1
|
Endothelial Dysfunction in COVID-19: Potential Mechanisms and Possible Therapeutic Options. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12101605. [PMID: 36295042 PMCID: PMC9604693 DOI: 10.3390/life12101605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, a novel coronavirus found in Wuhan (China) at the end of 2019, is the etiological agent of the current pandemic that is a heterogeneous disease, named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 affects primarily the lungs, but it can induce multi-organ involvement such as acute myocardial injury, myocarditis, thromboembolic eventsandrenal failure. Hypertension, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and obesity increase the risk of severe complications of COVID-19. There is no certain explanation for this systemic COVID-19 involvement, but it could be related to endothelial dysfunction, due to direct (endothelial cells are infected by the virus) and indirect damage (systemic inflammation) factors. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), expressed in human endothelium, has a fundamental role in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In fact, ACE2 is used as a receptor by SARS-CoV-2, leading to the downregulation of these receptors on endothelial cells; once inside, this virus reduces the integrity of endothelial tissue, with exposure of prothrombotic molecules, platelet adhesion, activation of coagulation cascades and, consequently, vascular damage. Systemic microangiopathy and thromboembolism can lead to multi-organ failure with an elevated risk of death. Considering the crucial role of the immunological response and endothelial damage in developing the severe form of COVID-19, in this review, we will attempt to clarify the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
Collapse
|
2
|
SCD14-ST and New Generation Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Prediction of COVID-19 Outcome. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12060826. [PMID: 35740951 PMCID: PMC9220996 DOI: 10.3390/biom12060826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Since no definitive cure for COVID-19 is available so far, one of the challenges against the disease is understanding the clinical features and the laboratory inflammatory markers that can differentiate among different severity grades of the disease. The aim of the present study is a comprehensive and longitudinal evaluation of SCD14-ST and other new inflammatory markers, as well as cytokine storm molecules and current inflammatory parameters, in order to define a panel of biomarkers that could be useful for a better prognostic prediction of COVID-19 mortality. SCD14-ST, as well as the inflammatory markers IL-6, IL-10, SuPAR and sRAGE, were measured in plasma-EDTA of ICU COVID-19 positive patients. In this longitudinal study, SCD14-ST resulted significantly higher in patients who eventually died compared to those who were discharged from the ICU. The results suggest that the new infection biomarker SCD14-ST, in addition to new generation inflammatory biomarkers, such as SuPAR, sRAGE and the cytokines IL-6 and IL-10, can be a useful prognostic tool associated with canonical inflammatory parameters, such as CRP, to predict SARS-CoV-2 outcome in ICU patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Stauning MA, Altintas I, Kallemose T, Eugen-Olsen J, Lindstrøm MB, Rasmussen LJH, Gamst-Jensen H, Nehlin JO, Andersen O, Tingleff J. Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor as a Decision Marker for Early Discharge of Patients with COVID-19 Symptoms in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med 2021; 61:298-313. [PMID: 34092446 PMCID: PMC7997406 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (The Covid-19 pandemic) strains health care capacity. Better risk stratification, with discharge of patients with a predicted mild disease trajectory, can ease this burden. Elevated blood-soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has previously been shown to be associated with risk of intubation in confirmed COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether point-of-care measures of suPAR in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms of COVID-19 can identify patients that can be safely discharged. METHODS Observational cohort study including all patients in the ED with symptoms of COVID-19 from March 19 to April 3, 2020. SuPAR was measured at first presentation. Review of electronic patient records 14 days after admission was used to assess disease trajectory. Primary endpoints were mild, moderate, severe, or very severe trajectory. The predictive value of suPAR, National Early Warning Score (NEWS), C-reactive protein (CRP), and duration of symptoms was calculated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC). RESULTS Of 386 patients, 171 (44%) had a mild disease trajectory, 79 (20%) a moderate, 63 (16%) a severe, and 73 (19%) a very severe disease trajectory. Low suPAR was a strong marker of mild disease trajectory. Results suggest a cut-off for discharge for suPAR < 2.0 ng/mL if suPAR is used as a single parameter, and <3.0 ng/mL when combined with NEWS ≤ 4 and CRP < 10 mg/L. CONCLUSION suPAR is a potential biomarker for triage and safe early discharge of patients with COVID-19 symptoms in the ED. suPAR can be used even before SARS-CoV-2 status is known.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Ahm Stauning
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Izzet Altintas
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Thomas Kallemose
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Jesper Eugen-Olsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Mette Bendtz Lindstrøm
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hejdi Gamst-Jensen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Jan O Nehlin
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Ove Andersen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Tingleff
