Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated with Capecitabine: A Population-Based Analysis

Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Outcomes in Older Adult Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer

Importance

The association of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with survival in the general population of patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains controversial. As such, the role of this treatment in the treatment of older adult patients (aged ≥70 years) needs to be evaluated.

Objective

To describe the patterns of use of AC and compare survival outcomes of AC and observation in older adult patients following resection of BTC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included 8091 older adult patients with resected BTC with data available in the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2019. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: AC and observation. The AC cohort was subdivided into single-agent and multiagent AC treatment.

Exposures

Adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation following BTC resection.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) of patients who received AC compared with observation following resection of BTC as evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score matching were performed to address indication bias.

Results

Between 2004 and 2019, of 8091 older adult patients with resected BTC identified (median [range] age, 77 [70-90] years; 5136 women [63.5%]; 2955 men [36.5%]), only one-third (2632 [32.5%]) received AC. There was an increase in the use of AC across the study period from 20.7% (n = 495) in 2004 to 2009 to 41.2% (n = 856) in 2016 to 2019. Age 80 years or older (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25-0.33; P < .001) and gallbladder primary site (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; P < .001) were associated with a lower odds of AC. Following inverse probability of treatment weighting, as a composite, AC was not associated with improved survival (median OS, 20.5 months; 95% CI, 19.2-21.7 months) compared with observation (median OS, 19.0 months; 95% CI, 18.1-20.3 months). A longer median OS was associated with single-agent AC (21.5 months; 95% CI, 19.9-24.0 months) but not multiagent AC (19.1 months; 95% CI, 17.5-21.1 months) compared with observation (median OS, 17.3 months; 95% CI, 16.1-18.4 months). This improvement in OS with single-agent AC was not apparent on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05; P = .44). However, age at diagnosis of 80 years or older (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.42; P < .001) and treatment at nonacademic centers (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20, P < .001) were associated with worse OS.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of older adult patients, AC was not associated with an improvement in survival compared with observation following BTC resection. These findings suggest the need for further study of AC for older adult patients who may benefit after curative intent surgery for BTC.

The influence of adjuvant chemotherapy dose intensity on overall survival in resected colon cancer: a multicentered retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in North America. Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer (CC) reduces cancer recurrence, but also causes significant toxicity requiring dose reductions. The effect of dose intensity on survival outcomes is not fully understood and strengthening the evidence supports informed decision making between patients and oncologists.

METHODS

Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, between 2006 and 2011, for resected colon cancer at four Canadian academic cancer centers were retrospectively analyzed. All patients must have received oxaliplatin with either capecitabine (CAPOX) or 5-FU (FOLFOX). Dose intensity (DI) was calculated as total delivered dose of an individual chemotherapy agent divided by the cumulative intended dose of that agent. The influence of DI on overall survival was examined.

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty-one patients with high-risk stage II or stage III resected CC were eligible and included in the analysis. FOLFOX was the most common regimen (69.6%) with 29.7% of patients receiving CAPOX and 0.7% receiving both therapies. Median follow-up was 36.7 months. The median DI for 5-FU and capecitabine was 100% and 100% with 13.6% and 9.8% of patients receiving ≤ 80% DI, respectively. The median DI of oxaliplatin was 70% with 56.8% of patients receiving ≤ 80% DI. A DI of > 80% for each chemotherapy component was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival compared to those with a DI of ≤ 80% (5-FU HR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.08-0.65, p = 0.006; capecitabine HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.33-0.94, p = 0.026; oxaliplatin HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.33-0.82, p = 0.005). Patients with T2 and/or N2 disease with an oxaliplatin DI > 80% had a trend towards improved survival (HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.38-1.02, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

In resected CC an adjuvant chemotherapy DI of > 80%, of each chemotherapy agent, is associated with improved overall survival.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: Advances in the folate-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy backbone

Notwithstanding recent treatment advances in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), chemotherapy with a combination of a fluoropyrimidine and a folate agent, often 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, remains the backbone of treatment regimens for the majority of patients with mCRC. This is despite a recent focus on molecular-targeted treatments and patient stratification according to mutational status or expression levels of specific genes. Intracellular folate concentration was discovered to be pivotal in the cytotoxic efficacy of 5-FU, paving the way to the current standard combination therapy approach. Subsequent discovery that systemic chemotherapy agents, such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin, can further increase the efficacy of 5-FU-based treatments led to the development of several combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI. Subsequent efforts to optimise 5-FU-based treatments have focused on 5-FU analogues, initially capecitabine and the combination drug tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and then TAS-102, which has recently been evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for refractory colorectal cancer. Further approaches taken to improve the efficacy of 5-FU chemotherapy regimens have focused on optimising the route and dosing schedules and regulating folate metabolism. Pharmacokinetic variability caused by the requirement for metabolic conversion of leucovorin has been central to recent research, and the development of agents such as arfolitixorin which bypass the need for metabolic conversion remains promising for future therapeutic candidates. In this review, we summarise the evidence leading to the current treatment regimens employing 5-FU and leucovorin, focusing on recent approaches taken to optimise and refine treatments to improve clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC.

