1
|
Gebuijs L, Wagener FA, Zethof J, Carels CE, Von den Hoff JW, Metz JR. Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors causes severe craniofacial malformations in zebrafish larvae. PeerJ 2022; 10:e14338. [PMID: 36444384 PMCID: PMC9700454 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective A key pathway controlling skeletal development is fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and FGF receptor (FGFR) signaling. Major regulatory functions of FGF signaling are chondrogenesis, endochondral and intramembranous bone development. In this study we focus on fgfr2, as mutations in this gene are found in patients with craniofacial malformations. The high degree of conservation between FGF signaling of human and zebrafish (Danio rerio) tempted us to investigate effects of the mutated fgfr2 sa10729 allele in zebrafish on cartilage and bone formation. Methods We stained cartilage and bone in 5 days post fertilization (dpf) zebrafish larvae and compared mutants with wildtypes. We also determined the expression of genes related to these processes. We further investigated whether pharmacological blocking of all FGFRs with the inhibitor BGJ398, during 0-12 and 24-36 h post fertilization (hpf), affected craniofacial structure development at 5 dpf. Results We found only subtle differences in craniofacial morphology between wildtypes and mutants, likely because of receptor redundancy. After exposure to BGJ398, we found dose-dependent cartilage and bone malformations, with more severe defects in fish exposed during 0-12 hpf. These results suggest impairment of cranial neural crest cell survival and/or differentiation by FGFR inhibition. Compensatory reactions by upregulation of fgfr1a, fgfr1b, fgfr4, sp7 and dlx2a were found in the 0-12 hpf group, while in the 24-36 hpf group only upregulation of fgf3 was found together with downregulation of fgfr1a and fgfr2. Conclusions Pharmacological targeting of FGFR1-4 kinase signaling causes severe craniofacial malformations, whereas abrogation of FGFR2 kinase signaling alone does not induce craniofacial skeletal abnormalities. These findings enhance our understanding of the role of FGFRs in the etiology of craniofacial malformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Gebuijs
- Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Department of Animal Ecology and Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Frank A. Wagener
- Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Zethof
- Department of Animal Ecology and Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Carine E. Carels
- Department of Human Genetics and Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johannes W. Von den Hoff
- Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Juriaan R. Metz
- Department of Animal Ecology and Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu L, Toriseva M, Afshan S, Cangiano M, Fey V, Erickson A, Seikkula H, Alanen K, Taimen P, Ettala O, Nurmi M, Boström PJ, Kallajoki M, Tuomela J, Mirtti T, Beumer IJ, Nees M, Härkönen P. Increased Expression and Altered Cellular Localization of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-Like 1 (FGFRL1) Are Associated with Prostate Cancer Progression. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020278. [PMID: 35053442 PMCID: PMC8796033 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in men. PCa is primarily regulated by androgens, but other mechanisms, such as fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling, are also involved. In some patients, PCa relapses after surgical removal of prostate, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used as the first-line treatment. Unfortunately, the patients often lose response to ADT and progress by other mechanisms to castration-resistant, currently non-curable PCa. In our study, we aimed to identify better diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets against PCa. We analyzed patient PCa tissue samples from radical prostatectomies and biopsies, and used physiologically relevant 3D organoids and mouse xenografts to study FGFR signaling in PCa. We found that FGFRL1, a protein belonging to the FGFR family, plays a role in PCa. Our results suggest that FGFRL1 has significant effects on PCa progression and has potential as a prognostic biomarker. Abstract Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) 1–4 are involved in prostate cancer (PCa) regulation, but the role of FGFR-like 1 (FGFRL1) in PCa is unclear. FGFRL1 expression was studied by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry of patient tissue microarrays (TMAs) and correlated with clinical patient data. The effects of FGFRL1 knockdown (KD) in PC3M were studied in in vitro culture models and in mouse xenograft tumors. Our results showed that FGFRL1 was significantly upregulated in PCa. The level of membranous FGFRL1 was negatively associated with high Gleason scores (GSs) and Ki67, while increased cytoplasmic and nuclear FGFRL1 showed a positive correlation. Cox regression analysis indicated that nuclear FGFRL1 was an independent prognostic marker for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Functional studies indicated that FGFRL1-KD in PC3M cells increases FGFR signaling, whereas FGFRL1 overexpression attenuates it, supporting decoy receptor actions of membrane-localized FGFRL1. In accordance with clinical data, FGFRL1-KD markedly suppressed PC3M xenograft growth. Transcriptomics of FGFRL1-KD cells and xenografts revealed major changes in genes regulating differentiation, ECM turnover, and tumor–stromal interactions associated with decreased growth in FGFRL1-KD xenografts. Our results suggest that FGFRL1 upregulation and altered cellular compartmentalization contribute to PCa progression. The nuclear FGFRL1 could serve as a prognostic marker for PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Yu
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (L.Y.); (M.T.); (S.A.); (V.F.); (P.T.); (M.N.)
