Downregulation of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27kip1 Might Correlate with Poor Disease-Free and Overall Survival in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis

As the most commonly occurring cancer in women worldwide, breast cancer poses a formidable public health challenge on a global scale. Breast cancer consists of a group of biologically and molecularly heterogeneous diseases originated from the breast. While the risk factors associated with this cancer varies with respect to other cancers, genetic predisposition, most notably mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, is an important causative factor for this malignancy. Breast cancers can begin in different areas of the breast, such as the ducts, the lobules, or the tissue in between. Within the large group of diverse breast carcinomas, there are various denoted types of breast cancer based on their invasiveness relative to the primary tumor sites. It is important to distinguish between the various subtypes because they have different prognoses and treatment implications. As there are remarkable parallels between normal development and breast cancer progression at the molecular level, it has been postulated that breast cancer may be derived from mammary cancer stem cells. Normal breast development and mammary stem cells are regulated by several signaling pathways, such as estrogen receptors (ERs), HER2, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways, which control stem cell proliferation, cell death, cell differentiation, and cell motility. Furthermore, emerging evidence indicates that epigenetic regulations and noncoding RNAs may play important roles in breast cancer development and may contribute to the heterogeneity and metastatic aspects of breast cancer, especially for triple-negative breast cancer. This review provides a comprehensive survey of the molecular, cellular and genetic aspects of breast cancer.

Signaling pathways in breast cancer: therapeutic targeting of the microenvironment

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Understanding the biology of this malignant disease is a prerequisite for selecting an appropriate treatment. Cell cycle alterations are seen in many cancers, including breast cancer. Newly popular targeted agents in breast cancer include cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) which are agents inhibiting the function of cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and agents targeting proto-oncogenic signaling pathways like Notch, Wnt, and SHH (Sonic hedgehog). CDKIs are categorized as selective and non-selective inhibitors of CDK. CDKIs have been tried as monotherapy and combination therapy. The CDKI Palbocyclib is now a promising therapeutic in breast cancer. This drug recently entered phase III trial for estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer after showing encouraging results in progression free survival in a phase II trials. The tumor microenvironment is now recognized as a significant factor in cancer treatment response. The tumor microenvironment is increasingly considered as a target for combination therapy of breast cancer. Recent findings in the signaling pathways in breast cancer are herein summarized and discussed. Furthermore, the therapeutic targeting of the microenvironment in breast cancer is also considered.

Inflammatory breast cancer: the disease, the biology, the treatment

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of invasive breast cancer accounting for 2.5% of all breast cancer cases. It is characterized by rapid progression, local and distant metastases, younger age of onset, and lower overall survival compared with other breast cancers. Historically, IBC is a lethal disease with less than a 5% survival rate beyond 5 years when treated with surgery or radiation therapy. Because of its rarity, IBC is often misdiagnosed as mastitis or generalized dermatitis. This review examines IBC's unique clinical presentation, pathology, epidemiology, imaging, and biology and details current multidisciplinary management of the disease, which comprises systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy.

Is there a role for mammary stem cells in inflammatory breast carcinoma?: a review of evidence from cell line, animal model, and human tissue sample experiments

Stem cells are pluripotent cells, with a large replicative potential, which perform normal physiological functions such as tissue renewal and damage repair. However, because of their long lifespan and high replicative potential, stem cells are ideal targets to accumulate multiple mutations. Therefore, they can be regarded as being responsible for the initiation of tumor formation. In the past, numerous studies have shown that the presence of an elaborate stem cell compartment within a tumor is associated with aggressive tumor cell behavior, frequent formation of metastases, resistance to therapy, and poor patient survival. From this perspective, tumors from patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an aggressive breast cancer subtype with a dismal clinical course, are most likely to be associated with stem cell biology. To date, this hypothesis is corroborated by evidence resulting from in vitro and in vivo experiments. Both gene and microRNA expression profiles highlighted several stem cell-specific signal transduction pathways that are hyperactivated in IBC. Also, these stem cell-specific signal transduction pathways seem to converge in the activation of nuclear factor-kappa B, a molecular hallmark of IBC, and induction of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Recently, the latter mechanism was identified as a prerequisite for the induction of stem cell characteristics in breast cancer cells.