Systemic Therapy of Common Tumours in Older Patients: Challenges and Opportunities. A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Review Paper

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Decision-making for systemic treatments in older patients with cancer is difficult because of concerns for decreased organ function, risk of toxicity, limited life expectancy due to comorbidities and the lack of evidence available to guide its management in this population. Here, we review the data on the role of systemic agents for the treatment of common malignancies in this age group.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence on the use of systemic treatments for older patients with cancer is increasing, especially for newer options including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents that provide comparable benefit in older and younger patients. Nonetheless, the risks for short- and long-term toxicities need to be considered. More research is warranted and represents a unique opportunity to increase the knowledge on cancer treatment for older adults. Healthy, older individuals should be considered for standard systemic treatment options, whereas those at risk based on geriatric assessments require adjusted plans. Geriatric assessments are key for decision-making.

Current Treatment Strategies for Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer

Colon cancer is one of the most common cancers in the United States and is expected to rise as the prevalence of colon cancer is increasing with increasing aging population. Though some studies have shown benefits of chemotherapy in the elderly population, however, they are also at risk of drug toxicities. We searched major search engines including PubMed, Medline and EMBASE and reviewed articles published in the last 10 years. Here we present current treatment strategies available for the metastatic colon cancer in elderly patients.

Association Between Serum Folate Level and Toxicity of Capecitabine During Treatment for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Folate level was proposed to be a predictor for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. We conducted a prospective study to determine the association between serum and red-cell folate and capecitabine-related toxicity in patients with colorectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included diagnosis of colorectal cancers; eligible patients who were scheduled to undergo capecitabine monotherapy or capecitabine-oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for adjuvant or palliative purposes. Exclusion criteria included concomitant radiotherapy or chemotherapy other than capecitabine or CAPOX and creatinine clearance <30 mL/min. Fasting serum and red-cell folate were measured prior to chemotherapy. Capecitabine was administered at 2,500 mg/m² per day (monotherapy) or 2,000 mg/m² per day (CAPOX) for 14 days every 3 weeks. The toxicity of the first four cycles was documented by clinical investigators who were blinded to folate levels.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were recruited, of whom 126 were eligible; 40 patients had capecitabine alone, and 86 patients received CAPOX. The rates of grade 2 and grade 3 toxicity were 63.5% and 14.3%, respectively. Nausea and vomiting were the most common grade ≥2 adverse event (47.7%), followed by hand-foot syndrome (25.4%), diarrhea (23.1%), and neutropenia (22.3%). Combination with oxaliplatin (odds ratio [OR], 2.77; p = .043) and serum folate (OR, 10.33; p = .002) were independent predictors of grade ≥2 toxicity. Red-cell folate was not predictive of toxicity. For every 10 nmol/L increment in serum folate, the risk of grade ≥2 toxicity increased by 9%.

CONCLUSION

Serum folate level, but not red-cell folate, was associated with higher rate of grade ≥2 toxicity during capecitabine-based treatment. Excessive folate intake may be avoided before and during capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This is the first prospective study to evaluate the association between serum folate level and capecitabine-related toxicity in patients with colon cancers. It shows that higher serum folate level is associated with increased risks of moderate to severe toxicity during capecitabine-based treatment. Excessive folate intake should be avoided before and during capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

Tolerance to Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Cancer

Background

Due to demographic changes, the number of elderly people with cancer will increase in the next decades. In the past, elderly patients with cancer were often excluded from clinical trials. Chronological age has been considered a risk factor for increased toxicity and reduced tolerance to chemotherapy.

Methods

We present a review on toxicity of chemotherapy and factors associated with toxicity in elderly patients with cancer, and we discuss chemotherapeutic agents and treatment options in treating this patient population.

Results

Age is a risk factor for increased toxicity to chemotherapy and decreased tolerance. However, few trials have been reported with adjustment for age-associated changes such as impairment of functional status and increased comorbidity, which also show an independent association with increased toxicity. Published data may include several biases, such as referral and publication bias.

