Feasibility and safety of outpatient Bexxar therapy (tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma based on radiation doses to family members

Approaches to Reducing Normal Tissue Radiation from Radiolabeled Antibodies

Radiolabeled antibodies are powerful tools for both imaging and therapy in the field of nuclear medicine. Radiolabeling methods that do not release radionuclides from parent antibodies are essential for radiolabeling antibodies, and practical radiolabeling protocols that provide high in vivo stability have been established for many radionuclides, with a few exceptions. However, several limitations remain, including undesirable side effects on the biodistribution profiles of antibodies. This review summarizes the numerous efforts made to tackle this problem and the recent advances, mainly in preclinical studies. These include pretargeting approaches, engineered antibody fragments and constructs, the secondary injection of clearing agents, and the insertion of metabolizable linkages. Finally, we discuss the potential of these approaches and their prospects for further clinical application.

Immunotherapeutic approaches for cancer therapy: An updated review

In spite of specific immune effector mechanisms raised against tumor cells, there are mechanisms employed by the tumor cells to keep them away from immune recognition and elimination; some of these mechanisms have been identified, while others are still poorly understood. Manipulation or augmentation of specific antitumor immune responses are now the preferred approaches for treatment of malignancies, and traditional therapeutic approaches are being replaced by the use of agents which potentiate immune effector mechanisms, broadly called "immunotherapy". Cancer immunotherapy is generally classified into two main classes including active and passive methods. Interventions to augment the immune system of the patient, for example, vaccination or adjuvant therapy, actively promote antitumor effector mechanisms to improve cancer elimination. On the other hand, administration of specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against different tumor antigens and adoptive transfer of genetically-modified specific T cells are currently the most rapidly developing approaches for cancer targeted therapy. In this review, we will discuss the different modalities for active and passive immunotherapy for cancer.

Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy consists of approaches that modify the host immune system, and/or the utilization of components of the immune system, as cancer treatment. During the past 25 years, 17 immunologic products have received regulatory approval based on anticancer activity as single agents and/or in combination with chemotherapy. These include the nonspecific immune stimulants BCG and levamisole; the cytokines interferon-α and interleukin-2; the monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ofatumumab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab; the radiolabeled antibodies Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and I-131 tositumomab; the immunotoxins denileukin diftitox and gemtuzumab ozogamicin; nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplants with donor lymphocyte infusions; and the anti-prostate cancer cell-based therapy sipuleucel-T. All but two of these products are still regularly used to treat various B- and T-cell malignancies, and numerous solid tumors, including breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, melanoma, kidney, glioblastoma, bladder, and head and neck. Positive randomized trials have recently been reported for idiotype vaccines in lymphoma and a peptide vaccine in melanoma. The anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody ipilumumab, which blocks regulatory T-cells, is expected to receive regulatory approval in the near future, based on a randomized trial in melanoma. As the fourth modality of cancer treatment, biotherapy/immunotherapy is an increasingly important component of the anticancer armamentarium.

Tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab (Bexaar)

Tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab (Bexaar) therapeutic regimen targets monoclonal antibodies against the CD20 antigen expressed in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This article reviews the mechanism of action and clinical indications for this regimen.

I-131 tositumomab

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a subgroup of B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) that account for 15 - 30% of all lymphomas. I-131 tositumomab is a radiommunoconjugate of (131)I and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody tositumomab. It is one of two available radioimmunoconjugates for the treatment of recurrent, refractory, or transformed FL.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review describes the clinical pharmacology of I-131 tositumomab, dosing and administration guidelines, and the key clinical trials providing evidence of its efficacy and safety in patients with FL, transformed, or other aggressive B-NHL, in combination with chemotherapy, or its incorporation in transplant conditioning regimens. This review also covers safety and regulatory concerns regarding the use of I-131 tositumomab.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review critically appraises the clinical trials behind approval of I-131 tositumomab as a second-line agent for FL and also outlines the data supporting its use in the upfront setting.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

I-131 tositumomab is a safe and effective option for patients with recurrent, refractory, or transformed FL and carries promise in the upfront treatment of FL, aggressive B-NHL, and as a transplant conditioning regimen.

Radioimmunotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a review for radiation oncologists

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review advances in radioimmunotherapy (RIT) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and to discuss the role of the radiation oncologist in administering this important new form of biologically targeted radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A review of articles and abstracts on the clinical efficacy, safety, and radiation safety of yttrium Y 90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and iodine I 131 tositumomab (Bexxar) was performed.

