Synchronous primary corpus and ovarian cancer: High incidence of endometriosis and thrombosis

Colorectal anastomotic leakage after conversion surgery for advanced endometrial cancer treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab: a case report

The combination therapy of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LP) is increasingly recognized as an important second-line regimen for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). However, the safety and efficacy of conversion surgery with low anterior rectal resection for unresectable EC following LP therapy is unknown. A 37-year-old woman was referred with unresectable EC with pleural fluid, peritoneal dissemination, and ascites. After the failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, she was administered LP as second-line treatment. After 10 treatment cycles, uterine and peritoneal tumors significantly reduced in size, except the left ovarian metastatic tumor which became slightly larger. Cytoreductive surgery, including low anterior resection of the rectum and colorectal anastomosis, achieved complete resection. However, on postoperative day 11, the patient experienced an anastomotic leakage around the colorectal anastomosis site, necessitating a double-barreled colostomy and percutaneous drainage. She was discharged 15 days after the second surgery and resumed LP therapy after 44 days following the second surgery. We report a case in which conversion surgery after LP therapy was conducted for unresectable advanced endometrial cancer. Our findings indicate that if bowel resection is required, a longer preoperative withdrawal period may be necessary to prevent postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Clinical significance of initial symptoms in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer

Objective

Endometriosis is associated with various symptoms, but their severity varies from case to case. In this study, we investigated the reality of symptoms presented by patients with clinically early-stage endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) and explored the relationship between symptoms and laboratory/imaging findings, pathological findings, and prognosis.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective case-control study of patients who received initial surgical treatment and were diagnosed with clinically early-stage EAOC, including ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC), ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), and seromucinous borderline tumor (SMBT). Patients with OEC/OCCC diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 and those with SMBT diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 were included. Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for statistical analyses.

Results

One hundred-seven patients (OEC, n=31; OCCC, n=39; SMBT, n=37) were included. Fifty-nine (55.1%) patients presented with symptoms, and the proportion of patients with OEC who presented with symptoms was significantly higher than that of others (OEC, 77.4%; OCCC, 43.6%; SMBT, 48.6%). The details of symptoms differed significantly among the pathological types (lower abdominal pain/abdominal discomfort/abnormal bleeding, OEC: 11/8/9; OCCC: 6/12/1; SMBT: 15/5/3). Only in the OEC group did symptomatic patients show significantly higher white blood cell (WBC) count and neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratio (symptomatic vs. asymptomatic, median: WBC count: 7250 vs. 5000, p=0.008; N/L ratio: 4.6 vs. 1.7, p=0.013). None of the asymptomatic patients showed recurrence during follow-up.

Conclusion

Patients with EAOC show varying symptoms depending on the histological type of the tumor. Laboratory findings underlying symptoms also vary by histopathological type, which may reflect differences in the carcinogenesis process.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

As the second most common subtype of Epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs), ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is associated with a high rate of cancer-associated thrombosis. Previous studies revealed the wide range prevalence (6-42%) of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among OCCC patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of VTE among OCCC patients as well as factors affecting it.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to December 12th, 2022. Studies reporting venous thromboembolic events in women with clear cell carcinoma of the ovary were included. Demographic data, clinical, and paraclinical features of the patients were independently extracted by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Out of the 2254 records, 43 studies were processed for final review. The qualified studies involved 573 VTE cases among 2965 patients with OCCC. The pooled prevalence of VTE among OCCC patients was 21.32% (95%CI=(17.38-25.87)). Most VTE events were reported in Japanese women (26.15%), followed by Americans (24.41%) and UK (21.57%), and Chinese (13.61%) women. VTE was more common in patients with advanced stages (37.79%) compared to those with early stages of the disease (16.54%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma is associated with a high rate of cancer-associated thrombosis. VTE events in OCCC patients were higher in advanced stages and Japanese women.

Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: The Origin and Targeted Therapy

Endometrial cysts (ECs) are thought to be the origin of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC). A hypothesis that the oxidative stress of iron in cysts causes “malignant transformation of ECs” has been proposed, but this has not been verified. Several population-based studies showed that endometriosis was a risk factor but did not reflect the “malignant transformation of ECs”. A review showed that most patients were diagnosed with EAOC early in monitoring following detection of ECs, and that these cases might have been cancer from the start. Epidemiologically, EAOC was reduced by hysterectomy rather than by cystectomy of ECs. Gene mutation analyses identified oncogenic mutations in endometriosis and normal endometrium and revealed that the same mutations were present at different endometriotic lesions. It was also shown that most of the gene mutations found in endometriosis occurred in normal endometrium. Taking together, EAOC might be caused by eutopic endometrial glandular epithelial cells with oncogenic mutations that have undergone menstrual blood reflux and engrafted in the ovary, rather than by low-risk ECs acquiring oncogenic mutations and becoming malignant. This review discusses the mechanisms of EAOC development and targeted therapy based on genetic variation in EAOC with a focus on eutopic endometrium.

