HIPEC for gynaecological malignancies: A last update (Review)

Pattern of recurrence in endometrial cancer. The murderer always returns to the scene of the crime

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer recurrence occurs in about 18 % of patients. This study aims to analyze the pattern recurrence of endometrial cancer and the relationship between the initial site of primary disease and the relapse site in patients undergoing surgical treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all surgically treated patients with endometrial cancer selecting those with recurrence. We defined primary site disease as uterus, lymph nodes, or peritoneum according to pathology analysis of the surgical specimen. The site of recurrence was defined as vaginal cuff, lymph nodes, peritoneum, and parenchymatous organs. Our primary endpoint was to correlate the site of initial disease with the site of recurrence.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 1416 patients. The overall recurrence rate was 17,5 % with 248 relapses included in the study. An increase of 9.9, 5.7, and 5.7 times in the odds of relapse on the lymph node, peritoneum, and abdominal parenchymatous sites respectively was observed in case of nodal initial disease (p < 0.001). A not significant difference in odds was observed in terms of vaginal cuff relapse (OR 0.9) between lymph node ad uterine primary disease (p = 0.78). An increasing OR of 8.7 times for nodal recurrences, 46.6 times for peritoneum, and 23.3 times for parenchymatous abdominal recurrences were found in the case of primary peritoneal disease (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Endometrial cancer tends to recur at the initial site of the disease. Intraoperative inspection of the adjacent sites of primary disease and targeted instrumental examination of the initial sites of disease during follow-up are strongly recommended.

Cytoreduction Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Primary and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most frequent cause of death among women with gynecologic malignant tumors. Primary debulking surgery (PDS) with maximal surgical effort to reach completeness of cytoreduction, followed by chemotherapy, has become the standard of care; moreover, some experiences have shown that a comprehensive treatment approach of surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) could improve the prognosis of ovarian cancer. We carried out a retrospective analysis of all consecutive sixty-six patients diagnosed with primary advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer who underwent debulking surgery plus HIPEC in a single center between September 2005 and October 2020. For 33 patients with primary EOC, with a median follow-up period of 70 months, the median overall survival was 56 months (range: 48.1–96.9); and the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 13 months (range: 19.9–53.7). In the recurrent population, the median follow-up period was 78 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 82 months (range: 48.1–96.9), and the median DFS was 17 months (range: 19.7–53.0). In our study, we have found that CRS plus HIPEC is feasible, with very low rates of major complications and good results in terms of overall survival.

The Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Uterine Cancer Therapy

Endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma represent the two major types of uterine cancer. In advanced stages, both cancer entities are challenging to treat and correlate with a meagre survival and prognosis. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a form of localized chemotherapy that is heated to improve the chemotherapeutic effect on peritoneal metastases. The aim of the current review is to study the role of HIPEC in the treatment of uterine cancer. A literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE and LIVIVO databases with a view to identifying relevant studies. By employing the search terms "hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy", "uterine cancer", "endometrial cancer", and/or "uterine sarcoma", we managed to identify 26 studies published between 2004 and 2023. The present work embodies the most up-to-date, comprehensive review of the literature centering on the particular role of HIPEC as treatment modality for peritoneally metastasized uterine cancer. Patients treated with cytoreductive surgery, alongside HIPEC, seem to profit from not only higher survival but also lower recurrence rates. Factors such as the completeness of cytoreductive surgery, the peritoneal cancer index, the histologic subtype, or the applied chemotherapeutic agent, all influence HIPEC therapy effectiveness. In summary, HIPEC seems to represent a promising treatment alternative for aggressive uterine cancer.