RESULTS

The clinical efficacy of RIT in NHL has been shown in numerous clinical trials of 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan and 131I tositumomab. Both agents have produced significant responses in patients with low-grade, follicular, or transformed NHL, including patients with disease that had not responded or had responded poorly to previous chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Reversible toxicities such as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia are the most common adverse events with both agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Radioimmunotherapy is safe and effective in many patients with B-cell NHL. 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan and 131I tositumomab can produce clinically meaningful and durable responses even in patients in whom chemotherapy has failed. Treatment with RIT requires a multispecialty approach and close communication between the radiation oncologist and other members of the treatment team. The radiation oncologist plays an important role in treating patients with RIT and monitoring them for responses and adverse events after treatment.

Radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphoma with radiolabelled anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies

CD20 has proven to be an excellent target for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma, first for the chimeric monoclonal antibody rituximab (Rituxan), and more recently for the radiolabelled antibodies Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and I-131 tositumomab (Bexxar). Radiation therapy effects are due to beta emissions with path lengths of 1-5 mm; gamma radiation emitted by I-131 is the only radiation safety issue for either product. Dose-limiting toxicity for both radiolabelled antibodies is reversible bone marrow suppression. They produce response rates of 70%-90% in low-grade and follicular lymphoma and 40%-50% in transformed low-grade or intermediate-grade lymphomas. Both products produce higher response rates than related unlabelled antibodies, and both are highly active in patients who are relatively resistant to rituximab-based therapy. Median duration of response to a single course of treatment is about 1 year with complete remission rates that last 2 years or longer in about 25% of patients. Clinical trials suggest that anti- CD20 radioimmunotherapy is superior to total body irradiation in patients undergoing stem cell supported therapy for B-cell lymphoma, and that it is a safe and efficacious modality when used as consolidation therapy following chemotherapy. Among cytotoxic treatment options, current evidence suggests that one course of anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy is as efficacious as six to eight cycles of combination chemotherapy. A major question that persists is how effective these agents are in the setting of rituximab- refractory lymphoma. These products have been underutilised because of the complexity of treatment coordination and concerns regarding reimbursement.

Radioimmunotherapy for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is the most common hematological malignancy in the United States with a rapidly increasing incidence. Most follicular NHL is indolent but incurable, whereas the more aggressive varieties do respond to therapy. Most patients with follicular NHL who transform to an aggressive NHL are very difficult to treat successfully. Treatment options have included chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, alone or in combination, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The efficacy of monoclonal antibodies is augmented when they are combined with a radioisotope like iodine-131 or yttrium-90. There have been a number of studies done in recent years studying the efficacy of this form of therapy, i.e., radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in patients with NHL. This review attempts to integrate the information from the various clinical trials done using RIT in patients with relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed NHL and in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It also includes updates on the use of RIT in elderly patients and in patients with significant bone marrow involvement among other recent advances made in this field.

Medical health physics: a review

Medical health physics is the profession dedicated to the protection of healthcare providers, members of the public, and patients from unwarranted radiation exposure. Medical health physicists must be knowledgeable in the principles of health physics and in the applications of radiation in medicine. Advances in medical health physics require the definition of problems, testing of hypotheses, and gathering of evidence to defend changes in health physics practice and to assist medical practitioners in making changes in their practices as appropriate. Advances in radiation medicine have resulted in new modalities and procedures, some of which have significant potential to cause serious harm. Examples included in this review include radiologic procedures that require very long fluoroscopy times, radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies, and intravascular brachytherapy. This review summarizes evidence that supports changes in consensus recommendations, regulations, and health physics practices associated with recent advances in radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation oncology. Medical health physicists must continue to gather evidence to support intelligent but practical methods for protection of personnel, the public, and patients as modalities and applications evolve in the practice of medicine.

Medical health physics: a review

Medical health physics is the profession dedicated to the protection of healthcare providers, members of the public, and patients from unwarranted radiation exposure. Medical health physicists must be knowledgeable in the principles of health physics and in the applications of radiation in medicine. Advances in medical health physics require the definition of problems, testing of hypotheses, and gathering of evidence to defend changes in health physics practice and to assist medical practitioners in making changes in their practices as appropriate. Advances in radiation medicine have resulted in new modalities and procedures, some of which have significant potential to cause serious harm. Examples included in this review include radiologic procedures that require very long fluoroscopy times, radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies, and intravascular brachytherapy. This review summarizes evidence that supports changes in consensus recommendations, regulations, and health physics practices associated with recent advances in radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation oncology. Medical health physicists must continue to gather evidence to support intelligent but practical methods for protection of personnel, the public, and patients as modalities and applications evolve in the practice of medicine.