Does endometriosis have an effect on the survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer?

Purpose:

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer is defined as the concurrent presence of ovarian cancer with endometrial cancer. We aimed to evaluate whether there is an effect of endometriosis on progression-free survival and overall survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer. We also compared these findings with the patients having endometrial-only tumors and ovarian-only tumors.

Methods:

The patients who underwent surgery for endometrioid or clear-cell endometrial-only tumors and/or ovarian-only tumors and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer between 2005 and 2016 were included in this cohort study. The effect of the presence of endometriosis on progression-free survival and overall survival in these women who met the criteria was determined using statistical methods. Women were also compared regarding their demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics.

Results:

A total of 176 patients were included in this study. All histology types of tumors located in endometrium or ovary were endometrioid or clear-cell cancer. Endometriosis was present in 62 patients (35.2%), whereas adenomyosis was present in 44 patients (25%). Endometriosis was diagnosed more frequently in women with ovarian-only tumors and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer than those with endometrial-only tumors (59.2% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001 and 45.7% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001, respectively). The patients with endometriosis showed no significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.70; 95% confidence interval = 0.48–6.03; p = 0.408 and hazard ratio = 1.67; 95% confidence interval = 0.30–9.44; p = 0.562, respectively). The presence of endometriosis was a stronger predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival comparing with the presence of adenomyosis.

Conclusion:

The women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer should be informed that endometriosis has no detrimental effect on progression-free survival and overall survival.

A Case of Synchronous Primary Corpus and Ovarian Cancer with Pseudo-Meigs Syndrome: Utilization of a Diagnostic Laparoscopy for the Accurate Diagnosis

We report a case of synchronous primary corpus and ovarian cancer (SPC) with massive ascites due to Pseudo-Meigs syndrome (PMS). A 48-year-old woman presented with complaints of abnormal genital bleeding and abdominal discomfort. Massive ascites and tumors in the endometrium and right ovary were detected. Although imaging tests showed no evidence of dissemination, and ascites cytology was negative, we performed a diagnostic laparoscopy to exclude the possibility of microdissemination because pathological findings of the corpus tumor were suggested to be so-called Type-2 endometrial cancer. Laparoscopy clearly confirmed no dissemination in the peritoneum. We ultimately diagnosed this patient with SPC with massive nonmalignant ascites due to PMS and performed an appropriate treatment. This report is the first case of SPC that developed PMS.

Impact of endometriosis on risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The risks of gynecologic cancer have not been well established in women with endometriosis. The objective of the present study was to investigate the influence of endometriosis on the risk for three gynecologic cancer (ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer and cervical cancer).

METHODS

We gathered updated evidence about the risk relationship between endometriosis and gynecologic cancers by conducting a comprehensive search of several medical literature electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The design and quality of all studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

Of the 8538 articles our search produced, we selected 25 qualified studies, including 16 cohort studies and 9 case-control studies. Patients with endometriosis had both an increased risk of ovarian cancer [RR  1.964; 95% CI (1.685, 2.290)]. The risk of endometrial cancer (EC) is not necessarily higher in patients with endometriosis [RR 1.176, 95% CI (0.878, 1.575)]. Endometriosis was not associated with an increased risk for cervical cancer (CC) [RR 0.670, 95% CI (0.537, 0.838)].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with endometriosis need to be closely observed and rechecked regularly to prevent malignant changes.

Endometriosis-associated Ovarian Cancers

Endometriosis-associated cancers include clear cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. A history of endometriosis has long been considered to be a risk factor for later development of these malignancies; however, recent molecular genetic evidence has provided unequivocal evidence that these lesions are in fact the precursors for endometriosis-associated cancers. Herein, we will explore the relationship between endometriosis and ovarian carcinomas, similarities between the premalignant lesions and their cancerous counterparts, and the potential role of mutations and the ovarian microenvironment that may contribute to malignant transformation.

Synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers: a multicenter review of 63 cases

AIMS

To investigate clinicopathologic characteristics, therapeutic methods, and prognostic factors in women with synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers (SEOCs).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2 cancer registry databases in Turkey was conducted to identify patients diagnosed with SEOCs between January 1995 and December 2012. Patients with recurrent, metastatic, and metachronously occurring tumors were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The analysis included 63 women with SEOCs. Seventy-six percent of the patients had stage I endometrial cancer, and 60% of the patients had stage I ovarian cancer. Thirty-seven patients (58.7%) had endometrioid/endometrioid histology. Optimal cytoreduction was obtained in 47 (74.6%) patients. Recurrence developed in 17 patients (27%). Multivariate analysis confirmed lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (odds ratio [OR] 3.1, p = 0.045), whereas early-stage disease and optimal cytoreduction were found to be independent good prognostic factors for both PFS (OR 12.85, p&lt;0.001 and OR 4.58, p = 0.004, respectively) and OS (OR 7.31, p = 0.002 and OR 2.95, p = 0.028, respectively). The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 74% and 69%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that optimal cytoreduction, early-stage disease, and LVSI are the most significant factors affecting survival in women with SEOC.

