Surgical management for non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with synchronous liver metastasis: A consensus from the Chinese Study Group for Neuroendocrine Tumors (CSNET)

Long-term Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm With Synchronous Hepatic Metastasis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate surgical impact on the overall survival (OS) of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (pNEN) with synchronous hepatic metastases (sHMs).

METHODS

A total of 163 pNEN-sHM patients were recruited from 3 institutions in China, who were categorized into 3 groups: no resection, resection of the primary lesion, and resection of both primary and hepatic lesions (PHR). Cox regression was employed to evaluate surgical impact on the OS.

RESULTS

In the overall cohort analysis, PHR demonstrated a significant protective effect on OS (hazard ratio, 0.302; 95% confidence interval, 0.127-0.721; P = 0.007). Nevertheless, subgroup analysis revealed PHR conferred a survival advantage in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) located on the pancreatic body/tail (bt-pNET-sHM) (hazard ratio, 0.287; 95% CI, 0.087-0.946; P = 0.040), whereas surgical treatment did not significantly impact survival in the subgroups of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma-sHM or pancreatic head/neck pNET-sHM (hn-pNET-sHM).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the survival benefit of surgery was observed only in the bt-pNET-sHM subgroup. Considering the multifactorial nature of decision-making, surgical intervention for pNEN-sHM management should be approached with a careful and comprehensive assessment, to prevent excessive surgery strategies.

Ectopic Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Syndrome due to Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

A 55-year-old woman presented to her primary care physician with facial and lower leg edema. After being referred to our hospital because of hypothyroidism and hypokalemia on blood tests, she also had elevated adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels, but a dexamethasone suppression test showed no cortisol suppression. Ectopic ACTH syndrome due to pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) was suspected. endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration was performed, and a histopathological examination of the obtained specimen revealed multiple liver metastases of the PNEC. Imaging after etoposide and cisplatin therapy showed cystic changes in the primary lesions and shrinkage of the liver metastases, and the ACTH levels were within the normal range.

A radiomics-based interpretable model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVES

To develop a computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in a non-invasive manner.

METHODS

Patients with pNETs who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT between 2010 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Radiomics features were extracted, and five radiomics-based ML models, namely logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, and GaussianNB, were developed. The performance of these models was evaluated using a time-independent testing set, and metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. The accuracy of the radiomics model was compared to that of needle biopsy. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) tool and the correlation between radiomics and biological features were employed to explore the interpretability of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients (mean age: 50 ± 14 years; 53 male) were included in the training set, whereas 100 patients (mean age: 48 ± 13 years; 50 male) were included in the testing set. The AUCs for LR, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and GaussianNB were 0.758, 0.742, 0.779, 0.744, and 0.745, respectively, with corresponding accuracies of 73.0%, 70.0%, 77.0%, 71.9%, and 72.9%. The SHAP tool identified two features of the venous phase as the most significant, which showed significant differences among the Ki-67 index or mitotic count subgroups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An interpretable radiomics-based RF model can effectively differentiate between G1 and G2/3 of pNETs, demonstrating favorable interpretability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The radiomics-based interpretable model developed in this study has significant clinical relevance as it offers a non-invasive method for assessing the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and holds promise as an important complementary tool to traditional tissue biopsy.

KEY POINTS

• A radiomics-based interpretable model was developed to predict the pathological grade of pNETs and compared with preoperative needle biopsy in terms of accuracy. • The model, based on CT radiomics, demonstrated favorable interpretability. • The radiomics model holds potential as a valuable complementary technique to preoperative needle biopsy; however, it should not be considered a replacement for biopsy.

Decreasing utilization of surgical interventions amongst patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Since 2013, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) consensus-guidelines have endorsed consideration of surgical intervention for pancreatic- neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) with liver metastases.

METHODS

Patients with non-functional PNET with liver only metastases from 2010 to 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database.

RESULTS

34.7% underwent surgical intervention (13% PNET resection, 2.1% surgical management of liver metastases (SMLM), 19.5% PNET resection ​+ ​SMLM). In multivariable analysis, government insurance, year of diagnosis>2013, increasing primary tumor size were associated with lower rate of surgical intervention. Receiving treatment at an academic center (OR 3.59, 95%CI 1.81-7.11; P ​< ​0.001) or integrated cancer network (OR 3.21, 95%CI 1.57-6.54; P ​= ​0.001) was associated with a higher rate of surgical intervention. The overall rate of surgical intervention decreased from 45.7% in 2010 to 23.0% in 2019.