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Altintas I, Eugen-Olsen J, Seppälä S, Tingleff J, Stauning MA, El Caidi NO, Elmajdoubi S, Gamst-Jensen H, Lindstrøm MB, Rasmussen LJH, Kristiansen KT, Rasmussen C, Nehlin JO, Kallemose T, Hyppölä H, Andersen O. suPAR Cut-Offs for Risk Stratification in Patients With Symptoms of COVID-19. Biomark Insights 2021; 16:11772719211034685. [PMID: 34421295 PMCID: PMC8371731 DOI: 10.1177/11772719211034685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Elevated soluble urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to investigate the associations between plasma suPAR levels (testing the cut-offs ⩽4, 4-6, and ⩾6 ng/mL) with risk of 14-day mortality, and with the risk of mechanical ventilation in patients that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Methods Observational cohort study of patients presenting with symptoms of COVID-19 at Department of Emergency Medicine, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark from March 19th, 2020 to April 3rd, 2020. Plasma suPAR was measured using suPARnostic technologies. Patients were followed for development of mechanical ventilation and mortality for 14 days. Validation of our findings were carried out in a similar sized COVID-19 patient cohort from Mikkeli Central Hospital, Finland. Results Among 386 patients with symptoms of COVID-19, the median (interquartile range) age was 64 years (46-77), 57% were women, median suPAR was 4.0 ng/mL (2.7-5.9). In total, 35 patients (9.1%) died during the 14 days follow-up. Patients with suPAR ⩽4 ng/mL (N = 196; 50.8%) had a low risk of mortality (N = 2; 1.0%; negative predictive value of 99.0%, specificity 55.3%, sensitivity 95.2%, positive predictive value 17.4%). Among patients with suPAR ⩾6 ng/mL (N = 92; 23.8%), 16 died (17.4%). About 99 patients (25.6%) tested positive for SARS CoV-2 and of those 12 (12.1%) developed need for mechanical ventilation. None of the SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with suPAR ⩽4 ng/mL (N = 28; 38.8%) needed mechanical ventilation or died. The Mikkeli Central Hospital validation cohort confirmed our findings concerning suPAR cut-offs for risk of development of mechanical ventilation and mortality. Conclusions Patients with symptoms of COVID-19 and suPAR ⩽4 or ⩾6 ng/mL had low or high risk, respectively, concerning the need for mechanical ventilation or mortality. We suggest cut-offs for identification of risk groups in patients presenting to the ED with symptoms of or confirmed COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izzet Altintas
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Jesper Eugen-Olsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Santeri Seppälä
- Emergency Department, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland
| | - Jens Tingleff
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Marius Ahm Stauning
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Nora Olsen El Caidi
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Sanaá Elmajdoubi
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Hejdi Gamst-Jensen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Mette B Lindstrøm
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Klaus Tjelle Kristiansen
- Department of Anesthesiology Intensive Care Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Christian Rasmussen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Jan O Nehlin
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Thomas Kallemose
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Harri Hyppölä
- Emergency Department, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland
| | - Ove Andersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang X, Hu Z, Yue X, Cui Y, Cui J. Expression of Inflammatory Factors in Critically Ill Patients with Urosepticemia and the Imaging Analysis of the Severity of the Disease. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2021; 2021:6659435. [PMID: 33688422 PMCID: PMC7914102 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6659435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Urine sepsis is a complex inflammatory response of the body to infection with a high fatality rate. It is one of the main causes of death in noncardiovascular intensive care units. Nevertheless, in daily clinical practice, early sepsis is often not detected. In this paper, discharged cases of urinary sepsis from the Department of Urology and Critical Care Medicine of a university hospital were collected as the observation group, and common urinary tract infection cases were selected as the control group. We sorted and summarized the discharged case information of the observation group and the control group. The results of the study showed that, after renal pelvis perfusion, the expression of HMGB1 protein and mRNA increased, and the expression of TLR4 increased; inhibiting HMGB1 can reduce the expression of inflammatory factors caused by perfusion and reduce the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages caused by perfusion. In addition, r HMGB1 treatment can promote the expression of inflammatory factors caused by perfusion and aggravate the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages caused by perfusion. We found that inhibition of HMGB1 can inhibit the expression of TLR4/My D88 signaling molecules and r HMGB1 treatment can enhance the expression of TLR4/My D88 signaling molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Huang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine Neurosurgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing 404000, China
| | - Zongjun Hu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine Neurosurgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing 404000, China
| | - Xi Yue
- Department of Critical Care Medicine Neurosurgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing 404000, China
| | - Yong Cui
- Department of Critical Care Medicine Neurosurgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing 404000, China
| | - Jiwen Cui
- Department of Critical Care Medicine Neurosurgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing 404000, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kiyan Y, Tkachuk S, Rong S, Gorrasi A, Ragno P, Dumler I, Haller H, Shushakova N. TLR4 Response to LPS Is Reinforced by Urokinase Receptor. Front Immunol 2020; 11:573550. [PMID: 33362762 PMCID: PMC7757075 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.573550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
