall survival (OS) (35.3 vs 19.8 months; P = .1349; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.47; hazard ratio, 1.48) in the TX group appeared to be longer compared with those in the NX group, although the difference did reach not statistical significance. Patients aged ≥40 years who were postmenopausal and presented with visceral metastases were more likely to benefit from the TX regimen in terms of PFS and OS, whereas positive hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status or a history of taxane treatments did not affect differences in PFS and OS between the TX and NX groups. Hand-foot syndrome occurred more frequently in the TX group than in the NX group (47% vs 16.7%; P < .0001), but the frequencies of other minor adverse effects were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A TX regimen for advanced breast cancer followed by capecitabine maintenance medication led to longer PFS and response duration than an NX regimen, even for patients who had previously received taxane in (neo)adjuvant settings. Cancer 2015. © 2015 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Anticancer oral therapy: emerging related issues

The use of oral anticancer drugs has shown a steady increase. Most patients prefer anticancer oral therapy to intravenous treatment primarily for the convenience of a home-based therapy, although they require that the efficacy of oral therapy must be equivalent and toxicity not superior than those expected with the intravenous treatment. A better patient compliance, drug tolerability, convenience and possible better efficacy for oral therapy as compared to intravenous emerge as the major reasons to use oral anticancer agents among oncologists. Inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variations in the bioavailability of oral anticancer drugs may be more relevant than for intravenous agents. Compliance is particularly important for oral therapy because it determines the dose-intensity of the treatment and ultimately treatment efficacy and toxicity. Patient stands as the most important determinant of compliance. Possible measures for an active and safe administration of oral therapy include a careful preliminary medical evaluation and selection of patients based on possible barriers to an adequate compliance, pharmacologic issues, patient-focused education, an improvement of the accessibility to healthcare service, as well as the development of home-care nursing symptom-focused interventions. Current evidences show similar quality of life profile between oral and intravenous treatments, although anticancer oral therapy seems to be more convenient in terms of administration and reduced time lost for work or other activities. Regarding cost-effectiveness, current evidences are in favor of oral therapy, mainly due to reduced need of visits and/or day in hospital for the administration of the drug and/or the management of adverse events.

Vinorelbine and fluorouracil plus leucovorin combination (ViFL) in patients with anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

This phase II study was designed in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination of vinorelbine (VNB), fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

METHODS

From 12/2003 to 12/2007, 51 women (median age 59) were treated. Performance status (PS) (ECOG) was 0-2 (median 0). The chemotherapy consisted of VNB 25 mg/sqm on day 1 added to FU and LV (following De Gramont schedule) on day 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 14 days. 518 cycles of CT were administered (median 12). Most common sites of metastatic spread were: bone, liver, lymph nodes, lung.

RESULTS

We recorded three cases of G4 neuthropenia and in one case it was febrile; no others G4 toxicities were seen. G3 toxicities were more common, especially neuthropenia (8 patients) asthenia (4) mucositis (2) and Hand-Foot Syndrome (2). Overall response rate was 27.5% (14 patients had a PR) and disease control rate was 76.5%; 12 patients experienced disease progression. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7.70 months and overall survival (OS) was 18.70 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate that the ViFL regimen has substantial activity in patients with MBC already treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The combination may be considered a valid choice for the treatment of MBC. Better survival results were seen in patients with visceral metastases than bone involvement. The low response rate shows that the ViFL regimen is not suitable for the neoadjuvant setting.

A phase I study of gefitinib, capecitabine, and celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of the combination of gefitinib, capecitabine, and celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were treated with escalating doses of gefitinib once daily, capecitabine twice daily (14 of 28 days), and celecoxib twice daily. Plasma samples for biomarkers were obtained at baseline and weekly for the first 2 cycles. Pharmacokinetic variables were correlated with toxicity and presence of biological effect. Tumor biopsies from 5 patients were analyzed for changes in tumor metabolic activity by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was done as a correlate in 6 patients at the MTD. Thirty-nine patients received 168 cycles of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicities observed included nausea, dehydration and nausea, diarrhea, and stomatitis. The MTD was 250 mg/d gefitinib (days 1-14) and 2,000 mg/m2/d capecitabine divided twice daily (days 8-21) every 28 days. Celecoxib was eliminated due to concerns of increased risk for cardiovascular toxicity, although no patients in this study had cardiac events. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma had a confirmed partial response. Fourteen of 39 (36%) patients maintained prolonged stable disease for a median of 4 months (range, 3-24 months). [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan and metabolomic analyses revealed differences in metabolic response to gefitinib versus capecitabine. The combination of gefitinib and capecitabine is well tolerated and appears to have activity against certain advanced solid tumors, providing a rationale for further evaluation in advanced solid malignancies.