Conclusions

Decision making in elderly cancer patients should be based on the results of a geriatric assessment. Patients with few or no limitations should be treated as younger patients are treated. Data with a high level of evidence are unavailable for patients showing moderate or severe limitations in a geriatric assessment.

[Colorectal cancer in the elderly. Surgical treatment, chemotherapy, and contribution from geriatrics]

Age is the biggest risk factor for colorectal cancer, with 70% of the cases in patients over 70 years old. For this reason, a review is presented on the surgical treatment and chemotherapy of cancer of colon and rectum in the elderly. A search was performed in PubMed, including words such as elderly, surgery, colorectal cancer, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and oncogeriatrics, and review articles and originals on treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly were selected. A narrative form was developed from the latest evidence with the results obtained on the treatment of this pathology. Although the treatment of colorectal cancer is standardised, a prior comprehensive geriatric assessment is required in the case of the elderly, before deciding the type of treatment in order to offer these robust elderly-standardised guidelines for the robust elderly and adapt them for use in fragile patients.

The impact of age on first-line systemic therapy in patients with metachronous metastases from colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The paucity of evidence for the optimal use of systemic therapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) poses significant challenges to cancer specialists. The present population-based study provides insight into the impact of age on palliative systemic therapy in patients with metachronous metastases from CRC, in order to optimize the decision-making process.

METHODS

Data on the development and treatment of metachronous metastases were collected for patients with primary resected CRC diagnosed between 2003 and 2008 in the Eindhoven area of the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients undergoing surgery for metastases were excluded, resulting in a study population treated with palliative intent, with or without systemic therapy (n=746).

RESULTS

385 patients received palliative systemic therapy (52%). Patients aged ≥75years were less likely to receive systemic therapy (31% ≥75years vs 73% <60years) and more likely to receive single-agent chemotherapy than combination-chemotherapy. Elderly patients (≥75years) treated with capecitabine-oxaliplatin (CAPOX) received fewer cycles (51% ≤3 oxaliplatin cycles, 43% ≤3 capecitabine cycles) and lower cumulative dosages compared to patients aged <75years, although initial dosages were similar. If capecitabine monotherapy (CapMono) was administered, starting dosages were 2414mg/m²/d<75years and 1992mg/m²/d≥75years (p<0.05), but no differences in number of received cycles or cumulative dosages were observed.

CONCLUSION

Age beginning at 75years significantly influenced palliative systemic therapy. Even in selected elderly patients, first-line treatment with CAPOX was associated with less cycles and lower cumulative dosages compared to younger patients. With single-agent fluoropyrimidine therapy, however, no such results were observed.

Chemotherapy use and adoption of new agents is affected by age and comorbidities in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has changed substantially in the last 2 decades, but to the authors' knowledge, the effect of age and comorbidities on chemotherapy use has not been well studied to date.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC who were being treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy between January 1995 to December 2009 were studied using the LifeLink Health Plan Claims Database. The cohort was divided into older (aged >70 years) and younger (aged ≤70 years) patients. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess comorbidity burden. The Wilcoxon and chi-square tests were used in univariate and logistic regression in multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 16,087 patients were identified, with 24% of the patients who were receiving chemotherapy being aged >70 years. The percentage of patients with a CCI >1 receiving chemotherapy increased over time (14% in 1996 vs 40% after 2004; P<.05). Older patients were less likely to receive treatment with >2 agents compared with younger patients (15% vs.22% and 11% vs.16%, respectively, in 2003 and 2009; P<.001). After approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1998, the use of irinotecan was lower in older compared with younger patients, a difference that resolved by 2002 (15% vs 38% [P<.05]; 62% in both groups [P = .9], respectively). Similarly, oxaliplatin was used more frequently in younger patients in 2003 (22% vs 15%; P<.05), with a decrease in this difference noted by 2009 (64% vs 60%; P = .95). On multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio, 0.65; P<.001) and a CCI >1 (odds ratio, 0.84; P<.001) were found to be associated with a lower likelihood of receiving combination chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this commercially insured population, the percentage of older patients treated for mCRC was low, and the rate of chemotherapy adoption was found to lag behind that of younger patients. However, the percentage of older patients with comorbidities receiving therapy increased over time. Cancer 2016;122:3191-8. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Retrospective analysis of the effect of CAPOX and mFOLFOX6 dose intensity on survival in colorectal patients in the adjuvant setting

