Primary, secondary or less frequent causes of immune thrombocytopenia: A case report

Current Understanding of Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Review of Pathogenesis and Treatment Options

The management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and the prediction of patient response to therapy still represent a significant and constant challenge in hematology. ITP is a heterogeneous disease with an unpredictable evolution. Although the pathogenesis of ITP is currently better known and its etiology has been extensively studied, up to 75% of adult patients with ITP may develop chronicity, which represents a significant burden on patients' quality of life. A major risk of ITP is bleeding, but knowledge on the exact relationship between the degree of thrombocytopenia and bleeding symptoms, especially at a lower platelet count, is lacking. The actual management of ITP is based on immune suppression (corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins), or the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab, or spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitors. A better understanding of the underlying pathology has facilitated the development of a number of new targeted therapies (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal Fc receptors, strategies targeting B and plasma cells, strategies targeting T cells, complement inhibitors, and newer TPO-RAs for improving megakaryopoiesis), which seem to be highly effective and well tolerated and result in a significant improvement in patients' quality of life. The disadvantage is that there is a lack of knowledge of the predictive factors of response to treatments, which would help in the development of an optimized treatment algorithm for selected patients.

Early treatment of rituximab combined with eltrombopag for secondary thrombocytopenic purpura in rheumatoid arthritis: A case report

RATIONALE

Secondary immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is also known as acquired thrombocytopenic purpura, autoimmune disease is usually one of the important causes. There are few reports about treatment of refractory thrombocytopenic purpura in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We report a case of refractory ITP in which changes in platelet-related markers with therapeutic agents are worthy of the attention of clinicians.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 69-year-old woman admitted for ecchymosis on the neck and arms for 15 days presented to our hospital. She was diagnosed with RA 5 years ago.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis met the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 classification criteria. The disease activity score 28 (DAS-28) was 4.6, indicating that the disease activity was moderate.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with first-line therapies and second-line treatment--eltrombopag (EPAG) were ineffective. Therefore, we performed rituximab combined with a low dose of EPAG.

OUTCOMES

The patient received 2 cycles of rituximab combined with EPAG, and reported no new petechiae on her buccal mucosa and limbs during follow-up.

LESSONS

This case suggests that early treatment of rituximab combined with EPAG is beneficial to patients with refractory ITP in RA. In terms of disease dynamic monitoring, immature platelet fraction (IPF) may be an auxiliary indicator for predicting efficacy, but its significance needs further study.