CONCLUSION

Despite guideline recommendations and the suggested survival benefits, only one-third of patients underwent surgical intervention, potentially influenced by the rising utilization of systemic therapy in the past decade.

Synchronous primary duodenal papillary adenocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Synchronous primary cancers (SPCs) have become increasingly frequent over the past decade. However, the coexistence of duodenal papillary and gallbladder cancers is rare, and such cases have not been previously reported in the English literature. Here, we describe an SPC case with duodenal papilla and gallbladder cancers and its diagnosis and successful management.

CASE SUMMARY

A 68-year-old Chinese man was admitted to our hospital with the chief complaint of dyspepsia for the past month. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen performed at the local hospital revealed dilatation of the bile and pancreatic ducts and a space-occupying lesion in the duodenal papilla. Endoscopy revealed a tumor protruding from the duodenal papilla. Pathological findings for the biopsied tissue revealed tubular villous growth with moderate heterogeneous hyperplasia. Surgical treatment was selected. Macroscopic examination of this surgical specimen revealed a 2-cm papillary tumor and another tumor protruding by 0.5 cm in the gallbladder neck duct. Intraoperative rapid pathology identified adenocarcinoma in the gallbladder neck duct and tubular villous adenoma with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and local canceration in the duodenal papilla. After an uneventful postoperative recovery, the patient was discharged without complications.

CONCLUSION

It is essential for clinicians and pathologists to maintain a high degree of suspicion while evaluating such synchronous cancers.

New insights in diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare epithelial neoplasms derived from pluripotent endocrine cells along the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. GEP-NENs are classified into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Despite overlapping morphological features, GEP-NENs vary in molecular biology, epigenetic, clinical behavior, treatment response, and prognosis features and remain an unmet clinical challenge. In this review, we introduce recent updates on the histopathologic classification, including the tumor grading and staging system, molecular genetics, and systemic evaluation of the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs at different anatomic sites, together with some insights into the diagnosis of challenging and unusual cases. We also discuss the application of novel therapeutic approaches for GEP-NENs, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. These findings will help improve patient care with precise diagnosis and individualized treatment of patients with GEP-NENs.

Serum Biomarker Status with a Distinctive Pattern in Prognosis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEPNEC) is a major research focus, but the application of biomarkers to guide its prognostication and management is unsatisfying. Clinical values of conventional serum biomarkers, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA199) warrant scrutiny.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with GEPNEC with baseline NSE, CEA, and CA199 levels provided in Peking University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively studied. Relationships between biomarkers and prognosis were investigated by the χ2 test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 640 GEPNEC patients were enrolled. NSE, CEA, and CA199 were elevated in 59.5%, 28.5%, and 21.3% of the population, respectively. Higher NSE had worse median overall survival (OS) (17.0 months vs. not reached, hazard ratio = 2.77 [2.06, 3.73], p < 0.001), and so did patients with higher CEA and CA199. Multivariable analysis confirmed that NSE and CA199 correlated with OS independently. Baseline NSE level and NSE remission predicted OS and the response of patients with first-line etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) treatment. Furthermore, we combined NSE/CEA/CA199 to segregate GEPNEC into novel subgroups, namely, adenocarcinoma-like NEC (ALN), neuroendocrine-like NEC (NLN), and triple-normal NEC (TNN). The groups shared distinctive clinicopathologic features and prognosis (21.0 months vs. 17.1 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001). The EP regimen remained the priority treatment option in NLN/TNN, while ALN was predisposed to "adenocarcinoma-like chemotherapy."

CONCLUSIONS

Elevation of NSE, CEA, or CA199 was common and independently indicates poor prognosis in GEPNEC patients. Serum biomarker-based subtypes suggest meaningful clinical implications and appropriate therapeutic approaches, illuminating promising ways to characterize the prognosis of GEPNEC.