BACKGROUND

Despite lack of a true comparative study, the folfox (5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin) and capox (capecitabine-oxaliplatin) regimens are believed to be similar in their efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of stage iii colorectal cancer. However, that belief has been disputed, because real-life data suggest that the capox regimen is more toxic, leading to more frequent reductions in the delivered dose intensity-thus raising questions about the effect of dose intensity on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective data review for two Canadian institutions, the Segal Cancer Centre and the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, considered patients diagnosed with stage iii colorectal cancer during 2006-2013. Primary endpoints were dose intensity and toxicity, with a secondary endpoint of disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 180 eligible patients (80 at the Segal Cancer Centre, 100 at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre). Of those 180 patients, 75 received capox, and 105 received mfolfox6. In the capox group, a significant dose reduction was identified for capecitabine compared with 5-fluorouracil in mfolfox6 group (p = 0.0014). Similarly, a significant dose reduction was observed for oxaliplatin in mfolfox6 compared with oxaliplatin in capox (p = 0.0001). Compared with the patients receiving capox, those receiving mfolfox6 were twice as likely to experience a treatment delay of more than 1 cycle-length (p = 0.03855). Toxicity was more frequent in patients receiving mfolfox6 (nausea: 30% vs. 18%; diarrhea: 47% vs. 24%; peripheral sensory neuropathy: 32% vs. 3%). At a median follow-up of 40 months, preliminary data showed no difference in disease-free survival (p = 0.598). Pooled data from both institutions were also separately analyzed, and no significant differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the use of capox despite a lack of head-to-head randomized trial data.

Palliative chemotherapy for patients 70 years of age and older with metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) commonly affects elderly people, an understudied subset of patients. We analyzed the survival impact of the first and subsequent lines of chemotherapy in eligible non-trial patients 70 years of age and older with mcrc treated between 2004 and 2012.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective analysis estimated overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (pfs) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, score on the Charlson comorbidity index, dependency in activities of daily living, and exposure to 1 or more chemotherapy doublets, capecitabine alone, or best supportive care (bsc).

RESULTS

Of 109 patients identified, 29 elected bsc, and 80 received chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, age was not associated with os [hazard ratio (hr): 0.99; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.92 to 1.05], but a performance status of 2 or higher was associated with a decreased likelihood of survival (hr: 3.12; 95% ci: 1.87 to 5.76), and exposure to 1 or more doublets was associated with improved survival (hr: 0.33; 95% ci: 0.17 to 0.66). In univariate analysis, a trend toward improved os was observed for first-line doublet chemotherapy compared with capecitabine (hr: 0.66; 95% ci: 0.41 to 1.07), and pfs was superior (hr: 0.46; 95% ci: 0.26 to 0.84). Compared with exposure to 1 doublet, exposure to the 3 potential cytotoxic chemotherapies was not associated with improved os (hr: 0.77; 95% ci: 0.41 to 1.43). The incidence of neutropenia with first-line folfiri was 40%; the incidences of bevacizumab-related arterial and venous thrombosis were both 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to 1 or more doublet chemotherapies for mcrc was associated with better outcomes in non-trial patients 70 years of age and older. Elderly patients treated with palliative chemotherapy and bevacizumab should be monitored carefully for arterial and venous thrombotic events.

Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly

Colorectal cancer has a high incidence, and approximately 60% of colorectal cancer patients are older than 70, with this incidence likely increasing in the near future. Elderly patients (> 70-75 years of age) are a very heterogeneous group, ranging from the very fit to the very frail. Traditionally, these patients have often been under-treated and recruited less frequently to clinical trials than younger patients, and thus are under-represented in publications about cancer treatment. Recent studies suggest that fit elderly patients can be treated in the same way as their younger counterparts, but the treatment of frail patients with comorbidities is still a matter of controversy. Many factors should be taken into account, including fitness for treatment, the wishes of the patient and family, and quality of life. This review will focus on the existing evidence for surgical, oncologic, and palliative treatment in patients over 70 years old with colorectal cancer. Careful patient assessment is necessary in order to individualize treatment approach, and this should rely on a multidisciplinary process. More well-designed controlled trials are needed in this patient population.