Preoperative bevacizumab combined with letrozole and chemotherapy in locally advanced ER- and/or PgR-positive breast cancer: clinical and biological activity

The antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab showed synergistic effects when combined with chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. We presently investigated the activity of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy, including capecitabine and vinorelbine, and endocrine therapy, including letrozole (+triptorelin in premenopausal women), as primary therapy for patients with ER and/or PgR ⩾10% T2–T4a-c, N0–N2, M0 breast cancer. Biological end point included the proliferative activity (Ki67), whereas clinical end points were clinical response rate, pathological complete response (pCR) and tolerability. Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and their progenitors, as surrogate markers of antiangiogenic activity, were measured at baseline and at surgery.Thirty-six women are evaluable. A clinical response rate of 86% (95% CI, 70–95) and no pCR were observed; Ki67 was significantly decreased by 71% (interquartile range, −82%, −62%). Toxicity was manageable: two grade 3 hypertension, four grade 3 deep venous thrombosis and no grade >2 proteinuria were observed. Treatment significantly decreased the percentage of viable CECs and prevented the chemotherapy-induced mobilisation of circulating progenitors. Basal circulating progenitors were positively associated with clinical response. In conclusion, bevacizumab is feasible and active in association with primary chemoendocrine therapy for ER-positive tumours in terms of proliferation inhibition, clinical response and antiangiogenic activity.

First-line chemotherapy for HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients who received anthracyclines as adjuvant treatment

The treatment decision for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received anthracyclines within the course of adjuvant chemotherapy is troublesome, particularly if trastuzumab and hormonal treatment are not indicated. In the first part of this review we discuss the value of retreatment with anthracyclines, a topic that has been indirectly evaluated by retrospective studies with conflicting results and within a small phase III trial with a negative outcome. Evidence on liposomal anthracyclines is also reviewed. In the second part of the review, alternative options of first-line chemotherapy are discussed. These include taxanes as single agents, taxanes in combination with other cytotoxic drugs, combinations without anthracyclines and taxanes, and innovative treatments including target-based agents. Both the amount and the quality of evidence on these treatments are poor. Few phase III studies are available and most of them have been performed with registrative aims sponsored by the companies who own the winning drug. Beyond indications derived from such studies, there is a great need for more clinical research in this setting.

Results of a phase I trial of intravenous vinorelbine plus oral capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer

The management of metastatic breast cancer becomes increasingly intricate, requiring new drugs and combinations. We present here the results of a phase I study evaluating the maximal tolerated dose of vinorelbine combined with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy. Vinorelbine was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, and capecitabine was given orally twice daily from day 1 to 14 (three cycles every 21 days). Three out of six patients receiving vinorelbine at 25mg/m2/day and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m2/day presented with a dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of protracted grade 3 neutropenia, hand-foot syndrome and/or liver test disturbances. Despite of a dose reduction in vinorelbine (20mg/m2/day), one patient among four developed a dose-limiting febrile neutropenia. This regimen cannot be recommended as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. These findings are not in agreement with previous publications of this schedule, or with promising results using both drugs orally.

Optimizing clinical care of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a new oral vinorelbine plus trastuzumab combination

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab (T) combined with i.v. vinorelbine (i.v.VNR) is an active regimen for patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). In order to further improve quality of life of patients undergoing treatment for ABC, a new regimen using oral vinorelbine (oVNR) (d1 + d3) plus q3wks T was tested (ToVNR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with ABC, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu 3+ or FISH positive received 288 treatment cycles with T 6 mg/kg (loading dose, 8 mg/kg) on d1 and oVNR 55 mg/m(2) on d1 + d3, q3wks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients and 286 treatment cycles were evaluated (two patients were lost to follow-up). Treatment was very well tolerated. Two patients had complete response (CR), 14 partial response (PR), 17 stable disease (SD) and four disease progression (PD) (overall response rate: 43%). Clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD >24 months) was 73%. Median time to progression was 8.9 months (range 2-27) and median duration of response was 10.9 months (range 2-27).

CONCLUSIONS

The ToVNR combination is active and very well tolerated. It favorably compares with the combination of T and weekly i.v. administered VNR, allowing a more convenient once every three weeks hospital admission and leaving patients and care providers free from the unpleasant effect of i.v.VNR.