Survival Benefit of Resection Surgery for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched SEER Database Analysis

Simple Summary

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a devastating illness but guidelines consider it unresectable once metastasized. However, resection of the primary tumor is carried out in select cases and retrospective analyses indicate that this may improve survival. Even so, these analyses are limited to single centers or fail to account for biased patient selection. We overcome these limitations with a propensity score-matched SEER database analysis that reliably demonstrates surgery can extend overall survival. Furthermore, we identify prognostic factors that could aid the selection of patients for randomized controlled trials. Thus, this study paves the way for future work that aims to update treatment guidelines in accordance with surgical developments.

Abstract

Guidelines do not recommend resection surgery for oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, reports in small samples of selected patients suggest that surgery extends survival. Thus, this study aims to gather evidence for the benefits of cancer-directed surgery (CDS) by analyzing a national cohort and identifying prognostic factors that aid the selection of candidates for CDS or recruitment into experimental trials. Data for patients with PDAC and hepatic metastasis were extracted from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). The bias between CDS and non-CDS groups was minimized with Propensity Score Matching (PSM), and the prognostic role of CDS was investigated by comparing Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 12,018 patients were extracted from the database, including 259 patients who underwent CDS that were 1:1 propensity score-matched with patients who did not receive CDS. CDS appeared to significantly prolong median overall survival from 5 to 10 months. Multivariate analysis revealed chemotherapy as a protective prognostic, whilst survival was impaired by old age and tumors that were poorly differentiated (Grades III–IV). These factors can be used to select patients likely to benefit from CDS treatment, which may facilitate recruitment into randomized controlled trials.

Worth it or not? Primary tumor resection for stage IV pancreatic cancer patients: A SEER-based analysis of 15,836 cases

BACKGROUND

Primary tumor resection (PTR) as a treatment option for patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer (PC) is controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IV PC patients, with treatment data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), were screened. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

We enrolled 15,836 stage IV PC patients in this study. Propensity score-matched analyses revealed improved OS and CSS of patients receiving chemotherapy plus PTR versus chemotherapy (median survival time [MSTOS ]: 13 vs. 9 months, p = 0.024; MSTCSS : 14 vs. 10 months, p = 0.035), and chemoradiotherapy plus PTR versus chemoradiotherapy (MSTOS : 14 vs. 7 months, p = 0.044; MSTCSS : 14 vs. 7 months, p = 0.066). Multivariate adjusted analyses further confirmed these results. Stratified with different metastatic modalities, multivariate analyses suggested that PTR significantly improved the OS and CSS among patients with ≤1 metastatic organ, and that patients with brain metastasis might not benefit from chemotherapy treatment.

CONCLUSION

PTR improves the OS and CSS of stage IV PC patients on the basis of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, provided that the metastases involve ≤1 organ. Chemotherapy, however, should be carefully considered in patients with metastases involving the brain.

Liver metastases

Liver metastases are commonly detected in a range of malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer, melanoma, lung cancer and breast cancer, although CRC is the most common primary cancer that metastasizes to the liver. Interactions between tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment play an important part in the engraftment, survival and progression of the metastases. Various cells including liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, parenchymal hepatocytes, dendritic cells, resident natural killer cells as well as other immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils are implicated in promoting and sustaining metastases in the liver. Four key phases (microvascular, pre-angiogenic, angiogenic and growth phases) have been identified in the process of liver metastasis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, CT, MRI and PET scans are typically used for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Surgical resection remains the main potentially curative treatment among patients with resectable liver metastases. The role of liver transplantation in the management of liver metastasis remains controversial. Systemic therapies, newer biologic agents (for example, bevacizumab and cetuximab) and immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized the treatment options for liver metastases. Moving forward, incorporation of genetic tests can provide more accurate information to guide clinical decision-making and predict prognosis among patients with liver metastases.

The Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (2020)

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are highly heterogeneous, and the management of pNENs patients can be intractable. To address this challenge, an expert committee was established on behalf of the Chinese Pancreatic Surgery Association, which consisted of surgical oncologists, gastroenterologists, medical oncologists, endocrinologists, radiologists, pathologists, and nuclear medicine specialists. By reviewing the important issues regarding the diagnosis and treatment of pNENs, the committee concluded evidence-based statements and recommendations in this article, in order to further improve the management of pNENs patients in China.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: a contemporary review of treatment strategies

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are globally increasing in prevalence and the liver is the most common site of metastasis. Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) are heterogeneous in clinical presentation and prognosis. Fortunately, recent advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies have improved the multidisciplinary management of this challenging condition. When feasible, surgical resection of NELM offers the best long-term outcomes. General indications for hepatic resection include performance status acceptable for major liver surgery, grade 1 or 2 tumors, absence of extrahepatic disease, adequate size and function of future liver remnant, and feasibility of resecting >90% of metastases. Adjunct therapies including concomitant liver ablation are generally safe when used appropriately and may expand the number of patients eligible for surgery. Among patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. For patients who are not surgical candidates, liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization can provide locoregional control and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options also exist for patients with advanced or progressive disease. Ongoing research efforts are needed to identify novel biomarkers that will define the optimal indications for and sequencing of treatments to be delivered in a personalized fashion.

Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that vary in their clinical presentation, behavior and prognosis. The most common site of metastasis is the liver. Surgical resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is thought to afford the best long-term outcomes when feasible. Initial preoperative workup should include surveillance for carcinoid syndrome, screening for evidence of liver insufficiency, and performance of imaging specific to neuroendocrine tumors such as a somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography scan. Standard surgical principles apply to hepatic surgery for NELM, namely prioritizing low central venous pressure anesthesia, minimizing blood loss, knowledge of liver anatomy, generous use of intraoperative ultrasound, as well as safe parenchymal transection techniques and practices to avoid bile leakage. Knowledge of established prognostic factors may assist with patient selection, which is important for optimizing short- and long-term outcomes of hepatic resection. Adjunct therapies such as concomitant liver ablation are used frequently and are generally safe when used appropriately. For patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. Primary tumor resection in the setting of unresectable metastatic disease is more controversial, however generally recommended if morbidity is acceptable. For patients who are not surgical candidates, due to either patient performance status or burden of liver disease, several liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization are available to assist with locoregional control, extend progression-free survival (PFS), and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options exist for patients with metastatic PNET which are often prioritized for those patients with advanced or progressive disease. A systematic approach in a multi-disciplinary setting is likely to result in the best long-term outcomes for patients with pancreatic NELM. Ongoing research is needed to determine the optimal patient selection for hepatic surgery as well as the ideal treatment sequencing for those patients with NELM.

Simultaneous resection of the primary tumour and liver metastases after conversion chemotherapy versus standard therapy in pancreatic cancer with liver oligometastasis: protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised phase III control trial (CSPAC-1)

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 50% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are diagnosed with distant metastasis, especially liver metastasis. The current standard treatment for these stage IV patients is palliative chemotherapy. There is increasing agreement that synchronous PDAC and liver metastasis resection may benefit highly selected patients. Thus, the Chinese Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (CSPAC)-1 trial is being launched to establish a strategy for selecting PDAC patients with liver oligometastases who may benefit from synchronous resection after conversion chemotherapy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this study, liver oligometastasis is defined as no more than three metastatic lesions irrespective of their distribution within the liver lobes. The trial contains two steps. In the first step, 1000 to 1200 needle biopsy-confirmed PDAC patients with liver oligometastases are eligible for inclusion. Candidates will receive first-line chemotherapy. The RECIST V.1.1 criteria combined with tumour markers will be applied to evaluate the tumour response to chemotherapy every two cycles. Pancreatic cancer and hepatic metastasis resectability will be identified by multidisciplinary teams. Approximately 300 patients who meet our criteria will enter the second step and be randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to simultaneous resection of the primary pancreatic cancer lesion and liver oligometastases if no extensive metastatic sites are found during surgery or standard chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy is recommended, and regimen selection should be based on the preoperative chemotherapy regimen. The primary endpoint is real overall survival (from enrolment to death). This study was activated in July 2018 and is expected to complete accrual within 5 years.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Serious adverse events will be reported. Trial results will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03398291; Pre-results.

Value of computed tomography evaluation in pathologic classification and prognosis prediction of gastric neuroendocrine tumors

Background

The study aims to investigate the correlation of CT characteristics with pathological classifications and the prognostic value of CT features in patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs).