The place of targeted agents in the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Despite the high prevalence of colorectal cancer in a continuously aging population and the substantial advances in the treatment of metastatic disease during the past decade, the treatment of elderly patients with advanced, unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer is a clearly unmet need. Since older patients are under-represented or even excluded from randomized trials, the evidence that oncologists use as guidance is weak. However, small prospective studies, pooled analyses and observational studies show that combination approaches are safe, efficacious and feasible in the geriatric population with metastatic colorectal cancer. The use of biologic agents targeting angiogenesis and the epidermal growth factor receptor, which have been shown to clearly improve outcomes in multiple prospective trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, is a vital component of the aforementioned combination approaches. Herein, we review all available data concerning the management of elderly patients with these agents and underscore the differences between this age subgroup and younger patients.

Incidence and relative risk of grade 3 and 4 diarrhoea in patients treated with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil: a meta-analysis of published trials

AIM

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that can effectively replace infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for treatment of colorectal, gastric and breast cancer. This study aims to analyze the incidence and the relative risk of grade 3 and 4 diarrhoea in patients treated with capecitabine or 5-FU in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were reviewed for RCTs that compared capecitabine with 5-FU for treatment of solid malignancies. The incidence and relative risk (RR) of grade 3/4 diarrhoea were estimated for each arm in the overall population and in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies and 15,761 patients were included. Among these 8303 and 7458 patients received capecitabine or 5-FU based therapies, respectively. In the overall populations severe diarrhoea was reported in 16.6% (95% CI 15.8, 17.4) and in 12.7% (95% CI 11.9, 13.4) of patients treated with capecitabine or 5-FU-based therapies, respectively. The RR was 1.39 (95% CI 1.14, 1.69, P = 0.0010). In 14,899 CRC patients, the incidence of severe diarrhoea was 17.0% (95% CI 16.2, 17.9) and 12.9% (95% CI 12.1, 13.7), respectively, with a RR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.18, 1.81, P < 0.0001). In CRC patients treated with combined chemotherapy, the RR was 1.40 (95% CI 1.07, 1.82; P = 0.01) for patients receiving oxaliplatin and 2.35 (95% CI 1.76, 3.13; P < 0.0001) for patients receiving irinotecan.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with capecitabine is characterized by an increased risk of severe diarrhoea, mainly in patients affected by CRC and treated with polichemotherapy. Combination treatment with irinotecan doubles the risk over 5-FU.

An update on the management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the elderly

SUMMARY 

The availability of new chemotherapeutic and targeted agents has changed the life expectancy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer thanks to the possibility of sequentially administering fluoropyrimidines combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus monoclonal antibodies. This approach is seldom feasible in the elderly, especially because of the poor tolerability of some agents. Frail patients should only receive palliative treatment. Oppositely, fit elderly patients can be treated with more aggressive therapies, similarly to the younger ones. What is not sufficiently known is how to manage the elderly categorized as intermediate. In the coming years, it appears necessary how to accurately differentiate the elderly through a comprehensive geriatric assessment performed with validated scales and uniformed criteria simpler than those currently available.

Refining the Chemotherapy Approach for Older Patients With Colon Cancer

Population studies support an increased incidence of most cancers among older adults. Colorectal cancer has high prevalence in the aging population, with a median age of 69 years at diagnosis and 74 years at death. The vast majority of patients with colon cancer (CC) will require chemotherapy treatments during their disease course, challenging oncologists with the task of tailoring therapy for older patients with CC in the face of limited evidence-based data to guide them. Factors such as comorbidity, performance status, cognitive function, and social support may affect decision making and complicate tolerance of any recommended therapy. In recent years, attention to the specific needs of the aging population with cancer has given rise to the field of geriatric oncology in general, and has generated an increasing fund of knowledge on which to base chemotherapy delivery for this specific population of patients with CC. This article will review the available data specifically for chemotherapy management of older patients with CC in the postoperative and metastatic settings.

Differences between referred and nonreferred patients in cancer research

BACKGROUND

In Canada, provincial cancer registries have been established to provide rigorous population-based data for patients with colorectal cancer. Databases maintained by regional cancer agencies contain a broader scope of information and have been used as a surrogate source of information for colorectal cancer research. It is unclear whether these data can be reliably extrapolated to all patients affected by colorectal cancer. We sought to determine whether patients included in a referral-based database are systematically different from patients who are not included.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare patients referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency with those who were not referred. Comparison was based on age, sex and geographic location. We used univariate and logistic regression analysis to identify significant differences between the cohorts.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis demonstrated that the referral and nonreferral cohorts differed in sex, age and geographic location. For patients with rectal cancer, the referral and nonreferral cohorts varied in age and geographic location. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in age and geographic location but not sex for patients with colon and rectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Patients included in the referral database differed in age and geographic location from those included only in the provincial database. Studies using large data sets from referral centres must be interpreted with caution and may not be representative of the entire patient population.