| | - Mervi Toriseva
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (L.Y.); (M.T.); (S.A.); (V.F.); (P.T.); (M.N.)
| | - Syeda Afshan
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (L.Y.); (M.T.); (S.A.); (V.F.); (P.T.); (M.N.)
| | - Mario Cangiano
- GenomeScan, 2333 BZ Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.C.); (I.J.B.)
| | - Vidal Fey
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (L.Y.); (M.T.); (S.A.); (V.F.); (P.T.); (M.N.)
| | - Andrew Erickson
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford 0X3 9DU, UK;
| | - Heikki Seikkula
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (H.S.); (O.E.); (M.N.); (P.J.B.)
| | - Kalle Alanen
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (K.A.); (M.K.)
| | - Pekka Taimen
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (L.Y.); (M.T.); (S.A.); (V.F.); (P.T.); (M.N.)
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (K.A.); (M.K.)
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (H.S.); (O.E.); (M.N.); (P.J.B.)
| | - Martti Nurmi
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (H.S.); (O.E.); (M.N.); (P.J.B.)
| | - Peter J. Boström
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (H.S.); (O.E.); (M.N.); (P.J.B.)
| | - Markku Kallajoki
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (K.A.); (M.K.)
| | - Johanna Tuomela
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (L.Y.); (M.T.); (S.A.); (V.F.); (P.T.); (M.N.)
| | - Tuomas Mirtti
- HUS Diagnostic Center and Research Program in Systems Oncology (ONCOSYS), Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Inès J. Beumer
- GenomeScan, 2333 BZ Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.C.); (I.J.B.)
| | - Matthias Nees
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (L.Y.); (M.T.); (S.A.); (V.F.); (P.T.); (M.N.)
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University in Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Pirkko Härkönen
- Institute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland; (L.Y.); (M.T.); (S.A.); (V.F.); (P.T.); (M.N.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +358-40-7343520
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aprajita, Sharma R. Comprehending fibroblast growth factor receptor like 1: Oncogene or tumor suppressor? Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 29:100472. [PMID: 34689016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Like 1 (FGFRL1) signaling has crucial role in a multitude of processes during genetic diseases, embryonic development and various types of cancer. Due to its partial structural similarity with its classical Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor [FGFR] counterparts and lack of tyrosine kinase domain, FGFRL1 was thought to work as a decoy receptor in FGF/FGFR signaling. Later on, growing number evidences showed that expression of FGFRL1 affects major pathways like ERK1/2, Akt and others, which are dysfunctional in a wide range of human cancers. In this review, we provide an overview of the current understanding of FGFRL1 and its roles in cell differentiation, adhesion and proliferation pathways . Overexpression of FGFRL1 might lead to tumor progression and invasion. In this context, inhibitors for FGFRL1 might have therapeutic benefits in human cancer prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aprajita
- University School of Biotechnology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - Rinu Sharma
- University School of Biotechnology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Dwarka, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dissecting the Interaction of FGF8 with Receptor FGFRL1. Biomolecules 2020; 10:biom10101399. [PMID: 33019532 PMCID: PMC7600612 DOI: 10.3390/biom10101399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In mammals, the novel protein fibroblast growth factor receptor-like 1 (FGFRL1) is involved in the development of metanephric kidneys. It appears that this receptor controls a crucial transition of the induced metanephric mesenchyme to epithelial renal vesicles, which further develop into functional nephrons. FGFRL1 knockout mice lack metanephric kidneys and do not express any fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 8 in the metanephric mesenchyme, suggesting that FGFRL1 and FGF8 play a decisive role during kidney formation. FGFRL1 consists of three extracellular immunoglobulin (Ig) domains (Ig1-Ig2-Ig3), a transmembrane domain and a short intracellular domain. We have prepared the extracellular domain (Ig123), the three individual Ig domains (Ig1, Ig2, Ig3) as well as all combinations containing two Ig domains (Ig12, Ig23, Ig13) in recombinant form in human cells. All polypeptides that contain the Ig2 domain (Ig123, Ig12, Ig23, Ig2) were