A phase I study of an all-oral combination of vinorelbine/capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes

BACKGROUND

Few overlapping toxicities and oral formulations make capecitabine plus oral vinorelbine an attractive new combination for treating patients with breast cancer. An all-oral regimen minimizes inconvenience for the patient and saves medical resources.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To determine the recommended dose for this all-oral combination, we conducted a phase I study in 21 patients with metastatic breast cancer after failure of previous chemotherapy with anthracylines and/or taxanes for advanced disease. Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily was given on days 2-7 and 9-14. Vinorelbine was administered at escalating doses of 40-80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of vinorelbine was performed in cohorts of 3 patients, but the dose of vinorelbine could also be increased to the next level in the same patient after 3 cycles if there were no dose-limiting toxicities. In total, 173 cycles were administered (median, 8 cycles; range 1-21+ cycles).

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated: there were no grade 4 toxicities, and the only grade 3 toxicities in > 1 cycle were hand-foot syndrome and neutropenia (2% of cycles each). The maximum tolerated dose could not be determined using predefined criteria. However, in this heavily pretreated patient population, intrapatient vinorelbine dose escalation > 60 mg/m2 was rarely achieved. Thus, we considered vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 to offer the best dose level-toxicity ratio. At this dose, grade 3 toxicities occurred in only 7% of the 58 cycles administered. Among 19 evaluable patients, 7 exhibited response or stable disease lasting > 6 months, giving a clinical benefit rate of 37%. Duration of response in the 2 responding patients was 5 months and > 16 months.

CONCLUSION

The all-oral combination of capecitabine/vinorelbine is well tolerated and active in heavily pretreated patients. Oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 is recommended in combination with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for further evaluation.

Metastatic breast cancer: an updating

This article reports on recent advances on metastatic breast cancer. Detection, prognostic factors, predictors of response to therapy and therapy, with particular regard to targeted therapies, were examined.

DETECTION

Unlike current guidelines that yet do not routinely recommend intensive clinical-instrumental post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients, relatively large data collected in the last decades have shown that an intensive post-operative follow-up with 'dynamic evaluation' of a suitable tumour marker panel precedes a few months as average the clinical and/or instrumental sign of a pending relapse in most relapsed patients and largely limits the use of the common instrumental examinations.

PROGNOSIS AND THERAPY PREDICTORS

Disease-free interval (DFI)<or=24 months, adjuvant chemotherapy, liver and distant soft tissue involvement or DFI>24 months and disease confined to bony skeleton are prognostic factors more often correlated with relatively poor or prolonged survival, respectively. Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in primary tumour and at the relapse correlates strongly with response to salvage hormone therapy and data from large trials showed that 38-59% of ER and/or PR+ post-menopausal patients had clinical benefit from first line tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. An inverse correlation of ER with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been found. The co-expression of HER-2/neu and/or elevated serum HER-2/neu protein level were associated with a low rate and shorter duration of response of ER+ patients to first line hormone therapy. Accordingly, ER-EGFR- compared with ER-EGFR+ tumours are usually more responsive to endocrine therapy. High class III beta-tubulin expression or fall in insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) from baseline levels have been found to significantly predict resistance to chemotherapeutic agents.

THERAPY

Liposomes as carrier of doxorubicin (Caelix, Evacet, Myocet) is one approach to decrease the anthracycline-related cardiac toxicity. Weekly paclitaxel or docetaxel and oral formulation of vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (capecitabine) provide new effective and well tolerated options that reach greater dose intensity and cumulative dose than with the conventional schedules. As to the so called 'tailored' or targeted therapies, the more potent and highly selective third generation of aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane) targeting ER+ tumours by estrogen deprivation, challenge tamoxifen as current standard first line therapy in postmenopausals. One pilot study showed that stimulation of cellular immunity by the addition of beta-interferon-interleukin-2 sequence in patients on clinical benefit on first line tamoxifen significantly prolonged median overall survival (OS) and duration of response compared to that observed in similar patients only treated with tamoxifen. Trastuzumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to extracellular domain of HER-2, plus conventional chemotherapy has become a standard of care for women with overexpressing HER-2 tumours. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that in refractory metastatic breast cancer doubled the response rate of capecitabine although it did not affect survival. Finally, the so called 'oligometastatic' and a few stage IV diseases are conditions amenable to be rendered with no evidence of disease (NED) after local surgery and/or radiation. In both, as well as in complete responders to chemotherapy, minimal residual disease (m.r.d.) likely continues to be present. Recent data suggest that 'biological' therapy (immunomodulators and/or retinoids with or without hormone therapy), might be suitable to be successfully tested in these patients as maintenance treatment given soon after local intervention or chemotherapy.