Data on the characteristics and the survival of korean patients with colorectal cancer from the Korea central cancer registry

Purpose

The incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Korea have been increasing during the past decade. Therefore, it is important to understand the characteristics, including survival, of Korean CRC patients. The aim of this study was to use the nationwide cancer registry to evaluate the characteristics of Korean CRC, focusing on the survival, according to tumor location, sex, and specific age groups.

Methods

Using the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR), we analyzed a total of 226,352 CRC cases diagnosed from 1993 to 2010. The five-year relative survivals were compared for the proximal colon, the distal colon, and the rectum. Survival rates were compared between men and women and between patients of young age (less than 40 years old) and patients of advanced age (70 years old or older).

Results

The 5-year survival rates were improved in all subsites between 1993 and 2010. Distal colon cancer showed favorable survival compared to proximal colon or rectal cancer. Females demonstrated worse survival for local or regional cancers, and this difference was significant in for patients in their seventies. Young patients (<40 years old) showed better survival rates for overall and proximal colon cancer comparable to those for older patients (≥40 years old), but advanced age patients (≥70 years old) had worse survivals for all tumor subsites compared to their younger counterparts (<70 years old). These trends were similar in distant CRC.

Conclusion

Korean CRC has certain distinct characteristics of survival according to tumor location, sex, and age. Despite the limitations of available data, this study contributes to a better understanding of survival differences in Korean CRC.

Age and treatment choices in advanced colorectal cancer

SUMMARY Colorectal cancer is primarily a disease of the elderly. During the past 15 years, the median survival for metastatic colorectal cancer has increased significantly. Older patients are a heterogeneous population, and chronological age is not a reliable predictor of tolerance of treatment. There is now a significant body of evidence that demonstrates equal efficacy and tolerability of treatment between older and younger patients. Despite this, chemotherapy use declines with advancing age. Further research is needed to enable optimal management of this significant group of patients.

Impact of age on choice of chemotherapy and outcome in advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Age is a major risk factor for development of sporadic colorectal cancer but elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and are potentially offered chemotherapy less often.

METHODS

Data were obtained from South Australian Clinical Registry for advanced colorectal cancer between 1st February 2006 and 9th September 2010. Patients who received chemotherapy were analysed to assess the impact of single versus combination chemotherapy and to assess the outcome in two age cohorts, age < 70 years and ≥ 70 years.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 1745 patients in the database during this time period, 951 (54.5%) received systemic chemotherapy. 286 (30%) received first line therapy (median age 74 years) with single agent fluoropyrimidine and 643 patients (68%) received first line combination chemotherapy (median age 64 years). The median overall survival of patients receiving first line combination chemotherapy was 23.9 months compared to 17.2 months for those who received single agent fluoropyrimidine (p<0.001). Combination chemotherapy was given to 81% of patients aged < 70 years compared to 53% of those ≥ 70 years. There was no significant difference in median overall survival of patients receiving chemotherapy by age cohort, 21.3 months for age <70 years and 21.1 months for age ≥ 70 years (p = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcomes are comparable in both the elderly and younger patients. Patients who received initial combination chemotherapy were younger and had a longer median overall survival. In our study, age appeared to influence the treatment choices but not necessarily outcome.

Grade 3/4 neutropenia is a limiting factor in second-line FOLFIRI following FOLFOX4 failure in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Previous studies have reported improved outcomes for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with oxaliplatin or irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy. However, few studies regarding second-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan are currenlty available. We analyzed retrospectively the efficacy and toxicity in elderly patients (median age, 74 years) treated with second-line FOLFIRI following first-line FOLFOX4 failure. From March 2005 to January 2008, 35 elderly patients with mCRC received first-line FOLFOX4 comprising leucovorin, 5-FU and oxaliplatin followed by second-line FOLFIRI comprising leucovorin, 5-FU and irinotecan. The median number of treatment courses with FOLFIRI was 5 (range 2-32). One patient responded to the treatment. The disease control rate was 38.2%. The median time to treatment failure was 3 months, and the median overall survival (OS) time from the beginning of first-line chemotherapy was 20.7 months. The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 71.4%, while febrile neutropenia was 11.4%. The incidence of non-hematological toxicity was low. The use of the three active drugs, 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, in mCRC produced the longest OS in elderly as well as in younger patients. However, the elderly patients treated with second-line FOLFIRI had a high rate of hematological toxicity. Second-line FOLFIRI may therefore be used with caution in the elderly.