GPI-anchored uPAR is the receptor for the extracellular serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA). Though uPAR role in inflammatory processes is documented, underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study we demonstrate that uPAR is a part of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) interactome. Downregulation of uPAR expression resulted in diminished LPS-induced TLR4 signaling, less activation of NFκB, and decreased secretion of inflammatory mediators in myeloid and non-myeloid cells in vitro. In vivo uPAR−/− mice demonstrated better survival, strongly diminished inflammatory response and better organ functions in cecal ligation and puncture mouse polymicrobial sepsis model. Mechanistically, GPI-uPAR and soluble uPAR colocalized with TLR4 on the cell membrane and interacted with scavenger receptor CD36. Our data show that uPAR can interfere with innate immunity response via TLR4 and this mechanism represents a potentially important target in inflammation and sepsis therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia Kiyan
- Nephrology Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sergey Tkachuk
- Nephrology Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Pia Ragno
- Department of Chemistry and Biology, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Inna Dumler
- Nephrology Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hermann Haller
- Nephrology Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nelli Shushakova
- Nephrology Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Phenos GmbH, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
D'Alonzo D, De Fenza M, Pavone V. COVID-19 and pneumonia: a role for the uPA/uPAR system. Drug Discov Today 2020; 25:1528-1534. [PMID: 32562843 PMCID: PMC7299864 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Here, we highlight recent findings on the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA)/uPA receptor (uPAR) system that suggest its potential role as a main orchestrator of fatal progression to pulmonary, kidney, and heart failure in patients with coronavirus. Patients with prolonged background inflammation can present aberrant inflammatory reactions, well recognized as the main factors that can result in death and probably sustained by a dysregulated uPA/uPAR system. SuPAR, the soluble form of uPAR, represents a biomarker of disease progression, and its levels correlate well with comorbidities associated with the death of patients with coronavirus. New drugs that regulate the uPA/uPAR system could help treat the severe complications of highly pathogenic human coronaviruses (hCoVs), including pandemic coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele D'Alonzo
- University of Naples 'Federico II', Department of Chemical Sciences, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Via Cintia 46, 80126 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria De Fenza
- University of Naples 'Federico II', Department of Chemical Sciences, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Via Cintia 46, 80126 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pavone
- University of Naples 'Federico II', Department of Chemical Sciences, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Via Cintia 46, 80126 Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Zee P, Rietdijk W, Somhorst P, Endeman H, Gommers D. A systematic review of biomarkers multivariately associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome development and mortality. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2020; 24:243. [PMID: 32448370 PMCID: PMC7245629 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02913-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Heterogeneity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) could be reduced by identification of biomarker-based phenotypes. The set of ARDS biomarkers to prospectively define these phenotypes remains to be established. Objective To provide an overview of the biomarkers that were multivariately associated with ARDS development or mortality. Data sources We performed a systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar from inception until 6 March 2020. Study selection Studies assessing biomarkers for ARDS development in critically ill patients at risk for ARDS and mortality due to ARDS adjusted in multivariate analyses were included. Data extraction and synthesis We included 35 studies for ARDS development (10,667 patients at risk for ARDS) and 53 for ARDS mortality (15,344 patients with ARDS). These studies were too heterogeneous to be used in a meta-analysis, as time until outcome and the variables used in the multivariate analyses varied widely between studies. After qualitative inspection, high plasma levels of angiopoeitin-2 and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) were associated with an increased risk of ARDS development. None of the biomarkers (plasma angiopoeitin-2, C-reactive protein, interleukin-8, RAGE, surfactant protein D, and Von Willebrand factor) was clearly associated with mortality. Conclusions Biomarker data reporting and variables used in multivariate analyses differed greatly between studies. Angiopoeitin-2 and RAGE in plasma were positively associated with increased risk of ARDS development. None of the biomarkers independently predicted mortality. Therefore, we suggested to structurally investigate a combination of biomarkers and clinical parameters in order to find more homogeneous ARDS phenotypes. PROSPERO identifier PROSPERO, CRD42017078957
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip van der Zee
- Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wim Rietdijk
- Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Somhorst
- Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henrik Endeman
- Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik Gommers
- Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|