found to interact with FGF8 with very high affinity, whereas all constructs that lack the Ig2 domain (Ig1, Ig3, Ig13) poorly interacted with FGF8 as shown by ELISA and surface plasmon resonance. It is therefore likely that FGFRL1 represents a physiological receptor for FGF8 in the kidney and that the ligand primarily binds to the Ig2 domain of the receptor. With Biacore experiments, we also measured the affinity of FGF8 for the different constructs. All constructs containing the Ig2 domain showed a rapid association and a slow dissociation phase, from which a KD of 2–3 × 10−9 M was calculated. Our data support the hypothesis that binding of FGF8 to FGFRL1 could play an important role in driving the formation of nephrons in the developing kidney.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen R, Li D, Zheng M, Chen B, Wei T, Wang Y, Li M, Huang W, Tong Q, Wang Q, Zhu Y, Fang W, Guo L, Fang S. FGFRL1 affects chemoresistance of small-cell lung cancer by modulating the PI3K/Akt pathway via ENO1. J Cell Mol Med 2020; 24:2123-2134. [PMID: 31957179 PMCID: PMC7011138 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptor‐like 1 (FGFRL1), a member of the FGFR family, has been demonstrated to play important roles in various cancers. However, the role of FGFRL1 in small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the role of FGFRL1 in chemoresistance of SCLC and elucidate the possible molecular mechanism. We found that FGFRL1 levels are significantly up‐regulated in multidrug‐resistant SCLC cells (H69AR and H446DDP) compared with the sensitive parental cells (H69 and H446). In addition, clinical samples showed that FGFRL1 was overexpressed in SCLC tissues, and high FGFRL1 expression was associated with the clinical stage, chemotherapy response and survival time of SCLC patients. Knockdown of FGFRL1 in chemoresistant SCLC cells increased chemosensitivity by increasing cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, whereas overexpression of FGFRL1 in chemosensitive SCLC cells produced the opposite results. Mechanistic investigations showed that FGFRL1 interacts with ENO1, and FGFRL1 was found to regulate the expression of ENO1 and its downstream signalling pathway (the PI3K/Akt pathway) in SCLC cells. In brief, our study demonstrated that FGFRL1 modulates chemoresistance of SCLC by regulating the ENO1‐PI3K/Akt pathway. FGFRL1 may be a predictor and a potential therapeutic target for chemoresistance in SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Chen
- Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Oncology, Jiujiang First People's Hospital, Jiujiang, China
| | - Deyu Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Provincial Clinical College, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Meng Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Chen
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ting Wei
- Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Man Li
- Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weimei Huang
- Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qin Tong
- Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Provincial Clinical College, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yaru Zhu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Fang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Linlang Guo
- Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shun Fang
- Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gnatenko DA, Kopantsev EP, Sverdlov ED. The role of the signaling pathway FGF/FGFR in pancreatic cancer. BIOCHEMISTRY MOSCOW-SUPPLEMENT SERIES B-BIOMEDICAL CHEMISTRY 2017. [DOI: 10.1134/s1990750817020032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
7
|
Pietiläinen KH, Ismail K, Järvinen E, Heinonen S, Tummers M, Bollepalli S, Lyle R, Muniandy M, Moilanen E, Hakkarainen A, Lundbom J, Lundbom N, Rissanen A, Kaprio J, Ollikainen M. DNA methylation and gene expression patterns in adipose tissue differ significantly within young adult monozygotic BMI-discordant twin pairs. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015; 40:654-61. [PMID: 26499446 DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2015.