FOLFOX4 in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a prospective study

Elderly patients constitute a subpopulation with special characteristics that differ from those of the general population and have been under-represented in clinical trials. We, prospectively, analyzed the toxicity and efficacy of the original FOLFOX4-regimen in the treatment of elderly patients affected by metastatic (m) colorectal cancer (CRC). Thirty-six consecutive patients aged 67-82 years (median age 72 years), 22 males and 14 females, with mCRC and measurable disease, were enrolled in the study. The primary site of metastases was the liver (36.1% of patients). The median ECOG Performance Status (PS) was 1. The main hematological and extra-hematological (grade 3 or 4) toxicities were neutropenia (38.9%) and neurological (13.9%), respectively. A total of 36 patients, aged 67-82 years were included. Twenty-two and 14 patients were male and female, respectively. The median age was 72 years (range 67-82). The primary site of metastases was the liver (36.1% of patients). The median ECOG Performance Status (PS) was 1. The overall response rate (ORR) was 44.4% and similar to original study. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months and median overall survival (OS) was 16 months. The main hematological and extra-hematological (grade 3 or 4) toxicities were neutropenia (38.9%) and neurological (13.9%), respectively. Tolerability, however, was manageable and no toxic death occurred. FOLFOX4-regimen maintains its efficacy, and safety ratio in elderly patients with mCRC and good performance status. It would be considered the treatment of choice in the treatment of this particular setting of patients.

Metastatic colorectal cancer in the elderly: An overview of the systemic treatment modalities (Review)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently occurring types of cancer. Worldwide, more than 800,000 new cases of CRC are diagnosed each year. The median ages at CRC diagnosis and death are 71 and 75 years, respectively. The majority ot patients (50-60%) with colorectal cancer are diagnosed at stage IV disease. Patients aged 65 or older are characterized by a higher incidence of significant co-morbidities, decreased regenerative capacity of bone marrow and worse general performance. Anti-neoplastic therapies used for the treatment of colorectal cancer include irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, capecitabine and monoclonal antibodies. Analysis of the efficacy of the presented chemotherapeutic and chemoimmunotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of metastatic CRC in patients older than 65 and 70 years compared to 'younger' patients, generally demonstrated comparable efficacy, time to disease progression and overall survival. Age criterion should not be considered when assessing the eligibility of patients with metastatic CRC for treatment of the above-mentioned chemotherapeutic and chemoimmunotherapeutic regimens. Treatment should be individualized based on the potential risks and benefits anticipated for each patient.

Folate intake along with genetic polymorphisms in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A relationship between dietary folate intake and efficacy of fluorouracil (FU) is supported by preclinical data. Furthermore, there are several reports that evaluated genetic polymorphisms of MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) or TYMS (thymidylate synthase) and efficacy of FU. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports that evaluate simultaneously the effects of folate intake and genetic polymorphisms on clinical outcome of gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the survival impact of estimated folate intake by a food frequency questionnaire and MTHFR and TYMS polymorphisms in 132 patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated with first-line FU-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval, 9.4-13.4 mo) and median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval, 4.1-6.3 mo). Patients with folate intake of >260 microg/day (n=88) showed longer overall survival compared with low folate intake (n=44; overall survival, 12.2 versus 8.4 mo). In a multivariate Cox model, patients who had folate intake of >260 microg/day, MTHFR 677 TT polymorphism, and TYMS-3' untranslated region 6-bp insertion were associated with better survival. Similar tendency was observed in progression-free survival. No interaction was observed between folate intake and favorable genotypes.

CONCLUSION

Folate intake and genetic polymorphisms of MTHFR and TYMS were associated with better clinical outcome by FU-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

IMPACT

Our results suggested folate intake and folate-related genetic polymorphisms may play an important role in efficacy of FU-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Feasibility and efficacy of capecitabine and FOLFIRI in patients aged 65 years and older with advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the tolerability and efficacy of single-agent capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in the first-line treatment of patients aged > or =65 years with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with mCRC treated at the Military Medical Institute, Warsaw, between January 2003 and June 2008 were eligible. A total of 123 patients were identified (FOLFIRI, n = 67; capecitabine, n = 56).

RESULTS

The overall response rate with FOLFIRI was 28.1 versus 16.4% with capecitabine (P = 0.1398). Median time to disease progression with FOLFIRI was 8.8 versus 7.5 months with capecitabine (P = 0.20), and median overall survival was 19.0 versus 15.4 months (P = 0.93). In the FOLFIRI group, neutropenia and anaemia were significantly more frequent than in the capecitabine group. The main non-haematological toxicity was hand-foot syndrome found only in the capecitabine group.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent capecitabine and FOLFIRI are effective first-line regimens in patients aged > or =65 years with mCRC.