Methods

Ninety-one cases of pathologically diagnosed g-NENs, including 15 cases of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (G1 and G2) and 76 cases of poor-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (G3 and MANEC) were retrospectively studied. All cases were included in correlation analysis of CT characteristics with pathologic grades. Among them, 76 patients who had fulfilled follow-up data were included for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.

Results

CT characteristics that favor poor differentiation include tumor location (fundus and cardia), larger tumor size (>3.0 cm), infiltrative growth, unclear tumor margin, serosa involvement, ulceration and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). Most variables had sensitivities >80% and specificities >60% to distinguish NECs from NETs. Through log-rank analysis, it was revealed that serosa involvement, cystic degeneration, necrosis, heterogeneous enhancement and lymph node metastasis led to worse DFS and OS for patients with g-NENs (P<0.05). COX regression analysis showed that serosa involvement and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factor for DFS and OS, respectively, despite of grading, staging and therapeutic choices (P<0.05). Moreover, high Ki-67 index (>55%) in G3 g-NENs is in correlation with serosa involvement and lymph node metastasis; accordingly, patients with higher Ki-67 index had worse 1-year DFS (61.7% vs. 92.3%; P<0.05).

Conclusions

CT characteristics can be useful discriminators and prognostic factors for g-NENs and may help identify G3 g-NEC from G3 g-NEN by revealing its poor differentiation and high invasive potential.

Hepatic Resection for Non-functional Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Does the Presence of Unresected Primary Tumor or Extrahepatic Metastatic Disease Matter?

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of unresected primary tumor, as well as extrahepatic metastasis, on the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing hepatic resection for non-functional neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NF-NELM).

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatic resection for NF-NELM were identified from a multi-institutional database. Data on clinical and pathological details, as well as the long-term overall survival (OS) were obtained and compared. Propensity score matching was performed to generate matched pairs of patients.

RESULTS

Among the 332 patients with NF-NELM, 281 (84.6%) underwent primary tumor resection, while 51 (15.4%) did not. Patients who underwent primary resection were more likely to have a pancreatic primary and metachronous NELM. The long-term OS of patients who did and did not have the primary neuroendocrine tumor (NET) resected was comparable on both unmatched (10-year survival rate 66.8% vs. 54.0%, p = 0.192) and matched (10-year survival rate 75.7% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.271) analyses. In contrast, patients with NF-NELM and extrahepatic metastasis had a worse OS following resection compared with patients who had intrahepatic-only metastasis on unmatched (10-year survival rate 37.5% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.002) and matched (10-year survival rate 37.5% vs. 86.3%, p = 0.011) analyses. On multivariable analysis, while resection of the primary NET was not associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-1.2, p = 0.195), the presence of extrahepatic metastasis was independently associated with long-term risk of death (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-9.2, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

While surgery should be considered for patients with NF-NELM who have an unresectable primary tumor, operative resection of NF-NELM may not be as beneficial in patients with extrahepatic disease.

A modified M-stage classification based on the metastatic patterns of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to improve the M-stage classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs).

METHODS

Two thousand six hundred sixty six pNENs were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to explore the metastatic patterns of pNENs. Metastatic patterns were categorized as single, two, or multiple (three or more) distant organ metastasis. The mean overall survival and hazard rate of different metastatic patterns were calculated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. The discriminatory capability of the modified M-stage classification was evaluated by Harrell's concordance index.

RESULTS

The overall survival time significantly decreased with an increasing number of metastatic organs. In addition, pNENs with only liver metastasis had better prognosis when compared to other metastatic patterns. Thus, we modified the M-stage classification (mM-stage) as follows: mM₀-stage, tumor without metastasis; mM₁-stage, tumor only metastasized to liver; mM₂-stage, tumor metastasized to other single distant organ (lung, bone, or brain) or two distant organs; mM₃-stage, tumor metastasized to three or more distant organs. Harrell's concordance index showed that the modified M-stage classification had superior discriminatory capability than both the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) M-stage classifications.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified M-stage classification is superior to both AJCC and ENETS M-stage classifications in the prognosis of pNENs. In the future, individualized treatment and follow-up programs should be explored for patients with distinct metastatic patterns.

