Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results

Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for uterine artery embolization: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundUterine artery embolization (UAE) is a procedure commonly used to control uterine bleeding or pain. While the procedure is traditionally performed through the transfemoral approach (TFA), the transradial approach (TRA) is another method.PurposeTo compare the effectiveness of the UAE using the TRA approach versus the TFA approach.Material and MethodsThis non-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2022. A total of 42 female patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and/or pelvic pain from uterine fibroids were randomly assigned to either the TRA group or the TFA group. Data collected included demographic information, procedural details, patient satisfaction, and radiation metrics.ResultsThe TRA group had significantly lower numbers of microsphere vials used compared to the TFA group (P = 0.014). While there were no significant differences in procedure times (P = 0.058), fluoroscopic times (P = 0.117), or radiation doses (P = 0.466), the TRA approach was associated with a higher success rate in achieving bilateral UA catheterization and fewer instances of bilateral sheath insertion. Patient satisfaction scores were similar between the groups, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.932). Minor adverse events such as local hematoma and color changes were more frequent in the TFA group, though these differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionAlthough both approaches were effective for the UAE, the TRA approach may be a viable alternative to the TFA due to its higher success rate in achieving bilateral catheterization, lower radiation doses, and shorter procedural times.

Comparison Between Radial and Femoral Artery Access for Transarterial Chemoembolisation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the technical success rate, the selectivity of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), the complication rate, the radiation dose given to the patients and the hospitalization stay between TACE performed using femoral artery approach (FAA) and TACE performed using radial artery approach (RAA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Between June 2020 and April 2022, 49 patients with HCC who underwent 116 TACEs (75 using FAA and 41 using RAA) were included. Differences in technical success rate, selectivity of micro-catheterization, radiation dose given to the patients, fluoroscopy time, hospitalization stay duration, and complication rate were compared between FAA and RAA using Fisher exact or Student t tests.

RESULTS

No differences in technical success rates were found between RAA (93%; 39/41 TACEs) and FAA (100%; 75/75 TACEs) (P = .12). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of selectivity of catheterization, radiation dose, fluoroscopy time and hospitalization stay duration. Five patients had Grade 2 complications (hematoma) after FAA vs. one patient with one Grade 1 complication (radial artery occlusion) after RAA (5/75 [7%] vs. 1/41 [2%], respectively; P = .42). No major arterial access site complications occurred with FAA or RAA.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that RAA is a safe approach that does not compromise the technical efficacy and the selectivity of TACE compared to FAA in patients with HCC.

Superior Hypogastric Nerve Blockade for Uterine Artery Embolization: A Systematic Review

Superior hypogastric nerve block (SHNB) has potential to reduce pain following uterine artery embolization (UAE). However, existing studies are limited by design, sample size, or conflicting results. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Outcomes included technical success, time to complete SHNB, time under fluoroscopy, procedure time, time to recovery, needle repositioning, same-day discharge, readmission, pain, analgesic consumption, and adverse events. Of 15 included studies, the same-day discharge rate was 98.8%, and readmission rate was 6.9%. The mean pain score was 3.4 in patients who received SHNB compared to 4.3 among controls. Of patients who received SHNB, 46.7% did not require further pain medication. Major adverse events occurred in 0.4% of patients. Early clinical studies suggest that SHNB appears to reduce pain and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing UAE. Additional randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Uterine Myomas: Endovascular Treatment

Uterine fibroids embolization is a safe and effective organ sparing treatment for fibroid-related symptoms based on a broad range of published evidence including randomized-controlled trials. Indication to treatment is usually the presence of symptomatic uterine fibroids. In this review, a systematic search of journal articles relevant to the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids was conducted, with a special focus on the indication to treatment, technique, procedural outcomes and pain control. All clinical trials published in English language, representing original research, and reporting clinical outcomes associated with interventions for the management of symptomatic uterine fibroids were considered.

Transradial Embolization, an Underused Type of Uterine Artery Embolization Approach: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: The most utilized approach for the embolization of uterine arteries is the transfemoral path. However, the transradial approach (TRA) has been gaining popularity among cardiologic interventions in the last years but only few studies have shown its applicability in uterine myoma treatment. The objective of this paper is to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of TRA when compared with the transbrachial, transulnar or transfemoral approach (TFA) for uterine arteries embolization (UAE). Materials and methods: A systematic review of the literature that analyzes the TRA for UAE it was carried out, in order to assess its safety and effectiveness. It was systematically searched the literature (Google Scholar, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Embase) using the words ''uterine artery embolization''/''uterine embolization'' and ''transradial''/''radial''. All the relevant papers published until March 2020 were retrieved and analyzed. Results: Ten studies were considered eligible for this topic. TRA is a comparable method with TFA for uterine artery embolization. Conclusions: These studies allowed us to conclude that TRA is as safe and efficient as TFA. Its advantages include few complications, shorter hospitalization period, and rapid mobilization but a steeper learning curve has the disadvantage of a longer learning curve compared to TFA. Yet, these findings are built on few reports and more research is needed.

Intra-arterial lidocaine for pain control after uterine artery embolization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of intra-arterial lidocaine for pain control of uterine artery embolization remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of intra-arterial lidocaine versus placebo on the postoperative pain intensity of uterine artery embolization.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through April 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of intra-arterial lidocaine versus placebo on pain control of uterine artery embolization. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Three RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for uterine artery embolization, intra-arterial lidocaine was associated with substantially reduced pain scores at 4 h (SMD = -0.85; 95% CI = -1.31 to -0.38; p = .0003) and analgesic consumption (SMD = -0.84; 95% CI = -1.26 to -0.42; p < .0001), but has no obvious influence on pain scores at 7 h (SMD = -0.19; 95% CI = -0.63 to 0.25; p = .40) or pain scores at 24 h (SMD = -0.55; 95% CI = -1.25 to 0.16; p = .13).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-arterial lidocaine is effective for pain control after uterine artery embolization.

Intraoperative transradial angiography augments safe hysterectomy for uterine fibroids in the setting of ambiguous arterial anatomy: a case report

Background

Transfemoral access is the traditional gold standard for uterine artery angiography; however, transradial access is gaining in popularity because of its decreased complication profile and patient preference. We present a case of a patient who underwent successful total abdominal hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids with ambiguous pelvic vasculature that would have been otherwise aborted if it were not for intraoperative transradial access angiography.

Case presentation

A 52-year-old Caucasian woman presented to her gynecologist for an elective total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. During preoperative imaging, a 15-cm mass consistent with a uterine fibroid was identified, and the patient’s gynecologist decided to treat her with surgical resection, given the fibroid’s size. The procedure was halted upon discovery of a complicated vascular plexus at the fundus of the uterus, and an intraoperative vascular consult was requested. The vascular operator used a transradial access to perform pelvic angiography in real time to identify the complicated pelvic vasculature, which allowed the gynecologist to surgically resect the uterine fibroid. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 4 without any complications.

Conclusions

Intraoperative imaging is a useful technique for the identification of complicated anatomical structures during surgical procedures. The successful outcome of this case demonstrates an additional unique benefit of transradial access and highlights an opportunity for interdisciplinary collaboration for management of complicated surgical interventions.