Expression levels of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 in renal cell carcinoma and their association with lymph node metastasis

Therapeutic options for different metastatic sites arising from renal cell carcinoma: A review

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stands among the top 10 malignant neoplasms with the highest fatality rates. It exhibits pronounced heterogeneity and robust metastatic behavior. Patients with RCC may present with solitary or multiple metastatic lesions at various anatomical sites, and their prognoses are contingent upon the site of metastasis. When deliberating the optimal therapeutic approach for a patient, thorough evaluation of significant risk factors such as the feasibility of complete resection, the presence of oligometastases, and the patient's functional and physical condition is imperative. Recognizing the nuanced differences in RCC metastasis to distinct organs proves advantageous in contemplating potential treatment modalities aimed at optimizing survival outcomes. Moreover, discerning the metastatic site holds promise for enhancing risk stratification in individuals with metastatic RCC. This review summarizes the recent data pertaining to the current status of different RCC metastatic sites and elucidates their role in informing clinical management strategies across diverse metastatic locales of RCC.

Targeting Tumor Angiogenesis with the Selective VEGFR-3 Inhibitor EVT801 in Combination with Cancer Immunotherapy

The receptor tyrosine kinase VEGFR-3 plays a crucial role in cancer-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, promoting tumor development and metastasis. Here, we report the novel VEGFR-3 inhibitor EVT801 that presents a more selective and less toxic profile than two major inhibitors of VEGFRs (i.e., sorafenib and pazopanib). As monotherapy, EVT801 showed a potent antitumor effect in VEGFR-3–positive tumors, and in tumors with VEGFR-3–positive microenvironments. EVT801 suppressed VEGF-C–induced human endothelial cell proliferation in vitro and tumor (lymph)angiogenesis in different tumor mouse models. In addition to reduced tumor growth, EVT801 decreased tumor hypoxia, favored sustained tumor blood vessel homogenization (i.e., leaving fewer and overall larger vessels), and reduced important immunosuppressive cytokines (CCL4, CCL5) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in circulation. Furthermore, in carcinoma mouse models, the combination of EVT801 with immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) yielded superior outcomes to either single treatment. Moreover, tumor growth inhibition was inversely correlated with levels of CCL4, CCL5, and MDSCs after treatment with EVT801, either alone or combined with ICT. Taken together, EVT801 represents a promising anti(lymph)angiogenic drug for improving ICT response rates in patients with VEGFR-3 positive tumors.

Significance:

The VEGFR-3 inhibitor EVT801 demonstrates superior selectivity and toxicity profile than other VEGFR-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. EVT801 showed potent antitumor effects in VEGFR-3–positive tumors, and tumors with VEGFR-3–positive microenvironments through blood vessel homogenization, and reduction of tumor hypoxia and limited immunosuppression. EVT801 increases immune checkpoint inhibitors’ antitumor effects.

Classical epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and alternative cell death process-driven blebbishield metastatic-witch (BMW) pathways to cancer metastasis

Metastasis is a pivotal event that accelerates the prognosis of cancer patients towards mortality. Therapies that aim to induce cell death in metastatic cells require a more detailed understanding of the metastasis for better mitigation. Towards this goal, we discuss the details of two distinct but overlapping pathways of metastasis: a classical reversible epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (hybrid-EMT)-driven transport pathway and an alternative cell death process-driven blebbishield metastatic-witch (BMW) transport pathway involving reversible cell death process. The knowledge about the EMT and BMW pathways is important for the therapy of metastatic cancers as these pathways confer drug resistance coupled to immune evasion/suppression. We initially discuss the EMT pathway and compare it with the BMW pathway in the contexts of coordinated oncogenic, metabolic, immunologic, and cell biological events that drive metastasis. In particular, we discuss how the cell death environment involving apoptosis, ferroptosis, necroptosis, and NETosis in BMW or EMT pathways recruits immune cells, fuses with it, migrates, permeabilizes vasculature, and settles at distant sites to establish metastasis. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic targets that are common to both EMT and BMW pathways.