Time to think: Selecting patients who may benefit from synchronous resection of primary pancreatic cancer and liver metastases

Pancreatic cancer remains a lethal disease and is associated with poor prognosis, particularly for patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis. Recently, Oweira reported a retrospective study that included 13233 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. They demonstrated that pancreatic cancer patients with isolated liver metastases had worse outcomes than patients with isolated lung metastases or distant nodal metastases. At present, the standard treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer is chemotherapy. However, improvement in the safety of pancreatic surgery has led to the consideration of more aggressive surgical approaches. Schneitler reported two cases of hepatic metastatic pancreatic cancer in which negative margin (R0) resection and long survival were achieved after effective preoperative chemotherapy. In general, these two studies indicate that although pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis have a poor prognosis, surgical approaches may prolong survival for a few of these patients. A strategy to select hepatic metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who may benefit from surgical intervention is urgently needed.

Treatment options for PNET liver metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms. About 40-80% of patients with PNET are metastatic at presentation, usually involving the liver (40-93%). Liver metastasis represents the most significant prognostic factor. The aim of this study is to present an up-to-date review of treatment options for patients with liver metastases from PNETs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify all pertinent studies published up to May 2018.

RESULTS

The literature search evaluated all the therapeutic options for patients with liver metastases of PNETs, including surgical treatment, loco-regional therapies, and pharmacological treatment. All the different treatment options showed particular indications in different presentations of liver metastases of PNET. Surgery remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option in patients with PNETs and resectable liver metastases, even if relapse rates are high. Efficacy of medical treatment has increased with advances in targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, and the introduction of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Several techniques for loco-regional control of metastases are available, including chemo- or radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with PNET metastases should be multidisciplinary and must be personalized according to the features of individual patients and tumors.

The side effects and complications of percutaneous iodine-125 seeds implantation under CT-guide for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The present study investigates the side effects and complications of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous iodine-125 (I-125) seeds implantation for advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for patients treated with implantation of I-125 seeds under CT-guide in our hospital from May 2010 to April 2015. The side effects and complications were collected and their possible reasons were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were enrolled. The side effects were categorized as fever in 29 cases (37.18%), abdominal pain in 26 cases (33.33%), nausea and vomiting in 9 cases (11.54%), diarrhea in 5 cases (6.41%), and constipation in 4 cases (5.13%). Complications were composed of pancreatitis in 9 cases (11.54%), infection in 5 cases (6.41%), seed migration in 2 cases (2.56%), intestinal perforation in 1 case (1.28%), and intestinal obstruction in 1 case. The incidence of complication was 23.08% (18/78). The difference in incidence of complication was statistically significant between patients implanted with ≤27 seeds and those with >27 seeds (P = .032).

CONCLUSION

The side effects and complications frequently occur in implantation of I-125 seeds for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. More concern should be given to the patients treated by this technique.

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a prognostic biomarker in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is not generally considered to be a biomarker in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), as the majority of pNETs present with a normal range of CA19-9. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of serum CA19-9 levels as a prognostic factor in a relatively large number of patients with pNETs. Consecutive patients were retrospectively collected from a single institution between June 2006 and February 2015. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve were used to select the cut-off values for the baseline CA19-9 levels. The primary end point was set as overall survival. Potential factors associated with the abnormal elevation of CA19-9 expression levels in pNETs were also investigated. The cut-off value for CA19-9 was 16 U/ml as determined by the ROC curve, and for the area under the ROC curve it was 0.68. In total, 32.7% of patients (51/156) had CA19-9 expression levels higher than the cut-off value. Univariate analysis demonstrated that CA19-9 >16 U/ml was an adverse prognostic factor for patients' overall survival. The CA19-9 >16 U/ml group had a statistically higher proportion of tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage III or IV, as compared with the CA19-9 ≤16 U/ml group. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate that CA19-9 is a prognostic biomarker of pNETs, one that may reflect its aggressiveness and severity.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors including well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs). The incidence of pNENs has increased over the past few decades. Although, the understanding and interest for this tumor have also increased significantly, the debate about classification and diagnosis continues. Although the primary treatment for pNENs is surgical resection, there is still a lack of effective therapeutic options for patients with advanced unresectable pNENs. Although many therapeutic methods have proven effective, the choice of treatment and specific programs are still unclear. Our article presents an overview of pNENs, with a focus on their diagnostic work-up, clinical presentation and treatment options.