Biology and management of inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of a locally advanced breast cancer that is thought to account for approximately 1-5% of all newly diagnosed breast cancers diagnosed in the USA. Historically, IBC was considered to be a uniformly fatal disease with less than 5% of patients surviving past 5 years. With the advent of a multidisciplinary approach to management, survival outcomes have improved with 5-year survival rates of over 40% being reported. Research efforts are now focused on trying to better understand the epidemiological and molecular characteristics of this disease to further improve survival. Two genes, Rhoc GTPase and WISP3, have been identified that have been found to be concordantly altered in the majority of inflammatory breast cancer tumors and may serve as potential targets for future therapeutic agents. The purpose of this review is to summarize the latest epidemiological and molecular characteristics of IBC, describe the difficulties encountered in trying to clinically diagnose this entity, highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and present some of the latest data on the management of this disease.

p27(Kip1) as a prognostic factor in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate via a meta-analysis the association between p27 expression and clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. We conducted a meta-analysis of 20 studies (n= 6463 patients) that evaluated the correlation between p27 expression and indicators of breast cancer clinical outcome, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Data pooling was performed by RevMan 4.2. A total of 60% (9 of 15) of the studies showed a significant association between p27 high expression and OS, whereas 25% (2 of 8) and 60% (3 of 5) studies demonstrated a correlation between p27 high expression and DFS and RFS, respectively. The relative risks (RRs) were 1.34 (1.26–1.42) for OS (P < 0.00001), 1.27 (1.10–1.47) for DFS (P= 0.001) and 1.49 (0.92–2.42) for RFS (P= 0.10). In lymph node-negative breast cancer patients, the RRs for OS and RFS were 1.84 (1.30–2.59; P= 0.0005) and 1.30 (0.20–8.50; P= 0.78), respectively. In lymph node-positive breast cancer patients, the RRs for OS and RFS were 2.99 (1.77–5.07; P < 0.0001) and 1.49 (0.80–2.77; P= 0.21), respectively. This meta-analysis indicates that reduced p27 is an independent prognostic factor for poor overall and disease-free cancer survival.

Molecular targets for treatment of inflammatory breast cancer

Despite progress in combined-modality treatment with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy, the long-term outcome for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) remains poor. Therapies that target vasculolymphatic processes--angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and vasculogenesis--have shown potential in the treatment for IBC, as represented by bevacizumab. Although the therapeutic effect of targeting lymphangiogenesis and vasculogenesis requires further investigation, targeting of angiogenesis has potential, not only through true antiangiogenic effects, but also through antitumor effects in concert with other pathways. Therapies that target cell proliferation pathways are the most promising targeted therapies for IBC. In particular, therapies that target human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (for example, trastuzumab and lapatinib) have performed well in the clinical setting, leading to improved outcomes for patients with IBC. Metastatic pathways could have a unique, key role in the aggressiveness of the IBC phenotype. Further extensive work on the unique molecular characteristics of IBC is essential to ensure improved outcomes for patients with this disease. In this Review we discuss three pathways--vasculolymphatic, cell proliferation and metastatic--that could represent important targets in the treatment of IBC.

Relapse-free survival in breast cancer patients is associated with a gene expression signature characteristic for inflammatory breast cancer

PURPOSE

We hypothesize that a gene expression profile characteristic for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with rapid cancer dissemination and poor survival, might be related to tumor aggressiveness in non-IBC (nIBC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

RNA from 17 IBC samples and 40 nIBC samples was hybridized onto Affymetrix chips. A gene signature predictive of IBC was identified and applied onto 1,157 nIBC samples with survival data of 881 nIBC samples. Samples were classified as IBC-like or nIBC-like. The IBC signature classification was compared with the classifications according to other prognostically relevant gene signatures and clinicopathologic variables. In addition, relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared by the Kaplan-Meyer method.

RESULTS

Classification according to the IBC signature is significantly (P < 0.05) associated with the cell-of-origin subtypes, the wound healing response, the invasive gene signature, the genomic grade index, the fibroblastic neoplasm signature, and the 70-gene prognostic signature. Significant associations (P < 0.01) were found between the IBC signature and tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, ErbB2 status, and patient age at diagnosis. Patients with an IBC-like phenotype show a significantly shorter RFS interval (P < 0.05). Oncomine analysis identified cell motility as an important concept linked with the IBC signature.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that nIBC carcinomas having an IBC-like phenotype have a reduced RFS interval. This suggests that IBC and nIBC show comparable phenotypic traits, for example augmented cell motility, with respect to aggressive tumor cell behavior. This observation lends credit to the use of IBC to study aggressive tumor cell behavior.

Pathologic aspects of inflammatory breast cancer: part 2. Biologic insights into its aggressive phenotype

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive and distinct form of primary breast cancer with a peculiar clinical presentation and dismal clinical outcome. This review addresses the pathologic aspects of this entity and discusses the molecular alterations involved in the highly malignant phenotype of IBC.