The Risks for Ovarian, Endometrial, Breast, Colorectal, and Other Cancers in Women With Newly Diagnosed Endometriosis or Adenomyosis: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies report a link between endometriosis and ovarian cancer (OC). Using a population-based cohort study to confirm the association between endometriosis and cancer is desirable. We thus examined the magnitude of the risks of OC, endometrial cancer (EC), breast cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), and other cancers in women with newly diagnosed endometriosis or adenomyosis (internal endometriosis).

METHODS/MATERIALS

Women older than 20 years with claims data between 2003 and 2005 were identified from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Dataset containing 1 million individuals randomly sampled from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Those with preexisting malignancies, hysterectomy, or oophorectomy were excluded. The endometriosis cohort (n = 2266, including 768 cases of pure adenomyosis) and comparison cohort (n = 9064), formed by 1:4 matching, were followed up until incidence cancer, dropout, or December 31, 2008. Outcome measures included cancer incidence and adjusted hazard ratio by Cox model adjusted for age group, comorbidities, and endometriosis medication use.

RESULTS

With 9842 person-years of follow-up in endometriosis cohort and 36,274 person-years of follow-up in comparison cohort, there were increased risks of all cancers (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.4), OC (4.56, 1.72-12.11), and EC (4.05, 1.20-13.66). The ovarian endometriosis group was associated with increased risk of subsequent OC (4.37, 1.07-17.83). The adenomyosis group was strongly associated with both OC (5.50, 1.95-15.50) and EC (5.13, 1.36-19.40). Increased risk of subsequent CRC was observed in women with adenomyosis with coexistent endometriosis at other sites (13.04, 2.21-77.04). However, no statistically significant increased risk of breast or other cancers was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Having limitations such as lacking of parity information which may affect the magnitude of risk estimates, this study demonstrates that ovarian endometriosis has a 4-fold increased risk of OC. Adenomyosis may associate with a 4- to 5-fold increased risk of OC and EC, and unexpectedly, a 13-fold increased risk of CRC.

Progestins in the fertility-sparing treatment and retreatment of patients with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in developed countries. Approximately 3%-14% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed in young women under 40 who want to preserve their fertility. The incidence of endometrial cancer in this age group is increasing, for which fertility-sparing therapy is increasingly used because it is one of the most important quality of life issues in these women. Progestin therapy is the most common type of fertility-sparing therapy. In this review, the most up-to-date findings regarding fertility-sparing progestin therapy for young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer is addressed in terms of diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and oncologic and reproductive outcomes. Fertility-sparing progestin therapy is highly effective in selected young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer. The selection of appropriate patients through comprehensive pretreatment evaluation is of paramount importance to achieve the best outcomes without compromising survival. Because of the high rate of recurrence after successful fertility-sparing therapy, close surveillance is mandatory, and prophylactic hysterectomy is the best option for patients who have completed family planning. Pregnancy outcomes are very promising with the aid of assisted reproductive technologies. Continuous daily oral medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate are the preferred progestins for fertility-sparing therapy, but future studies should be performed to determine the optimal dose and treatment duration of these agents.

Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary in young women: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

OBJECTIVE

Some authors have recommended the use of diagnostic laparoscopy as a pretreatment assessment step for conservative hormonal treatment in young women with endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of synchronous primary cancer of the endometrium and ovary in young women.

METHODS

The medical records of 3240 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery between 1995 and 2010 were collected from 7 institutions and were retrospectively reviewed. Low-risk endometrial cancer was defined as tumors without myometrial invasion; normal or benign-looking ovaries; normal CA-125; grade 1 endometrioid histology; and early stage endometrial cancer on pretreatment assessment.

RESULTS

Fifteen percent (471/3240) were younger than 40 years of age. The incidence of synchronous ovarian cancer in young women with endometrial cancer was 4.5% (21/471). In patients with low-risk endometrial cancer, synchronous cancers were not identified.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of synchronous ovarian malignancies in young women with endometrial cancer was quiet low (4.5%), unlike previous studies have revealed (11-29%). Therefore, diagnostic laparoscopy is not mandatory in patients with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer selected for conservative treatment to confirm the absence of ovarian malignancy.