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2015] [Revised: 08/29/2015] [Accepted: 09/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about epigenetic alterations associated with subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in obesity. Our aim was to study genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression differences in SAT in monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs who are discordant for body mass index (BMI). This design completely matches lean and obese groups for genetic background, age, gender and shared environment. METHODS 14We analyzed DNA methylome and gene expression from SAT, together with body composition (magnetic resonance imaging/spectroscopy) and glucose tolerance test, lipids and C-reactive protein from 26 rare BMI-discordant (intrapair difference in BMI ⩾3 kg m(-2)) MZ twin pairs identified from 10 birth cohorts of young adult Finnish twins. RESULTS We found 17 novel obesity-associated genes that were differentially methylated across the genome between heavy and lean co-twins. Nine of them were also differentially expressed. Pathway analyses indicated that dysregulation of SAT in obesity includes a paradoxical downregulation of lipo/adipogenesis and upregulation of inflammation and extracellular matrix remodeling. Furthermore, CpG sites whose methylation correlated with metabolically harmful fat depots (intra-abdominal and liver fat) also correlated with measures of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and low-grade inflammation, thus suggesting that epigenetic alterations in SAT are associated with the development of unhealthy obesity. CONCLUSION This is the first study in BMI-discordant MZ twin pairs reporting genome-wide DNA methylation and expression profiles in SAT. We found a number of novel genes and pathways whose methylation and expression patterns differ within the twin pairs, suggesting that the pathological adaptation of SAT to obesity is, at least in part, epigenetically regulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H Pietiläinen
- Obesity Research Unit, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Institute for Molecular Medicine FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - K Ismail
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - E Järvinen
- Obesity Research Unit, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - S Heinonen
- Obesity Research Unit, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Tummers
- Obesity Research Unit, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - S Bollepalli
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - R Lyle
- Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Muniandy
- Obesity Research Unit, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - E Moilanen
- The Immunopharmacology Research Group, University of Tampere School of Medicine and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Hakkarainen
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J Lundbom
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.,German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - N Lundbom
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A Rissanen
- Obesity Research Unit, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J Kaprio
- Institute for Molecular Medicine FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Ollikainen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Targeted disruption of the intracellular domain of receptor FgfrL1 in mice. PLoS One 2014; 9:e105210. [PMID: 25126760 PMCID: PMC4134281 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
FgfrL1 is the fifth member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (Fgfr) family. Studies with FgfrL1 deficient mice have demonstrated that the gene plays an important role during embryonic development. FgfrL1 knock-out mice die at birth as they have a malformed diaphragm and lack metanephric kidneys. Similar to the classical Fgfrs, the FgfrL1 protein contains an extracellular part composed of three Ig-like domains that interact with Fgf ligands and heparin. However, the intracellular part of FgfrL1 is not related to the classical receptors and does not possess any tyrosine kinase activity. Curiously enough, the amino acid sequence of this domain is barely conserved among different species, with the exception of three motifs, namely a dileucine peptide, a tandem tyrosine-based motif YXXΦ and a histidine-rich sequence. To investigate the function of the intracellular domain of FgfrL1, we have prepared genetically modified mice that lack the three conserved sequence motifs, but instead contain a GFP cassette (FgfrL1ΔC-GFP). To our surprise, homozygous FgfrL1ΔC-GFP knock-in mice are viable, fertile and phenotypically normal. They do not exhibit any alterations in the diaphragm or the kidney, except for a slight reduction in the number of glomeruli that does not appear to affect life expectancy. In addition, the pancreas of both FgfrL1ΔC-GFP knock-in and FgfrL1 knock-out mice do not show any disturbances in the production of insulin, in contrast to what has been suggested by recent studies. Thus, the conserved motifs of the intracellular FgfrL1 domain are dispensable for organogenesis and normal life. We conclude that the extracellular domain of the protein must conduct the vital functions of FgfrL1.
Collapse
|