Serum vitamin B12 and folate status among patients with chemotherapy treatment for advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting results on the role of cobalamin and folate for epidemiology and carcinogenesis in colorectal cancer patients and the need of supplementation for prevention of chemotherapy toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum cobalamin, folate, and homocysteine were analysed before and during the treatment of 93 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) with first-line chemotherapy treatment. This cohort was compared with a healthy control group of 224 individuals.

RESULTS

Patients with ACRC had similar cobalamin, folate, and homocysteine values as the healthy control group. There were no correlations between serum cobalamin, folate, and homocysteine values and objective response. There were no correlations to anaemia or other severe toxicity for cobalamin and homocysteine. A total of 12 patients had folate deficiency, and 10 of those suffered from severe toxicity (grade 3 or more). All patients had markedly increased folate values after 2 months of treatment. Folate and homocysteine did not predict patient outcome; however, patients with subclinically low cobalamin values (<300 pmol/L) had significant better overall survival and time to progression than patients with normal or high cobalamin values.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ACRC seem to have fairly adequate cobalamin and folate status before and during chemotherapy treatment. This study indicates that ACRC patients receiving chemotherapy do not need supplementation with vitamin B12 and folate. A minor portion of the patients had folate deficiency, and most of those patients had severe toxicity. Patients with subclinically low cobalamin values had surprisingly better survival.

Capecitabine: have we got the dose right?

In the past 5-10 years there has been a growing trend for substituting conventional 5-fluorouracil with the oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, in chemotherapy regimens. This regimen change is based on evidence of the efficacy equivalence of these two drugs and the lack of an increase in overall toxic effects when capecitabine is used. Many investigators in different parts of the world have determined their own starting dose for capecitabine, usually based on their experience of toxic events within the population of patients they treat. This starting dose is usually between 1,000-1,250 mg/m(2), which is generally administered twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days rest. This Review summarizes why there may indeed not be a universally applicable starting dose for capecitabine because of interpatient differences in basic physiology, pharmacogenomics and diet. This article also explores which of these factors contribute to the observed inter-regional geographical variation in capecitabine toxicity, and explains why even within a region various factors should prompt a clinician to modify the starting dose.

Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in the elderly

The recent improved survival in advanced colorectal cancer, owing in a large part to advances in adjuvant treatment, has mainly been reported in studies of younger patient groups. Less is known about outcome in elderly patients, the fastest growing cohort of cancer patients. The antimetabolite capecitabine used sequentially or concomitantly with the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor irinotecan or the DNA cross linking agent oxaliplatin are now considered to be the standard first line chemotherapy regime. The role of surgery in advanced colorectal cancer in the elderly is restricted to the relief of bowel obstruction and where appropriate resection of hepatic metastasis. Advanced chronological age has not been shown to be a contraindication to the consideration of these interventions. Indeed, chronological age alone does not provide sufficient guidance when considering the appropriateness of any palliative treatment regime in the elderly.

Anal carcinoma of the elderly treated with radiotherapy alone or with concomitant radio-chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To analyse the results achieved with radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) or radiotherapy alone (RT) in elderly patients (pts) affected with squamous cell anal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1990 to 2002, 62 pts aged > or =70 years were treated with RT (14) or RTCT (48). There were 9 stage I, 29 stage II, 11 stage IIIa and 13 stage IIIb. MMC+5FU was given concomitantly with RT in an early period, later replaced by Cddp+5FU. In the RTCT group, 36Gy were delivered to pelvic+inguinal lymph nodes, with a tumor boost (18Gy).

RESULTS

Stage II fared significantly better than stage III in terms of locoregional control (LRC) but not overall survival (OS). Pts treated with RTCT had improved LRC, but not OS. LRC was 81% at 3 and 5 years for the RTCT group; the RT group had a LRC of 61% at 3 years. There were more locoregional relapses in the MMC group (29%) versus the Cddp group (19%) and in pts treated with a split (32%) versus no split (19%). No G3 acute toxicity was observed in the RT group; in the RTCT group 15 pts (31%) developed a G3+ acute toxicity. G3+ late damage occurred in 2 pts in the RT only group and in 3 pts in the RTCT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly people considered fit for RTCT should undergo the same schedules used for younger people. MMC or Cddp+5FU are feasible in the elderly, even without a planned split.